Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Digital Self-Harm in Adolescents: Strategies of Prevention: Letter To Editor
Digital Self-Harm in Adolescents: Strategies of Prevention: Letter To Editor
Letter to Editor
Address for correspondence: Dr Sujita Kumar Kar, King George’s Medical University,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Email: drsujita@gmail.com
To the Editor
Digital self-harm is a form of digital aggression which is directed towards self [1]. In digital
self-harm behaviour, information technology largely influences this dangerous activity [2]. The
contents about hurting self, amounts to digital self-harm [2]. The purview of digital self-harm
is not limited to posting information related to hurting self; it also includes demean oneself, or
There is a single article found after a search of the PubMed database from the time of inception
till end of August 2020, using the search term “Digital self-harm” signifies the dearth research
on it. Here we aimed to discuss digital self-harm behaviour among adolescents [2].
Various risk factors have been identified in the context of digital self-harm, which is, to a larger
extent, modifiable. These factors are depression, cyberbullying, substance use, bullying and
abuse at school (which also includes issues related to sexual abuse & sexual bullying) as well
as deviant behaviours associated with adolescent age (juvenile delinquency) [2]. It has been
reported that the use of slangs (verbal abuse, bullying) is not uncommon in society, including
prestigious organizations like school [3]. The psychological trauma sustained through such
Media sometimes plays a detrimental role in digital self-harm; so, cautious and responsible
media coverage may be helpful in the prevention of digital self-harm. Strict media regulations
through cyber legislation may help prevent this emerging sensitive issue. It could be beneficial
in promoting good mental health as well as suicide prevention [4]. Though various cyber laws
exist, there is a need for intense monitoring to ensure successful implementation of these laws.
It has been reported that multiple apps (e.g., Yik Yak, Whisper & Secret) promote
cyberbullying [5,6]. There are also groups with similar behaviour (cutting communities, other
self-harm behaviours) that are engaged to share detrimental behaviours (1). The government
should keep a close watch on such apps and websites. Putting restriction on such websites and
educating the possible harmful consequences to children and adolescents at the school may be
Digital self-harm in adolescents is also a matter of concern in India. Reports suggest that many
Indian adolescents increasingly indulge in sexting, body shaming, traumatizing with vulgar
jokes and planning sexual assault in the online chat boxes, like other countries [7]. Such
cyberactivity (abuse) may traumatize the person (or group of persons) targeted and may
develop shame and guilt, which may, in turn, result in digital self-harm. The victim may display
the self-harm behaviour in an online platform, to punish or take revenge from the perpetrator.
Selection of a particular method of suicide largely influences the outcome of suicide. It has
been reported that people with self-harm behaviour often search for various means of
committing self-harm or suicide from online resources. Restricting the availability of such
The World Health Organization (WHO) had proposed certain recommendations for the
management of self-harm and suicide [9]; which are very relevant in the context of digital self-
139
harm, too. The table below summarizes the recommendations by WHO for the prevention of
Also, there is a need to understand the self-harm behaviour under the umbrella of Antecedent-
relational difficulty, stress, role models, provocation (stimulus). Individuals who go for digital
self-harm anticipate certain consequences (e.g., revenge, getting attention). Prevention of self-
harm, including suicide among adolescents, is the ultimate goal of management, which can be
achieved by addressing the antecedents, which led to self-harm behaviour in the first place.
Specific treatment of digital self-harm is a narrow domain of prevention, and the existing
evidence reveals that psychosocial as well as pharmacological treatment has little role in the
management of self-harm [10]. The factors that attribute to self-harm need to be identified in
adolescents, and it needs to be addressed universally. Parenting does play a role in the
regulation of digital self-harm among children and adolescents. Neglectful and authoritarian
parenting may promote digital self-harm; whereas the authoritative parenting (allowing the
child as well as controlling the behaviour of the child; caring attitude towards the emotional
needs of the child and setting limits) is associated with better regulation of digital self-harm
[11,12]. There is a need to regulate the selling of alcohol to adolescents as well as parental
control of adolescents to use alcohol in their home settings. Alcohol use increases the risk of
violence, abuse, bullying, as well as sexual crimes, which in turn increases the risk of self-harm
behaviour.
The challenges in dealing with digital self-harm behaviour are that there are no consensus or
self-harm / suicidal behaviour, the strategies followed in dealing with suicidal or self-harm
behaviour are to be adopted for its management. There is a need to formulate recommendations
for the prevention of digital self-harm, as it is not the replica of suicide or deliberate self-harm.
140
References
1. Pater J, Mynatt E. Defining digital self-harm. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM
Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2017.
p. 1501–13.
141
2. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Digital self-harm among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017,
61:761–6.
3. Kar SK, Arafat SY, Menon V. Psychological Underpinning of Slanging. Indian J
Psychol Med. 2020.
4. Maloney J, Pfuhlmann B, Arensman E, Coffey C, Gusmão R, Poštuvan V, et al. How
to Adjust Media Recommendations on Reporting Suicidal Behavior to New Media
Developments. Arch Suicide Res 2014, 18:156–69.
5. Meldrum RC, Patchin JW, Young JT, Hinduja S. Bullying Victimization, Negative
Emotions, and Digital Self-Harm: Testing a Theoretical Model of Indirect Effects.
Deviant Behavior. 2020;1–19.
6. John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, et al. Self-
Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People:
Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018, 20(4):e129.
7. Memon AM, Sharma SG, Mohite SS, Jain S. The role of online social networking on
deliberate self-harm and suicidality in adolescents: A systematized review of literature.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2018, 60:384.
8. Biddle L, Gunnell D, Owen-Smith A, Potokar J, Longson D, Hawton K, et al.
Information sources used by the suicidal to inform choice of method. J Affect Disord
2012, 136:702–9.
9. WHO | Self harm and suicide [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 12]. Available from:
https://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/evidence/suicide/en/
10. Hawton K, Saunders KE, O’Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet.
2012, 379:2373–82.
11. Jeffery CP. Parenting in the digital age: Between socio-biological and socio-
technological development. New Media & Society. 2020.
12. Zurcher JD, Holmgren HG, Coyne SM, Barlett CP, Yang C. Parenting and
cyberbullying across adolescence. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018, 21:294–303.
Sujita Kumar Kar, Associate Professor, Department of psychiatry, King George’s Medical
University, Lucknow-226003, Uttar Pradesh, India. S.M. Yasir Arafat, Assistant Professor,
Department of Psychiatry, Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka-1340, Bangladesh.