Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizational Behavior System
Organizational Behavior System
The systems base rest on the fundamental beliefs and intentions of those who join to create it and of the
managers who currently administer it.
The philosophy of organizational behavior held by management consists of an integrated set of
assumptions and beliefs about the way things are, the purpose for these activities and the way they
should be.
Five major organizational behavior philosophies:
1. Autocratic
2. Custodial
3. Supportive
4. Collegial
5. System
The philosophy of organizational behavior held by a manager stems from two sources:
1. Fact Premises
- Represent our descriptive view of how the world behaves
2. Value Premises
- Represent our view of the desirability of certain goals and activities.
Managers also have the primary responsibility for instilling three other elements into the organizational
behavior system –
Mission
- An organization also typically creates a Mission Statement, which identifies the business it is in,
the market niches it tries to serve, the types of customers it is likely to have and the reasons for
its existence.
- Many mission statements even include a brief listing of the competitive advantages or strengths
that the firm believes it has.
- In contrast to vision, mission statements are more descriptive and less future - oriented. They
are still rather broad, and need to be converted to goas to become operational and useful.
Goals
- Are relatively concrete formulations of achievements the organization is aiming for within set
periods of time.
- Goal setting is a complex process, for top management’s goals must be merged with those of
employees, who bring their psychological, social and economic needs with them to an
organization.
Douglas McGregor
- He was one of the first writers to call attention to managerial models.
- 1957 – he presented a convincing argument that most management actions flow directly from
whatever theory of human behavior the managers hold.
- He suggested that management philosophy controls practice. Management’s human resource
policies, decision – making styles, operating practices and even organization designs flow from
key assumptions about human behavior.
- Introduced Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X
- A traditional set of assumptions about people.
- It assumes that most people dislike work and will try to avoid it if they can.
- Workers are seen as being inclined to restrict work output, having little ambition, and avoiding
responsibility if at all possible.
- They are believed to be self – centered, indifferent to organizational needs, and resistant to
change.
- Common rewards cannot overcome this natural dislike for work, so management is almost forced
to coerce, control, and threaten employees to obtain satisfactory performance.
Theory Y
- Implies a more humanistic and supportive approach to managing people.
- It assumes that people are not inherently lazy.
- Any appearance they have of being that way is the result of their experiences with less –
enlightened organizations, and if management will provide the proper environment to release
their potential, work will become as natural to them as recreational play or rest and relaxation.
- Management believes that employees are capable of exercising self – direction and self – control
in the service of objectives to which they are committed.
- Management’s role is to provide an environment in which the potential of people can be released
a work.
McGregor’s argument was that management had been ignoring the facts about people. The facts
are that the Theory Y set of assumptions is more truly representative of most people. There will
always be important differences among people, so a few individuals will fit the assumptions of
the Theory X model. He argued that management needed to change to a whole new set of
assumptions about people – one based on the emerging behavioural science research.
Four major contribution of McGregor:
1. He stimulated subsequent generations of managers to think consciously about their belief
systems and management models.
2. He was an early advocate of the practical value of reading and using research findings to
better understand human behaviour.
3. He introduced and publicized one of the early theories of motivations (the hierarchy needs
model by Maslow)
4. He became a spokesman for a trend that had been developing over e along period of time –
the need to bring human values into balance with other values at work.
* This model, at one time, is a useful way to accomplish work and not a complete failure.
Its principal weaknesses are its high human costs and its tendency to encourage high – level managers to
engage in MICROMANAGEMENT – which is the immersion of a manager into controlling the details of
daily operation.
MICROMANAGERS – tend to control and manipulate time, place their self – interest above that of
employees, institute elaborate approval processes, specify detailed procedures for everything, and closely
monitor results.
And the RESULT – low morale, paralyzed decision making due to fear of being second – guessed and high
turnover.
Though most employees are comfortable and cared for, most of them really do not feel fulfilled or
motivated.
Although the custodial model does provide employee security, it is best viewed as simply the foundation
for growth to the next step.
* One key spark for the supportive approach was a series of research studies at the HAWTHORNE
PLANT OF WESTERN ELECTRIC in the 1920s and 1930s.
- This Hawthorne studies was led by Elton Mayo and F.J. Roethlisberger, the researchers gave
academic stature to the study of human behaviour at work by applying keen insight, straight
thinking and sociological backgrounds to industrial experiments.
- They concluded that an organization is a social system and the worker is not a simple tool but a
complex personality that often is difficult to understand. They also suggested that an
understanding of group dynamics, coupled with the application of supportive supervision was
important.
- This model depends on leadership instead of power and money.
- Through leadership, management provides a climate to help employees grow and accomplish in
the interests of the organization the things of which they are capable.
- The leaders assume workers are not by nature passive and resistant to organizational needs, but
are made so by an inadequately supportive climate at work.
- They will take responsibility, develop a drive to contribute, and improve themselves if
management will give them a chance.
Management’s Orientation:
- To support the employee’s job performance rather than simply support employee benefit
payments as in the custodial approach.
Psychological Result
- Feeling of participation and task involvement in the organization.
- Employees may say “we” instead of “they” when referring to their organization.
- They are more strongly motivated than by earlier models because their status and recognition
needs are better met, thus, they have drives for work.
- Supportive behaviour is not the kind of approach that requires money. Rather, it is a part of
management’s lifestyle at work, reflected in the way it deals with other people.
The manager’s role is one of helping employees solve their problems and accomplish their work.
- This model works well with both employees and managers, and it has been widely accepted by
many managers.
- The Psychological result is self – discipline. Feeling responsible, employees discipline themselves
for performance on the team in the same way members of a football team discipline themselves
to training standards and the rules of the game.
- In this kind of environment, employees normally feel some degree of fulfillment, worthwhile
contribution and self – actualization, even though the amount may be modest in some situations.
- The self – actualization will lead to moderate enthusiasm in performance.
- Under this model, managers try to convey to each worker, “You are an important part of our
whole system. We sincerely care about each of you. We want to join together to achieve a better
product or service, local community and society at large. We will make every effort to make
products that are environmentally friendly and contribute to sustainability.”