Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AISC 1984v01
AISC 1984v01
AISC 1984v01
/ - (
MODERN STEEL
CONSTRUCTION
An Unending Symphony in Steel
A Tale of Two Bridges
New Engineering for Steel Construction Released
Building with a Historical Flourish
Creating Space Where There is None
Steel Wins the Roof "Sweeps"
DECK OATISHEET.
NO. 4c:=::::=========~
COMPOSITE DECK/SLAB I VALUES
TOTAL r-______~C~O~M
~PO~S~ITE
~~ I~
(~Mo~me
~n~t~o~fr
lne~rI1
=·~.)~:~i~~h~
e .·~/ft~.=o~f~
w~~~ili
~------_1
SLAB 150 PCF, n-9 11 5 PCF, n- 14
DECK/SLAB COMBINATION DEPTH r---------~~G~og
~.~~--------~------~~~
G~og
~.~~-------1
V 22 n W 19 U U U n 21 W " U U U
4.00" 3. 5 3. 6 3.8 4 .1 4. 4 4.7 5.0 2. 8 2. 9 3.1 3. 3 3. 6 3.8 4.0
~
4. 50" 4. 9 5.2 5. 4 S.B 6.2 6.6 7.0 3. 9 4. 1 4.3 4.7 5.0 5. 4 5. 7
~ .,~ 4, 75" 5.a 6.1 6. 3 6.a 7. 3 7. a a. 2 4. 6 4.a 5.1 5.5 5.9 6. 2 6.6
~ Ylrt15~.0~0~"j~t6j.a~=7t·j11j7~·f4tj7j.
. 1
~5~
a .~5~~9t·tOt~9~.5 tf5~
9ttf t
. 4[jt5~·i6t~5~·t9tt6~.4~=t6.~a~j7~.~2tj7~.6t1
. 520~"~7.9~.0~9~.~4~9~.~af,1~0~.5~1~1.~2~1~1~.~9+1~2~.~5~7~.1~72.~4~7~.*a~a~
. 4~~9.~0~9~.7.5+1~0~.101
l ~" B-LOK 5 . 75" 10 . 310 . 811.212.012.813.6 14 . 3 8.1 8.5 B. B 9 . 510.210.8 11.4
UNlTEDSTEELDECK, IN C. 6.00" 11.812.312 . 713.614.515.416 . 2 9.2 9.610 . 010 . 811.512.212.9
4. 00" 3.5 3. 7 3.9 4.2 4.5 4. 8 5.1 2.a 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.9 4.1
~lTo
4. 50" 5.0 5.2 5.5 5.9 6. 3 6. 7 7.1 4.0 4. 2 4.4 4. 7 5. 1 5.4 5.7
4.75" 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.9 7.3 7.B 8 . 2 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.5 5.9 6.3 6.6
1 '12 · I CW 5 . 00"
5 . 50"
6. 8
9. 0
7.1 7.4 7.9 8. 5
9. 4 9.810 . 511. 111.812.4
9.0 9.5 5. 3
7.0
5.6 5.9 6. 4
7. 4 7. 7 a . 3 8.9 9.410.0
6. 8 7.2 7.6
I y," LOK· FLOOR 5. 75" 10 . 210.711.111.9 12.6 13 . 4 14 . 1 8. 0 8.4 8.8 9 . 4 10.0 10.711.3
UNITED STEEL DECK, INC. 6 . 00" 11.612.212.613 . 514.315.115.9 9.0 9.5 9 . 910.611.312.112 . 7
4.50" 4.6 4. 9 5.1 5.5 5. 9 6.2 6.6 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.8 5 . 1 5.4
~~
5.00" 6.2 6.5 6.a 7. 3 7. a a.3 a.a 4.9 5.2 5. 4 5. 9 6.3 6.a 7.2
'" 'I ~ ' I· D
5.25"
5.50"
7.1 7.5 7.8 8.4 9.0 9.5 10.1 5.6 6.0 6 . 2 6.8 7.2 7.7 8.2
8.1 8.5 8.9 9.610.210.9 11. 5 6 . 4 6 . 8 7.1 7.7 8.2 8.8 9 . 3
~ 2··
6 . 00" 10.511.011.412 . 313.113.914.7 8.3 8.7 9.1 9.810 . 511.211 . 8
2" LOK· FLOOR 6.25" 11.812.412.913.914.7 15.6 16.5 9 . 3 9.810.211 . 011.812.613.3
UNITED STEEL DECK, INC. 6 . 50" 13. 3 13.9 14 . 5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.4 10.4 11 . 0 11.4 12 . 3 13.2 14.0 14.8
5 . 50" 7 . 8 8.2 8.6 9.2 9.8 10 . 5 11.1 6.2 6.6 6 . 9 7.4 8 . 0 8.5 9.0
~IIo
6 . 00" 9 . 810.310 . 711.512.313.113 . 9 7.8 8.2 8.6 9 . 310.010.711.3
' .' .~. ' : ~
6 . 25" 10 . 9 11.5 11.9 12.9 13 . 7 14.6 15.5 8.6 9.1 9.610.411 . 111.912.6
6.50" 12 . 112 . 7 13.314.315.216.217 . 2 9. 6 10 . 1 10 . 6 11.5 12.3 13.2 13 . 9
7.00" 14.9 15.6 16.3 17.5 18.6 19.9 21.0 11.8 12 . 4 13.0 14.1 15.0 16.1 17.0
3" LOK· FLOOR 7.25" 16.417.318 . 019. 320 . 621.923.113 . 013.714.315.516.6 17 . 7 18.7
UNITED STEEL DECK, INC. 7 . 50" 18.119.019.8 21.3 22.6 24 . 1 25 . 4 14.3 15.1 15.7 17.0 18.219.4 20.6
*The 'I' values shown in the table ha ve been calculated by usmg the transformed section method of analysis - concrete
converted to eqUivalent steel.The averages of the cracked and the uncracked I values are shown, Use E= 29,500 ksi
(and the I shown) for hve load deflechon calculallons.
All values are based on UNITED STEEL DECK, INC. deck secllons.
. ~i;rL~
- I
~'(
P~r
- p~ -- t2 ~ '- - MEMBER
Write Ir------------------~
LUKENS STEEL COMPANY
586 Services BUilding
I CoatesvIlle. PA t9320
I
I
right I Please send me 8 copy of your brochure, LUKENS CONSTRUCTIONAL I
•
I PLATE STEELS I
I NAME I
now I TITlE
ICOMPANY
ILCITY
__________________
AOOflESS
STATE liP
I
I
I
~
MODERN
CONGTRUCTION
Published by
American Institute
VOLUME XXIV NUMBER 1 FIRST QUARTER t 984
•
of Steel Construction
The Wrigley Building CONTENTS
400 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60611 Beth Israel : Unending Symphony in Steel 5
A Tale of Two Bridges 10
OFFICERS
John H Busch. Chairman
New Engineering for Steel Construction Released 14
Werner H. OU8sebarth,
333 Wacker: Building with a Historical Flourish 17
First Vice Chairman Cedars-Sinai : Space Where There is None 22
Charles P LewIs , Prestonwood Baptist: Steel Wins the Roof "Sweeps" 26
Second Vice Chairman Welded Steel Duct Bridges Factory Buildings 28
Oscar W Stewart, Jr .. Treasurer
Richard G. Altmann, President
William W lanigan,
Secretary & General Counsel
Geerhard Hssljer 1984 PRIZE BRIDGE COMPETITION ANNOUNCED
Vice President, Research & Englneermg Entfles for AISC's 52nd Prize Bndge Compelltlon-to select the most
LewIs Brunner. beautiful bridges opened during the penod Jan . 1, 1982 through June 30,
Vice President, Marketmg 1984-8re now being accepted. A distmgUlshed panel of professionals
has been named as the Jury of Awards:
EOITORIAL STAFF
Edward V, Hourigan, Dlfector-Structures Design and Construction, New •
George E Harper, Editor of Publications York Dept. of Transportation , Albany, NY
Amy Kragnes, Edltonal Assistant Richard W, Karn, President, 8/ssell & Karn, San Leandro, CA ; Presldent-
James Herman, Business elect of ASCE
Thomas R, Kuesel, Chalfman, Parsons 8rmckerhoff Quade & Douglas,
New York, NY
Charles Selm, Prmclpal, T. Y. Un International, San FranCISco, CA
Harry Weese, Chalfman, Harry Weese & AsSOCiates, Chicago, IL
REGIONAL OFFICES
NORTHEAST REG ION Judgmg of entfles will take place on September 18, and the winners will
New York. NY (Hdq ) 212'695-4291 be adVised shortly thereafter on the jury's decision, Wmners will be fea-
BeSl00. MA 6171329 7417 tured in the December Issue 01 Englneenng News-Record. Award pres-
Ph iladelphia, PA 609·858·· 9354 entations to the winners will be made at AISC 's prestlgrous Fourth Annual
PlIlsb urgh. PA 4121443 8840 Awards Banquet in Chicago on December 4th.
SO UTHERN RE G IO N All entnes must be postmarked not later than September I, 1984. Further
Allanta GA (Hdq ) 404/458-7679 details and entry forms may be obtained from : AfSC, Awards Commlftee,
Charlotte. NC 704/541 0960 400 N, Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611 -4185.
Dallas. TX 2 141630.5236
Houstoo. TX 713/2706363
ENGINEERING FOR STEEL CONSTRUCTION NOW RELEASED I
CENTRAL REGIO N The all-new Engineering lor Steel Construction IS now available. A brand-
Chicago. IL (Hdq ) 3121670-2400
new text for advanced detailers and design engineers, the book IS keyed
DelrOit. MI 3 131352·5558
6121888-379t to the 8th Edition Manual 01 Steel Construction. A musl for every deSigner's
Minneapolis. MN
St Lo",s, MO 314721- t332 reference sheff, it eontams design and detailmg procedures for more
WESTERN REGIO N
complex eonneel/ons and structures. 370 pages , with over 315 drawmgs.
Los Angeles, CA (Hdq ) 8181444-4519 See the summary on page 14, and the ad on page 25 for instruction on
Denver CO 303183 1-4622 ordermg. Order today for early delivery!
San FranCISCo. CA
•
4151932 -0009
AISC HEADOUART ERS
Chicago IL 3 12/670-2400
GOVERNMENTAL
AFFA IRS
Washington, D C 2021466-5548 I
MOOERN STEE L CONSTRUCTI ON
Beth Israel Hospital:
Unending Symphony of Flexibility
by Elliot Paul Rothman, Terry A. Louderback and Apostolos M. Antonopoulos
he Beth Israel Hospital In Boston . The scheme chosen utilizes 3 V.-In light-
T Mass IS a tightly grouped complex of
Interconnected structures bUilt at Intervals
weight concrete topping on 2-ln. compos-
lIanges of each cantilevered glfder. With
appropnate stiffener plates
The Reisman BUilding IS similar to the
Ite steel deck supported by composne
that began In 1928. The most recent round structural steel beams and glfders The Dana Research BUilding In ItS vertical ex-
of construction. known as "The Prolect," scheme offered lightweight. shallow struc- pansion upon the onglnal steel frame de-
Includes four major structures Reisman , tural depth and a relatively high degree of signed for future loads. Here, however, the
Libby. Stoneman and Northeast Buildings. rigidity for the moment-resisting frames deSign problem was somewhat dillerent
a total of $44 million of construction In By Introducing light gauge steel studs as The onglnal lateral force resisting system
addition. Immediately p[lor to beginning backup for the extenor bnck as well as at (steel moment resisting frames) was
design work on The ProJect . the team de· cnllcal Intenor partitions, the team was based on a maximum uitlmate bUilding
signed the new $12·mlllion Dana Blomed· able to provide the owner With one more height of approximately 110 It above the
Ical Research FacIlity also at the Beth Is· lloor (about 17.000 sq It) than was pos- roof of the onglnal deSign IntrodUCing
rael Hospital. Each new structure reqUIred Sible uSing the onglnal type of construc- lightweight matenals. such as composite
innovative solutions to varying sets of lion- and Without compromlsmg the steel glfders and beams supporting com-
problems sound lloor construcllon the owner and poSIte steel decks plus lightweight con-
team demanded As a resuit . live new crete lloor topping and light gauge steel
Lightweight Construction Gains 35,000 lloors were provided Instead of four studs. the lloor·to-lloor height was kept to
Sq Ft Not Otherwise Possible One of the interesting structural features absolute minimum (12 ft on upper lloors)
For the Dana Biomedical Research BUild· of thiS bUilding was that the fabflcator Nine additional stones were bUlit upon the
109 the problem was to maXimIZe the total elected to fabncate columns With canll- eXlsllng structure. Instead of the eight pos·
1I0or area above the eXisting four-story levered glfders as "trees' so the glfdel Sible If new construction was the same as
Siosberg-Landay BUilding which was o[lg- section could be continuous through the the onglnal deSign That IS a net Increase
. ,naII YdeSigned for lIexlblllty and future ver- column while the columns were spliced at
IIcal expansion of lour new lloors Member mid-height This resulted In a shop-welded
sizes were based on luture construction moment connection (the structure resists
With the same configuration as the onglnal lateral Jorces by moment-resisting Irames) Boston 's Beth Israel Hospital Model photo
deSign . Ie 4 V.-m. solid one-way slabs on between the ends of each column and the and legends show multiplicity 01 remodel ·
non-composite structural steel beams To Ing Campus plan al lett Photo by Peter
maXimize the number of additional lloors. Vanderwarker
yet maintain the quality of Ihe onglnal con-
struction . several alternative Jramlng
schemes were Investigated
~
• Hartt! ffi
151 Ouarter 1984 5
of 18,000 sq ft of floor area. These reduced from the fourth floor up. No new structure Steel Solves Complex Building
floor-to-floor heights requ ired very close could be permitted below. By using Requirements
coordination among team members. Un- trussed supports at each existing column , Perhaps the most challenging structural
der the present building program, Ihe hos- and interconnecting these supports from problem was Ihe Northeasl BUilding. ThiS.
pital is constructing four new floors , plus floor to floor, Ihe new loads are Iransferred new structure is contiguous to three ex
numerous rooftop penthouses, the roofs of through bear ing at the ends of the istlng buildings-Rabb, Gryzmlsh and Ya-
which can serve as future floors . compression diagonals into the eXlsllng mins- each of a different type and era of
The Libby Building Computer Medicine columns. Cantilever moments , due to new construction. Among the important con-
Facility, partially below grade, is a one- conslruction, are Iransferred Into the ex- siderallons In the selection of a structural
story re inforced concrete structure at- isting structure at each floor (and roof) by system were: 1) relatively shallow con-
tached to the libby BUilding and con- hOrizontal compression and lenslOn struclion was reqUIred to provide ample
nected to the hospital complex by a tunnel. forces . The horizontal components of Ihe headroom while matching the floor-to-floor
The structure was designed for future ver- compression force on Ihe diagonal struts heights of the eXisting buildings; 2) certain
tical expansion of three additional floors . tend to neg ale the tension force In Ihe hor- portions of the eXisting buildings, which
izontal members at all levels, except the were eventually to be demolished and re-
Innovative Upgrading of Existing roof and lowest floor, where special con- placed with new construction, were to re-
Patient Rooms to Standards nections are provided to transfer unbal- main in operation while construcllon of the
The Stoneman BUilding will be expanded anced horizontal forces. Construcllon IS new bUilding was underway; 3) the multi-
laterally to provide more spacious pallent light weight to minimize the Increased load use nature of the new building requ ired
rooms consistent with rooms in the Reis- on Ihe exisling structure Each column and different live loads at different floors , but
man Building . The structural solution 10 en- foot ing in Ihe existing struclure affected by for coord ination reasons the depth of
larging the patient rooms in the Stoneman Ihe new construction was checked and structure was to remain constant. This
Building evolved from the criteria that the found to have adequate reserve strength characteristic was critical in coordinating
east rooms be expanded by 8 ft , but only to safely support the new loads. the work of Ihe mechanical, plumbing and
electrical trades .
-
•
Steel framing of Northeast BUilding met most challenging
structural problems In complex remodeling
• DESIGN CRITER."
,....
Future
,
"""'._l...,dlon
l.=."
....
Conttructloft
g._ •
1 o."iIn ~. lhown ,n poonds per lCI~re
.... ...
t:1. .aotOf o.~
Z For .1Iow.bIot 11,1"'" eoiumn Ioads_
column ~ule ~
,- . . .
-
,"
3 0..0 load .'lOWance lor lulu.1I 1l00f l _1 1 /301M'I1
,.
"
eontlllJ(:toon bUed on pr_"y tJ\OWn
eon'IPQl'hon "ab tystem
....,-, ... -
i .._ flo."
t~,
"'-t,I_
=-=-
,.
Ilf._-,,,,,,,,,I
,.LI,.,:...,..-;r
No'" 7 .E.... 1102
II: E..... IO'!'»
6
mechanlC.1. plumb."", .•leclncal or OIher
II"CI\,JSI" of IMrI,t.on II . . .na cle«l1oad o'
1trut'lu"
I
Tote! """0'" ot e.a:ttriof cum·" WI.
IVSttm. Includlrog 'l't1IflQf CIIIOd"'O ,nd
b.ck"'l>p ,hall not •• CMd SO P • ,
,.
"- . . .. ,.
f .. / ......
'00
-
-
NorthNtl BuIIdInO
NorttMel' &.1(1,"9
$I'ucl..... A<IeI \lOtI
10 R.bb &10(1'''11
•
15t Quarterl1 984 7
The construction manager, aller study- Site excavation would have required gen- of the bay. The same size W14 was used
Ing the conflicts between new and existing eral dewatering of the site and the dnving throughout the building. Resultant floor
construcllon, and the phasing difficulties, of sheet piling to maintain an access road depth was 20 in" the same as for the con -
suggested that, for ease of construction , from the street along the Northeast Build- crete scheme. The key to the success Of .
the rest of the bay adfacent to the Ing to the rear of the Beth Israel site. To the structural steel scheme still was ItS
Gryzmish Building be converted to struc- reduce the required excavation and elim- compatibility with both the architecture
tural ste el. The columns , girders and Inate the sheeting and dewatering, engi- and the mechanical work.
beams could be erected under, over and neers considered caissons. With the con-
around the emergency corridor and the crete building, a low allowable bearing Creative Detailing In Structural Steef
slab and deck placed later when the cor- value of 3.5 tons per sq fl. and the depth Architectural requlremenls dictated that
ndor was no longer needed of clay available for construction of the moment-resisting frames should be used
A major element of the Northeast Build- bells, caissons would not work. for lateral braCing . The number of frames
Ing and the Emergency Unit IS the en- reqUired was determined , and the frames
trance cancpy, which provides for cov- Steef Accommodates Multi-use were located so there was a path for me-
ered ambulance parking and mechanical Buildings chanical ducts 10 travel under the 20-ln.
areas. As the canopy design developed, All factors Indicated a re-evaluallon from deep structure. At pOints where ducts
the consensus of structure, given the long concrete was required. A more complete crossed under heavy girders of the mo-
spans required and the limestone facade , design was completed . which was spe- ment frame , close scrutiny of mechanical
was structural steel cific for two of the tYPical floors . As men- deSign and the architecture permitted 21 -
lioned earlier, different live loads were re- In . deep girders. By raising the moment
Effect on Foundations qUired at vanous floors. The second and frame girders 3 In. abcve the soffit of the
The last factor which probably had the flllh floors reqUired live loads of 150 psf. deck, 24-1n. deep girders could be used ,
greatest Impact on the chOice of structure The remaining floors needed only 60 psf. greatly redUCing the reqUired weight of
was the building foundations. With a cast- The lightly loaded floors were designed steel. The deeper raised girders, besides
In-place concrete structure. very large With composite beams generally at Ihlrd haVing smaller flanges which made the
spread footings, or possibly even a mat- pOints of the bay, W14 With 2-1n. deck and moment connections more economical,
or a combination of the two-would have 4 V. -in. lightweight concrete. On heavily also made the frames stiffer and reduced
been reqUIred for foundations. Construc- loaded floors . the same slab and deck fabncatlon costs of the beams Because
lion of the footings would have reqUIred were used as well as the same beam de- the top of the girder was 3 In. above the
general site excavation about 15 II below sign , but the beam spacing was de - top of the beam , coping at the top beam
the lowest level of the Northeast BUilding. creased from third pOints to quarter points flanges was not required (Fig . 1).
~-----------------------------------'.
•
Colu"",
Provkle ""1 I. 's "
reefd For ".nt<:at
ahg"'F'/Ief'II of we
weld II I 10 Mam
Weld R. _ 12" to R. •
• Deck ClQwr.
Wl0 .
Slllt
.a SIde
III J
""41
Raised Girder
_ 18 a· TIp 01 Angl •
•
01 Column Web
I
~t • ..eh.!eM
I '." ml" ..,.m
.~C.
LS II S
galv.n'le<!
IT)'p )
Girder Connection
man BUilding brick relief al each floor IS elt ... KI~lm.... ;"e
0 1 L 5 1 5 -l'11).
continuous and was achieved without the
need for diagonal "kickers" which often In- Floor 3
lerfere wllh services In Ihe ceiling space $El &6'-0" +
•
Vertical channels supporting Ihe hOrizon-
lal angles are supported from perimeter w.o .
WS_lO ' -
beams and girders by cantilevered Wide-
lIange stubs which are. In turn. backed up
by beams framing perpendicular to the
perimeter beams or girders (Fig 2). For FIgure 2 E)(tenor wall section shows re hevlng angle suspended from cantilevered
Wide-flange stubs
Architect perimeter beams which span parallel With was slruclural steel The change Irom con-
Martha L Rothman·Elhot Paul Rothman Inc
1I00r beams. supplementary backup crete to sleel became even more favorable
Boston, Massachusetts
beams were added to align With each relief when sleel prices dropped dUring Ihe lime
Structural Engineer angle support between preliminaries and re-evaluatlon
Souza and True Inc When Ihe slructural portions of the
Watertown, Massachusetts Advantages of Steel Construction Northeast BUilding were completed, Ihe
Construction Manager By changing Ihe Slructure from concrete CM had saved nearly Ihree monlhs of con
Jackson Consuuctlon Company to steel, caissons became a Viable foun~ SlrUCtlOn time by uSing sleel ralher Ihan
Dedham Massachusetts dation scheme. Con5equenJly general concrele And In addition to Ihe time
Geotechnica l Consultant site excavation was reduced and Ihe re~ saved prelimInary estimates tndlcated
Geotechnical Engineers Inc qUirements for sl1e dewatering and sheet that from $500.000 10 $750.000 was saved
Winchester, Massachusetts piling were eliminated Deep cantilevered In Ihe cost of the lolal slruclure
grade beams reqUired to sUPPOr! new col The Norlheasl BUilding and the se-
Steel Fabricators
Montague-Bens Company Inc (The Prolectl umn5 Immedlalely adiacent 10 Ihe eXisting quence of evenls which led to liS comple-
Lynchburg Virginia structures were reduced sIgnIfIcantly In tion, affords a good example of the :lexI-
depth billty and Ihe creativity pOSSible In
Haarmaan Steel Corporation (Dana BUildIng) After the deSign leam Identified a struc- construction wllh Slruclural steel All of the
Chicopee Massachusetts
tural system compatible wllh architectural new bUildings al Beth Israel Hospllal each
Steel Erector and mechanical syslems. the conslructlon wllh liS unique sel of SlruClural deSign
• Daniel Marr & Son Company manager could develop a total structural problems offered a challenging assign·
Boston, Massachusetts estimate whIch accounted for the cost of menl 10 the deSign leam Siruc tural steel
Owner struclure. both superstruclure and foun- has been used effectively to prOVide Ihe
Beth Israel Hospital dallons. and ti me of completion The CM's owner wllh well~englneered economical
Boston Massachusells analYSIS Indlcaled clearly the best malerlal and funCllonal spaces 0
151Ouarter 1984 9
Bridge Rehab with Speed and Low Cost . ..
•
Bristol Steel Corporation
enstol, VIrgInIa
Owner
Norfolk & Western Railroad
Roanoke , Virginia
•
and-a-half-Iane facility to meet today's re- placements for the Original buckled floor Bucknell University
LeWisburg Pennsylvania
qUifed speCIfications would have cost beams, were Installed Finally. a slight up-
nearly $200.000. Besides the cost advan- ward camber of the roadway was Intro- Steel Fabricator/Erector
tage of thiS plan. a primary benefit IS ItS duced for appearance Wlillamsport Fabricators. Inc
erection speed and a minimal Interruption The prinCiple of the system IS not merely Wilhamsport, Pennsylvania
of traffiC The steel bUllderlerector met a reinforcement of the old bridge, but Virtual Owner
GO-day time limit to both fabricate and in- replacement With a new arch bridge In the Borough of Coudersport Pennsylvania
-- - --
-
"We cast this Hambro® "The Caoam Hambro® D-5oo composite floor system saved us
lime, material and money when we used it to build our corpor-
ate headquarters. Congress Park IV." says Robert Satter. "We
comrosite floor today. cast a floor one day and stripped it just 24 hours later. By then.
it was ready for the sub trades to use as a work platform. rhe
GreenSpGlnl 1. Houston, TX
Arch S I Moms
Enor Walt!!' P MoOl'" Co
Cont McGregor Construclton Co
Ovlpr Flilmdswood OtvelopmerU Co (Euon)
GTEfHlnes. Westboro. MA
Arch Drummey, Rosane, Anderson
Engr Anderson-NJC:lOls & Co
Cont: 'lapp! & Co , Inc,
e hambro
We put a ceiling on the cost of floor construction,
Engineering for Steel Construction, just published by
AISC , delineates the most recent advances in connec-
tions and detailing for structural engineers.
Here's a detailed summary . . ..
•
Engineering for Steel Construction
Reprinted courtesy Civil Engineering
Magazine, January 1984.
by Robert O. Disque
QUALITY PROCEDURES
- . . ..
OUALITY PROCEDURES
CERTIPICAIION
• • • • U • • • detailing firm follows prescribed draftmg room procedures designed to reduce the possibility of error
• AS.UR •• compliance with specification
• .S.U • • • Impartial evaluation of operations
FABRICATORS " .. your job demands the best. You can In rease the quality of your shop drawings and guarantee
profesSionalism by uSing a firm certified under Ihe National InSlilul. of Steel Delailing QUALITY PROCEDURES PROGRAM,
Contact:
Baresel Corp. Central Detailing Service Corp. Dallas Detailing Co.
13320 Mapledale 140 S, Flower St., #20 t 2636 Walnut Hill Lane, #301
Norwalk, CA 90650 Orange, CA 92668 Dallas, TX 75229
213/921·6758 714/937·1573 214/350-7986
Gunther Baresel Jamie Gardner Robert Steger
Fritz Baresel Ron Germaine
•
'.A. Free, ,r. & Co.• Inc. Schreiber & McGhee, Inc.
P,O, Box 21007 P.O. Box 270580
Columbia, SC 29221 Dallas, TX 75227
803/772·4150 214/388-0674
'oe A. Free, Jr. Tom McGhee
·The National Institute of Steel Detailing Quality Procedures Program is administered by Abslech.
IS No
4
Is MSC circulated In your office?
How many people read It? _ _
Yes No
Modern Steel
~s your functIon? Check 6 Are you dIrectly responsible lor specifyIng the type of framIng used
1 for the proJects designed by your firm?
Construction 2.
3
1 Yes 2 No
4.
5,
6, 8
Readership Do you read (scan)
1 every Issue
2 . most issues
3. some Issues
structlon. do you mostly:
4 no Issues
Survey
~odern Steel ConstructIon of 10 Are the articles techOlcal enough?
~o 1 Yes Too technical? 1. Yes
Please check and mail.
•
2. No 2 No
No postage necessary. lhons do you read regularly? In structural englneenng design area, how do you compare MSC With
others you read? Check
Better than As good as Not as good as Can 't compare
1.
2.
3.
4,
5
6.
7.
8
yould you like to read In MSC? 14 Of the bUIldings your firm designs, what percentage are
steel-framed _ _ ' 0
concrete-framed _ _ %
1000/0
_ _%
16 Are you a member of A1SC?
_ _ 0'0 1. No Which type? Achve Member 1
_ _ ~o 2 . Yes ASSOCiate Member 2.
_ _ 0, ,0
Prolesslonal Member 3
•
-_%
17
_ _ 0,
_ _ 0,0 Do you have any other comments on Modern Steel Construction
or Amencan Institute at Steel Constructfon you'd like to give us?
_ _ 00
- _ %
_ -
o0
100%
111111
NO POSTAGE
NECESSARY
IF MAILED
IN THE
•
UNITED STATES
BUSINESS REPLY M A IL
FIRST CLASS PER MIT NO 11588 CHICAGO . IL
•
The curved facade flows naturally With a
bend In the Chicago River that turns In
front of the bUilding In contrast to thiS
magnificently curved surface, the three re-
maining Sides are straight but they have
notches that break up the flat surfaces
While the tnangular site presented an
Interesting challenge to the architects to
come up wllh a working footpnnt of Ihe
bUilding, the constraints below the ground
presented the struclural engineers With
their first challenge . Invesllgatlon of the
subsurface Indicated a caisson foundation
system would be most applicable How
ever, easements from two subway lines
and the close proximity of the foundation
to the property line loomed as formidable
challenges
Concessions by the Chicago Transit Au·
thonty eliminated one easement Grade
beams span to, and cantilever off the cais-
sons to support the structure along both
the Lake Street subway easement and the
Wacker Dnve foundations
The shape of the bUilding limited the
number of available Intenor columns. and
spans for the gravity system vaned Widely
Any structural system that rel ies on con-
•
tinuity or repetilion could not be Incorpo-
rated economically In thiS prolect In ad-
dillon, the curved surface and notches
presented addilional engineering chal-
lenges
Engineers analyzed five gravity and lat-
Last steel up for 333 WaCker Building at histone site (I). Above (and r)
•
shows building 's structural steel frame as it curves to adapt to triangular
site Renowned Merchandise Mart in background (r)
~SysComp
2042 Broadway
Sanla MonICa. CA 90404
(213)829-9707 (800) 421-7157
, 51 Quarter 1984 19
analysIs of that system aXial loads from one Iruss node to another. that time could be saved by reVising the
The wind tunnel data Indicated signifi- ZOning reqUIrements for the bUilding re- normal sequence of construction . This
cant lorsional loads would be applied 10 sulted in a plaza design that Interrupted presenled a unique and unexpecled chal -
the laleral structural system. The effective thiS system and prOVided us with another lenge.
eccentricity of the wind load on the curved challenge. DeSign and documentation was based .
surface was about 60 ft. To resist thiS tor- on the concrele slructural system extend-
sion, a moment-connected exterior frame Yet More Challenges! Ing up to the third floor at the core and to
concealed behind the curlaln wall would By recessing the bUilding enclosure at the the ground floor for Ihe balance of the
have been ideal. This lateral syslem would ground floor , the zoning ordinance pro- building . From these points , the sleel
have been attracllve, although highlight- Vides for a five-story bonus The arcade structure would have orlglnaled . Due to
Ing Ihe structure of the building was not Ihus created made it Impossible to extend Ihe contractor's concern that the compli-
an Initial architectural consideration. How- the X-brace system to Ihe foundation . To cated lower level concrete work would not
ever, since the sides of the bUilding are work around thiS, the engineers used the be completed In time for the scheduled
not perpendicular to each other, Iransfer- floor diaphragms, beginning at the third beginning of steel erection, erection was
ring loads around Ihe corners efficiently floor , to transfer the load to the core started at the top of the caissons. ThiS ap-
would be Impossible using momenl con- Analysis indicated the majority of the proach reqUired Incorporation of extensive
nections. In addition, Ihe number of avail- load transfer would take place at the third temporary support systems below the third
able exterior columns was Ilmlled by ar- floor . By Increasing the Ihlrd floor slab floor This temporary steel, encased In
ch,teclural conSiderations. Without tightly thickness, emplOYing extensive reinforce- concrete, remains embedded In the final
spaced columns, the rigid frame lacked ment on that level, and by providng suf- structure This temporary system permit-
economical Stiffness. Finally, nolches In ficient shear studs on the remaining trans- ted steel erection through the 13th level
the Side and back walls would inlerrupt Ihe fer floors, the marriage of the exterior X- With Ihe final concrete structure In place,
continuity required for ngld frames. brace system and the concrete floor dia- steel erection above Ihe 13th level pro-
To determine If the centrally loaded core phragms was complete. These floor dia- ceeded unhindered.
could be of assistance In resisting applied phragms were then anchored to the core With thiS unique approach to construc -
torsional loads, core framing in both steel _primarily by uSing shear studs. The third tion , extensive modifications were re -
and concrele was analyzed . The deler- floor load transfer Incorporated , In addition quired In the concrete struclure so that
mlnallon was It would be more effiCient to shear studs, drag beams and reinforc- reinforCing steel would be placed In a
and economical to Incorporate an extenor Ing bars anchored directly to the top of the manner consistent with the design. The re-
sleel frame as typical and prOVide a stiff- concrete core. DeSigning Ihe core walls In sult of the design and construction team
ened concrete core only where the exterior concrete from Ihe caissons up to the third effort has already been recognized by an
frame could not be used floor permitted stiffening of the Gore suf- award from the Structural Engineers As-
An X-braced exlernal syslem With lim- fiCiently to resist total torSional loads Once sociation of IllinOIS for its ·contrlbution to .
Ited hOrizontal proJecllon on the curved these loads were In the core, Ihe concrete Ihe state of the art of the structural engi-
surface, running Ihe full Width on the re- slab al the ground floor and the slab on neering profession.·
maining Ihree sides, was proposed ThiS grade (as diaphragms) deliver tile forces When the 10lnt venture of Urban Invest-
syslem was found mosl effiCient In meellng to the foundation system. SpeCial X-brac- ment and Development Co. and EqUitable
the torsional challenge. The bracing IS de- ing was employed in the core above the life Assurance society of the U.S. deCided
Signed on t 2-slory modules With this third floor to help control Ihe total hOrizon- 10 develop this site they knew It would be a
module, diagonals Interact column/beam tal bUilding drlfl unique building. The result of Ihe efforts of
nodes al every second floor At the When the general contractor analyzed the entire bUilding team-a bUilding whose
notches, links are Incorporated to transfer the construclion schedule, he deCided uniqueness Will never be duplicated! 0
Architects
Kahn , Pedersen, Fox. New York City, and
Perkins & win. Chicago, IIhnols
Structural Engineer
GeE of illinOIS, Inc
Chicago illinOIS
General Contractor
Inland Construction Co
Chicago illinOIS
•
Steel Erector
Amencan Bridge DIVISion, US Steel Corp
Owners
Urban Investment and Development Co ., and
Equitable Ufe Assurance SocIety
ChIcago 11hnOiS
•
"'HI
by Kenneth Liu he Cedars-Sinai Medical Center In Los The first problem the architect faced
and T Angeles IS one of the most modern
hospitals In the nallon When It was con-
was to find a spot for the facllily In the
confined. bUilt-up property of the hospitaL
Michael L. Bobrow
structed In t 976. every effort was made to The answer was the east plaza level of the
provide for future reqUIrements. as well as center. a landscaped area on the roof of
the current needs of the faCility But to fore- the parking structure of the eight-story
see all future reqUIrements. particularly for center ThiS plaza while attractive. was not
a medical faCility IS ImposSible fully ulilized. and It would provide a can·
A few years later. the hospital needed venlent locallon for the addition The Pri-
additional space for a conference cen- mary constraint as far as the structural en-
tera small auditOrium and severat rooms gineer was concerned was weight The
In which to hold seminars The architect. plaza was not deSigned to support another
Kenneth UU , AlA IS prtnclpal architecture and together with the structural engineer. structure If It were necessary to
Michael L Bobrow AlA. IS a partner In the came up with a ptan for a SOO-seat audi- strengthen the eXlsllng structure betow the
arctutectural !lrm 01 Bobrow Thomas and As- tOrium. fleXible space for SIX seminar plaza leveL the new faCility would not be
SOCiates, Los Angeles. California rooms. and even a small art gallery economically feasible .Part of the solullon.
•
In addition to clearing the area was to re-
move some of the planters and benches
from the surrounding area The rest of the
solution was to prOVide a light efficient
structural steel frame for the addition Within
the constraints of the seismiC codes and
also to carefully monllor the weight of other
building matenals
The architectural challenge was to cre-
ate a structure which would appear as a
natural extension of the eXlsllng medical
center yet maintain Its own IndiVidual
Idenllty Continuity was achieved With the
same solar· bronze glass as the eXisting
bUilding IndiViduality was expressed by
breaking down the scale of the bUilding
IDa;~~~m~~~~~~~~7.~n
I (212) 486·9890. Domestic Telex: (W.U.) 125 159, Int' l Telex (ITT) 421180.
II In Canada: TradeARBED Canada, Inc., 1176 Blair Road, Burlington,
OntariO, Canada L7M 1K9. (416) 335-5710, Telex 0618258
II
Please send complete Information on TradeARBED's 40 ' beams and I
I " TAILOR-MADE" beams.
I Name Tltie I
Firm
I Address __
I
l...!;!!L ________s.!!!.e__ .2.I !!....~J
Ilr-v.lE Ali!BEDlnc.
151 Quaner 1984 INNOVATORS OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS
23
by employing setbacks along Ihe roof manent art gallery In ItS more than tADO- Archftect
plane. The resultant crystalline structure. sq It of gallery and lobby space, changing 8obrowfThomas and Associates
•
through the play of the same color and a exhibitions of the hosplta 's highly es- Los Angeles . California
radically different scale. permits the ad- teemed con temporary art collect,on are Structural Engineer
dition to visually bounce back and forth held Albert G Presky and ASSOCiates
between Its own identity and that as an Technically, what IS partlcularty unusuat Los Angeles. California
extension of the main bUilding about the bUilding IS the use of the plaza General Contractor
Internally. arrival in the conference cen- level as ItS Site The design team , working Jones Brothers Construction Co
ter is defined by a two-story lobby gallery. with the structural engineer, deve oped a Los Angeles. California
which creates ItS own sense of special tight structure that would meet the seismiC
Steel Fabricator
place within the center This cenlral area. codes The $35-mlllion addition . named
Riverside Steel ConslrucllOn
and the one-story wings on each side, ac- the Harvey S Morse Conference Center
Santa Fe Springs, California
commodate a 6,ODO-sq It audl toflum which for the Los Angeles phllanthrop st, pro-
IS divIsible Into SIX rooms designed fa! vides 12,000 sq ft of space for medical Owner
professionals, hospital staff and commu- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
seminars Advanced , state-of-the-art au-
o Los Angeles . California
dio-visual equipment IS available In all nlly use
meellng areas In addition, there IS a per-
•
lightweight " field" volume - half the thickness and half the weight of the standard "library"
version of the 8th Edition Manual published by AISC since mid-1980.
Printed on fine , opaque "bible" paper, with a flexible , lightweight cover, this new light-
weight version of the Manual is ideal to use on a job site or to carry in a briefcase. It won 't
quite fit in your pocket - but it's a great traveling companion .
The new lightweight volume, and the standard "library ' volume, are each available for
the same price of $48.00. But now you have a choice :
Library Volume : Standard 8th Edition Manual, 832 pages, based on the
1978 AISC Specification .
Lightweight Field Identical contents and type size, same number of pages-
Volume: but only %" thick and weighs only 1 lb. 5 V. oz.
Use the convenient coupon below to order either version (or both).
Please ship immediately the following order for the 8th Edition AISC Manual of Steel Construction at
$48 each (ArSC member pnce $36): _ _copies of Field Volume _ _copies of Library Volume;
$ total payment enclosed .
COMPANY
ADDRESS
Please enclose remittance . No C.D .C orders In New Yorl<:. California and illinoiS add sales tal(
ShiPPing charges prepaid In U.S.
•
24 MODERN Sl EEL CONSTRUCTION
• COMPLETELY REVISED ...
now available from AISC
•
advanced detailer's and design
engineer's needs. • All aspects of connection
• Comprehensive guide to design and detailing
current detailing and design • Latest information on
practice for steel-framed metallurgy and on welding
structures.
• Updated skewed, sloped and
• Handsome, concise, with 370 canted beam connections
pages of directions, problems/
solutions, 315 drawings. • Framing for heavy construction
• A valuable reference for anyone • Heavy bracing connections
involved in steel design and • Six appendices contain design
construction. aids and tables
MSC641
Exterior of Preslonwood Baptist Church, Oallas (I.) shows steel -framed rool
sweeping upward to cross . Long truss spans in intenor (r ) provide uninter-
rupted sightlines for worshippers
ransfer of exhaust gases from the top BUilding layout at the mill permitted tachlng the duct only to the lower tower,
•
T of a smeller bUltdlng In the new Florida
Steel Company mill In Jackson. Tenn Into
placement of three supporting towers for
the Inchned duct Thus, design of he duct
while suspending It, hammock-type fash -
Ion. from the other two towers Thus, the
cleanup equipment on the ground was as a two-span continuous bridge Nlth two duct expands and contracts about the
necessary to collect dust and filter the air end canillevers became possible (Fig 2) lower-tower support Total longitudinal diS-
before releasing It Into the atmosphere The maximum span between towers, and placement of the duct end at the smeller
Design of a 322-11 long 12 V.-1I dla duc t the longest cantilever, were 143-11 and 55- bUilding, about the lower-tower support,
Inchned t 5' with the horizontal, was re- ft long , respectively was calculated at 9 In Similar displace-
qUired Temperature effects governed design of ments at the two Intermediate tower sup-
Conventional structural designs re - the duct supports at the towers. Exhaust ports were calculated at 7V. In and 2'1'.
qUired support for the duct all along ItS gases of 400' F keep the duct QUite hot In., respectively. Since these displace-
length In various ways These were not as dUring normal plant operallon . HO'Never, a ments can easity be realized by the long
compelltlve In cost, and lime of fabrication potential shutdown of operations dUring suspension rods, temperature-Induced
and erection, as one design which used the winter could possibly bring the tem- stresses are hardly generated In the duct
the duct Itself (In bridge-type fashion) to perature of the duct down to 0' F Thus, Thus freed from temperature-Induced
support the loads (see Fig 1) expansion of the duct between a poSSible stresses, deSign of the duct was governed
70' F at erection lime and 400' F dUring by gravity loads and Wind Use of a sllff-
German Gurfmkel IS professor 01 cIvil eng i- service, followed by contracllon to 0' F. ened-shell cross section reqUired only a
neering Umver Slty of IllinOIs-Champaign· had to be accommodated by the supports 3/ 16-ln thick plate reinforced by a set of
Urbana IIhnols ThiS was accomplished by rig idly at- longitudinal and circumferential sllffeners
•
Figure 1 Welded sleel duct (322 11 long x
12 5ft dla ) bridges three supporllng tow-
ers Duct permits removal of 400" F ex-
haust gases from lop of smelter building
WT'.""'"
SnHN£It ITVP}
[NO OF
"I'"
SLIDES
71'- e·
SCRAP HANOLING BUILDING
IIt· o· •
28 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION
•
(see Fig 3) ASTM A36 steel was specified ered ,n deSign of the duct It was deter-
and the structure was welded together mined that the governing load was caused
with E60 t8 electrodes by Ihe combined action of self weight piuS
Weight of Ihe stiffened shell was cal- snow and Ice DeSign of the cross section
culated at 505 Ib ft ProvIsions were made 01 the duct called for prOViding strength to
also for future placement of longitudinal reslstlhe slmullaneous effects of a t ,580-
grating and ralflng at an additional 95 Ib klp·ft bending moment, a IS-kip longltu·
ft to permit eaSier access and Inspection dlnallhrust and a 71-klp Iransverse shear
of the duct Thus Ihe total gravity load was DeSign crltena called for a shell sllffened
taken at 600 Ib ft externally by a set of 20 continuous lon-
The live load on the ducl. conslsllng of gitudinal angles The maximum compres-
snow and Ice was calculated at 330 Ib sive stress, due to combined action of
ft Wind load was eSllmated at 30 psf (for
a lOQ·year mean recurrence Interval. a
bending moment and thrust, was 8 kSI on
Ihe cntlcal angle sllffener, acllng compos-
NATIONAL
basIc speed of 80 mph and exposure Type
C) thiS led to a Uniformly dlstnbuted wind
Itely With lOin of effecllve flange from the
shell Transverse clrcumferenllal stiffeners
INSTITUTE OF
load of 375 Ib ft acting against the duct were deSigned to prevent buckling of Ihe STEEL DETAILINC
In a plane inclined 15° 10 the hOrizontal and longitudinal stiffeners Their spacing was
comalnlng Ihe longitudinal aXIs of the duct calculaled to allow as much as one per-
Vanous loading conditions were consld- cent devlalion In the longitudinal aXIs of
r~p'~S~nI;ng :
the independenl sleel detailer
d~dicar~d 10:
increasing professionalism in the
sleel detailing induSlry and
improving relation among
colleagues in the steel
construction industry
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
2506 GROSS POINT ROAD
EVANSTON, ILLINOIS 60201
Figure 3 Front vIew of duct as It hangs hammock-style from 2'h-ln dla (312) 475-7530
steel bars attached to top beam of supporting tower Duct IS welded
cyf,ndnca l snell :1 16-ln In,ck shffened Iongllud,nally by 20 3x3xlO-ln
steel angles Transverse stiffening IS WT6x13 flngs 13 It apart At sup -
port towers WT8x33 flng supports are used
•
151 Ouarter 1984 29
the duct between them This hmltatlon IS be of speclallnleresl (see Fig 5) . Thus. In
considered well within normal fabrication lhe same fashion as a sailboat IS stabilized
tolerance and IS unlikely to be exceeded against the wind . the duct IS proVided at
A cross section of the duct at one of two
suspended suppo~s IS shown In Fig 5
Note the 3116-ln thick sleel shell sllffened
by 20 longlludlnal 3V, x 3V, x 318-ln. steel
angles In addition. there IS a WT8x33.5
clrcumferenllal sllffener attached to lhe
duct thai IS used 10 lransfer the bridge
each tower with keel -type devices. one be-
low and one above These devices are ac-
tivated In the wind by bearing against the
transverse beams of the supporting
frames Longitudinal displacements of the
duct at these locations are faclhtated by
sandwiched neoprene plates
Architect (mill)
TLM Engineers
Jackson. Tennessee
•
reaClion lhrough two 2V2-ln dla hanger The duct was welded together In lhe
rods to the supporting-tower frame shop and fabricated In longitudinal sec- Structural Engineer (duetlng)
Professor German Gurllnkel
The duCI IS provided with reSISlance to lions lor shipment. These were temporarily
UniverSIty of Ilhnols-Champaign-Urbana
wind-Induced forces al each suppo~lng bolted together In the field Unlll welded
tower The keel-lype devices used al lhe permanently In place. The fi nished dUCI- Owner
,nlermed,ate and upper towers. where the bridge has been In conllnuous opera lion Flonda Sleel Company
duct IS suspended by hanger rods. may since late 1981 0 Jackson. Tennessee
lOV/ER
•
LEG
I
II
3,,.. t SHELL·
;,r.
-..\, 1
CROSS-SECTION
•
30 MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION
Pick the Profile that's right for you I
Need Some Help?
Manufacturing Plants:
Epic Metals Corporation is involved daily • Pittsburgh. Po • Chicago. III.
In engineering and manufacturing • Toledo. Ohio • Lakeland. Fla.
Composite Decks, EPC Cellular Raceway Contact us today for Prompt Domestic
and Internot,onol Sh,pments
System, Cellular Decks, Roof Decks, Form
Decks, Roofing and Siding.
Our staff IS ready to serve your needs. EPIC
,
~rchltects, EnQlneers, Contractors ... Eleven Talbot Avenue. Rankin PA 15104
give us a call ... write ... telex ... or PHONE: 412/351·3913
TWX: 710-664·4424
come and Visit. EPICMETAL BOOK
We olso manufacture some of the above profiles In aluminum
31
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION
J
l
The Wrigley Building, 400 North Michigan Avenue BULK RATE
US POSTAGI'
Chicago, Il 60611 PAID
WHEATON , III
Address CorrectIon Requested
Perm,' No .766 •
AMERICAN
COMPUTERS
& ENGINEERS