Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

6.

Selected Lifting and Loading Equipment

The following recommendations are based on Sources of information on the most important
knowledge and experience of the insurer gained relevant technical regulations and directives are:
from numerous cases of damage. The guidelines
given are primarily aimed at avoiding or removing DIN leaflets, VDI guidelines and AWF leaflets:
those faults and deficiencies which are frequently
Beuth-Vertrieb GmbH
repeated and lead to damage and interrupted Burggrafenstr. 4--7, 1000 Berlin 30,
operations.
Practice shows that a very high percentage of or
all damage can be traced to factors which can Beuth-Vertrieb GmbH
certainly be influenced. In this regard, technical Friesenplatz 16, 5000 Cologne,
shortcomings in design, faulty manufacture and or
assembly, unsuitable materials, faulty handling, Beuth-Vertrieb GmbH
inadequate maintenance and (of even more signi- Gutleutstr. 163, 6000 Frankfurt/Main.
ficance) ignorance, thoughtlessness and negli-
gence, as well as insufficient co-operation, are VDE regulations:
the reasons for extensive and costly damage.
VDE-Verlag GmbH
Bismarckstr. 33, 1000 Berlin 12 (Charlottenburg).
Regulations Serving Operational Safety
Existing building codes, operational instructions Regulations of the employers' liability insurance
and supervision directives have, after all, been companies for the prevention of accidents:
drafted with a view to loss prevention and hence Carl Heymanns-Verlag KG
to the protection of human beings and property. Gereonstr. 18-33, 5000 Cologne.

Allianz Versicherungs-AG, Handbook of Loss Prevention


© Allianz Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin/München 1978
6.1. Slewing Cranes and Loading Bridges

Representative of the large number of damage ropes must be allocated to this group, since it
cases to slewing cranes and loading bridges can be traced almost exclusively to mishandling
reported to the insurer during recent years is the and inadequate maintenance.
survey given in Table 1, in which 476 cases of
damage to slewing cranes in shipyards and cargo-
Discussion of Damage Causes and Locations
handling facilities are divided in accordance with
the causes and primary locations of damage. First of all, the high proportion (42%) of all
damage arising from product faults stands out
in Table 1. This high proportion can be ex-
Product Faults
plained, on the one hand, by the fact that the
Apart from design faults, product faults include cranes concerned are long-lived products which
manufacturing and materials faults and the so- have partly been built in the post-war years, at
called late assembly faults (e.g., as a result of the time when circumstances made it necessary
faulty alignment of machine components), as well to improvise and also on occasion to make use
as planning faults, the responsibility for which of less suitable materials. On the other hand (and
lies not only with the manufacturer but also with this primarily concerns the high proportion of
the user. In addition, product faults include all damage arising from design faults), the changes
repair faults which later give rise to further dam- to which crane construction was subjected in the
age. 1950's have contributed to the increase in the
damage quota ascribed to product faults. The
demands for maximum economy, new technical
Assembly Accidents
assumptions and changed conditions in impor-
This group comprises all damage which has tant fields of application have resulted in convert-
occurred during assembly (e.g., by crashing down ing the old design of slewing crane into a cargo-
as a result of rope breakage). handling machine of high efficiency, but in the
course of this conversion numerous problems of
many different kinds had to be solved.
Operational Faults
With respect to the primary damage locations,
Operational faults include all damage caused by i.e., those from which damage (e.g., rupture, dis-
mishandling and faulty maintenance. Also, dam- tortion and short-circuits) originates as a result
age arising from collisions, storms and broken of manufacturing faults, inadequate maintenance,

Table I. Distribution of the causes and primary locations of 476 cases of damage to slewing cranes.

Cause of damage Distribution of Location of damage Distribution of


the number of the number of
damage cases [%J damage cases [%J

Product faults 42 Structural steelwork 26


Assembly accidents 2 (including booms)
Operational faults 56 Mechanical equipment 51
(travelling, slewing,
lifting, luffing gear, etc.)
Electrical equipment 7
Wire ropes 3
Various 13
(through collision, storms
and other causes)

You might also like