Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conditional Statements: Related Conditionals Symbols
Conditional Statements: Related Conditionals Symbols
Hypothesis – the part of the conditional following the word “if” (underline once).
“today is Saturday” is the hypothesis.
Conclusion – the part of the conditional following the word “then” (underline twice).
“we don’t have to go to school” is the conclusion.
To write a statement as a conditional, identify the sentence’s hypothesis and conclusion by figuring out which part of the
statement depends on the other.
As we saw with inductive reasoning, to prove a conjecture false, you just have to come up with a counterexample.
The hypothesis must be the same as the conjectures and the conclusion is different.
Example: Write a counterexample to the statement, “if a quadrilateral has four right angles, then it is a square.”
A counterexample would be a quadrilateral that has four right angles (true hypothesis) but is not a square (different
conclusion). So a rectangle would work.
Negation of P – “not p”
Notation: p
Example: The negation of the statement “Blue is my favorite color,” is “Blue is not my favorite color.”
Type Statement
Conditional (p →q) If an animal is a cat, then it has four paws.
Converse (q →p) If an animal has four paws, then it is a cat.
Inverse ( p → q) If an animal is not a cat, then it does not have four paws
Contrapositive ( q → p) If an animal does not have four paws, then it is not a cat
Example: Write the conditional, converse, inverse and contrapositive of the statement:
Biconditional – a statement whose conditional and converse are both true. It is written as “p if and only if q”, “p iff q”, or
“p↔ q”
To write the conditional statement and converse within the biconditional, first identify the hypothesis and conclusion,
then write p →q and q →p.
2. Write the hypothesis, “if and only if”, and the conclusion.
Premises - All statements in an argument and all statement forms in an argument form are called premises except for
the last one.
Valid - If an argument form is valid that means no matter what particular statements are substituted for the statement
variable in its premises, if the resulting premises are all true, then the conclusion is true.
Construct a truth table showing the truth values of all the premises and the conclusion.
A row of the truth table in which all the premises are true is called a critical row.
A. If there is a critical row in which the conclusion is false, the argument form is invalid
B. If the conclusion in every row is true, then the argument form is valid.
Example. Use truth tables to show that the following forms of arguments are invalid.
p →q
p
Therefore q
Premises Conclusion
p q p →q
p q
1 T T
2 T F
3 F T
4 F F
p
Generalization p Proof by p →q
Therefore, division p →r
p˅q into cases q →r
therefore, r
Specialization p˄q
therefore,
p
Conjunction P
Q
Therefore,
p˄q
Examples
For the next three examples, use truth tables to show that the argument forms referred to are valid. Indicate which
column represents the premises and which represent the conclusion, and include a sentence explaining how the truth
table supports your answer. Your explanation should show that you understand what it means for a form of an
argument to be valid.
p ˄ q, therefore q
Premises Conclusion
p q p˄q q
1 T T
2 T F
3 F T
4 F F
Example
p˅q
p, therefore q
Premises Conclusion
p q p˅q ~p q
1 T T
2 T F
3 F T
4 F F
Example
p˅q
p →r
q →r
therefore r
p q r p˅q p →r q →r r
1 T T T
2 T T F
3 T F T
4 T F F
5 F T T
6 F T F
7 F F T
8 F F F
Fallacies – Converse Error
p →q
q
therefore, p
It's a fallacy because at no point is it shown that p is the only possible cause of q; therefore, even if q is true, p can still
be false.
Example:
If my car was Ferrari, it would be able to travel at over a hundred miles per hour.
Here the fallacy is fairly obvious; given the evidence, the car might be a Ferrari, but it might also be a Bugatti,
Lamborghini, or any other model of performance car, since the ability to travel that fast is not unique to Ferraris.
p →q
p
Therefore, q
It's a fallacy because replacement is not allowed because a conditional statement is not logically equivalent to its
inverse.
Example
Again, it is intuitively obvious that this reasoning does not work. While many professors may consider being nailed with
a cream pie a sufficient reason to assign a grade of "F" to a student, there are an overwhelming number of other reasons
for which you might flunk (cheating, not studying, not showing up for tests, etc.).
Example
The argument might be valid or it might exhibit the converse or inverse error. Use symbols to write the logical form of
each argument. If the argument is valid, identify the rule of inference that guarantees its validity. Otherwise, state
whether the converse or inverse error is made.
If this computer program is correct, then it produces the correct output when run with the test data my teacher
gave me.
This computer program produces the correct output when run with the test data my teacher gave me.
SET THEORY
SET
A set is any collection of objects specified in such a way that we can determine whether a given object is or is not in the
collection
In other words A set is a collection of objects
These objects are called elements or members of the set
Sets are usually denoted by capital letters A, B, S, etc. The elements of a set are usually denoted by small letters a, b, t, u, etc.
Examples: A = {a, b, d, 2, 4}
B = {math, religion, literature, computer science}
HISTORY OF SET
The theory of set was developed by German mathematician Georg Cantor (1845 – 1918). A single paper, however, founded
set theory, in 1874 by Georg Cantor: “On a Characteristic Property of All Real Algebraic Numbers”.
He first encountered sets while working on “problems on trigonometric series”
Cantor published a six – part treatise on set theory from the years 1879 to 1884. This work appears in Mathematische
Annalen and it was a brave move by the editor to publish the work despite a growing opposition to Cantor’s ideas.
The next wave of excitement in set theory came around 1900, when it was discovered that Cantorian set theory gave rise to
several contradictions
Bertrand Russell and Ernst Zermelo independently found the simplest and best known paradox, now called Russell’s
Paradox: consider “the set of all sets that are not members of themselves”.
The ultimate paradox was found by Russell in 1902 (and found independently by Zermelo). It simplify defined a set A = {X|
X is not a member of X}
Russell used his paradox as a theme in his 1903 review of continental mathematics in his The Principles of Mathematics
Zermelo in 1908 was the first to attempt an axiomatisation of set theory
Godel showed, in 1940, that the axiom of Choice cannot be disproved using the other
Where it is desirable to refer to a set as an indivisible entity, one typically denotes it by a single capital letter. By convention,
particular symbols are reserved for the most important sets of numbers:
∅ - Empty set
∁ - Complex Numbers
N – Natural Numbers
R – Real Numbers
OPERATION OF SETS
UNION OF SET
The union of two sets would be wrote as A ∪ B, which is the set of elements that are members of A or B, or both too.
Example:
S1 S2 S1 ∪ B
INTERSECTION OF SET
Example:
S1 S2 S1 ∩ B
S1 S2 S1 – S2
----------------------------------------------------------- End of
Lesson 5 ---------------------------------------------------------
LOGIC AND SET THEORY
Name: ____________________ Date: May 04, 2020
Section: ____________________ Score: __________
Out of Forty students, 14 are taking English Composition and 29 are taking Chemistry.
a. if five students are in both classes, how many students are in neither class?
c. what is the probability that a randomly chosen student from this group is taking only the Chemistry class?
A ∩U =A A ∪ ∅= A
DOMINATION LAW
A ∪ U=U A ∩∅=∅
IDEMPOTENT LAW
A ∪ A= A A ∩ A=A
COMPLEMENTATION LAW
´
( A)= A
COMMUTATIVE LAWS
A ∪ B=B ∪ A A ∩ B=B ∩ A
ASSOCIATIVE LAWS
A ∪ ( B ∪ C )=( A ∪ B ) ∪C A ∩ ( B∩ C )= ( A ∩ B ) ∩C
DISTRIBUTIVE LAWS
A ∪ ( A ∩B )= A A ∩ ( A ∪ B )= A
COMPLEMENT LAWS
A ∪ Á=U A ∩ Á=∅
PROVING SET IDENTITIES
Different Ways to Prove Set Identities:
1. Prove each set (side of the identity) is a subset of the other
2. Use set builder notation and propositional logic
3. Membership Tables: Verify that elements in the same combination of sets always either belong or do not belong to the
same side of the identity. Use 1 to indicate it is in the set and 0to indicate that it is not.