The document provides a rubric to evaluate essays on four criteria - content, reasoning, and writing - at one of four levels: poor/unsatisfactory, basic/satisfactory, solid/good, or expert/excellent. Each level includes descriptors of the characteristics that would qualify the essay for that level in terms of addressing content, use of reasoning and synthesis, clarity of writing, and proper use of terminology.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate essays on four criteria - content, reasoning, and writing - at one of four levels: poor/unsatisfactory, basic/satisfactory, solid/good, or expert/excellent. Each level includes descriptors of the characteristics that would qualify the essay for that level in terms of addressing content, use of reasoning and synthesis, clarity of writing, and proper use of terminology.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate essays on four criteria - content, reasoning, and writing - at one of four levels: poor/unsatisfactory, basic/satisfactory, solid/good, or expert/excellent. Each level includes descriptors of the characteristics that would qualify the essay for that level in terms of addressing content, use of reasoning and synthesis, clarity of writing, and proper use of terminology.
The essay illustrates poor The essay illustrates rudimentary The essay illustrates solid The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course understanding of the course material understanding of the course understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or by: (1) mentioning, but not fully material by correctly: (1) material by thoroughly and incorrectly addressing the relevant explaining, the relevant content; (2) addressing most of the relevant correctly: (1) addressing the content; (2) failing to identify or identifying some of the key content; (2) identifying and relevant content; (2) identifying inaccurately explaining/defining concepts/ideas (though failing to fully explaining most of the key and explaining all of the key key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or or accurately explain many of them); concepts/ideas; (3) using correct concepts/ideas; (3) using correct incorrectly explaining key (3) using terminology, though terminology; (4) explaining the terminology; (4) explaining the points/claims and the reasoning sometimes inaccurately or reasoning behind most of the key reasoning behind key behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating points/claims; and (5) (where points/claims; and (5) (where inappropriately using terminology. some key claims/points, but failing to necessary or useful) necessary or useful) substantiating explain the reasoning behind them (or substantiating some points with points with several accurate and doing so inaccurately). accurate examples. original examples.
The essay reflects substandard or The essay reflects basic reasoning by: The essay reflects fairly strong The essay reflects expert poor reasoning by: (1) failing to (1) synthesizing some of the material, reasoning by: reasoning by: synthesize the material or doing so though remains vague and (1) synthesizing material, (2) (1) synthesizing material; (2) inaccurately; (2) failing to make undeveloped; (2) making a few making appropriate connections making connections between connections between connections between between some of the key relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) ideas/claims/points or doing so ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and inaccurately; and (3) failing to inaccurately connecting others; (3) accurately evaluating the thorough evaluation of the evaluate the issue or problem. evaluating the issue/problem at a very issue/problem; and (4) relevant issue or problem; (4) basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring identifying ad discussing key identifying and discussing assumptions and implications. assumptions and/or implications. important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.
The essay does not communicate The essay is often unclear and difficult The essay is mostly clear as a The essay is clear, and concise as ideas/points clearly due to: (1) to follow due to: (1) some result of: (1) appropriate use of a result of: (1) appropriate and inappropriate use of terminology inappropriate terminology and/or terminology and minimal precise use of terminology; (2) and vague language; (2) reliance on vague language; (2) ideas sometimes vagueness; (2) minimal number absence of tangents and coherence disjointed and incomprehensible being fragmented, wondering and/or of tangents and lack of of thoughts; and (3) logical thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack repetitive; and (3) poor organization. repetition; and (3) fairly good organization of ideas and thoughts. of recognizable organization. organization