Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bloque Ii The Skeleton of The Message Unit 4 - Syntactic Elements and Structures of The Clause
Bloque Ii The Skeleton of The Message Unit 4 - Syntactic Elements and Structures of The Clause
Bloque Ii The Skeleton of The Message Unit 4 - Syntactic Elements and Structures of The Clause
The single independent clause (or simple sentence) is divided into two main parts. The SUBJECT (S) and the
PREDICATOR (P). Syntactically, these are the two main functional elements.
SUBJECT
Semantically and communicatively, the subject encodes the main participant in the clause.
The subject has the highest claim to the status of TOPIC
PREDICATE
It can consist of…
o Only the PREDICATOR, realised by a verbal group
o The PREDICATOR + one or more other elements, determined by the predicator.
The predicate tends to be the most informative part of the clause
The two main functional categories which occur in post-verbal position are the OBJECT (O) and the
COMPLEMENT (C).
These elements are syntactically and semantically required to complete the clause and they are determined by
the predicator (which is not the case with the Adjuncts).
OBJECT
There are two main types of objects: the Direct Object (Od) and the Indirect object (Oi).
In English, the Oi precedes the Od.
Semantically, they encode the key participants in the event other than the subject (animate or
inanimate, concrete or abstract). Examples:
COMPLEMENTS
Complements encode those constituents that semantically are not participants (rather they
characterise or identify the Subject or the Object) but which are required syntactically and
semantically.
There are two types of Complements:
o The Complement of the Subject or the Subject Complement (Cs).
o The Complement of the Object or the Object Complement (Co).
ADJUNCTS
Sometimes there are some elements which can be omitted without affecting the syntactic and semantic
acceptability of the clause: the ADJUNCTS
The criteria adopted for the classification of clause functions are four:
1. Determination by the verb
2. Position
3. Ability to become the subject
4. Realization of these functions
The number and type of objects and complements that can occur in a clause are determined by the verb
according to its POTENTIAL or VALENCY. We can distinguish three classes or verbs:
TRANSITIVE VERBS: They usually require one or more objects (Od, Oi, C). Transitive verbs occur in one
of the following forms:
o S-P-Od > I carry a bag
o S-P-Oi-Od > I’ll send you a postcard
o S-P-O-C > I find it beautiful
INTRANSITIVE VERBS: They do not admit objects but sometimes they predict a complement of space
or time (a LOCATIVE ELEMENT)
o The plane landed
COPULAR VERBS: A type of intransitive verb that requires a Subject Complement (Cs), or, in some
cases a Locative/Goal element (Cloc).
Note that certain verbs have both transitive and intransitive uses: He broke my heart vs. When I heard the
truth, my heart broke.
A locative element is a type of complement required by a few transitive verbs such us put and place
(Put/place the bag on the table)
It is also predicted by many intransitive verbs of motion such as come, go, fly, drive, which can predict
such meaning as Direction (flying south) and Goal (go to Rome)
Besides predicting an attribute, some copular verbs of being such as be, remain and stay predict being
in a location
o Attribute > He stayed calm She went pale
o Locative/Goal > He stayed in bed She went to work
The difference between a Locative and an Adjunct is that Locatives are required by the verb, while
Adjuncts can be omitted.
Moreover, adjuncts differ from subjects and objects in that there is no limit to the number of adjuncts
that can be included in a clause.
2. POSITION
The second criteria for the classification of clause functions is the POSITION:
Objects occur immediately after the verb, with the indirect object before the direct object when both
are presented.
Adjuncts occupy different positions according to the type, and are often moveable within the clause.
Examples:
o Peter saw you > SVOd
o Jane send you a letter > SVOiOd
o Yesterday, Rose kissed you > ASVOd
o He told you a joke in the bar > SVOdOiA
The third criteria for the classification of clause functions is the ABILITY TO BECOME THE SUBJECT:
The fourth criteria for the classification of clause functions is the REALISATION OF THESE FUNCTIONS.
Objects are typically realised by NGs and answer questions with what? who? or which?
o What did they carry? (the students carried backpacks.)
Subject and Object Complements can be realised by Adjective groups (AdjG) or by a NG.
o The map (NG) was useful (AdjG)
Circumstantial Adjuncts are realised by PPs or AdvGs and sometimes NGs. They generally answer
questions with where? How? Why?
o He drives on the right (PP) / slowly (AdvG)
o I’ll see you next week (NG)
Clausal elements of functions enter into varied relationships with each other to express different types of
proposition concerning different states of affairs:
S-P Sam ǀ died
S-P-Od We ǀ ate ǀ an apple
S-P-Oi-Od You ǀ gave ǀ them ǀ a present
S-P-Cs My car ǀ is ǀ a Ford
S-P-A Noa ǀ left ǀ one month ago
S-P-Od-Co They ǀ found ǀ the play ǀ amusing
S-P-Od-Cloc You ǀ place ǀ the focus ǀ on specific parts of a page
When dealing with clause elements, we must be aware that there are PROTOTYPICAL and NON-
PROTOTYPICAL realisations:
It is true that most functions are typically realised by a certain class of unit, but with the exception of the
predicator function (which is always realised by a verbal group), there is no one-to-one correspondence
between class or unit and syntactic function in English: each function can be realised by different classes of
unit, and each unit can perform various functions.
The Predicator syntactically determines the number and type of Objects and Complements in a clause. It is
syntactically identified by position and concord and it is associated with a number of semantic domains.
The Subject is the functional category of the clause of which something is predicated.
It represents the primary participant in the clause and has the cognitive status of Topic
In basic clauses (finite, active and declarative) the subject has the semantic function of Agent.
But the subject can be associated with almost every type of participant role.
Syntactic Features
In English, the Subject is obligatory in declarative and interrogative clauses, but not in the imperative.
When two or more clauses with the same subject are conjoined, it can be omitted, in all but the first
one.
o She entered the room, closed the door and opened the window
In question tags, the subject is referred anaphorically by a pronoun
o His cousin is a pilot, isn’t he?
In declaratives and wh- questions (in which the wh- element is subject), the subject is placed before
the finite verb
o Unfortunately, everybody was gone when I arrived
o Who called you yesterday?
In yes/no questions and in wh- questions (in which the wh- element is not subject), the subject is
placed after the finite operator
o Are you happy with the exam?
o What subjects are you taking this semester (What subject is Object)
Subject pronouns (I, you, he, she, it, we, they) realise the subject function whereas object pronouns
(me, him, her, it, us…) are used as Objects
The Subject determines number (singular or plural) and person agreement with the verb
o The student has learned the lesson
o The students have learned the lesson
Paradigmatic contrast with a present form is applied with verb forms that show no number or person
contrast.
o The time had all passed > The time has all passed
Subjects determine number, person and gender agreement with the Subject Complement, and of
reflexive pronouns Cs, Oi and Od.
o John and Paula are his parents
o Why don’t you give yourselves (Od) a break?
A. Nominal Groups
These are the most prototypical function of the subject as they mainly refer to persons and things. They can
range from simple heads to complex NG structures.
B. Dummy it
Non-referential or semantically empty use of the pronoun it that occurs in expressions of time, weather and
distance.
C. Unstressed there
It cannot be replaced by a pronoun but it fulfils the following criteria: position, inversion with auxiliaries and
repetition in tag questions
It usually specifies time and place but it can also denote instrumental meanings and idiomatic manner uses.
E. Adjectival head
When preceded by a definite determiner, certain adjectives that represent conventionally recognised classes of
people (the elderly) or abstraction can function as heads of (non-prototypical) NGs.
F. Embedded clauses
Extraposition is frequent in speech and writing, especially to avoid long and heavy subjects.
Extraposition is obligatory in clauses with it + verbs of seeming (seem, appear) and happening (happen, turn
out)
It seems that they were fine after all (*That they were fine after all seems)
It so happened that the pilot lost the race (*That the pilot lost the race happened)
The Predicator is present in all major types of clause, including the imperative. It may be transitive, intransitive
or copular.
It is the most central of all constituents after the subject and the predicator
It occurs only in transitive clauses with transitive verbs: hit, buy, send
It goes right after the predicator, but it follows the Oi if there is one.
o I have sent the letters
o I have sent you all (Oi) a letter (Od)
It is typically realised by a NG, as in I know the truth, but it may also be realised by embedded clauses,
as in I know what you mean
It can be ‘promoted’ to become subject in a passive clause
o The letters (S) have been sent.
They can be tested for, by Wh-questions (Who(m), What? Which? How much/many?) and by clefts
o What did you send?
o What I send where the letters (wh-cleft)
SEMANTIC FEATURES
It is associated with several semantic roles in which ‘affectedness’ is not a feature and with many
types of verbs
o He headed the ball into the goal (Affected)
o The burglars used a crowbar to break into the house (Instrument)
o I felt chills all over my body (Phenomenon)
o The government wants to give a push to the economy and employment (Range)
o He swam the Mediterranean sea (Affected Locative)
The highly non-prototypical Range Ods include have a rest/smoke/drink; take a sip/nap; give a
kick/nudge; do a dance; and many others. The NG in these cases is a deverbal noun (i.e. derived from
the verb) which follows a verb that is ‘light’ in semantic content such as have.
Speech act deverbal nouns such as promise and warning are commonly used as Ods
o She made a promise
o They issued a warning letter
A. Nominal Group. This is the Od typical realisation, ranging from a pronoun 1 or proper name to full NGs 2. A
longer and more complex NGs may also be possible in certain registers 3.
1) I don’t understand that.
2) Have you read the newspaper article I sent you?
3) Poaching is threatening the world’s remaining population of whales.
A few verbs take untypical Ods such as have (They have two dogs), cost (It costs twenty euros), lack (He lacks
ideas), resemble (He resembles his grandfather), fit (Do these pants fit me?), suit (That colour suits you well),
weigh (She weighs sixty kilos), contain (That box contains your gift), and measure (It measures one metre by
two). These verbs don’t passivize, but their Ods pass the wh-cleft test: What he lacks is ideas.
B. Anticipatory it. It is necessary as an ‘anticipatory Od’ in SPOdCO structures in which the Od is realised by a
finite or non-finite clause:
D. Finite Clause.
Two types:
Nominal that-clauses (that often omitted in informal English)
o They fear that there may be many casualties. (nominal that-clause)
Wh-clauses
o No-one knows what his job is (wh-clause)
o You can do whatever you want (wh-nominal clause)
Both that-clauses and wh-clauses at Od can sometimes become a subject in a passive clause and then
extraposed:
E. Non-finite clause.
Two types:
Infinitive clauses (with or without to)
o Many people prefer to travel by plane
-Ing clauses
o Mane people prefer travelling by plane
Many embedded clauses at Od occur with an explicit subject of their own (when the implicit subject is not the
same of the main clause):
To-infinitive clause
o The population wants to have clean streets (implicit subject – they)
o The population wants the government to solve the rubbish problem (explicit subject -the
government)
-ing-clause
o Do you mind waiting outside (with implicit subject)
o Do you mind me/my waiting outside? (with explicit subject in objective or possessive case)
to- infinitive or -ing clause
o She loves telling the truth (implicit subject)
o She loves people telling the truth (explicit subject)
o She loves for people to tell the truth (for + explicit subject + to-inf) (AmE)
*Non-finite clauses are very non-prototypical Ods as they represent situations, not entities and do not easily
passivize. However, many can become the focus of a wh-cleft
It occurs only with verbs that take 2 objects (give, send). Its position is between the verb and the Od:
o I sent him an e-mail
It is typically realised by a NG, but occasionally by a wh-nominal clause.
It is associated with 2 semantic roles: recipient and beneficiary or ‘intended recipient’.
In passives, the Recipient Oi corresponds to the subject.
Both Recipient and beneficiary Oi have an optional prepositional paraphrase (Op). for the Recipient,
the preposition is to, for the Beneficiary it is for.
o The doctor gave oxygen to the injured man I’ll buy drinks for you all.
o She lent a few CDs to her neighbour He got the tickets for us all.
The Oi can generally be left unexpressed without affecting the grammaticality of the clause
o The doctor gave oxygen I’ll buy the drinks
o He doesn’t like lending his CDs He got the tickets
Both Recipient and Beneficiary Ois are typically realised by NGs and less typically by wh- nominal relative
clauses.
More marginally, a recipient Oi can be realised by a non-finite -ing clause or a PP, but not in the case of a
Beneficiary Oi, which always refers to an entity:
I’m giving using social networks less interest lately (-ing cl)
Let’s give after the break more preference (PP)
6.3 PREPOSITIONAL VERBS AND THE PREPOSITIONAL COMPLEMENT (PC) or OBJECT (OP)
Many common verbs in English take a specific preposition. They are called prepositional verbs. The preposition
+ the following NG are often analysed as the Prepositional Complement (PC). Alternatively, the verb and
preposition are seen as a whole and the following NG as the Object mediated by a preposition (PO).
This combination functions as a lexical unit in which the verb + the preposition has a different meaning from
their separate words. ‘Take after’ has nothing to do with take, nor with the usual meaning of ‘after’.
I came across some old toys (find) He takes after his father (resemble)
Paul has come into a fortune (inherit) I’ve gone off milk (lose the liking of)
Type B (rely + on)
This is a less idiomatic combination. Verbs in this group - account for (explain), refer to, tamper with (interfere
with) – are not used without their specific preposition.
How do you account for their lack of interest in the country’s politics?
Someone has been tampering with the printer.
It represents a special use (usually with a distinctive meaning) of a verb that can function without the
preposition such as laugh (at), look (at), believe (in)
Type A: the verb + prep. Behave syntactically as one unit, whereas the PP ‘after the dog’ does not in
fronting, focus of a cleft, wh-question adverb insertion
Acceptable Unacceptable
Fronting: My dog Luke looked after *After my do Luke looked
Focus of a cleft It’s my dog (that) my neighbour *it’s after my dog (that) my neighbour looked.
looked after.
Wh-question Whose dog did my neighbour *After whose dog did my neighbour look?
look after?
Adverb insertion My neighbour looked after my ?My neighbour looked carefully after my dog
dog carefully
Type B: the PP can function as an independent unit, but the effect is marked and very formal
Formal Informal
Fronting: On Tom you can rely Tom you can rely on
Focus of a cleft It’s on Tom (that) you can rely It’s Tom you can rely on
Wh-question On whom can you rely? Who can you rely on?
Adverb insertion You can totally rely on Tom Who can you totally rely on?
Type C: syntactically, the PP functions in the same way as type B. however, the formal variant is at
odds with the type of verb that usually falls into this group
Formal Informal
Fronting: At John the partners laughed John the partners laughed at
Focus of a cleft It was John that they laughed It was John that they laughed at
Wh-question At whom did the partners laugh? Who did the partners laugh at?
The preposition is stranded when it stays close to its verb, that is, it is displaced from its position in a PP. This
can also occur in passive clauses and in relative clauses.
In many combinations, the NG complement of a PP can become subject in a passive clause. The preposition
then is obligatory stranded.
NGs are typical realisations of the Op, but nominal clauses and non-finite -ing clauses also occur:
He almost ran over an old lady in the city centre this morning (NG).
I strongly object to what they proposed (nominal clause).
She believes in getting things done well. (-ing clause)
There are various degrees of integration, from relatively integrated such as smile (at) and wait (for), where the
verb can function without a preposition, to those that form a new lexical unit with the preposition (look after,
take to)
The PP following type 3 verbs such as smile and wait is often classified as Adjunct or as prepositional
complement (PPC).
In this grammar, it is used the term prepositional Object for the NG complement of a preposition which can
refer to a participant, different from the circumstantial PP functioning as C loc or as Adjunct.
Phrasal verbs are combinations of a lexical verb and an adverbial ‘particle’ ( p) (get up, switch on/off,
take back, sit down). They may be:
o Intransitive with no object:
1) What time do you normally get up at the weekend?
o Transitive:
1) She switched off the computer / She switched the computer off
2) She switched it off
With a noun as Object, the particle may precede or follow the object, as in 1. But if the Object is a
pronoun, the particle is placed after it, as in 2. It should be remarked this choice has to do with
emphasis purposes.
o They cancelled the party (focus on party)
o The cancelled off the party (focus on party)
o They cancelled the party off (focus on off)
Some verb + particle combinations can be used both transitively and intransitively, e.g. blow up
(=explode), break down (=reduce to pieces)
o Terrorists blew up terminal 4 (transitive)
o The petrol station has blown up (intransitive)
They consist of a lexical verb followed by an adverbial particle and a preposition ( run up against, do away with).
They are characteristic of informal English and function like prepositional verbs, taking a prepositional object in
the clause
Many verbs can be followed by a PP functioning as a circumstantial Complement, as in They went to the park.
They express meanings of place, direction, times or means. They are generally questioned by Where, when, or
how, as opposed to What? Who? As is usual with Objects.
There is a parallel between intransitive phrasal like walk down and single verbs of movement followed by a
directional Complement (walk down the stairs)
It is the obligatory constituent which follows a copular verb and which cannot be made subject in a
passive clause
o Who’s that? It’s him/ It’s he
o He became a professional football player at an early age
It does not represent a new participant, but completes the predicate by adding information about the
subject referent.
It can be realised not only by a nominal group but also by an adjectival group (Adj. G).
As well as be and seem, several verbs can be used to link the subject to its Complement; these add
meanings of transition (become, get, got, grow, turn) and perception (sound, smell, look) among
others. The constituent following such verbs will be considered Cs if the verb can be replaced by be
and can’t stand alone, without a change of meaning.
o I know it sounds strange, but… (=is strange) *I know it sounds
o That looks good (=is good) *That looks
There is number agreement between the subject the subject and its Complement, and gender
agreement with a reflexive pronoun at complement, as in I am not myself today. But there are some
exceptions to number agreement:
o Ann and Peter make a good couple
o My neighbour’s dogs are a joy
Semantic criteria are applied to explain the use of a joy in My neighbours’ dogs are a joy, since
abstractions are equally applicable to singular or plural subjects.
A third type exemplified by expressions such as wool, cotton, rather an odd colour, the same
height/length, etc. can all be paraphrased by a PP with of (of wool, of rather an odd colour, of the
same height, etc.)
Copular verbs predict meanings of being something, describing or identifying the subject referent. The
Cs completes the predicate by providing information about the subject with regard to its Attributes or
its identity. The identifying type is typically reversible, the attribute is not:
o The ballet was excellent (attribute) *Excellent was the ballet
o The company was the Royal Ballet (identifying) *The Royal ballet was the company
When be is followed by an expression of location in space or time (in the park, at 11 o’clock) the Cs is
analysed as locative. Sometimes a circumstantial expression (out of order) is semantically equivalent to
an attribute one (e.g. broken).
Attributive subject complements are realised by AdjGs and NGs. Identifying Subject Complements can be
realised by NGs and by clauses.
*Ngs and AdjGs can occur as attributive or identifying Cs, in passive clauses derived from S-P-Od-Co structures:
You are regarded as the family’s best friend (We regard you as the family’s best friend)
There is number agreement between the Od and the nominal group realising the Co
Circumstances (S) have made (P) the sisters (Od) enemies (Co)
o But there are some exceptions: expressions of size, shape, colour, height, etc.
You haven’t made the pants the same colour as the jacket
The Co can characterise the Od by a qualitative attribute or by a substantive attribute expressing the
name or status of the object referent
o The Police found the criminal unwilling to declare (Qualitative)
o They have appointed Andrew as president (substantive)
o The kids left the room in a mess (Circumstantial)
Sometimes a Co realised by a prepositional phrase (The kids left the room in a mess) is similar in
meaning to an adjectival complement (The kids left the room untidy). We can distinguish its status as
Complement from the superficially similar realisation by an optional Adjunct (in ten minutes in The
kids left the room in ten minutes) by the intensive relationship linking the Od and its complement. This
can be tested by paraphrase with be (the room was in a mess; *The room was in ten minutes).
Nominal Co elements are sometimes introduced by the prepositions as or for, and are then analysed as
‘oblique’ Object Complements. Thus, the relationship between the NG and the verb is not direct, but mediated
by a preposition. Some verbs require it and for others like consider it is optional.
as+ NG Her friends regard her as their guru.
for + NG Do you take me for a complete fool?
UNIT 8 – ADJUNCTS
8.1 SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC FEATURES
It is common to find a number of adjuncts in a single clause. They can be omitted without affecting the
grammaticality of the clause
(If possible) we’ll see you (tomorrow evening) (after the class) (with Mark and Susan) (at the cinema main
entrance).
Semantically, adjuncts represent circumstances, specifications and comments of many different types which
are attendant on the verb or the whole clause.
Provide experiential details about the action or state described by the verb, and answer such questions as
where? when? how? why? and occasionally what? as in What does he want that for? What did they die of?
They are the most similar ones to clause constituents. Like subject and object, they may be the focus of a cleft.
So, in the example Ann got a dog last week, we may highlight each element except the verb, including the
adjunct of time. But other types of circumstantial adjunct don’t pass this test:
Non-finite -ing, -en and verbless clauses are more loosely integrated into the clause and can’t be made the
focus of a cleft (*It was scared out of their wits that they called us) as can other circumstantials, including to-
infinitive clauses (It was to tell us their news that they called us).
Supplementives are units that are set off from the main clause by a comma or a pause. The -ing and -en types,
as well as verbless clauses such as afraid to leave the house fall into this category.
Certain verbs predict a circumstantial element without which the clause in incomplete syntactically and
semantically. Then they have the status of Complement and are summarised here:
Location in place or time, after a verb of position such as be, stay, live, lie, etc.
o We live in difficult time
o The house is located near a lake.
Extent in time or place with verbs such as take as in, The recovery takes several days, or last, as in the
exam lasts (for) two hours, in which the preposition is optional. In discourse, the time duration may be
omitted if it is understood, as in Their marriage didn’t last, meaning ‘didn’t last for a long time’.
Direction and Goal after verbs of movement such as go, come or of movement + manner such as fly,
as in They flew north (direction), They flew to Paris (Goal)
Source in ‘He went out of the house’, ‘They flew from Gatwick airport’.
Manner with behave, as in, ‘He is behaving rather naughtily’. Also with one sense of treat, as in ‘The
policeman treated the prisoner badly’.
There is a strong tendency to add circumstantial information, even when it is not strictly required by syntactic
or semantic criteria for a single clause, but because it may be crucial for the development of the discourse. So,
instead of saying Mike disappeared, we might add an optional circumstantial such as among the tourists, under
the sea.
The conditional clause adjunct – as in If you don’t study hard, you are not much goo as a university student – is
necessary for a full understanding of the speaker’s intended meaning. Without it, the message is very different.
With verbs such as leave, arrive and go, Source, Goal and Location adjuncts are omitted if they can be inferred
from the context (haven’t you left/arrived/gone yet).
They express the speaker’s evaluation or content of the message, or the viewpoint adopted. Syntactically, they
remain separate from the clause. They are usually found before the clause or after it. But they can also be
placed parenthetically or between commas, within a clause or sentence.
1. Epistemic, stance adjuncts > they express the speaker’s opinion regarding the validity of the content,
commenting on the certainty, doubt, possibility and obviousness of the proposition:
a. Undoubtedly, she is the best ballet danced alive today.
2. Evidential adjuncts > they signal the source of knowledge or information. They range from the
speaker’s own experience or belief (In my view/ In my experience) to the beliefs of others (According
to… In the words of…)
a. According to the predictions, the unemployment rate will drop significantly the next year
3. Evaluative adjuncts > they reflect subjective or objective attitude of the speaker towards the content
and sometimes toward the addressee:
a. Surely you can give him a second chance
b. Broadly speaking, Spanish health system is one of the best in the world (objective)
Stance adjuncts can be realised by adverbs, prepositional phrases, finite and non-finite causes:
They tell us how the speaker or writer understands the semantic connection between two utterances, or part
of an utterance, while indicating the semantic relationship holding between them. They are connectors of
structure:
Between groups: Salvador Dali was a prodigious painter and furthermore a great intellectual.
Between clauses: The street sweepers are on strike; nevertheless, the rubbish will be collected.
Between sentences: she has been undergoing treatment for cancer since she was diagnosed with
breast cancer. Consequently, she was never operated on.
Between paragraphs: in addition to all this… First of all… In conclusion…
Turns in conversation are instantiated by connective adjuncts such as Well…, Now…, Oh…, So…, that function as
discourse markers. Their role is twofold: they mark a new speaker’s turn in the conversation and they mark the
management of information, as well as the speaker’s attitude to the message.
Well has a variety of meanings, signalled by intonation, ranging from decision to deliberation.
Oh is a surprisal, indicating that the information received is contrary to expectations, or that the
speaker is adjusting to the new information or perception.
I mean, you see and you know regulate shared and unshared knowledge.
Look and Hey are attention signals
Yes, yeah, no and nope are responses that can occur with other markers.
Oh my goodness!
Oh well, there is always Channel 9
I’ve lost my mobile! Well, what do you expect?
You are always losing things