Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxguru - in-GST On Plotted Developemnt of Land
Taxguru - in-GST On Plotted Developemnt of Land
taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-plotted-developemnt-land.html
CA Chandrahasa Kannadka
09 Jun 2020
8,667 Views
0 comment
a. Development by Owner with his own funds and efforts including engagement of
contractors.
1/9
like landscaping, architecture, legal consultancy, plan sanction are also essentials for
carrying out the work. This is in the nature of works contract. Section 2(119) defines as
follows:
4. Development work by land owner: In case the work is carried on by the owner of
land by sourcing materials and labour there is no involvement of contractor. Hence there
will not be a works contract. However, if the land owner entered in to agreement with the
prospective buyers and collects advance money before completion of necessary works,
whether there is works contract and GST liability is to be examined. At the outset it
appears that the owner is carrying out works contract in pursuance of agreement with the
buyers and on behalf of the buyers. The final documentation for registration will show the
sale of land only. There is no sale of building. Entry 5 under schedule III ( Sale of land
and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building)
specify these type of transaction is neither supply of goods nor supply of services.
Conveyance of developed plotted land sans building is outside the scope of levy under
GST. Unlike the vertical development like apartments and buildings, in plotted
development, the sale is land only with out building. There may be some indications of
construction like a cable duct or sewerage chamber inside the plot, but surely not a
building. Under registration law, this is only conveyance of land. There is no liability
under GST because of nature of conveyance as land.
6. Barter transaction: The transaction between land owner and developer amount to
barter. Barter means a “thing or commodity” given in ‘in return of’ another. In other
words, no value is fixed- viz., barter of wrist watch with a wall clock. Exchange (goods or
services) for other goods or services without using money is barter. Land owner
2/9
relinquishes a portion of land in favour of developer who in turn provide development
services to land owner. There is time lag between two activities. Barter is within scope of
supply as per section 7 of CGST Act. Between land owner and developer there is inter se
transfer. The right to develop land is valuable right. The land owner generally executes
power of attorney in favour of developer giving him valuable right. This is one part of
transaction in the barter. The other part being developer in turn handing over developed
land to owner.
(a) any lease, tenancy, easement, licence to occupy land is a supply of services (this
entry is restricted wherever building is involved not land alone, the conjuncture”
and” between land and building make it clear)
5. Supply of services:
3/9
(1) the expression “competent authority” means the Government or any authority
authorised to issue completion certificate under any law for the time being in force and
in case of non-requirement of such certificate from such authority, from any of the
following, namely:—
(i) an architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the
Architects Act, 1972; or
(iii) a licensed surveyor of the respective local body of the city or town or village or
development or planning authority;
6. Composite supply:
5. Sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building.
9. Sale of land is neither sale of goods nor supply of services under schedule
III.Clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule III, squarely apply to the type of transactions
involved in plotted development of land. Hence we can safely conclude that there is no
liability on the end customer, i.e. buyer of plotted land. Whether there was agreement
prior to plotted development or otherwise the sale is only of sale of land. The activities like
road laying, drainage works, electricity supply facilities are incidental to development and
does not change character of sale of land. Even if termed as developed land there is no
transfer of building from land owner/developer to end customer. All the work done like
roads, drains, electricity supply facilities vest with public authority in terms of plan
sanction.
11. Developer’s title to the land: Developers generally do not register land or their
share under registration Act as conveyance. However, TITLE to land does not necessarily
mean of holding registered document. The GPA executed by land owner coupled with
MOU for development give sufficient and irrefutable evidence of tittle in favour of
4/9
developer. Developer enter in to the land, carry out development work and retain
possession of land in the course of development. These are sufficient indications of title to
the developer.
12. Revenue sharing agreement: Under this model it may be alleged that whatever
share the developer collects is equalling to the value of services of development he renders
and hence liable for tax under GST. The issue of increase in land value during the
development face is not addressed. As a consequence, the land value also indirectly build-
up in the service component. Cost plus 10% formula on the development costs may be a
fair valuation methodology to adopt to determine GST liability on development services.
13. Area sharing agreement: Under this model the agreement between land owner
and developer envisages sharing of developed land in agreed proportion after
development. Both the parties are free to sell their respective portion as they feel fit. In
this model the rights and responsibilities of the parties are defined in terms of the
development agreement. GPA is generally executed empowering developer to enter in to
land and carry out development. The barterelement is clearly visible in this model. The
valuation of development services may pose considerable constraints since the value of
land increases in the development phase and thereafter. It is difficult to capture such
increase and any formula that may fit the bill is again cost plus 10% methodology may be
suitable to the situation.
15. Valuation of development services: Rule 27 to 30, 31 read with Section 15-
The provisions of Rule 27 to 30 do not apply to the plotted development transaction,
therefore the value shall be determined as per Rule 31 of CGST Rules, applying the
reasonable means and consistent with the principles. The term “reasonable” means
having sound judgement, fair and sensible, as much as is appropriate or fair; moderate
5/9
etc., As per Cambridge Dictionary “reasonable” mean based on or using good judgement
and therefore fair and practical. Dictionary meaning of “reasonable” is that which is
agreeable to reason not absurd, within the limits of reason. The expression “reasonable”
therefore means rational, according to the dictates of reason and not excessive of
immoderate. Applying the above principle to the facts of the case, the view is that, in order
to comply the provision of section 7 read with entry 5 of Schedule III, exclusion of land
value based on market value from total consideration or levy of tax only on the
development charges based on the market value or cost plus reasonable profit shall be the
reasonable means consistent with the principle.
Rule 27. Value of supply of goods or services where the consideration is not wholly in
money
Rule 28. Value of supply of goods or services or both between distinct or related persons,
other than through an agent
Rule 31. Residual method for determination of value of supply of goods or services or
both .-Where the value of supply of goods or services or both cannot be determined
under rules 27 to 30, the same shall be determined using reasonable means consistent
with the principles and the general provisions of section 15 and the provisions of this
Chapter:
Provided that in the case of supply of services, the supplier may opt for this rule,
ignoring rule 30.
This valuation concept may be tested in the course of proceedings or questions that may
arise before higher judicial forum.
16. Land- whether exempted supply? –Under section 2 (47) “exempt supply”
means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax or which may
be wholly exempt from tax under section 11, or under section 6 of the Integrated Goods
and Services Tax Act, and includes non-taxable supply. Plotted development involves two
activities, development activity land and sale of plots. Sale of land is not supply in terms
of schedule III entry 5. Activity of sale of land cannot be considered as exempt supply for
the reason it is not at all supply hence the question of exemption under section 11 does not
apply.
6/9
Section 2(30) “composite supply” means a supply made by a taxable person to a
recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any
combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each
other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply.
The plotted land sold to customers is in the nature of composite supply, the main
component being land and the development services are only incidental to the same. Land
being not with in ambit of GST(neither goods nor services), the related services fall
outside the definition and stand isolated. The issue arises whether such services are
taxable. Land is not exempted under section 11 of CGST Act. By virtue of inclusion under
schedule III, it is outside GST. In such a situation the composite supply concept does not
save the development services from tax.The development services are taxable.
18. GST liability on land owner: The land owner is not liable under GST under any
circumstances. There is no construction of building is involved. Unless building
construction is involved entry no.5(b) under schedule II does not come in to picture in
the case of land owner. The construction may be out of own funds or may be out of
advance money received and used in development. Schedule III entry 5 mention Sale of
land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building- is neither
supply of goods nor services. Absence of building abundantly covers the transaction
falling under schedule III entry 5 as not supply under GST.
20. Rights arising out of land are immovable property:The term ‘immovable
property’ has not been defined under GST law. The General Clauses Act, 1987 defines
“immovable property” as to include land, benefits to arise out of land, and things attached
to the earth, or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. Section 2(6) of the
Registration Act, 1908 defines “immovable property” to include land, buildings,
hereditary allowances, rights to ways, lights, ferries, fisheries or any other benefit to arise
out of land, and things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything which is
attached to the earth, but not standing timber, growing crops nor grass. In order to
further understand the meaning of the term ‘benefits to arise out of land’, the
observations and interpretations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on the various judicial
rulings must be read as under:
7/9
b. State of Orissa v. Titagarh Paper Mills Company Limited AIR 1985 SC 1293.
On an understanding of the law laid down by various Courts, of the term ‘immovable
property, it can be safely stated that Development rights are the benefits arising out of the
land and the same is an immovable property. However, immovable properties are not
liable for GST, as supply of service under GST Law.
21. Title and ownership: The expression ‘title’ in the general proposition means that,
when equities are equal that he has the legal title will be preferred, includes in its broadest
sense all rights capable of being enjoyed and secured under the law(As per Aiyar’s Law
Dictionary) Hon’ble Guwahati High Court in the case of Nagen Hazarika vs Manorama
Sharma – AIR 2007 Gau 62 held that the expression ‘title’ is a broad expression in law
which cannot always be understood as akin to ownership. It conveys different forms of a
right to a property which can include right to possess such property. One holding a legal
title of lands is certainly included but rights amounting to less than the full legal title are
equally included with it. Title to land is the evidence of his right or the extent of his
interest. The apex Court in the case of Sunil Siddhartha Bhai v. CIT – AIR 1986 SC 368
observed that in its general sense, the expression ‘transfer of property’ connotes passing
of the entire bundle of rights from the transferor to the transferee. In Syndicate Bank vs
Estate Officer – AIR 2007 SC 3169, the Supreme Court held that a jurisprudential title to
a property may not be title of an owner. A title which is subordinate to an owner and
which need not be created by reason of a registered deed of conveyance may at times
create title. As per Section 3(a) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the expression ‘land’
includes benefits that arise out of land and things attached to earth or permanently
fastened to anything attached to the earth.
22. Conclusion:
8/9
Author Bio
My Published Posts
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
9/9