Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Somegoodgraphingmonopoly
Somegoodgraphingmonopoly
Fall 2008
Discussion Section #10 Handout November 13, 14
Step 3: The monopolist chooses QM where MC = MR (set the two equations equal to each other and solve for QM ).
CS
Pm =$55
PS = ProfitM DWL
Pc = $5 MC = ATC = $5
MC=5
MR: P = 105 – 4Q D: P = 105 – 2Q
Qm = 25 105/4 Qc = 50 105/2 Q
Now suppose that this market is characterized as perfect competition instead of monopoly. The demand curve is the same as
in the monopoly characterization. Furthermore, all firms have access to the same constant marginal cost technology and
there are no fixed costs.
P
$105 Perfect Competition
D
CS
Pc = $5 MC = ATC = $5
MC=5
D: P = 105 – 2Q
Qc = 50 105/2 Q
c) What is the equilibrium price in the competitive market PC?
Perfect competition implies Pc = MR = MC. Pc = 5.
Now let’s think about comparing the monopoly and the perfect competition outcomes.
e) Is the total quantity produced and demanded higher or lower in the monopoly case?
Lower
II. Suppose the technology the monopoly uses changed (somehow) and the monopolist now faces a marginal cost given by
MC=Q. The demand function and marginal revenue curve do not change. (A demand curve is P = 105 – 2Q. The marginal
revenue curve is MR = 105 – 4Q. )
P
$105 Monopoly
TR (total revenue)
TC (total cost)
Pm = $63 MC: P = Q
D
PS = ProfitM
$21
Qm = 21 105/4 105/2 Q
c) Does the monopolist make any profit? How much is the profit?
Total cost is the area underneath the MC curve up to the point of output quantity Qm.
Yes. Profit for monopolist: π (M) = (PM)*QM – TC = (63)*21 – ½ (21)(21) = $1,102.5
Question 2: Natural Monopolist -- When one is better
a) What is the profit-maximizing quantity and price for this monopolist?
q3, p1
b) Is this efficient?
No, the price is greater than the marginal cost, therefore, it is not
allocatively efficient. In addition, the output is smaller than the
intersection of ATC and MC (it does not show on the graph, but will
be at somewhere far to the right of the Q-axis), therefore, it is not
productively efficient, either.