Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KNIMOZHI N Edit
KNIMOZHI N Edit
KNIMOZHI N Edit
Page
Chapter 1 ABSTRACT
1.1 HOSPITALS IN INDIA
OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS OF STUDY
SCOPE OF STUDY
Chapter 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Chapter 3 PROFILE OF THE HOSPITAL
Chapter 4 RESULT & ANALYSIS
IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE
TABLES, FIGURES AND GRAPHS
LIST OF Tables
Table 1.1 Hospitals a System
Table 1.2 Intramural and Extramural Function of a Hospital
Table 1.3 Time Distribution on Administration Functions
Table 1.1 Survey Data
Table 1.2 Comparison of Job Satisfaction in Government and Private
Hospital Employees
Table 1.3 Comparison of Benefits
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF GRAPHS
Rapid scientific, technological and medical advances in recent years have completely
transformed the health care sector from conventional pattern. Hospitals now have become a dynamic
industry. Their core mission is delivery of quality patient care and medial excellence, which in turn
depends upon the job satisfaction of employees. Employee satisfaction is the amount of pleasure or
contentment associated with a job. The sources of job satisfaction can be extrinsic like superior-
subordinate relationship, working conditions and intrinsic (internal to the person). Intrinsic
The purpose of this study is to measure and compare job satisfaction of government and
private hospital employees. The sample of this study includes 90 employees, 40 from government
and 50 from private hospital. The data were collected by a survey (questionnaire method) that
consisted of the items from Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, about satisfaction and
dissatisfaction with different facets using a Likert – type scale. The results show that the job
satisfaction level of employees in private hospital is 76% which is more than the government
hospital 55%. The prominent areas of satisfaction in government hospital are job security and
benefits including retirement plan. In case of private hospital working conditions, leadership,
hospital has overall high level of employees satisfaction than in government hospital except some
INTRODUCTION
HOSPITALS IN INDIA
Early Indian rural considered the provision of institutional care to the sick as their spiritual
and temporal responsibility. The forerunners of the present hospitals can be traced to the times of
Buddha, followed by Ashoka. The Indian system of Medicine Ayurveda was prevalent that is
Sushruta (6th century B.C.) the famous surgeon who wrote Shushruta Samhita and Charaka (200
A.D.) the famous physician who wrote Charak Samhita. Their works are considered as standards for
many centuries with instructions for creation, of hospital, for provisions in lying and children rooms,
maintenance and sterilisation of bed linen with steam and fumigation. Medicine based on Indian
system was taught in the University of Taxila.
The most notable of the early hospitals were those built by king Ashok (273-232 BC). There
were rituals laid down for the attendants and physicians who were enjoined to wear white clothes
and promise to keep the confidence of the patients. In 10th century the age of Indian medicine started
to decline from the Mohammedan invasion. They brought Yunani (Greek) system of Medicine.
The modern system of Medicine in India was introduced in 17 th century with the arrival of
European Christian missionaries in South India. In 1664 the East India company established its first
hospital for soldiers at Chennai and in (1668) for civilian population. European doctors were getting
popular in 18th and 19th century. Organized medical training was started with the first medical college
in Calcutta in 1835 followed by Chennai in 1850. In the British period local government and local
self government bodies were encouraged to start dispensaries at tehsil and district level. In 1885
there were 1250 hospitals and dispensaries in British India. But the medical care scarcely reached 10
per cent of population in India.
The health scenario in 1947 was unsatisfactory. The bed to population ratio was 1:4000,
doctor to population ratio 1:6300 and nurse to population ratio 1:40,000.
After independence various committee were setup like Bohr committee (1943), Mudalidar
committee (1959), Hospital review committee (`1963). This committee made extensive
recommendations in the following areas.
Although the population was disturbed in urban & rural in the proportion of 20:80, a great depravity
existed in the facilities available in urban and rural areas.
1. Provision of adequate preventive, promotive and curative services to all in the form of
comprehensive health care (integration of services).
2. Delivery of this comprehensive health care through an infrastructure of hospital dispensaries
and by opening primary health care (PHC) centers at block level, and taluka level hospitals.
3. Development of adequate communication in rural areas.
4. Demarcation of health services into two groups, viz. personal and impersonal.
5. Fitting the above concepts into a short-term plan and a long-term plan.
6. The short term plan envisaged a province wise organization for the combined preventive and
curative health work through establishment of a number of primary, secondary and district
health units. The impersonal health services were to include town and village planning,
housing, water supply, drainage and general sanitation. The bed to population ratio was
planned about 1.03 per 1000 population at the end of 10 years.
7. The long term plan envisaged a primary Health Care Centre for every 40,000 population with
a 30 bedded rural hospital to serve for primary Health Care Centers. The bed: population
ratio is 1 bed per 1000 population.
8. The administrative structure should be tripartite :
a. (a) Clinical (b) nursing c) business administration
9. The following bed capacity should be attained :
10. Teaching hospitals – at least 500
11. District hospitals – At least 200
12. Tehsil hospital – At least 50
13. In case where distances are long and communication is difficult such as hill districts, certain
tehsil hospital should be developed as fully fledged centers.
From its gradual evolution through the 18th and 19th centuries, the hospital both in the eastern
and the western world-has come of age only recently during the past 50 years or so, the concept of
todays hospital contrasting fundamentally from the old idea of a hospital as no more than a place for
the treatment of the sick. With the wide coverage of every aspect of human welfare was part of
health care-viz. physical, mental and social well-being, a reach-out to the community, training of
health workers, biosocial research, etc.-the health care service have undergone a steady
metamorphosis, and the role of hospital has changed, with the emphasis shifting from :
Acute to chronic illness.
Curative to preventive medicine.
Restorative to comprehensive medicine.
Inpatient care to outpatient and home care.
Individual orientation to community orientation.
Isolated function to area-wise or regional function.
Tertiary and secondary to primary health care.
Episodic care to total care.
The important factors which have led to the changing role and functions of the hospital are as
follows:
Expansion of the clientele from the dying, the destitute, the poor and needy to all
classes of people.
Improved economic and social status of the community.
Control of communicable disease and increase in chronic degenerative diseases.
Progress in the means of communication and transportation.
Political obligation of the government to provide comprehensive health care.
Increasing health awareness.
Rising standard of living (especially in urban areas) and sociopolitical awareness
(especially in semi urban and rural areas) with the result that people expect better
services and facilities in health care institutions.
Control and promotion of quality of care by statutory and professional associations.
Increase in specialisation where need for team approach to health and disease is now
required.
Rapid advances in medical science and technology.
Increase in population requiring more number of hospital beds.
Sophisticated instrumentation, equipment and better diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Advances in administrative procedures and management techniques.
Reorientation of the health care delivery system with emphasis on delivery of primary
health care.
Awareness of the community.
People Communication
A. Staff * Between
* Physician * Physicians and patients
* Nurses * Physicians and nurses
* Paramedical * Physicians/nurses and paramedical staff
* Supportive * Physicians and administrator
B. Patients their attendants and * Administrative and community
relatives
Material * Administrator and nursing/paramedical staff
* Drugs and chemicals * Nursing/paramedical staff and patients
* Equipment
* Diet Decision Making in
Money
* To maintain staff, facilities * Cure: Diagnosis, treatment
and procure materials
* Care: Creature comforts of patients, diet
* Procurement of materials in right place at the right time.
Action
* Putting decisions into practice
* Balanced mix o communication decision making and
action
Source: B.M Sakharkar, “Principles of Hospital Administration and Planning” (2003), P-12.
The activities of the present day hospital can be divided into two distinct types intramural
and extramural. Intramural activities are confined within the walls of the hospital, whereas
extramural activities are the services which radiate outside the hospital and to the home environment
and community. These functions are set out in table below:
Table 1.2: Intramural and extramural functions of a hospital
1. Restorative
2. Preventive
3. Education
4. Research
Source: B.M Sakharkar, “Principles of Hospital Administration and Planning” (2003), P-14.
The division of hospitals into three categories:-
1. The first group is the “providers” of medical care, viz. the doctors, nurses,
technicians and paramedical personnel.
2. The second group is management, administrative and support group comprising
of personnel dealing with non clinical functions of the hospitals, such as diet, supplies,
maintenance, accounts, housekeeping, water and ward, etc.
3. The third group and the most important one for whose benefit the first two groups
exist in the first place, is that of the patients who seek hospital service and their attendants,
relatives and associates who, along with patient come in close contact of the hospital. This
group is broadly termed as the “community”.
REFERRAL FUNCTION
Organising a two way referral system from mobile and outreach clinics to the hospital
and referral back with reports for follow-up.
Backing up the referral system with medical records.
Organising visits of hospital specialists to outreach clinics.
Carry out training and reinforcing skills at PHC workers by visiting specialists.
Giving preferences to patients referred from PHC centres for specialist clinics and for
admissions.
SUPPORT FUNCTION
Providing logistics support in respect of equipment, materials, drugs and other supplies.
Reinforcing diagnostic capabilities of PHC workers and outreach clinics.
Providing transport for referrals and outreach services.
Making hospitals facilities available for training and retraining of PHC workers.
The technical abilities have outstripped our social, economic and political policies. The
technological advances in the field of medical sciences have provided clinicians with more esoteric
aids to diagnose and treat illnesses. Clinics and communities will continue to pressure hospital
management to provide such advances even though they will be very costly.
Not only pressures will increase for providing newer technological capabilities, but there will
be growing demands for such care. There are growing indications that this has started happening in
our Indian situation.
Since treatment is provided free of charge in government hospitals, it has in many cases
resulted in abuse, particularly in the outpatient department. This has led to the patient being made to
pay a small charge, varying between 10 to 20 per cent of the cost of medical attention, which, though
modest is a useful contribution to hospital running costs.
The model of the nationalized health system that took shape in Great Britain and some other
countries has not found true acceptance in India, because health and medical care is not a central but
state subject. Allocation of funds for the health sector both in the central and state budgets has also
declined gradually. Perhaps this is the reason, among others, that private institutions, commercial
firms and corporate bodies are jumping into the medical care field to form investor-owned, for profit
hospitals.
One third of the last decade’s increase in medical costs is attributed to increase use of high
technology medicine particularly surgical and diagnostic procedures. Even then, successful
launching of state of the art investor owned hospitals has proved that hospitals can benefit from
corporate management principles and can function profitably and efficiently without sacrificing
quality and affordability.
At the turn of the century most people died at home cheaply. Today, more than 20 per cent
die in expensively equipped hospitals, and it is estimated that up to half of an average person’s
lifetime medical expenses will occur during his last six months.
The changing trends are indicating the following:
In determining the extent and coverage, there will be more and more dominance by
consumers rather than providers or producers.
Hospitals and health care institutions will become akin to industries.
Not all services under one roof. Hospitals will be catering more and more to the needs of
patients in fragments, which:
Will lead to more and more specialized hospitals in place of general hospitals which provided
medical, surgical, obstetric and gynecological, ENT, pediatrics, etc. under one roof.
People will shop for medical care
Hospital will require more and more management skills as administrators at each level.
Will lead to growth of corporate hospitals and modern management concepts.
will be capital intensive
will be technology intensive
Ascendancy of technical expectations over human values.
SICKNESS INSURANCE
The charitable nature of hospital of the past has given way to the principle of the universality
where every social class is admitted. The introduction of sickness-insurance and social security
schemes, although not on universal scale has contributed to this. The economic structure in India has
not yet permitted large scale application of this principle, but the hospital system has to take stock of
this emerging development.
In making available the resources of specialised establishments for prevention on one hand
and inpatient care and treatment on the other, the multipurpose centre, combined and coordinated
with other health activities, represent the best service available. The future hospitals will have to
develop on these lines.
SPECIALTY HOSPITALS
These hospitals are like Escorts, Apollo. Medical science has expanded laterally include the
conditions surrounding sick people. Specialised hospitals are coming upon many plans in recent
years under one roof like Cancer and cardiovascular, geriatric hospitals, pediatric hospitals, prenatal
hospitals both in India as well as abroad.
Health maintenance organisation are institutions that are concentrating on preventive aspects
of medicine, emphasizing on diet, exercise, anti-smoking and anti alcohol programmes, meditations
and the like, with provision of only primary medical care. The scope of conventional preventive
medicine is being expanded by the health check-up centres.
ORGANISATIONAL CHART IN SPECIALITY HOSPITAL
G O V E R N IN G
BODY
C H A IR M A N
C H IE F
H O S P IT A L
A D M IN IS T R A T O R
C O M M IT T E E S M E D IC A L
D IR E C T O R
M E D . S TA F F N u rs in g M a in t e n a n c e M anager S to r e s Account
S tr u c tu re : C O M M IT T E E S u p e r in t e n d e n t E n g in e e r S u p p o r t S e r v ic e s M anager O ffic e r
C r e d e n tia ls
In f e c t io n
M e d . O u td it
M e d . R e c o rd W a rd s B u ild in g s , CSSD P u r c h a s in g Budget
P h a rm a c y a n d O p e r a t io n g ro u n d s , D ie t a r y C e n tr a l A c c o u n ts
th e r a p e u t ic s th e a tr e g a rd e n s M e d . R e c o rd s s u p p ly S a la r y
U t ilis a t io n s u ite E le c tr ic a l L a u n d ry a n d and
Labour and lin e n W ages
s u ite M e c h a n ic a l A d m is s io n
E m e rg e n c y M e d ic a l o ffic e
C e n tr a l E q u ip m e n t H ouse-
C H IE F O F
s u p p ly k e e p in g
S E R V IC E
S e c u rit y
M e d ic in e S u rg e ry O b s -G y n . P a e d ia tr ic s E m e rg e n c y
P a th o lo g y R a d io lo g y
Source: B.M Sakharkar, “Principles of Hospital Administration and Planning” (2003), P-143.
Fig.1.1
COST FACTOR
One of the important aspect with the patient satisfaction is the economic satisfaction of the
patient, there should be balance between quality and cost. With the advancement of technology the
cost of treatment is becoming high as a result of which high-class treatment is becoming
unaffordable to the vulnerable section of the society.
A hospital must accurately determent the cost of providing all its service though a proper
system of accounting. “An important administrative function is to determine then schedule of
changes for the service to be rendered. The change must be reasonable at sufficient income must be
generated. The first requirement is to find out the actual cost for providing each of the service.
In addition to the price of fees which we collect patients incur three other costs:
The time cost and trouble of looking into information locating the hospital and traveling,
which could be termed as effort cost.
The fear about the disease and treatment, trouble and pain side effects, recovery time and
extent of recovery could be termed as efforts cost.
Waiting time of the patient has to be considered as waiting cost.
This effort psychic and waiting cost also influence patient satisfaction to greater extent.
Adam Smith rightly said, “The real price of everything what everything real costs to the man
who wants to acquire it, it is the tool and the trouble of acquiring it”.
COMMUNICATION FACTOR
“Communication is the touching of mind, of person with person whether it is one man to a
thousand. It can include conversation, interview, dialogue, visual technique carefully used.” This is
of great significance as any wrong communication or misunderstanding can be responsible for
damages to patient as well as to the hospital. There is a need to issue, orders, instruction, and
proscription to be carried out clearly and understandably.
Better techniques of communication can contribute to the improvement of health
management by securing the flow of information needed for the effective functioning of the
organization at minimum cost. Communication such as signboards, information enquiry etc. is
important. The lack of ability of doctors, nurses and other staff to explain the things properly is a
major source of dissatisfaction by many patients.
The job of the administrator is to plan, to organize, to direct and to control—functions which
are inherent to the job of every administrator. As a general manager, he represents the organization
to higher authorities and to the outside world. He is responsible for policies and procedures, the
overall administrative structure, financial management, personnel management, reporting to the
board, relations with the medical staff, overseeing medical care, maintaining the physical facilities,
legal matters and maintaining good public relation.
Hospital chief executives have to spend almost 100 per cent of their time on non-medical
function and activities, far removed from direct patient care (Table 6.1). This precludes appointing
senior practicing doctors as chief executives. Medical doctors trained in health and hospital
administration, who are alive to the medical care needs of the patient also understand the needs of
the hospital and professionals working in them, and are thus more suitable to head hospitals.
Table 1.3: Time Distribution on Administration Functions
Source: B.M Sakharkar, “Principles of Hospital Administration and Planning” (2003), P-12.
Management of Resources
All decision making is limited by the human and material resources the hospitals has. The
variety and quantum of the pressures and constraints on hospital administration is best seen when it
comes to deciding between competing claims for manpower and financial resources. The hospital
administrator as an expert in the art of getting things done, does not arbitrate on this or that but
assimilates, reconciles and synthesizes all the views of those who put up competing demands.
Nevertheless, in making decisions, at times, he may have to succumb to what is expedient.
Negotiating
The administrator spends considerable time negotiating both with agencies outside the
hospital and with staff members within, especially regarding their working arrangements and
conflict resolution. Administrators must negotiate with third party payers (insurance companies,
employers) regulatory agencies, planning groups, equipment vendors and so on. There are also
elements of negotiation in the hiring of personnel and salary determination. Ideally, the administrator
should strive for a positive problem-solving situation. This implies moving away from a win-lose (I
win you lose, or vice versa) situation to a win-win (I win-you win) end result.
Containing Costs
With phenomenal rise in hospital costs, the administrator has to devote considerable time and
energy to monitor and contain costs. The medical staff knows very little or nothing about the
economics of hospital care. Therefore, it is necessary to make them cost conscious, to reduce
expenditure without jeopardizing patient care. The hospital administrator achieves this through
presenting them with different types of costing data and seeking their cooperation in containing
costs.
Evaluation
The ability to evaluate people, programmes and the overall effectiveness of the hospital is
one of the competencies the administrator has to develop. Evaluation includes evaluation of
employee-clientele relationship and interpersonal behaviour. The judging ability of the administrator
at times incorporates “intuition”.
The doctor patient relationship has changed in the 21 st century. The doctors earlier were only
concerned to treat the patient’s illness, but now they understand the emotional needs of the patients.
With the advancement of communication technology the patients can talk to the doctor and ask his
medical advice at phone. The patients can freely discuss their problems with the counselors and
doctors having friendly and cordial relations. Doctors now spent much time in communication with
the patient at various visits along with treating the patient’s illness. For example in the event of a
postoperative case, the patient who has been discharged a ‘Get Well’ card from the hospital signed
by the doctor and the administration can mean much to the patient.
1.10 ROLE OF PUBLIC RELATION DEPARTMENT IN SPECIALTY HOSPITALS
Larger hospitals should have a public relations or social service department strategically
located at outpatient department to monitor the attitude of people towards the hospital and provide
timely information, guidance and assistance of the people towards the hospital that will instill a
sense of confidence. The department should act as an official spokesman of the organization in all
matters pertaining to places, practices and programmes. In case of negative publicity breaking out
the department can play a role of fire extinguisher. In certain cases they can act as an advisor to the
top management in abandoning certain policies.
In the traditional period that is before independence the objective of the hospital was to treat
the patient and cure him. But after independence with the evolution of government hospitals both at
central and state level the objective was to prevent, cure and rehabilitate people and serve
community. The public health care system is crippled down due to lack of funds, as a result private
hospitals and corporate bodies are jumping into the medical care field to form investor owned, profit
hospitals to serve the quality health care with patient satisfaction at top priority. After globalisation,
medical tourism and cost effective health care is becoming a centre of attraction in developing
nations like India.
As a result more super specialty hospitals are opening in urban areas and rural health care is
left to graduate doctors who are appointed on contract basis and specialized doctors and services are
provided at district levels by State Governments but with inadequate and untrained staff and lack of
infrastructure. Due to this there is more proliferation of hospitals, which cater to different needs of
patient. These hospitals are capital as well as labour intensive and customer friendly in nature and
are run by hospital administrators/management personal, which act as a pillar in supporting various
functions of hospital. Their role is planning, organizing, directing, staffing, co-coordinating and
controlling the various administration as well as medical functions.
OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS OF STUDY
To measure and compare job satisfaction of government and private hospital employees.
To identify variables which have a significant impact on the satisfaction level of both private
private hospital.
There is no difference between government and private hospital employees regarding job
satisfaction.
There is no difference between government and private hospital employees regarding the
benefits provided.
SCOPE OF STUDY
Job satisfaction is viewed as a positive emotional response to a job situation resulting from
what the employee wants and values from the job. Employee’s satisfaction from their jobs is highly
significant for the effective functioning of any organization. It plays a key role in influencing the
attendance of workers, their productivity, work motivation, morale and bringing profits to the
organization. Thus the understanding of the job satisfaction level of employees and comparing with
both private and government hospital, is essential in order to motivate them from for better
performance as there is an intricate relationship between employee attitudes and patient satisfaction.
The present study is conducted in two renowned hospitals at Ludhiana City in Punjab viz
Government Civil Hospital and Dayanand Medical College Hospital.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER – 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The study of job satisfaction has established its importance as one of the most extensively
researched topics in industrial and organisational psychology. This research interest is well
demonstrated by the large number of published articles (estimated at 3,350 by Locke, 1976).
Oshagbemi (1996) suggests that this figure today would have more than doubled.
The late 1920s saw one of the first studies of job satisfaction undertaken by Mayo and his
colleagues. This study, also referred to as the ‘Hawthorne’ study, predominantly focused on
employee attitude and its impact on production levels. The study highlighted that employees/workers
develop their own perceptions of the work situation and the social environment, which affects their
attitudes towards their work.
The findings of the Hawthorne study provided consistent results with the observations of
Taylor in 1911, that individual workers value economic incentives/monetary rewards and are willing
to work harder for it (Locke, 1976; Landy, 1989). Following the Hawthorne study, Hoppock (1935)
published the first study of job satisfaction in its entirety. Using the global approach to measure job
satisfaction, Hoppock studied the job satisfaction of workers in the community of New Hope,
Pennsylvania. The study found that 88% of the surveyed were classified as being satisfied, and there
was a direct linear relationship between occupational level and job satisfaction. Despite being
methodologically flawed, the studies are well regarded as the onset of the study of the social aspects
of organizational behaviour (Roethlisberger and Dickson, 1939; Locke, 1976).
Schaffer’s (1953) study was the next major cornerstone in job satisfaction research. Schaffer
proposed a need- satisfaction framework, suggesting a hierarchy of 12 basic needs. The study found
that individual differences existed in the importance of the needs, and individuals satisfied with their
2 most important needs reported overall satisfaction.
The mid 1950s saw two important reviews of the job satisfaction literature – the first by
Brayfield and Crockett (1955) and subsequently by Herzberg et al (1957). Brayfield and Crockett
(1955), found no reportable correlations between job satisfaction and work-related outcomes. In
contrast, Herzberg et al (1957) suggested a systematic relationship between job satisfaction and
work-related outcomes. Herzberg et al, regarded satisfaction and dissatisfaction as different
phenomena, reflecting individual’s dual orientation towards work.
In developing taxonomy of job satisfaction research, the literature suggests 5 different
approaches to the study of job satisfaction.
DEMOGRAPHIC APPROACH
Researchers using this approach have dealt with the relationships of overall satisfaction and
other specific job attitudes to individual worker characteristics. The most commonly researched
demographic factors include age, education, gender and tenure (Saleh and Otis, 1964; Hulin and
Smith, 1965; Witt and Nye, 1992).
SITUATIONAL/ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH
The most dominant approach in the study of job satisfaction is the situational/environmental
approach. This studies the influence of a set of environmental variables/job characteristics on
employee affect and behaviour (Spector and Jex, 1991). The approach assumes that job satisfaction
is a direct result of the nature of the job and the work environment, and is based on the assumption
that individuals have ‘universal’ needs that can be satisfied by similar job attributes (Morrison,
1996). Researchers have generally argued against the existence of ‘universal’ human needs (Turner
and Lawrence, 1965). (This weakness of earlier models (eg Herzberg’s Work Characteristic Model)
was adequately dealt with by the outgrowth of the Hackman and Oldham’s (1975) Job
Characteristics Model (JCM).
Recent studies using the Job Characteristics Model (JCM) have indicated that job
characteristics reliably correlate with outcomes such as job satisfaction and absenteeism (Spector,
1985; Fried and Ferris, 1987). Individuals who perceive their jobs to be high on the 5 core
characteristics have reported high levels of job satisfaction and vice-versa. In addition, Hacker
(1990) found similar correlations between job characteristics and job satisfaction irrespective of the
nature of the job.
DISPOSITIONAL APPROACH
Over the last few decades there has been increasing literature focusing on the work or
dispositional factors in explaining job-related attitudes (Staw and Ross, 1985; Levin and Stokes,
1989; Judge, 1993; Morrison, 1996; Steel and Rentsch, 1997;). This approach draws its theoretical
underpinnings from the Genetic theory. Mitchell (1979) regarded dispositional variables as playing a
‘secondary’ role, but subsequent empirical evidence has tended to refute this. Staw and Ross (1985)
conducted the first major study using the dispositional argument. A longitudinal study was
conducted to investigate dispositions and job factors as determinants of job satisfaction. The study
found temporal stability in job satisfaction scores and this could be largely attributed to the role
played by dispositions in shaping work-related outcomes. Arvey et al (1989) also found support for
the genetic theory by studying job satisfaction of monozygotic (identical) twins reared apart. The
findings of this study were later re-inforced by a replicate study by Arvey, McCall, Bouchard and
Taubman (1994).
The majority of dispositional research has used personality characteristics as the main focus
of investigation in determining influences on job satisfaction. The literature suggests that personality
characteristics have generally been classified into 2 main categories : Positive affectivity and
Negative affectivity (Weiss and Cropanzano, 1996). (ie. The disposition to experience positive or
negative emotional states (Watson and Tellegen, 1985) Research findings indicate that individuals
high on positive affectively tend to experience greater levels of satisfaction and individuals high on
negative affectivity experience lower satisfaction (Porwal and Sharma, 1985; Levin and Strokes,
1989; Kraiger et al, 1989).
More recently, there has been increasing support for the Five-Factor Model of Personality
(referred to as the ‘Big-Five’), which aims to encompass most personality dimensions (Burke et al,
1993; Morrison, 1996; Salgado, 1997; Chiu and Kosinski, 1997; Mount and Barrick, 1998). In
addition, studies have indicated significant correlations between positive and negative affectivity and
the Big-Five personality dimensions (Watson and Clark, 1992). Specifically, it appears that the
personality characteristics of positive and negative affectivity correspond to the Extraversion and
Neuroticism dimensions, in the Five-Factor model of personality (Costa and McCrae, 1980, 1984;
Morrison, 1996). Studies conducted using the ‘Big-Five’ personality taxonomy have found support
for personality dimensions as predictors of work-related attitudes (job satisfaction) and outcomes
(job performance) (Barrick and Mount; 1991; Morrison, 1996; Tett et al, 1991).
Kohan and Connor (2002) examined job satisfaction, job stress and thoughts of quitting in
relation to positive and negative effect, life satisfaction, self-esteem and alcohol consumption among
police officers. The study concluded that job satisfaction was primarily associated with positive
effect, life satisfaction and self esteem; job stress was primarily associated with negative effect and
alcohol consumption; troughs of quitting had moderate loading on both the factors.
Lounsbury, et. al (2006) used a conceptual model proposing paths from personality traits to
career satisfaction and life satisfaction and then from career satisfaction to life satisfaction. The
sample consisted of information science professionals. An exploratory ‘maximum lifeblood common
factor’ analysis revealed two oblique personality factors. While the first factor comprised of
extraversion, optimism, assertiveness, openness and emotional stability, the second consisted of
conscientiousness and tough-mindedness. Results indicated a good fit for a two factor personality
model, showing significant links between personality factor and career satisfaction, between
personality factor and life satisfaction and then between career and life satisfaction.
From the above research it is concluded that the situational (or work) and the dispositional
(or personality) approaches have dominated the study of job satisfaction. However in recent years
researchers have argued using only one of these approaches presents an incomplete understanding.
This points to the appeal of an interactive approach in developing an improved conceptual
framework for studying job satisfaction by using both the characteristics of the job and the
individual’s personality characteristics.
After 1991 due to liberalization policy of India and globalization the health sector groomed
very fast pace in the hands of private hospitals due to technology exchange and expertise, various
researches were conducted on employee satisfaction which is related to patient satisfaction which is
the central motto of the private hospitals.
In (1996) David S. Osion conducted a study on hospital pharmacists to find relationship
between pharmacist’s job satisfaction and involvement in clinical activities, the study conducted that
number of hours or the percentage of time hospital pharmacists were engaged in clinical activities
was significantly associated with job satisfaction.
Deary, Blenkin and Agius (1996), in their study, they looked at the causes and outcomes of
job stress and personal achievement, have defined environmental demand, perceptions of demand
and ability to cope, and also stress responses, consequences of coping responses and feedback
among various stages of the stress process ass the aspects of satisfaction and dissatisfaction of the
doctors.
In Aronson (1997) conducted a study of job satisfaction of nurses working in private
psychiatry hospitals, about 3000 employers which revealed that working conditions pay dividends
and recognition of work were drivers of satisfaction among nurses.
In Anthony knight (2000) conducted a study on nuclear medicine technologists job
satisfaction having a sample size of 5000 employers in mainly four hospitals, the study revealed that
autonomy in making work schedules by the supervisor and superior subordinate relationship were
the main factors of satisfaction among technologists.
Kluger, Townend and Laid law (2003), in their study, in which the aim was to analyze the
job satisfaction, dissatisfaction and stress of anesthetists in Australia, have mentioned that private
practitioners find time issue more important compared to public ones, whereas public hospital
doctors find communication issue more important than private ones.
Zingeser (2004) conducted a study on career and job satisfaction in speech-language
pathology health care, the study examined that career growth and job satisfaction, are more subtle
aspects in the work lives of audiologists to gets and speech language pathologists.
Eker et al. (2004), in their study, where they examined the level of job satisfaction among
physiotherapists in Turkey, have stated that leadership, interpersonal; relationships advancement and
salary were the most important predictors of job satisfaction.
In (2005) study conducted by Dr. Bidhan Das on employee satisfaction means an efficient
health care facility, the study was conducted in a questionnaire format with 30 front office team
members and it revealed that compensation of benefits are important to employee job satisfaction.
Bennett, Plint, Clifford (2006), conducted survey at Canadian hospital based child protection
professionals on burnout, psychological morbidly, job satisfaction and stress. The study concluded
that burnout, and high levels of job stress were most responsible for the staff to leave and that
increasing the number of programme staff and consequently reducing the number hrs of work were
important areas of job satisfaction.
William, Bvelens and Jony (2007) conducted a study on impact of organizational structure or
nurse’s job satisfaction. The sampling unit consisted of 764 non-managing nurses in three Belgian
general care hospitals. The research concluded the importance of the dimension pay in nurse’s job
satisfaction which is not a function of the organization structure, is limiting hospitals in improving
nurse’s job factor. However the organizational structure does impact the other dimensions of
satisfaction i.e., specialization and formalization of authority.
Bayliss (2007) a comparative study of role stress on government and private hospital
employers of New Zealand. The sample size was 2000 conducted in four hospitals. The factors of
job stress are bureaucracy and interference of politicians in government hospitals and in private
hospitals the workload was a significant factor which indirectly affects satisfaction levels.
It is observed from different studies that nursing ranks are thinning just as the need for nurses
is poised to soar due to baby boomers heading into retirement. Radiation technologists and
technically inclined students are increasingly choosing software related jobs. Pharmacists are also in
short supply. Pharmacists are also in short supply at about half of all Indian hospitals. The causes are
lower pay combined with a frustrating work environment. With increased job pressures, an increase
in the acuity of patients, declining nurse to patient ratios, less autonomy and more administrative
duties, its no wonder health care professionals are re-evaluating their decisions. Non-hospital jobs
offer more flexible hours, more advancement opportunities, equal or better pay and a best less stress.
The stress level is same is in both government and private hospitals but factors contributing it to are
different, bureaucracy and interference of politicians in government hospital and workload in private
hospitals. The drivers of job satisfaction in case of pharmacists and radiation technologists are
reduced working hours, superior-subordinate relationship and autonomy in work in case of nurse are
working conditions, pay dividends and recognition of work. Stress due to work overload, inadequate
flow of communication is areas dissatisfaction among doctors.
HOSPITAL PROFILE
CHAPTER-3
HOSPITAL PROFILE
Government Hospital aims to provide the high-quality learning environment for those
undertaking taught and research degrees awarded by GMC in the Faculty of Medicine. Teaching and
Training for M.B.B.S. Degree at GMC are focused on health improvement, disease prevention, and
cure as well as fundamental understanding. All medical graduates must meet the core outcomes set
by the Medical Council of India (MCI).
VISION
To be a premier Medical Institute in South India, offering professional education and training
blended with ethical and human values, and to mould the Medical student into a dedicated doctor
who will practice the art of medicine with high human value.
MISSION
To render dedicated service to mankind with humanity.
a) General Medicine
The department of Pathology deals with abnormal changes caused by disease. The
department supports the clinical services and offers full diagnostic services in all areas of Pathology.
The department has diagnostic and teaching responsibilities. The diagnostic section includes
histopathology, cytology, haematology, immunopathology and blood bank facilities.
a) Paediatrics
The Department of Paediatrics offers comprehensive primary well-child and ill-child care as
well as consultation. It is concerned with the health of infants, children and adolescents, their growth
and development.
b) Chest Medicine
Chest Medicine Associates is a group of physicians who are fellowship-trained and board-
certified in the specialties of pulmonary, critical care, neurocritical care, and/or sleep medicine.
c) Dermatology
The Dermatology Department offers procedures and services, both investigative and curative,
pertaining to general dermatology, cosmetology dermatology and venereology. Comprehensive
consultation and treatment is provided for both outpatients and in-patients covering all
dermatological disorders.
d) Psychiatry
The department of Psychiatry handles all acute psychiatric emergencies at indoor and
outdoor and chronic mental health problems. The department is equipped for Psychotherapy, Psycho
pharmacotherapy and counselling. Medical & Psychiatry Social workers also help the department.
e) General Surgery
The Department of General surgery is a fully fledged department with three units functioning
all seven days a week providing round the clock service. Apart from routine general surgical work,
they regularly perform Laparoscopic and oncological Surgeries also. Upper GI endoscopy,
colonoscopy, Bronchoscopy and other investigation are also performed routinely.
f) Orthopaedics
The Orthopaedics Department is an acclaimed resource for treating muscle, bone, and joint
disorders. Areas of special emphasis include arthritis, joint replacement, spine surgery, sports
medicine, hand, foot and ankle, trauma, and paediatric orthopaedics.
g) Ophthalmology
h) Obstetrics
The department of Obstetrics is also a well established department. The department offers all
the routine obstetrics and gynaecology services. In addition, the department manages high-risk
pregnancy by prenatal diagnostic testing like chorion villus sampling, amniocentesis, foetal colour
Doppler and velocimetry studies. 19
I) Anaesthesiology
Anaesthesiology is a branch of medicine that allows safe usage of medical drugs to induce a
reversible state of total or partial lack of responsiveness to surgical procedures, so that they can be
carried out smoothly, without causing any distress and inconvenience to the patient.
PROFILE OF THE PRIVATE HOSPITAL
AMENITIES
Casualty
Blood Bank
SERVICES
6D Rapidarc
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Pheumatism Treatment
Health Checkup Packages
Thyroid Disorder Treatment
Gall Bladder Stone Treatment
Kidney Transplantation Surgery
Streotactic Radiotherapy, Radiosurgery
Sports Injury Treatment
Post Surgery Physiotherapy
RESULT AND ANALYSIS
CHAPTER – 4
This report presents the results of the Hospital Employee satisfaction survey of Civil Hospital
and Dayanand Medical College Hospital Ludhiana. Of the 40 and 50 completely filled
questionnaires from both the hospitals:
70% / 52% are 35 years of age or older
48% / 44% are female
72% / 64% are married
47% / 44% have two or less children
15% / 28% have worked at hospital less than 5 years
40% / 60% have a total before tax income less than Rs 20000/- per month
44%
45% 40%
40%
35% 32%
30%
25% 20%
20% 15% Governm ent
15%
15% 10% 10% Private
10%
10%
4%
5%
0%
Very satisfied Som ewhat Neither Som ewhat Very
s atis fied s atisfied nor uns atisfied uns atisfied
uns atisfied
Observation: The overall employee satisfaction level is more in private hospital than in
government hospital.
Analysis & Discussion: The study reveals that the overall level of job satisfaction in private
hospital (32+44=76%) is more than in government hospital (15+40=55%). It is attribute to the better
infrastructure, god working conditions, better facilities and work culture etc. in private hospital than
in government hospital.
Degrees of freedom
78 78 78 78 78
=n1+n2-2
H0 is rejected in cases 1, 2 and 3 showing there is a difference, Government hospital has less
The calculated value of t is less than the table values in cases 4 and 5.
disagreement level to the job satisfaction in government hospital and private hospital.
100%
100% 90% 90%
90% 80%
76% 75%
80% 70%
70%
60% 50%
45% 45%
50%
40% Government
Private
30%
20%
10%
0%
Understand Confidence Adequate Contributes Contributes
Plan in Planning to process to Mission
Leadership
Note: The percentage of ‘Understand Plans’ is the sum of the percentages of strongly agree
and somewhat agree. Similar pattern is followed in all the graphs for all the factors.
94% 96%
100%
90% 82%
75% 74%
80%
64%
70%
60%
50%
Government
40% 30% 30% Private
25% 25%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Proud to work Given Good Like work Feel valued
authority conditions
Observation: All general aptitude factors are higher in private hospital than in government
hospital.
Analysis & Discussion : General aptitude e.g., proud to work, given authority, good working
conditions, role clarity, recognition of work are higher in private hospital in comparison to the
government hospital due to the clean working environment, proper layout, centrally air conditioned
building, availability of latest equipment as demanded by doctors and technicians, maintenance of
equipments are well provided in private hospital. These facilities lack in government hospital. If a
doctor demands some latest equipment a lot of paper work has to be done. The undue legal
formalities and allocation of funds for the purchase takes long time. The class four employees do not
work properly. Sometimes they show disobedience to their senior due to security of job in
government hospital. In private hospital the duties are well defined, properly documented and
distributed at all levels of working without duplication of efforts. In government hospital undue
interference of seniors disrupts the activities of the juniors which also lead to stress. The recognition
of work is more in private hospital as the management appraises the employees though rewards and
promotions but in government hospital if any challenging work is accomplished by someone, the
management does not take into account and the awards if any are given politically.
Likes Co-
= Promotion
secure
Job is
Good work
workers
money
= more
team
spirit
Observation: Security of job is more in government hospital while all the other factors are
on higher side in private hospital.
Analysis & Discussion: In private hospital team cohesiveness is more among doctors, nurses
and paramedical staff for achieving the set targets and goals. They work together in a team spirit and
obey to the command of the team leader usually a senior doctor and results in utmost satisfaction of
the patients. In government hospital nurses and paramedical staff do not perform their duties well;
there is also lack of group cohesiveness. A doctor has to do their task also. In private hospital work
is acknowledged. The staff is promoted on the performance basis. In government if some critical
work is accomplished the senior do not recognize the work. The promotion is merely on the basis of
seniority and not on the basis of skill and targets accomplishment.
Graph 4.5: MANAGEMENT ISSUES (IN % AGE)
94% 86%
100% 90%
86%
90% 80% 80%
80%
70%
60% 45%
50%
40% 35% 30%
30% Government
15%
20% Private
10%
0%
Quality priority
Kept current
recognition
Feel trust
communication
Given
Frequent
Observation: The entire management issues factor have high percentage in private hospital
Analysis & Discussion: In private hospital, the recognition of work, communication flow,
and quality of services is higher than in government hospital. The management acknowledges the
work of each employee though the achievement of targets and feedback from the patients.
The communication flow is fast and frequent through intercom, e-mails or use of hospital
information system. Junior reports to the seniors and senior to the top management. The information
T-Test Method
Let us take the Hypotheses 2:
No. of observation
GH/PH 342 345 344 563 343
n
Degrees of freedom
22 22 22 22 22
= n1+n2-2
90%
90% 80%
80% 80%
76%
80% 70%
65%
70%
60%
50% 45% 45%
40% 40%
40% 35%
Government
30%
Private
20%
10%
0%
Treats fairly
to improve
support
Asks for
Tell well
Respects
Tells need
Given
inputs
done
Observation: All the supervisory issues have higher percentage in private hospital than in
government hospital.
Analysis & Discussion : The supervisory issues have a high percentage in private hospital
than in government hospital as the seniors contribute in guiding and watching the juniors regarding
handling of instruments, proper care of patients, diagnosis and treatment of illness, the medicine
with quantity and quality to be administered. In government hospital there is lack of support from
juniors as well as the seniors. They do not discuss the case with each other and thus do not contribute
The calculated value of |t| is greater than the table value in case 1, 2, and 3. Hence,
H0 is rejected in cases 1, 2 and 3 showing there is a difference, Government hospital has less
94%
100%
84%
90%
74%
80%
66% 65%
70% 60%
60%
50% 40%
35% Government
40% 30% 30% Private
30%
20%
10%
0%
Adequate Adequate Ongoing Fair salary Would
information orientation training recommend
Observation: Fair salary is more in government hospital while all the others have high
percentage in private hospital.
Analysis & Discussion: Fair salary is more in government hospital as the salary is quantified
according to the post held. In private hospital the salary of doctors is based on per patient or on share
basis and of paramedical staff and nurses is even on hourly basis. In government hospital there is no
adequate provision of on the job training or reorientation programmes. The doctors as well a other
staff are not updated on the latest researches in the medical field. If anyone wants to go for higher
education at the first instance he is not allowed to go or has to complete a lot of formalities and even
sometimes he is compelled to go on leave without salary.
T-Test Method
Let us take the Hypotheses 4:
The calculated values of |t| are greater than the table value in all cases 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Hence
H0 is rejected in all the five cases. It shows there is difference. The benefits like overall benefits
package, vacation, sick leave, health care, retirement, and disability are more in government hospital
90%
90% 85% 85%
80% 80% 80%
80% 75%
66%
70%
60% 56% 56%
50%
50% 46%
40% 38%
40%
Government
30%
Private
20%
10%
0%
Overall
Sick leave
Disability
Vacation
Health
Life
Retirement
Benefits
Observation: All these benefits are more in government hospital than in private hospital.
Analysis & Discussion: One of the major findings is that benefits are case of government
hospitals are more than in private hospital. In government hospital the salary is on the basis of post
held and seniority and not on performance basis whereas in private hospital it is based on the number
of patients per day treated by doctors or cared by staff nurses. The vacations on various occasions
are more in government hospital than in private hospital
disagreement level to the job satisfaction in government hospital and private hospital.
T-Test Method
Table 8.5: Comparison of Benefits
No. of observation
GH/PH 40,40 40,40 40,40 40,40 40,40
n
Mean X 23.14,19.7
9.43,5.43 3.14,9.43 3.14,1086 0.86,4.6
1
Degrees of freedom
12 12 12 12 12
= n1+n2-2
The calculated values of |t| are greater than the table value in all cases 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Hence
H0 is rejected in all the five cases. It shows there is difference. The benefits like overall benefits
package, vacation, sick leave, health care, retirement, and disability are more in government hospital
The study reveals that job satisfaction of private hospital employees is more than government
hospital employees as a result, specialist doctors move in private hospitals due to availability of
modern equipments, good working conditions, recognition and challenging work and chances of
advancement. The nurses and paramedical staff are happier in government hospital due to high
salary as compared to private hospital and less work. Due to high job security in government
hospital the nurse and paramedical people do not support the doctors in performing operations and
medical duties. The class four people show disobedience in performing their duties pertaining to
cleaning and maintaining the hospital premises, rather these people enjoy their working more in
government hospital than private hospital i.e. why the private hospitals are always in short of nurses
& paramedical staff. In government sector the promotion is on seniority basis than on performance
and is timely. These people have access to political persons. The quality of health care in
government hospital is almost degraded due to lack of latest instruments and support of staff which
led to the proliferation of private hospitals in Ludhiana city.
There is one government hospital and four big renowned hospitals like Dayanand Medical
College and Hospital, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Mohan Dai Oswal Hospital and
Apollo Hospital recently came into operation in 2005. These all are super specialty hospitals with a
capacity of more than 500 beds each.
The Punjab Government in 2006 appointed the doctors and paramedical staff on contract
basis in rural areas with a lucrative salary especially for graduate doctors as they are under paid in
private hospitals. This has resulted in the shortage of junior doctors in private hospitals. Now the
government is revising its healthcare machinery by appointing more doctors and paramedical staff
on contract basis even in urban areas in order to deliver the better health care facilities to poor
section of the society for which responsibility of healthcare lies on government. The contractual
labour policy helps the government to keep a track of highly performing staff so that they will enter
into job on achievement basis.The doctors get a competitive exposure in the private hospital and
their skills are optimally utilize and they are promoted on performance basis only. The private
hospital has an edge over government hospital in terms of infrastructure, autonomy given by
management on clinical activities and improvement in the clinical processes.
The sponsoring of doctors to fellowship programmes and nurses and paramedical staff to
diploma courses is done on the basis of achievement and performance.
They are provided with subsidized houses and canteen facilities. Due to above reasons the
healthcare is going day by day into the private hands from government as there is efficient
management in terms of manpower, materials, equipments, procedures and funds.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & LIMITATIONS
Universe: - The population for this particular study consists of physician, nurses,
paramedical staff of Government Civil hospital and Dayanand Medical College Hospital at Ludhiana
City in Punjab.
Sampling unit: - The sampling unit of this research consists of 120 employees (50 from
government hospital and 70 from private hospital) but the response result is 40 from government
Method of data collection: - The method of data collection was a field research and the
material used in study was a survey (questionnaire). In order to assess the job satisfaction Minneosta
Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) was used. The questions of the survey were adapted to the
hospital environment in order for them to be compatible with the research. The survey consisted of a
Likert-type scale ranging from 1 “Strongly agree” to 5 “Strongly disagree”. The scale was
standardized by calculating its reliability and validity. Reliability came to be 0.793 and validity was
0.890.
hesitation while answering the questions and to control internal validity. They were given to the
senior medical superintendent to be distributed to doctors, nurses and paramedical staff. They were
requested to return back in two weeks. It was predicted that filling out the survey would take 20
minutes. After two weeks, they were collected and taken into data analysis.
4.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
1. Biasness on the part of respondents: Some respondents were not ready to reveal the true
information.
2. Time Consuming-Many respondents do not return the Questionnaire in time despite of
several reminders.
3. Inaccurate access-Risk of colleting incomplete and wrong information as people are
unable to understand questions properly.
4. Non response-many people do not respond and returned the questionnaire without
answering all questions.
5. Questionnaire method cannot to used for illiterate persons.
CHAPTER – 5
CONCLUSION
The survey has brought certain features regarding the job satisfaction of government and
private hospital employees. The prominent areas of satisfaction among government hospital
employees are job security and benefits where as in private hospital areas of satisfaction are good
performance basis and recognition of good work. The employees of government hospital are
dissatisfied mainly due to lack of adequate and modern infrastructure, interference of seniors,
bureaucracy and politicians in the working of physicians, nurses and paramedical staff, lack of
support, disobedience from lower staff and lagging behind the private hospital in terms of up
benefits (like pension, insurance policies) and job security. Thus the government hospital is not at
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
Tripathi, P.C.; Personal Management and Industrial Relations, Sultan Chand and Sons,
New Delhi 2000.
Shankar, B.M.; Principles of Hospital Administration and Planning, Jaypee Brothers,
New Delhi, 2002.
Chabbra, T.N.; Human Resource Management Concepts and Issues, Danpat Rai and
Company Limited, New Delhi, 2005.
Kunders, G.D.; Hospital Facilities Planning and Management, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company, New Delhi, 2005.
ANNEXURE-II
QUESTIONNAIRE OF STUDY
………………… Hospital
We need your help! Your answers to the following questions will be an important part of the
an organizational review being competed for ………… Hospital. Please take a few minutes to
complete this survey, and return it today. The information you provide will be completely
anonymous.
1. How would you describe the level of your overall job satisfaction with your work at
……………..Hospital? Circle one answer.
Very Satisfied Very Dissatisfied
1 2 3 4 5
Describe your level of agreement/disagreement with each statement by circling one number
for each statement.
Agree Disagre
Strongly e
Strongl
y
1. a b c d e
2. a b c d e
Agree Disagre
Strongly e
Strongl
y
19 I am provided enough information by the a b c d e
. Hospital to do my job well
20 My initial training provided by the hospital a b c d e
. was as much as I needed.
21 I believe my salary is fair for my a b c d e
. responsibilities
22 Amount of health care paid for by health a b c d e
. insurance
23 Are there any benefits you would like to see added to …………… Hospital’s benefits
. package? (check one)
a b c d e
24 How long do you plan to continue your employment at …………… Hospital? (check one)
. 0 Less than 6 months 0 Less than 10 years
0 Less than 1 year 0 Indefinitely
0 Less than 5 years 0 Until retirement
a b c d e
25 Please tell us what …………….. Hospital can do to increase your satisfaction as an
. employee.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
The following questions are for statistical use only. The information will not be used to
attempt to identify individuals. This section is optional, but would help our analysis of the
data.
Check one box for each question.
Journal, Magazines
Oison David S; “Relationship between hospital pharmacists” job satisfaction and
involvement in clinical activities,” Healthy-system Pharmacy Journal June 1, 1996, Vol. No.
53, pp 281-284.
Tokar D.M., and Subich L.M., “Relative contributions of congruence and personality
dimensions to job satisfaction,” Journal of Vocational Behaviour, November 10, 1997, vol.
77, pp 703-7483.
Khwaja A., Qureshi R., Andrades M., Fatima Z., and Khwaja W., “Comparison of job
satisfaction and stress among male and female doctors in teaching hospital of Karachi,”
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 5, 1999, vol. 6, pp 301-308.
Lopoplo B Rosalie, “The Relationship of Role-Related variables to Job satisfaction and
commitment to the organization in a Restructured Hospital Environment”; Physical Therapy
Journal October 10, 2002, vol 82, pp 984-999.
Verhaeghe R., Mak R. and Van Maele G., “Job stress among middle-aged healthcare
workers and its relation to sickness absence,” Stress and Health: Journal of the International
society for investigator of stress, April 15, 2003, vol. 5, pp 265-274.
Randhawa G., “Job satisfaction and work performance: An empirical study”, IBAT
Journal of Management, Oct. 20, 2004, vol. 56, pp 70-80.
Byaliss R., “The national health service versus private and complementary medicine,”
British Medical Journal June 10, 2004, vol. 66, pp 95-100
Zingeser, “Career and Job satisfaction”, The ASHA. Leader June 12, 2004, vol 20, pp 14-
20.
Tanka Geetika; “A comparative study of Role Stress in Government and Private
Hospital”; Journal of Health Management December 1, 2006, vol 8, pp 11-22.
Salgado J.F., “The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European
community”, Journal of Applied Psychology Jan 3, 1997, vol 9, pp 408-430.
Kanfer, “every theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality”, Bulletin, July 13,
1990, vol 70, pp 50-60.