Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 - Cyrus Mistry's Ouster - This Can Be A Watershed Event in Tata Group's History
2 - Cyrus Mistry's Ouster - This Can Be A Watershed Event in Tata Group's History
Mistry's ouster: This can be a watershed event in Tata Group’s history The Economic Times
Cyrus Mistry's ouster: This can be a watershed event in Tata
Group’s history
Updated: Oct 25, 2016, 10.41 AM IST Post a Comment
By Rajiv Kumar
The terse, bland press statement from Bombay House about Cyrus Mistry’s departure left
me bewildered. This was worse than any scene from corporate fiction in which the CEO is
given the pink slip at the shortest possible notice.
This is most unusual and not in keeping with the reputation of good corporate governance
that the Tatas had earned over the past decades.
Also Read: Several decisions by Mistry did not go down well with Tata Trusts
A besieged Mistry, closeted by satraps on one side and the
Trust on the other, could well have given the classic CEO
It also may not be that easy for the appointed fivemember search committee to find a
ultimatum of 'my way or the highway'.
replacement with solid credentials and a modicum of selfrespect. That would, unfortunately,
but expectedly, boil the search down to another insider from the community. Will that not be
a pity? There can be three possible explanations to this most unusual action.
First, that Mistry genuinely felt that he was not up to the job of shepherding a sprawling conglomerate whose expanse across sectors and
geographies defies all attempt at finding an organisational or operational coherence.
This explanation is most unlikely because Mistry did not seem to be a quitter and his exertions over the last four years would also tend to
deny this possibility.
Second, that he was found wanting on performance and was summarily removed from the position by Tata Sons, in which the Tata Trust
— still headed by Ratan Tata — and Shapoorji Pallonji hold controlling shares.
Given that nearly all of Tata companies — including the laggard Tata Motors — have seen a rise in their market capitalisation over the past
year, the performance according to this visible yardstick could certainly not be faulted.
Other performance criteria are trotted out on the electronic media by current and former Tata PR hacks. These include, 'poor
communication style' (sic); indecisive leader qua the back and forth with Tata's steel operations in Britain and Europe; and inability to find
the CEO of some Tata companies.
Redrawing Top, Bottom Lines
These are all secondorder and weak criteria if they are at all relevant, given that both the top and bottom lines of the group as a whole
were doing fine. In business, these are the two principal criteria that should matter.
Apparently not for Bombay House. The argument that only a couple of Tata companies were keeping the entire group afloat is neither here
nor there. It has always been the case.
So for me, the third explanation looks to be the most plausible. This is the traditional case of the Tata Group’s corporate satraps rising
against the CEO. With a difference. In that on this occasion, unlike in the case of Russi Mody and Darbari Seth et al versus Ratan Tata,
the satraps have won.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporatetrends/cyrusmistrysousterthiscanbeawatershedeventinthetatagroupshistory/articles… 1/3
10/25/2016 Cyrus Mistry's ouster: This can be a watershed event in Tata Group’s history The Economic Times
There was already news of some of them chafing at Mistry's attempt to make the group leaner and more focused and bringing in external
consultants for greater professionalism. The satraps, who are best left unnamed, have pushed back and apparently received the backing
of Tata Trust, whose chairman, reportedly, did not have as handsoff an approach as is claimed.
A besieged Mistry, closeted by satraps on one side and the Trust on the other, could well have given the classic CEO ultimatum of 'my way
or the highway'. In this case, he was unceremoniously told to get on the bike.
From all accounts, this seems to be a personalitydriven outcome — and, hence, neither wellprepared nor wellexecuted. We could give it
the spin of being a clash of opposite cultures. But it would be just that: a spin. After all, Mistry has been on the board of Tata Sons since
2006 and has the genetic inheritance for all the required culture to have been ingrained in him.
In some sense, he was the quintessential Tata man: quiet, understated, focused, a believer in professionalism, and committed to the larger
corporate and national cause. In the absence of any explanation from any of the Bombay House reticent denizens, this would appear to be
the best conjecture.
This can be a watershed event in the Tata group’s long history. Does a holding company like Tata Sons bring any value to its globally
competing constituents?
Tata to Old Style
Even the Japanese Zaibatsus (the preWorld War 2 industrial and financial business conglomerates) or the South Korean chaebols (large
familyowned business conglomerates) have changed their functioning to be in sync with globalisation trends and requirements. It is time
that Tatas did so as well.
This may also yield some positive externalities as individual Tata companies focus more on product innovation and related R&D rather
than try and use the advantage that Bombay House afforded them of being on the inside track of the regulatory regime and nimbly
negotiating the Kafkaesque Delhi bureaucracy. This could change the operational model of India Inc.
Three cheers for that prospect.
(The writer is senior fellow, Centre for Policy Research)
Stay on top of business news with The Economic Times App. Download it Now!
Was Tata Sons unhappy with Cyrus Mistry's
of 9
Was Tata Sons unhappy with Cyrus Mistry's performance?
performance?
24 Oct, 2016
Text: Economictimes.com Tata Sons on Monday
announced that its Board has replaced Cyrus P
Mistry as Chairman of Tata Sons at a meeting
held in Mumbai. An insider said, there was an
NEXT
PLAY SLIDESHOW
NSE BSE
Change % Change
Company Name Price
(from 281212) (from 281212)
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporatetrends/cyrusmistrysousterthiscanbeawatershedeventinthetatagroupshistory/articles… 2/3
10/25/2016 Cyrus Mistry's ouster: This can be a watershed event in Tata Group’s history The Economic Times
Tata Metaliks Ltd. 406.75 344.95 558.17
Tata Elxsi Ltd. 1315.15 1085.60 472.93
Voltas Ltd. 395.50 290.40 276.31
Tata Communications Ltd. 656.30 419.45 177.10
Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. 620.00 309.55 99.71
Indian Hotels Company Ltd. 124.85 61.75 97.86
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. 2400.05 1132.55 89.35
Nelco Ltd. 93.30 41.95 81.69
Tata Motors Ltd. 554.00 243.95 78.68
Tinplate Company of India Ltd. 87.25 35.10 67.31
Tata Chemicals Ltd. 562.50 212.80 60.85
Trent Ltd. 203.15 74.82 58.30
Rallis India Ltd. 233.00 82.75 55.07
Tata Investment Corporation Ltd. 613.70 150.05 32.36
Titan Company Ltd. 370.70 89.55 31.85
TRF Ltd. 281.00 56.35 25.08
Tata Steel Ltd. 415.95 12.60 2.94
Tata Global Beverages Ltd. 149.95 10.50 6.54
Tata Coffee Ltd. 130.95 9.27 6.61
Tata Power Company Ltd. 82.65 26.60 24.35
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. 7.65 3.07 28.64
Live Market News Portfolio Mobile Live TV Newsletter Commodities Speed QnA Blogs Alerts RSS
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporatetrends/cyrusmistrysousterthiscanbeawatershedeventinthetatagroupshistory/articles… 3/3