S.

No Title of paper Year

Ballast water treatment:A

1 review 2013

Usage of Crumb Rubber

Filtration and UV
2 Radiation for Ballast Water 2017
Treatment

Crumb rubber filtration: A

3 potential technology for 2005
ballast water treatment

Water Ballast Treatment

4 using Active Carbon on 2016
Vessel

Efficacy testing with AirTree

5 ballast water treatment 2016
system

Ship board testing of a

6 deoxygenation ballast water 2007
treatment
 Optimisation of a waste heat
7 exchanger for ballast water 2015
treatment

Verification of mid-ocean
ballast water exchange using
8 naturally occurring coastal
tracers

DEVELOPMENT OF BALLAST
WATER TREATMENT
9 TECHNOLOGY BY 2009
MECHANOCHEMICAL
CAVITATION

COST EFFICIENCY OF
BALLAST WATER
TREATMENT SYSTEMS
10 BASED ON ULTRAVIOLET 2017
IRRADIATIONAND
ELECTROCHLORINATION
ballast water treatment
Summary Tools used

The use of filters or hydrocyclones forms a good

treatment step in ballast water treatment that can be
applied at all conditions that can be expected during
transport between the freshwater Great Lakes and the not specified
marine Arctic. additional treatment physical or chemical
is always required.

Carbon filter has better performance than crumb rubber

filter in filtering sea water.filtration method is
not able to reduce the value of water turbidity that
not specified
conduct by microbes in OD level 0.070.the treatment of
filtration and UV radiation the OD level will decrease to
0,010.

decreasing the media size and adding a coagulant could

improve the removal efficiency, but these approaches
will result in a higher head loss and subsequently a lower
not specified
Xow rate. ncreasing fitration rate reduced removal
efficiencies to some degree, and increased
head loss notably

using activated carbon in the vessel may use a filtration system

that can function as a cartridge. IMO
standards which define discharge clean ballast water can be not specified
met by using a filtering system based
activated carbon.

The single-dose treatment did reduce the number of

algae in the test water, but not sufficient. The
efficacy of the in-tank treatment was significantly better.
Bacteria and
not specified
algae were nearly completely eliminated. the highest
maintenance dose was needed in the test with brackish
water, whereas the total dose in freshwater and marine
water was comparable.

The method successfully reducedthe oxygen level within

the tanks and the water in the trea-ted tanks was anoxic
at the end of the trial. There was anunexpected decrease
in the number of viable bacteria inthe treated tanks after
not specified
about 5 days. The results of this study clearly
demonstrated the abun-dance and viability of the
zooplankton decreased moreover time in the treated
tanks compared to the untreatedtanks
 the waste heat potential on a ship, a system harvesting
the engine exhaust heat may be envisaged for which a
heat exchanger could be vital. Design optimisation of a
heater, employing the exhaust gases of an engine as
utility fluid, and ballast sea water as the process fluid
Designs were compared on the basis of annual cost,
optimum exit temperature of shell side not specified
fluid, optimum mass flow of tube side
uid and heat exchanger e ectiveness Increased
realisation of waste heat will give a competitive edge to
heat treatment methods, not only in costs but also in
enhancing the treatment potential of combination type
systems

the ballast water the exchange take place 200 miles

offshore and in water over 2000 m deep to reduce the not specified
effectiveness

Ballast water treatments were carried out using water

jet cavitation containing sodium hypochlorite
not specified
Mechanochemical cavitation is effective for plankton
treatment of ballast water.

electrochlorination may be almost five times more cost

effective than those based on UV irradiation, and almost not specified
eight times more cost effective than ballast wa-ter
exchange using the sequential method.
future possibilities

Electric field technology and

cavitation

crumb rubber filtration as the

pretreatment process for chlorine, UV,
ozone and other disinfection
technologies.

Analysis of DBP-formation and residual

toxicity during long-term exposure as is already
under discussion. Investigate bacterial
regrowth during the last two non-exposure
days.

methods of analysis would have to be

adapted and improved if further ship
board trials
switching the shell and tube side fluids
and nned tubular heat exchanger
designs.

future focus may be on thesystems

reliability with associated maintenance
costs