Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Xenakis Electroacoustic Music
Xenakis Electroacoustic Music
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/833529?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Perspectives of New Music is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Perspectives of New Music
AGOSTINO DI SCIPIO
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
This approach helps us, I believe, to tackle questions that are funda-
mental in music analysis: what is the material of the musical work under
observation? By what methods was the material worked on? How did this
way of working finally bring forth the perceived musical structure? What
relationship is there between sound and music? Thus, it becomes possible
to grasp meaningful features of the music theory and the aesthetic hypoth-
eses underlying the work in question. Music analysis is understood here
as a question of characterizing and evaluating the musical knowledge
* * *
FROM CONCRET PH . . .
Sound design for Concret PH followed three steps. As a first step, the
sounds of hot coals and burning material were recorded on tape. As a
second step, very short chunks were extracted from the recording and
isolated from their original context. Each chunk here corresponds to a
single crackle, to a single creak of the coal in consumption-noise bursts
lasting no more than a few hundredths (sometimes even a few thou-
sandths) of a second. As is expected, such sounds have a very large spec-
trum (see Example 1). Indeed, at this level the determination of
frequency becomes dependent on the duration: the shorter the sound
impulse, the wider the frequency band. (In other words, following
Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," a precise localization in the time
domain causes indeterminacy in the frequency domain.) As a conse-
quence, frequency and its perceptual attribute, pitch, are hardly control-
lable here, as it is impossible for human ears to integrate differences of
pitch and amplitude in such brief moments.5
As a third step, the short noise bursts were assembled to create a
longer texture, by piecing together innumerable scraps of tape. A series
of such textures was obtained, each having a particular temporal density
dn = kn/At. Textures were then submitted to two distinct strategies of
densification:
1S4.467 '111.3?0 '200272 '203 17S '206O77 '208,980 '211-882 1214.785 '217.682iw
.0
dB8
-10
-20
-30.
-40 -
A
50-
-s0
HZ:
0'-80"
* . . ..
I : . : . . D . . . '
*- '^!:''-! .": :.., ; ? ,i :, ,' ' :' ... .. : :. ' . ' ' ','' :
j:"
n,
i::
o, ?i ? i:: ? :?:' ? : - :-I.:I
: ? i ' ' '
a, (
,, :j: i ? i ir::::.?:':'-?;??? : :? ?'? ?:::'
-:
?,r:? It
?, f: i:: ? ?
%? ?, ,.
.? " :.i ::I t,l
I r
??? ? i '? ?':
i ?:- sC ?rri ?f. ;F? ::
- ? ; *r -fair
k ?1 ."
ix:?tt: ilai : :i: : i
.?( t"
,ir?
": I i ii
1??::I?:
:1: 1 t:
'I
r t
hi .. :?
.r?
:i. 're??
'I'ir;-
i ?::p:L
? ?I,:, :. . Z... -?.?
I;:I
I ?i: i.; ??'
:$ a ?* : i: t:''I
:1:I::1'???
i '." ??I/
i? 'f I' : :
I"?' i ' ' :i: I'
r?:r
r i :i?f? L I:i ?1ai : ??
i (b :? '
:::
I
L:: I? :O Cia :i': (-il
+. f Er
:?'. r f i:.-:? ?:L i
r 1
I
Y
?; .r! i? ?L:
1: i t iiI r
?i I- ?1
r
ii. 1 .?I
?;L?r? r?.:
IO LI U U
n,
r,
r-
.
w,
s : I?:
o_
1(, - ? . ?' . ? I : 1
;
*-? 1
i ?: :. ::: / ::.?: :?I?.: :?? i,?i?
h::
j??: i :?:?i:
?I t 1
O I) LP *
w r lvr,n r u* -rxln*e sra*n?-,?-- I--------?r*nlrurm
g0'52
?,
?,
*,
6
r .
O ir:
? . ?
(( ?i : ?:: ?i .:.:::: ? : . . : . . ??.'. . .... : : : : ?. '. : . '? : : : ?':1- ?:l..:l::::::i "
ii::
:;?:? ;;t?i?:
???i ?:?/ ,1 . I ,Ir; iT: ?:I ':d : ' ?
-:r 7-k?'': ? i
.i.- ;?: ri
1:! ?:
,? I-:
i:: 1:
ii(
"?'YY : ''
*-
*.. i: ?(
i
?:??
.:.i
?
:: :?;f
i?
.1. I: ii : :
.: r
;: :?: li?
i .?). c.
?r?i?::,-?. i?
1":'''? ? '
j'?2i ?tr C
oo tl to
-?? r* "'C""' ?:::: ;??::
So"- Ioo'
I_
*,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'i& '^ ::1:.::*:M J|^ ~~~~
?-;... .. :
* "i!~ -.~i':: - *~ ":.: : . .... ':^ ' - r ^ . - ~/ ". : :i . ' *:
- ::t'".; -..' -r~~~~~~~?
: ? ' .'. * : : :.' . ..:::*! : : !.*/:.. : .':'. . . ..
* ^ t.4 '^ '.^t "-^4'a '-.?*-? ,(:*!...* to '^ ^ li . :/ .* <^ . *-* ^ :- M *: **. * !:> * *"**<t-'<; . ( '
*? ~ f' t. an1 1.0
^ ***.~~~~~ ': -* *:'"* '" ;' ?''''"(":""''' ' '- '. h ' '"""
:_ ?.l.:'i: '.: : : . ~ . :
?; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '3
?, ~ ~ ~ 4 ~
if?
re,?
..
rd
. . J ; W0
i
. I
&
EXA
(REP
AN
~~~~~~~~~~?-
i....
* - . :. : . ?
? _ ' *-'~~~. . ': . * . . . , . . . . . ? ' .* ' . '* * * ** -
?._, .. .. . *. ' . .;
? - '.i
'"~" ' ' ''
!~ .
:. i~ .i!~;..ii~; ' i~.. ~: ':
* ..-
=6"-;!. i . ' ' ' ': '*:4-:.- ::;:! : . X::A
EXAMPLE 7B: PREDOMETAIL OF WARDS THE CONCRE T PH- THE SECOND TYPE OF
TEXTURE IS PREDOMINANT TOWARDS THE END, AS IN FRAGMENT 140"--145"
* * *
Xenakis's interest in p
sound of cicadas, the d
scenes, the thunder of
avoid speculation here
burning materials. The m
so much lie in this aco
dissection, selection, a
That is the material ha
designed, and largely d
phenomenal origin (ind
sound of breaking glasse
seen, by means of simpl
the rather simple form
It is to be emphasized
is a point of catastrophe
which transforms a bit
overall form of the piec
allows the listener-and
tion to the morphology
the shortest processes
listener's attention, th
sonic events.
... TO ANALOGIQUE B
F F IIms F
Af
I
III II
A A A
F iF F
/
t t
k)
a
I A f f
EXAMPLE 9: A GAUS
AND A RECTANGULAR GRAIN AS UTILIZED BY XENAKIS IN ANALOGIQUE B
Ag
n -
hf
At
- I
X Y
X 0.2 0.8
Y 0.8 0.2
x Y X Y
X 0.2 0.8 X 0.85 0.4
Y 0.8 0.2 Y 0.15 0.6
The decision as to whether the former or the latter should be used was
made at any given time on the basis of several rules which, for brevity's
sake, are not described here. X and Tare associated with two sets of val-
ues selected from among sixteen regions of frequency (each correspond-
ing to an octave), two sets selected from among four regions of
amplitude (in phones), and two sets selected from among seven regions of
density (in logarithmic units). Once the set has been selected, the partic-
ular values in that set are chosen on a purely random basis.
To successfully predict the evolution of the parameters, it is necessary
to answer this question: what is the system's general tendency during a
certain number of transitions? In the case of our first example matrix, we
have the following relationships:
X' = 0.2X+0.8T
T = 0.8X+0.2r
H = (HX) + (Hr)
H = --pilogpi
* * *
In the composition of
tinuum down to the fin
programmable, forma
itself. More recently, t
digital sound synthes
Fourier's paradigm-a s
which are impossible
MYCENAE -ALPHA
a = NpSt(l/p)
s(i) = Ag(,)
wherein g(O) is the sample read from the array location X, namely
O = [0+ + o(i)]modNp
As we can see, o varies with the index of discrete time, i. In the UPIC
system, o is controlled by the curves the composer intends to use as pitch
profiles.
The "score" of Mycenae-Alpha (Example 11) consists of a diagram
illustrating the temporal progression (horizontal axis) of a values (vertical
axis). It gives no information as to the actual pitches heard (except in case
the wavetable utilized stores the samples of a single-period sinusoid). Nor
does it give information about the particular wavetable selected for the
synthesis. However, it shows that the piece is made up of thirteen sec-
tions, each having a characteristic graphic outline. The shortest section is
section 4, only 5" in duration; the longest is section 13, lasting 1'01".
1 2 3 4
C., -_ I
5. i
C,.
.,
I
5 A'\ 6
a'
11 _ _ 12 13
i I I I
From the point of view of computer music system design, UPIC cer-
tainly represents one of the earliest examples of a uniform and coherent
music interface. However, there are also strongly constrictive aspects. I
shall mention two of these from among those which, in my opinion,
betray an involution in comparison with earlier works:
Similar observations also apply for Voyage absolu des Unari vers
Andromede (for two-track tape), realized with an updated version of
UPIC.25 Despite the different formal reach (Mycenae-Alpha lasts 9'36"
and Voyage more than 15'), Voyage, too, is divided into sharply contrast-
ing sections. Both works feature extensive glissando textures26 contrast-
ing with constant-pitch structures. Overall, differentiated sonorities
alternate between the following oppositions:
sounds, most synthetic sounds in the piece are quite noisy. In my obser-
vations below, I focus on the stochastic synthesis methods through which
these sounds were achieved. I will then discuss the detail of the musical
application of these methods in Gendy301.
* * *
The sound-representa
domain of the acoustic
sound signal by using
path traced by a point
of ranging continuous
rather irregular curves
Xenakis used to this end
eration, all of which, de
establish a condition of
can either be reduced
stems from two considerations:
f(x) = P[Xsx]
The functions most often used by Xenakis are the following (see
Example 12):
These can rather easily be simulated on the computer using simple Algo-
rithms. 33
f lxi ix
ix
-a + 'tI I I
f (xj f([XI
.-O.
... TO GENDT301
In 1991, twenty years after his first experiments with direct syn
Xenakis took up this research line once again. He marked his retu
The method can be described by saying that the end coordinates of seg-
ment i in the j-th waveform are stochastic variations applied to the end
coordinates of the segment i in waveform j- 1. That is,
Xi,j+ = Xi,i+fx(z)
Yij, = Yi,j+fy(z)
where fx(z) and fy(z) return positive or negative values, given an argu-
ment z (itself a random number with uniform distribution, i.e., white
noise). Samples are computed by linear interpolation between the initial
and end points in each segment:
where nij is the number of samples in the i-th segment. The segment
duration is
Dj = Yidi,.
Yi,j+ = Yi,+fy(z)
i,j+ 1 = Xi,j
(which means only the amplitude values are modified, thereby
causing a change in the spectrum);
Yi, j+ 1 = Yi,j
xi,j+1 = Xi,+fx(z)
(which means alterations of Dj, which cause changes of funda-
mental frequency of the sound, and, therefore, of pitch; eventually
this also causes audio rate frequency modulation, with related
spectral enrichment);
* transformation of both coordinates
Xi,j+ = Xi,j+fx(z)
Yi,j+l = Yi,j+fY(z)
(which means alterations of both spectrum and pitch; Example
13a and Example 13b show a transformation of this type).
2.j
x x x x 5.
O.j 1.1 2,j 3.j 4,j X8.j 9.j
FDj
y
5,j y6,
EXAMPLE 13A: POLYGONAL WAVEFORM GENERATED
WITH DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC SYNTHESIS
j+V'%OJ I
O .j+1
y
5Si
Y7,j+l
V6j+
The PARAG3 program supplies the GENDY program with the follow-
ing parameters:
For fx and f, one can select among stochastic functions of the type
already illustrated (uniform, exponential, normal, Cauchy). In Gendy301,
these functions are also used at the level of the macro-structure. The
PARAG3 program assigns a "time-field" to sixteen different voices-or
simultaneous synthesis processes; a field may be passive (silence) or active
(synthesis triggered) and its duration is calculated by exponential law,
based on a mean value D:
d = (-1/D)log(l - z)
....
.... , , ..,
.... .... ..... ....
.... ...., I..
...., ....
...., ....
...., .... I ......
.... I I?....
. ,5
..
...
...... . ....
, .... . .. .. ....
, .... ....
, .... ....
, .. .. ....
. .. ..., ... .... ....
.. . . ... ....
, .... ....
, .... , .. ....
..I,?
,.. . . . .... .... .... .... .... ........ . . ...., n
, I.... ,.......
... ....
* ...., .....
. .... II ....
.... ....,
,, I.....,
.... ....,
.. ....
. ....,
....
.... ........,
.... I... ....
.... i....
. I.. ...., ....
....
.... *, *
, ....I .... ,14
11...1
....
. Mj '
v e t "s
EXAMPLE
DISCUSSION
In a similar vein, Hugues Dufort writes: "Si tout le concret percu par
l'oreille est sous-tendu par des relations abstraites, on ne voit plus la rai-
son de maintenir une distinction entre une composition musicale qui
porterait les sons et une composition musicale qui porterait sur le
formes."40 In Xenakis's electroacoustic music, composing means letting
the form of sound and music emerge from lower-level processes-be it
the level of sound grains (Analogique B) or the digital samples themselves
(Gendy301).
* * *
CONCLUSION
NOTES
4. At the time, Bohor was one of the most radical attempts at annulling
linear articulation in Western music. Another tape piece that was just
as radical at the time was Fabricfor Che (1968) by James Tenney.
.~
i rc ./
10. Stafford Beer, "Below the Twilight Arch," General Systems no.
(1969): 20.
26. Though Xenakis's orchestral scores are liberally supplied with glis-
sandi, that is not the case with his earlier tape works, with the excep-
tion of Diamorphoses.
27. See, for example, Iannis Xenakis, "Music Composition Treks," Com-
posers and the Computer, ed. Curtis Roads (Los Altos, Calif.: Kauf-
mann, 1985), 171-91.
28. On graphical methods of sound synthesis, see discussion in Curtis
Roads, Computer Music Tutorial (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996),
329-35.
31. See Richard Toop's liner notes for the CD MO 782058; see also
Formalized Music, 293.