Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBHAM Micro Finance Assignment
SUBHAM Micro Finance Assignment
But over the last two decades, many lenders that began as non-profit organizations have
transformed into commercial microfinance institutions (MFIs) — among them, BASIX, SHARE,
SKS, and Spandana. As compared to SHG-Bank Linkage, these institutions have posted faster
growth rates and reached far more borrowers.
Last month, the state government put a halt to that with the AP Microfinance Ordinance,
suspending operations of MFIs in the state and for all intents and purposes allowing borrowers to
stop repaying their loans. The announcement of the Ordinance stressed the need to protect the
poor — but the move might well, in the long term, leave them far worse off.
The government has complained that too many poor borrowers find themselves subject to
coercive collection practices by MFIs. It knows that its SHG members sometimes “double-dip” by
taking on additional loans from the commercial lenders, and it sees that they tend to repay MFIs
faster. However, there are explanations other than coercion that might explain that. MFI loans are
more expensive than SHG loans, so a customer with two loans outstanding might reasonably
choose to repay the MFI loan first. The MFIs’ disciplined system of doorstep loan management
might also account for the greater customer responsiveness.
Now, the manager of the government program, SERP, has pushed the accusation of coercive
practices to a new level, blaming the MFIs’ attempts to recover loans for the suicides of 54 men
and women. This is a serious allegation and, again, prompts the question of whether there might
be alternative explanations. At the most basic level, note that according to the National Crime
Records Bureau, suicides in India occur at the rate of 10.8 deaths per 100,000 people every year
(based on 2008 data). If we apply this rate to the 6 million clients who are members of SKS
Microfinance, we might expect that there would be 648 clients succumbing to suicide every year.
This reasoning, of course, is rather absurd; but so is drawing a link from borrower suicides to MFIs
without evidence. (For a far more subtle discussion of the drivers of suicide among Indian
farmers, see these articles by Palagummi Sainath, an editor at The Hindu.)
What we are really seeing in Andhra Pradesh is the fallout from a long-standing competition
between MFIs and the state government, each of which believes it should be the source of
financial services to the poor. The government feels that it has a mandate to alleviate poverty;
indeed, it has a responsibility to disperse US$22.2bn to SHG members by 2014. MFIs believe that
the poor are ideal customers who have the right to financial inclusion. The two clashed first in
2006, also in Andhra Pradesh, and that Krishna crisis left many large MFIs crippled. But that time,
private equity investors stepped in, and with strong inflows of both debt and equity capital, timely
access to skilled talent, and significant use of technology, MFIs in general managed to continue
growing and even to vault past the government program.
Now, with the AP Ordinance, the government seems determined to remove borrowers’ access to
MFIs. As a piece of legislation, the AP Ordinance has more to do with helping the state
government program enjoy a monopoly over the poor than with preventing strong-armed debt
collection.
Clearly it would be better for the government to understand that the poor have the right to make
choices — and that there are better ways to serve the poor than crippling its competition.
At the same time, the MFIs need to understand that social businesses are complex and that, as
they scale and become part of the mainstream financial system, they need to be more careful
managers, of both their operational reality and their external image. When the most substantial
plank in your reputation platform is poverty alleviation, perceptions are all-important. In contrast to
the Indian Information Technology Industry, which has done a good job of managing values and
reputation without moving the focus from commercial objectives, the MFIs have allowed others to
shape perceptions of them. They are perceived as lacking in transparency about their interest
rates and unable to effectively manage external stakeholders such as the media and the State.
This perception comes closer to the truth when a leading MFI allows a post-IPO spat among its
own leaders to play out in front of the public.
The fight over the poor seems to be getting uglier, but microfinance is too good a tool for financial
inclusion to be thwarted by poor positioning. If both sides do not look inwards and make adequate
course corrections, their destructive competition has the potential to set us back by 10 years.
The story covers a microfinance crisis in the southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, triggered
by sensationalized newspaper accounts of suicides among over-indebted clients of some of
India’s biggest microfinance institutions (MFIs): SKS Microfinance, Spandana, Share, and
others.
These cases underscore rising debt stress among possibly tens of thousands of clients,
brought on by explosive growth of microfinance organizations in southern India.
In the quest to meet their growth targets, loan officers often sell loans to clients already
indebted to other organizations
The reports offered an opening for the state government, which runs a rival self-help
group (SHG) program, to pass a restrictive ordinance severely curtailing the MFIs.
The crisis threatens microfinance not only in Andhra Pradesh, but nationwide, as the
Reserve Bank of India moves toward removing the priority sector designation that has
fueled the sector’s growth (by making it advantageous for banks to lend to MFIs).
The blame for this unfortunate situation falls most squarely on the MFIs that failed to
restrain aggressive growth even as the market became increasingly saturated. Investors
must also swallow a big spoonful of blame. Because they paid dearly for shares in the
MFIs, they need fast growth to make their investments pay off.
The divvying up of blame doesn’t stop there, however. Perhaps the most important
target is the public sector policy environment that has treated microfinance institutions as
orphan children of the financial sector rather than helping them to build solid
foundations. In fact, the environment in which MFIs have grown up could almost have
been expressly designed to promote over-lending.
lack of control in the lending process of the MFIs themselves, and the protectionist
nature of India’s financial sector.
Measures Taken by the Government
The Sub-Committee of RBI Board headed by Shri Y.H. Malegam was appointed in October
2010 in the wake of the crisis like situation that originated from Andhra Pradesh (AP) following
controversy over the alleged abusive practices adopted by the MFIs involving exorbitant interest
rates, coercive recovery methods and multiple-loans. The Committee, examined the prevalent
practices of MFIs with regard to interest rate and lending and recovery practices, and explored
the scope for regulating these MFIs by RBI and the regulatory framework needed and gave
critical recommendations (Malegam, 2011). Current RBI guidelines for NBFC MFIs are based
on the recommendations of Malegam Committee.
The RBI is the sole regulator of financial services in India. RBI has also created separate
category of NBFC as “NBFC-MFIs” which are to be registered with RBI to continue their
microfinance operations. The RBI, pursuant to its decision to accept the recommendations of
the Malegam Committee (Malegam, 2011), brought NBFC-MFI under a separate regulatory
framework, through NBFC-MFI Directions. The basic elements of RBI Directions for NBFC-MFIs
are mentioned hereunder (rbi.org.in).
Pricing of Credit
The interest rates charged by an NBFC-MFI to its borrowers will be the lower of the following:
• Cost of funds means interest cost and margin is a markup of a maximum of 10 per cent for
large NBFCs-MFI and 12 per cent for others
• Processing charges by NBFC-MFIs shall not be more than 1 % of gross loan amount.
Processing charges need not be included in the margin cap. Further, NBFC-MFIs shall recover
only the actual cost of insurance for group, or livestock, life, health for borrower and spouse.
• A customer needs to know that there are only three components in the pricing of a loan viz. the
interest charge, the processing charge and the insurance premium
• The interest charged to customer is calculated on a reducing balance basis.
Customer Education
• No security deposit/ margin/collateral are required to be kept by the borrower with the NBFC-
MFI.
• The borrower should ensure that he gets a loan card from the NBFC-MFI reflecting: the
effective rate of interest charged; all other terms and conditions attached to the loan; information
which adequately identifies the borrower; acknowledgement by the NBFC-MFI of all repayments
including instalments received and the final discharge.
• All entries in the Loan Card should be in the vernacular language.
• NBFC-MFI does not levy penalty on delayed payment.
• It mandatory for the NBFC-MFIs to prominently display in all its offices and in the literature
issued by it and on its website, the effective rate of interest being charged by it.
• There must be a minimum period of moratorium between the grant of the loan and the due
date of the repayment of the first instalment.
Monitoring of Compliance
•The responsibility for compliance to all regulations prescribed for MFIs lies primarily with the
NBFC-MFIs themselves. Banks’ lending to NBFC-MFIs will also ensure that systems practices
and lending policies in NBFC-MFIs are aligned to the regulatory framework.
For his efforts, Yunus won the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. In awarding Yunus the peace
prize, which was actually awarded jointly to Yunus and his bank, the Nobel committee
noted that it was honoring Yunus and his bank "for their efforts to create economic and
social development from below." In other words, the committee paid homage to Yunus'
concept of creating economic opportunity from the ground up.
Annapurna Microfinance
Getting access to credit, sometimes, becomes difficult even for a salaried or self-employed professional.
Imagine, how would a poor un-employed individual get a loan amidst enormous banking formalities? A large
segment of people who live under poverty find it hard to get finance from established lending institutions. As
the country aim for an inclusive growth at all sectors, the provision of micro credit is certainly a powerful tool
that will bring financial inclusion.
Having visualized financial inclusion is the only way for development, Annapurna Microfinance helps poor
communities to establish small businesses in the society. The beneficiaries include fishermen, artisans,
farmers, small entrepreneurs, deprived communities etc.
The group’s members meet periodically when the new savings come in, recovery of
past loans are made from the members and also new loans are disbursed. This model
has been very much successful in the past and with time it is becoming more popular.
The SHGs are self-sustaining and once the group becomes stable it starts working on
its own with some support from NGOs and institutions like NABARD and SIDBI.
High transaction cost – generally micro credits fall below the break-even point of
providing loans by banks
Absence of collaterals – the poor usually are not in a state to offer collaterals to
secure the credit
Loans are generally taken for very short duration periods
Higher frequency of repayment of installments and higher rate of Default
SHG Loan
Women, who are unable to access credit through formal banking system, can get financial help
through income generation loan. Poor women, who are involved in micro businesses to support
their family, are identified and given credit assistance.
The loan provided under this scheme can be used for agriculture purposes, purchase of
agriculture related equipment, micro business enterprise, handicraft and handloom. The loan
amount could range from INR 8000 to INR 25,000. The repayment tenure is up to 36 months.
Safe Water and Sanitation to Households
Focusing on access to clean water, hygiene and sanitation, Annapurna Microfinance provides
loans to women to improve the living conditions. The credit is provided at affordable interest
rates for women to help their family live with a better sanitation. This product facilitates
construction of toilets, installation of water pipes, hand borewell, water purifier etc.
The loan amount could range between INR 2000 to INR 12,000. The repayment tenure is up to
24 months.
Crop Loan for Vegetable Cultivation
Both women and men can get a loan from Annapurna Microfinance for up to INR 25,000 for
cultivation purpose. The loan is provided exclusively for cultivation purpose. The borrowers can
repay the loan within 24 months.
Microenterprise Loan
People who are looking to start up a small business or improve the existing micro enterprise can
avail a loan for up to INR 20 Lakhs under this scheme. The loan can be availed individually or
together as a group. The repayment tenure is up to 36 months at the interest rate of 24%.
Dairy Development Loan
Dairy farming is one of the well-known occupations in the rural villages. Individuals who are
involved in dairy farming or want to set up a farm can avail a dairy development loan for up to
INR 1,50,000 at the interest rate of 23%. The loan can be repaid in 36 months. The preferred
clients are who have prior experience in the industry and have at least 2 cows.
Home Improvement Loan
The mission of this product to fund the poor people who want to repair or extend their own
house. Under this scheme, the customers can get funding starting from INR 20,000 to up to INR
1.5 Lakhs. The loan can be used to build a low-cost house for a comfortable living. The
repayment can be done up to 48 instalments.
Loans for Family Members of Leprosy Affected Patients
People who are affected with leprosy are often neglected in society. What they deserve is a
good opportunity to support their own life and family. The family members of leprosy affected
patients can get a loan up to INR 1 Lakh to start a small enterprise to become self-supportive.
The loan can be repaid in 36 instalments.
Loans for Widows, Unmarried Women, Single Mothers
Women who have no support of their better-half get an opportunity to avail a loan to become
self-supportive under this scheme. The purpose of the loan is to generate income through an
occupation. The maximum loan amount is up to INR 1 Lakh which can be repaid in 36 months.
Annapurna Student Education Loan
Students who have completed their higher secondary education can avail a loan to gain financial
support for further education. Maximum of 85% of the fee is provided as loan (subject to maximum of
INR 1 Lakh). The loan can be availed at an interest rate of 18% and repaid in 36 months.
Loans for Persons with Disability
Under this scheme, physically challenged individuals can get a loan for up to INR 1 Lakh which
can be repaid in 36 months. The purpose of the loan is to generate a regular income with the
loan amount.
Loans for Persons Belonging to the Community of Eunuch/Third Gender
It is a pity that third gender are often neglected a job opportunity in the society. Hence it is our
duty to create a friendly working atmosphere for survival. Annapurna Microfinance provides
exclusive loan for third gender community for up to INR 1 Lakh which can be used to generate
income regularly through a small enterprise.
the eligibility criteria, assessed before granting each loan, do not focus on strong
financial guarantees (salary, assets, etc.), but rely instead on more “human” criteria: if
the loan under consideration will help launch a new activity, its viability evaluation will
also include several interviews with the borrower in addition to the application form.
group solidarity mechanism. For example, with mutual funds or cooperatives, each
borrower serves as a guarantor for the other members within a “solidarity guarantee
support to borrowers, in order to help them succeed in their projects, manage their
budgets, etc. In this way, in addition to classic banking services, the MFI may offer
educational purposes.
the repayment methods for each loan may be adapted to suit the target audience, such
the products are adapted to the target audience in a way that has no real equivalent in
the traditional banking world. This is notably the case for group loans: the MFI requests
to constitute a group of borrowers and grants a single microloan to the entire group.
Typically offered to the poorest borrowers, group loans do not require any guarantee, but
instead rely on the solidarity of all group members. This creates a kind of “social
guarantee”: the members are responsible to the MFI, as well as to their co-borrowers.
solidarity: in this case, social ties seal the relationship, while trust builds the contract. In
some cases, tontines even operate among a group of people who all already know each
MFIs transpose this informal yet efficient principle, by developing a solidarity economy
and social criteria (motivation, competence, experience, etc.), as well as the project’s
viability and repayment capacity. It’s a method that works: the repayment rate for
pressure, as is the case in Bolivia with its system of publically indicating “bad
borrowers.”