International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volume 120 No. 5 2018, 1217-1224

ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)
url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/
Special Issue
http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON CONFESSION UNDER INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT

1872
1
KARTHIKEYAN K, 2Ms.ROJA
1
BA LLB(hons), Saveetha School Of Law, Saveetha University ,Saveetha institute of medical and
technical sciences, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
2
Assistant Professor, BA,BL,LLM,PG,CF.IS, Saveetha School Of Law, Saveetha University ,
Saveetha institute of medical and technical sciences, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
1
Karthikeyankumaran1999@gmail.com, 2rojak.ssl@saveetha.com

ABSTRACT
Confession of witnesses and the denounced is an essential determinant in the
proclamation of blame in a Criminal Justice Trial. The extension and the parameters of
'Admission' and the confession booth proclamations have gone past the limits of the
traditional Sections 24, 25, 27 and Sections 161, 164, 167 in the Indian Evidence Act,1872
and the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 individually. With the emergence of new
logical systems like Brain Fingerprinting, Brain Mapping, Narco-Analysis, Lie locators, and
so forth to trace the correct data for reasons for verification of data and tolerability as bit of
confirmation in the cases, a requirement for getting changes both the arrangements of
Procedural Codes previously mentioned is a rising idea. Advance ' Confession' is an idea
firmly interrelated to the worries of Part III rights revered in the Constitution of India, under
Article 20(3), 21 and so forth. The gross-misuse of the forces of the examining offices
(police) and the mishandle of counter-psychological oppression laws in the nation like the
(canceled) POTA and TADA which are currently struck for the gross infringement of
Fundamental Rights under Article 14 and 21 because of their natural ideas from the privileges
of charged under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has
acknowledged certainty that 'Confession booth Statements' expected impact the whole
discoveries and choices of theCriminal Trials. In this manner in different case laws the Courts
in India the significance of Voluntary Confessions, Prevention of Retraction from
Confessions, staying away from coercion and utilization of third degree constrain by the
police while the blamed is in care. The significance of confession booth explanation by the
witnesses is reflected in the Supreme Courts concern to bring in Witness Protection
Mechanism for motivations behind the criminal equity framework.

1217
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

KEYWORDS
Confession, criminal justice, frame work, Supreme Court, fundamental right

INTRODUCTION
Police cross examination constitutes a vital piece of the current criminal equity
framework. In spite of the fact that Confirming law.The Indian Evidence Act 1872 and
CriminalProcedure Code 1973 don't cast much weight on any announcement leaving an-
accused individual while cross examined by the police which in legitimate terms isn't
considered asan acceptable piece of confirmation according to Section 25(1) of the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872. In any case police personals are applying third degree strategy to
extricate statement which may encourage the examination. In India such affirmations are visit
that they torture accused under guardianship to inspire confession booth articulation, however
it is made to a magistrate and that legal officer needs to keep up some affability and take after
the set request given under Cr.P.C. when recording confession booth explanation, however it
is made to a magistrate and that legal officer needs to keep up some thoughtfulness and take
after the set request given under Cr.P.C. when recording confession booth articulation of any
person.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Whether the confession to the police officers is to be proved or not.

OBJECTIVE
1) To study on confession and then it’s irrelevant
2) To study on when confession proved to the police officers and its relavent
3) To study on confession by accused while in custody of police where proved against
him

HYPOTHESIS
HA: The confession to the police officers to be proved

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1) Critical analysis of confession under IEA, Mr.S.G. Goundappanavar, June,2014
Confession under Indian evidence act1872 which also deals with police atrocities and
criminal case which have been filed against the accused person and guilty main of an

1218
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

accused person are deals with Indian evidence act and custody are inadmissible of
articles 20(3) of Indian constitution.
2) Confession appears for the first time in section 24 of IEA, Shraddha
Section 24 of Indian evidence act of confession deals with the judicial confession and extra-
judicial confession and legal proceedings of the plea who has a guilty mind on
arrangements of a particular person.
3) The Indian police: A critical evaluation, A.Varma, 2005
Design of adaptability of police officers and their structural problems, capabilities and
performance of British rulers and colonial powers they are corrupt and has brutal
practices.
4) Critical analysis on confession, Arupan Gupta,2014
Accused person in authority and inducement of promise and reasonable in bargaining the
criminal procedure of charge of the accused person who has a offences in the police
officers
5) Confession under Indian evidence act 1872, vol 3, Ritishkumar, shashikanth
Confession is headed by the police officers in the custody of the accused person ,confession
given the accused person is distinguished in oral and documentary format and with
suggestions of relevant evidence and act committed by accused person.

INTERROGATION BY POLICE AND CONFESSIONS

The announcements made to the police are not conceded for the reasons for allowable
bits of proof as can be followed from perusing Section 162(3) Of Cr. P.C with Section 25the
Indian Evidence Act. Articulations to police not to be marked: Use of explanations
inevidence.A plain perusing of segments 61 and 167 of the Cr.P.C. uncovers that the police
investigation of the offences on account of a man captured without warrant ought to be
completed in the principal case inside 24 hours under area 61 or if not then inside 15days
under segment 167. Any cop making an examination may look at orally any individual
expected to be familiar with the actualities and conditions of the case, the finding can from
that point be illustrated in composing however these statements aren't to be marked by the
creator of such proclamations under Segment 162 (2). Segment 161 (2) gives what civilities
ought to be trailed by cop when making oral examination. A person during oral examination
might will undoubtedly answer all inquiries identifying with the case put to him by the
concerned cop, other than questions the responses to which would have a propensity to
uncover him/her to a criminal allegation or to a punishment or relinquishment. Any statement

1219
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

made to a cop can't be utilized for any reason for any request or trial in regard of any offence
under scrutiny. This announcement might be used to contradict such witness. [Section 162 of
the Cr.P.C]

CONFESSION IN POLICE CUSTODY

The Evidence Act gives a few shields with regards to the time when a man is
interrogated by police. While cross examining a speculate the scrutinising must not be
coercive or excessively scary. The police ought not remove confirmation or admission by
third degree method. Explanation made to cop by the accused isn't allowable in confirm aside
from that piece of the announcement which drives to discovery of implicating material.The
alert with regards to the suitability of confession made to a cop is proposed to secure the
denounced individual against third degree method by the police. The proving law is clear in
that an admission made to a cop isn't permissible, yet it can be utilized as a part of
confirmation of the thing recuperated as a result of the admission made to a cop by the
charged. In this way if a weapon utilized in a number of cases is recuperated by the police
because of admission made by a blamed individual, the recuperation is a pertinent bit of
confirmation. In this manner it would nor not be right to say that the arrangements of the
Evidence Act unmistakably censure the police and don't keep trust on them. In the event that
we read together the arrangements of the Constitution and the Evidence Act, the message is
clear. There is no command under the plan of the Constitution andEvidence Act that a man
can be undermined, tormented or any route controlled to extract any sort of explanation
which has implicating sway on the arrested or blamed individual. In any case, the miserable
and the awful piece of the story is that despite the arrangements of theConstitution and
Evidence Act, Police is applying third degree strategy, which renders the authentication of a
genuine and bona fide admission by the blamed, the observers under suspicion and the whole
criminal procedures under legal displays. The practicality of Indian Prisons and Police
custodial torment has turned out to be endemic to the point that consistently numerous
individuals kicked the bucket of or seriously harmed of police torment. In view of different
reasons third degree strategy is by and by. In any case solidified lawbreakers have some
training to survive extreme treatment thus, police can't extricate data from them without the
guide of third degree technique. This implies a huge level of confession booth explanations
that are made will be made automatic out of the extraordinary pressure that is forced behind
the bars or while in police guardianship. Other than this admissions of the witnesses
additionally continue changing by the impact and the circuitous weight that the criminals or

1220
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

denounced in the prominent cases can practice by goodness of their high societal position
Secondly , police captures a few people and undermines to torment or torment them as a
result of inspiring cash and numerous pure individuals on premise of constrained Confessions
are arrested by police and rebuffed by the courts. This sort of affirmation has been frequently
leveled against police. Thirdly, normal people have some average ethos with reference to
how criminals should be dealt with by the police.A extensive area of police intensely
consider that police can't be successful on the off chance that they do not take depend on
extreme treatment against solidified criminals.Fourthly, criminal equity arrangement of the
Indian sub-mainland depends on theAnglo-Saxon accusatorial framework under which the
focal point of the legal isn't on truth, yet on proof and this makes the 'Confessionary
Statements' to be conceded as-evidence as critical in Criminal Adjudication.

RECORDING OF STATEMENT
The law gives that the confession booth explanation should be recorded "either in
writing or any mechanical or electronic gadget like tapes, tapes or soundtracks from out of
which sound or pictures can be repeated" (Sec.32 (1) POTA). This is the verbatim replication
of the applicable arrangement in the TADA Act (Section 15 (1)), except for the expansion of
the word 'electronic'. As indicated by both these arrangements just a police officer not bring
down in rank than a Superintendent of Police can record the admission.

OTHER CONSIDERATION
These procedural shields don't deplete the security offered to the accused.Though
custodial admissions are allowable in prove, it is still for the court to decide on its worthiness
or evidentiary or probative esteem. Under the appropriate , be that as it may, the evidentiary
estimation of custodial admissions is held to be unimpeachable. It was frequently contended
that a confession booth proclamation being recorded by a cop is a powerless sort of
confirmation and should dependably be authenticated before basing a conviction. In a
progression of cases, the Supreme Court has held that once the confessional statement is
observed to be intentional and honest, it ends up substantive confirmation and does does not
require any validation, and the creator of an admission can be sentenced on such
uncorroborated admission.

1221
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

INCREASING VULNERABILITY TO CUSTODIAL TORTURE

As a signatory to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment, India has resolved to not do anything that is
inconsistent with its protest and reason. The denial of torment is total and may not be
suspended regardless of how deplorable the wrongdoing for which somebody has been
arrested, even in circumstances of crisis .However there is little uncertainty that torment and
other pitiless, cruel and degrading treatment keep on being endemic all through India.
Incomparable Court requests, NHRC guideline and authority sanctions have not discouraged
authorities from exacting torment on individuals in their guardianship. The Mali math
Committee's suggestions talked about beneath may additionally build powerlessness to
torment.

CONFESSION UNDER MEDIA TRIAL

While shedding the worn out old cover of bookkeeping proof the Courts inIndia have
as of late begun perceiving the significance of confession booth statements made in media.
The Supreme Court included another, and noteworthy, part to the conservative criminal
statute and given a part to the media in criminal trials by ruling that meetings given by a
denounced to TV channels could be thought about proof by courts.

CONCLUSION
On a closing note it is well-suited to express that the significance of confession can
never be undermined for the reasons for a criminal trial. Admission under theCriminal
Procedure Code, 1973 has numerous features to it. It has a key an incentive in the
CriminalJustice System, and in this manner the sacredness of the validness of confessionary
explanations be kept up and the consistent procedure of evolvement of new structures and
components of remembering confessionary confirm, might well be adjusted in the standard
arrangements of the current Procedural laws and the whole evidential law in the nation.
InIndia, the significance and the holy of the admission is all the more vital for the reason that
the Law implementing office is the same as the examining office is both vested in the police.
So now and again the over energy and the tension of the police agency is reflected in their
curse of intense means and falling back to the utilization of third degree violence for the
reasons for the withdrawing and drawing out the admission out of the accused people in
authority or the one's gone up against police remand.

1222
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

REFERENCE
1) Critical analysis of confession under IEA, Mr.S.G. Goundappanavar, June,2014
2) Confession appears for the first time in section 24 of IEA, Shraddha
3) The Indian police: A critical evaluation, A.Varma, 2005
4) Critical analysis on confession, Arupan Gupta,2014
5) Confession under Indian evidence act 1872, vol 3, Ritishkumar, shashikanth
6) Confessions, Manu Gupta, September 15, 2015
7) Indian evidence act, 1872-confessions, Admin lawn, September 1, 2014
8) Section 24 of Indian evidence act,1872, Shantanu chakrat
9) In custody law, impurity and prisoner abuse in South Asia, Nitya
Ramakrishnan,2013
10) Delhi judicial service pre-exam, Dr.Lal and Abhinav Misra,2002
11) Delhi assistant public prosecutors recruitment test, Abhinav Mishra,2010
12) West Bengal judicial service pre-exam, Dr.Lal & Misra
13) Pratiyogata darpa ,December, 2009
14) Text book on law of evidence, M.Monir, 2012
15) The Indian evidence act , No.1 of 1872, Sri Henry Stewart,Cunningham,1873
16) https://www.scribd.com/doc/3936103/The-law-of-Confession
17) http://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/KLIBEL7_Law-35.pdf
18) http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/7860/11/11_chapter%204.pdf
19) http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1547/Confession-under-Indian-
Evidence-Act.html
20) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2758057
21) Dr.Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S “In Vitro Evaluation of Anticariogenic
Activity of Acacia Catechu against Selected Microbes”, International Research
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No. 3 , Issue No. 3,
P.No 20-25, March 2018.
22) Trishala A , Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S,“ Physicochemical profile of Acacia
catechu bark extract –An In vitro study”, International Research Journal of
Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No. 3 , Issue No. 4, P.No 26-30,
April 2018.

1223
1224