Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

This research aimed to describe the discussions that were formulated in three questions: 1.

How
were the arrangement and enforcement of Qanun sanctions against Khamar, Maisir, Khalwat,
and Zina? 2. How were the performance of the socialization and implementation of the number
6 year 2014 of Qanun sanctions in Subulussalam City? 3. How were the impacts on the
community behaviour of Subulussalam after the Qanun sanctions number 6 year 2014 was
enacted?

This type of research was included in qualitative descriptive research by using the statute
approach (legal approach). The data sources of this research were divided into two sources,
namely the primary data source that was obtained from interviews with several speakers in the
field. And secondary data source that was obtained through library study include books, archives,
and rules that were arranged systematically.

In general, this study found that Qanun sanctions number 6 year 2014 about Khamar, Maisir,
Khalwat and Zina were good in regulation. Seen from the rules and sanctions that were already
complete, as well as the implementation. Nonetheless, for the enforcement was still very lacking.
This was evidenced by the large number of unhandled cases. Similarly, the knowledge and
awareness about Qanun sanctions was also very less, this was because of the lack of socialization
conducted by the Islamic Scholars Assembly (MPU), the Islamic Sharia Service (DSI),
SATPOL-PP and WH. Consequently the Qanun sanctions number 6 year 2014 did not affect the
public behavior of Subulussalam City (ineffective).

You might also like