Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agha Pour 2017
Agha Pour 2017
Effects of Kinesio Taping® on knee function and pain in athletes with patellofemoral
pain syndrome
PII: S1360-8592(17)30012-8
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.01.012
Reference: YJBMT 1477
Please cite this article as: Aghapour, E., Kamali, F., Sinaei, E., Effects of Kinesio Taping® on knee
function and pain in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome, Journal of Bodywork & Movement
Therapies (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.01.012.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Title page:
Effects of Kinesio Taping® on knee function and pain in athletes with patellofemoral
pain syndrome
PT
Elaheh Aghapour1, Fahimeh Kamali1,2*, Ehsan Sinaei1
RI
1
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University
SC
of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2
Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,
U
Shiraz, Iran
*
Corresponding author:
AN
M
Name: Fahimeh Kamali
E-mail: fahimekamalii@gmail.com
number: CT-92-6832).
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Effects of Kinesio Taping® on knee function and pain in athletes with patellofemoral
pain syndrome
PT
ABSTRACT
RI
Objective: To compare the knee performance and pain in athletes with patellofemoral
pain syndrome (PFPS) before and after applying Kinesio Tape® (KT) on vastus
SC
medialis obliquus (VMO) muscle.
Participants: Fifteen participants (10 females, five males) with unilateral PFPS were
U
examined and compared under taped and untaped conditions.
AN
Intervention: VMO of the involved leg was taped from origin to insertion, with 75% of
Results: Paired t-test showed statistically significant increase in VMO peak torque and
EP
also repetition of step- down test and bilateral squat after using KT. Pain intensity was
Conclusions: KT application over VMO can decrease pain and improve the functional
AC
PFPS. However, more research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of this
therapeutic procedure.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
medialis obliquus
Nomenclature:
PT
PFPS = patellofemoral pain syndrome
RI
KT = Kinesio Tape®
SC
VL = vastus lateralis
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. INTRODUCTION
pathology in physically active individuals (McConnell 1986). It is also one of the most
PT
common knee disorders experienced by athletes in variety of sports (Bolgla and Boling
RI
2011), which accounts for about 30% of all injuries seen in sport medicine clinics and
SC
crepitus and functional deficits are other related manifestations of PFPS (Al-Hakim,
Jaiswal et al. 2012) that generally leads to decreased activity level. This problem can
U
also cause athletes to limit their sportive activities (Petersen, Ellermann et al. 2014).
AN
Retropatellar localized pain gets aggravated during physical activities e.g. stair
climbing, squatting and prolonged sitting, which can increase the load on patellofemoral
M
joint (Whittingham, Palmer et al. 2004). The precise underlying etiology of PFPS is still
laxity, overuse injuries and biomechanical changes in lower extremity are the main
TE
contributing factors (Loudon, Wiesner et al. 2002; Whittingham, Palmer et al. 2004).
Among the above-mentioned factors, quadriceps muscle strength is a key parameter that
EP
is closely associated with PFPS (Herrington 2001; Goharpey, Shaterzadeh et al. 2007;
Osorio, Vairo et al. 2013). The evidences show that quadriceps muscle is generally
C
weaker in patients with PFPS than healthy individuals (Osorio, Vairo et al. 2013).
AC
Quadriceps inhibition and atrophy can lead to decreased muscle peak torque, which is a
defined predisposing factor for PFPS (Herrington 2001). Muscle imbalance in heads of
the quadriceps, i.e. vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and vastus lateralis (VL) can
eventually lead to patellar tilting to the lateral side of the knee joint, which in turn
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
aggravates the symptoms (Lee and Cho 2013). It is reported that VMO strength plays an
stabilizer of the patella. That is to say, insufficiency and delay in VMO activation can
PT
decreases the function of the knee joint (O'Sullivan and Popelas 2005; Lee and Cho
RI
2013).
SC
nature. Up to now, a variety of therapeutic methods has been practiced in order to
address PFPS including electrotherapy modalities (Lake and Wofford 2011), stretching
U
and strengthening exercises (Alba-Martín, Gallego-Izquierdo et al. 2015), balance
AN
training (Mahmoud and Kamel 2015), patellar braces (Lun, Wiley et al. 2005), patellar
mobilization (Stakes, Myburgh et al. 2006), biofeedback training (Park and Kang 2014),
M
and so forth. However, athletes usually prefer therapeutic measures which do not restrict
their ability to participate in sportive exercises. With respect to this issue, KT, which
D
has gained high popularity over recent years, can be an ideal option to tackle PFPS.
TE
KT is one of the most commonly used stretchable tapes in sport injuries in terms
EP
of prevention, treatment and also enhancing athletes' performance (Wong, Cheung et al.
2012; Montalvo, Buckley et al. 2013). KT and its method of application were first
C
introduced by Kenzo Kase in 1973 (Tsai, Hung et al. 2009). Depending on the direction
AC
Wallıs et al. 2003). Despite the prevalence of KT application in recent years, its
efficiency in injured athletes is still a matter of debate (Montalvo, Buckley et al. 2013),
while there is limited evidence which supports its role in facilitating muscle strength in
PFPS (Kase, Wallıs et al. 2003; Wong, Cheung et al. 2012; Montalvo, Buckley et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
improve pain and quadriceps strength in subjects with PFPS. In another study,
Freedman reported that KT can significantly decrease pain and improve functional
performance in individuals with PFPS, while sham KT does not have any therapeutic
PT
effect (Freedman, Brody et al. 2014). Conversely, the results of the previous studies
RI
have indicated that KT probably is not capable of enhancing muscle strength in healthy
SC
To the best of the author's knowledge, to date no study has examined the effect
U
present study was designed in order to investigate the effectiveness of KT as an
AN
accessible, simple to apply, and non-invasive technique on knee performance in athletes
with PFPS.
M
2.1. Subjects
TE
Fifteen athletes (ten females and five males) with unilateral PFPS who referred
EP
from December 2013 and March 2014, were recruited by simple sampling. Sample size
C
was calculated with SPSS software on the basis of information from a previous related
AC
study (α=0.05, β=0.2, power=80%)(Wong, Cheung et al. 2012). All subjects gave
informed consent prior to their participation and ethical code was obtained from Ethics
(Reference number: CT-92-6832). The patients were included if they had at least three
sessions of 2-hour physical activity per week, over six months prior to the study.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
running, ascending and descending steps, squatting and prolonged sitting, as well as
obtaining scores between 45 and 70 (out of 100) on the Kujala questionnaire (Nijs, Van
Geel et al. 2006) and scores between three to six (out of 10) on visual analogue scale
PT
(VAS) during resistive knee extension were the other inclusion criteria. We considered
RI
the upper point of six for VAS and lower point of 45 for Kujala, in order to exclude
subjects with high levels of pain and disability, who were assumed not to be able to
SC
complete functional tests and isokinetic evaluations. In addition, at least one of these
valid diagnostic tests of PFPS, i.e. eccentric step down, patellar apprehension and vastus
U
medialis coordination tests had to be positive (Nijs, Van Geel et al. 2006). We recruited
AN
only the participants who suffered from PFPS in their dominant leg in order to avoid
bias in evaluations.
M
The patients were excluded if they had neurological or rheumatoid diseases, low
back or hip pain, fractures or surgeries in their lower limbs, received physical therapy
D
treatments or cortico steroid injections in knee joint over the past three months and used
TE
opioid or analgesic drugs in last 72 hours prior to the study. Patients with internal knee
subluxation or dislocation and subjects with bilateral PFPS were also excluded. An
2.2. Procedures
All 15 participants were asked to attend two sessions with one week interval, in
order to avoid carry-over effects. During the first session, subjects completed the Kujala
questionnaire and their characteristic data were recorded and isokinetic and functional
tests were carried out without any intervention. During the second session, VMO of the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
involved leg was taped and then all the assessments were repeated. Pain intensity was
also evaluated by VAS, at the beginning and end of each session and the mean
difference of pain pre-post performing isokinetic and functional tests in each session
PT
2.3. Intervention
RI
Patient's shaved thigh was cleaned with alcohol. With the patient laid supine
SC
with hip in 30º and knee in 50º flexion, VMO was taped with a 5-cm Y-shaped KT
(Kinesio Tape® -South Korea) from the origin to the insertion, in order to gain
U
facilitatory effect (Słupik, Dwornik et al. 2006). This method of application is defined
AN
by Kenzo Kase as the standard KT application for VMO (Kase 2016) (see figure 1).
tension (Kase 2016). This tension was confirmed by measuring the change in length of
isokinetic tests
C
system, Inc; New York, USA) (see figure 2). The dynamometer was calibrated before
each session. All participants were acquainted with the equipment before testing. The
participants were seated in the chair of the dynamometer instrument in the position
described by Dvir et al. (Dvir, Halperin et al. 1991) and carried out 10 repetitions at
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
each speed, with a 10-second rest between each repetition. A repetition comprised
They were asked to work with sub-maximally effort for the first seven repetitions as
warm-ups, which ensured us that they were familiarized with the instrument. Afterward,
PT
the last three trials of concentric and eccentric quadriceps contractions with maximal
RI
effort were performed. Average peak torque of the last three repetitions was recorded.
They were verbally encouraged and were allowed to get visual feedback from the
SC
monitor screen. The same protocol was then repeated after two minutes recovery for the
U
Place figure 2 here
functional tests
AN
M
Subjects also performed step-down test and bilateral squatting, in a random
sequence. The reliability of these functional tests had been proven (Loudon, Wiesner et
D
al. 2002).
TE
subject steps forward and downward toward the floor with the heel and then return to
EP
For bilateral squat test, the examinees stand with knees in full extension, hip-
AC
width apart. Afterwards, they bend their knees to 90º and then return to full extension.
One cycle consists of straight standing to 90º knee flexion and back to start position.
The numbers of cycles during 30 seconds defines the score of this test.
Data were analyzed with SPSS software, version 16 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL,
test, paired t-test was used to measure any differences between taped and untaped
conditions. A p-value of under 0.05 was considered as statistical significance in all the
PT
evaluations.
RI
3. RESULTS
SC
All the 15 recruited subjects completed the trial. Demographic data of
participants are summarized in table 1 (see table1). As Table 2 shows, pain intensity,
U
assessed by VAS reduced significantly after VMO taping (p=0.020). In terms of
AN
isokinetic evaluations, normalized peak torque increased significantly following the
application of KT on VMO. P-values were 0.032 and 0.040 for concentric contractions
M
and 0.017 and <0.001 for eccentric contractions, respectively at 60 and 180°/s velocities.
According to Table 2, number of repetitions of step down and bilateral squat tests
D
4. DISCUSSION
C
pain, which is consistent with previous studies (Osorio, Vairo et al. 2013). This pain
et.al compared the effects of real and sham KT on pain intensity during functional tasks
in patients with PFPS and reported a significant decrease in pain following real KT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(Freedman, Brody et al. 2014). However, their method of taping was different from
ours, in a way that they taped from middle of femur to the middle of tibial shaft, in
order to support the patella. In this study, our target muscle was VMO and we did not
change the alignment of the patella. As a result, pain reduction in our experiment
PT
seemed to be more than biomechanical effects, due to gate control theory; KT can
RI
stimulate neuromuscular pathways via increasing afferent feedback. It is suggested that
KT may clinically be helpful for the purpose of pain relief in patients with PFPS (Aytar,
SC
Ozunlu et al. 2011), and can be used as an adjunct to the traditional physical therapy,
without any proven negative side effect (Montalvo, Buckley et al. 2013).
U
According to the present study, application of KT on VMO can lead to greater
AN
concentric and eccentric peak torques at 60 and 180º/s velocities. Based on the
reported that KT cannot increase quadriceps peak torque in healthy individuals, (Fu,
D
Wong et al. 2008; Wong, Cheung et al. 2012; Poon, Li et al. 2015; Yeung, Yeung et al.
TE
2015)which is inconsistent with the findings of our study. It is obvious that the
participants in the mentioned studies were healthy individuals, who did not have any
EP
with our results. It should be noticed that there is a reverse relation between pain
C
intensity and muscle peak torque (Herrington 2001; Osorio, Vairo et al. 2013). It is
AC
believed that decreasing pain can result in greater quadriceps activity by boosting the
afferent inputs into the dorsal horn of spine and consequently decreasing the inhibition
placed upon alpha motor neuron excitability (Herrington 2001; Herrington 2004).
Therefore, the improved isokinetic strength seen in this study can be attributed to pain
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
relief induced by KT. According to the literature, applying KT can enhance muscle
excitability. It is also believed that KT can increase blood circulation, which in turn may
affect muscle functions (Halseth, McChesney et al. 2004; Akbaş, Atay et al. 2010).
PT
Its ability to change the excitability of the central neuronal system through interacting
RI
with motor control was reported in previous studies (Fu, Wong et al. 2008). Chen et al.
showed that VMO taping can alter the timing of VMO activation and improve
SC
VMO/VL ratio (Chen, Hong et al. 2007).
U
functional tests i.e. step-down and bilateral squat. In a study in 2010, Akbas et. al.
AN
revealed that KT could not add any extra effect to conventional exercises in treatment of
women with PFPS (Akbaş, Atay et al. 2010). However, their findings do not necessarily
M
mean that KT is ineffective regarding pain and functional performance; furthermore, the
D
exercise plus KT group in their trial showed faster improvement in hamstring muscle
TE
isokinetic strength assessment and functional tests, it is proposed that both isokinetic
EP
dynamometry and functional test must be carried out in order to assess the functional
functional tests have the benefit of evaluating the knee joint under the conditions that
AC
integrity (Loudon, Wiesner et al. 2002). It is also suggested that KT can improve
pain intensity, exciting skin receptors, and correcting malalignments (Słupik, Dwornik
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
et al. 2006). Hence, the decreased perceived pain and improvement of ability to generate
peak torque as well as enhancing proprioception in situ could lead to increased number
performance.
PT
Study limitations
RI
We encountered some limitations in the present study including the lack of long-
SC
term evaluations and a real control group, which we hope to be considered in the future
studies. Furthermore, our sample size was rather small and should be increased in future
U
studies. Such modifications can provide more reliable and generalizable results upon the
AN
efficacy of VMO KT in athletes with PFPS.
5. CONCLUSIONS
M
Our study showed that applying KT on VMO can decrease pain and improve the
D
Acknowledgments:
PT
The present article was extracted from the master thesis written by Elaheh Aghapour
and was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences grants No.
RI
6832. The authors would like to thank the Research Consultation Center (RCC) of
SC
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for their invaluable assistance in English-
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
REFERENCES
PT
Akbaş, E., A. O. Atay, et al. (2010). "The effects of additional kinesio taping over exercise in the
treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome." Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica
RI
turcica 45(5): 335-341.
Al-Hakim, W., P. K. Jaiswal, et al. (2012). "The non-operative treatment of anterior knee pain."
The open orthopaedics journal 6(1).
Alba-Martín, P., T. Gallego-Izquierdo, et al. (2015). "Effectiveness of therapeutic physical
SC
exercise in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review."
Journal of physical therapy science 27(7): 2387.
Aytar, A., N. Ozunlu, et al. (2011). "Initial effects of kinesio® taping in patients with
patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, double-blind study." Isokinetics and
U
Exercise Science 19(2): 135-142.
Bolgla, L. A. and M. C. Boling (2011). "An update for the conservative management of
AN
patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to
2010." International journal of sports physical therapy 6(2).
Campolo, M., J. Babu, et al. (2013). "A comparison of two taping techniques (kinesio and
mcconnell) and their effect on anterior knee pain during functional activities." Int J
M
Sports Phys Ther 8(2): 105-110.
Chen, W.-C., W.-H. Hong, et al. (2007). "Effects of kinesio taping on the timing and ratio of
vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis muscle for person with patellofemoral
D
Fu, T.-C., A. M. Wong, et al. (2008). "Effect of Kinesio taping on muscle strength in athletes—a
pilot study." Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 11(2): 198-201.
Goharpey, S., M. Shaterzadeh, et al. (2007). "Relationship between functional tests and knee
muscular isokinetic parameters in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome."
C
LaBella, C. (2004). "Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation and treatment." Primary Care:
Clinics in office practice 31(4): 977-1003.
Lake, D. A. and N. H. Wofford (2011). "Effect of Therapeutic Modalities on Patients With
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome A Systematic Review." Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary
Approach 3(2): 182-189.
Lee, S.-E. and S.-H. Cho (2013). "The effect of McConnell taping on vastus medialis and lateralis
activity during squatting in adults with patellofemoral pain syndrome." Journal of
PT
exercise rehabilitation 9(2): 326.
Loudon, J. K., D. Wiesner, et al. (2002). "Intrarater reliability of functional performance tests
for subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome." Journal of athletic training 37(3):
RI
256.
Lun, V. M., J. P. Wiley, et al. (2005). "Effectiveness of patellar bracing for treatment of
patellofemoral pain syndrome." Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 15(4): 235-240.
Mahmoud, W. S. E.-d. and E. M. Kamel (2015). "The Effect of Additional Balance Training
SC
Program to Gluteus Medius Strengthening Exercises on Patellofemoral Pain
Syndrome." International Journal of Therapies and Rehabilitation Research 4(2): 7.
McConnell, J. (1986). "The management of chondromalacia patellae: a long term solution."
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 32(4): 215-223.
U
Montalvo, A. M., W. E. Buckley, et al. (2013). "An Evidence-Based Practice Approach to the
Efficacy of Kinesio Taping for Improving Pain and Quadriceps Performance in
Physiotherapies 2013.
AN
Physically-Active Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Patient." Journal of Novel
Nijs, J., C. Van Geel, et al. (2006). "Diagnostic value of five clinical tests in patellofemoral pain
syndrome." Manual therapy 11(1): 69-77.
M
O'SULLIVAN, S. P. and C. A. Popelas (2005). "Activation of vastus medialis obliquus among
individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome." The Journal of Strength &
Conditioning Research 19(2): 302-304.
D
Osorio, J. A., G. L. Vairo, et al. (2013). "The effects of two therapeutic patellofemoral taping
techniques on strength, endurance, and pain responses." Physical Therapy in Sport
14(4): 199-206.
TE
Park, S.-K. and J.-Y. Kang (2014). "Effects of EMG-biofeedback training on functional ability and
Q-angle in patellofemoral pain syndrome." The Korean Society of Physical Therapy
26(2): 68-73.
Petersen, W., A. Ellermann, et al. (2014). "Patellofemoral pain syndrome." Knee Surgery,
EP
Stakes, N. O., C. Myburgh, et al. (2006). "A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine
Efficacy of Combined Spinal Manipulation and Patella Mobilization Compared to
Patella Mobilization Alone in the Conservative Management of Patellofemoral Pain
Syndrome." Journal of the American Chiropractic Association 43(7).
Tsai, H.-J., H.-C. Hung, et al. (2009). "Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive
lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study." Supportive
care in cancer 17(11): 1353-1360.
Whittingham, M., S. Palmer, et al. (2004). "Effects of taping on pain and function in
patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial." Journal of Orthopaedic
& Sports Physical Therapy 34(9): 504-510.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Wong, O. M., R. T. Cheung, et al. (2012). "Isokinetic knee function in healthy subjects with and
without Kinesio taping." Physical Therapy in Sport 13(4): 255-258.
Yeung, S. S., E. W. Yeung, et al. (2015). "Acute effects of kinesio taping on knee extensor peak
torque and electromyographic activity after exhaustive isometric knee extension in
healthy young adults." Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 25(3): 284-290.
PT
Table 1: Demographic characteristics and baseline values
Parameter mean±SD
RI
Age(yr) 24.3±4.4
SC
Height(m) 1.64±6.5
Weight(kg) 57.2±14.1
U
Visual Analog Scale 3.66±0.89
PT
variable Untaped Taped p-value
(mean+SD) (mean+SD)
Pain Difference
VASa(0-10)
RI
2.86 ±1.76 1.6 ±1.35 0.020*
Functional Performance
Step-down 15.6±4.3 20.01±5.8 <0.001*
SC
Bilateral squat 14.9±4.3 19.6±5.9 <0.001*
Peak Torqueb
Concentric, 60 105.4±43.2 137.6±46.9 0.032*
U
Concentric, 180 82.7±26.8 101.4±27.2 0.040*
Eccentric, 60 171.1±63.3 205.7±45.1 0.017*
Eccentric, 180 167.1±31.9 193.7±34.9 <0.001*
a
visual analog scale b AN
contraction type, angular velocity º/s
CAPTIONS TO ILLUSTRATIONS
PT
Fig. 1. Vastus medialis obliquus kinesio taping
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 1
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 2
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC