Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21 Value Analysis and Value Engineering
21 Value Analysis and Value Engineering
21 Value Analysis and Value Engineering
HO No. 09/21
1.0 INTRODUCTION:
Value Analysis (VA) and Value Engineering (VE) are common approaches to improving products
and Processes. In both VE and VA value is usually defined from the viewpoint of the customer
who will use the products and processes. Based upon this fundamental understanding, the
common question asked in all value-based analyses is 'Does this add value to the customer? If
the answer is “No” then there is high probability that whatever “this” is (cost action, part, step
feature, tolerance) it is waste that can be reduced or eliminated.
Although the technique is applied commonly in manufacturing, value analysis has been applied
to a broad range of activities and supply related problems out side the manufacturing area.
Application range from the design of operating system to the development of corporate re-
engineering projects to the procurement of service & transportation
a. Value Engineering
VE take place in the design process before a product is in production or a process has
been implemented for the first time. VE usually entails a methodical systematic study of
all phase of this design of a given item or process in relation to the function (value) the
finished product or process is to perform. VE recognizes that the design process provides
the greater opportunity for reducing cost in a proactive manner before the cost are
committed to in the actual product or process. VE should play a key role in a new product
development.
Value analysis (VA) as defined by ID Miles of general Electric company of USA which
developed this technique in 1947 is as follows:
“An organized creative approach which has for its purpose the efficient identification of
unnecessary cost i.e. costs which constitute neither quality nor use nor appearance, nor
customer features”
“It is the study of the design function and cost of any material, product or service, with
the object of reducing its costs through modification of design or materials specification,
manufacture by more efficient process, change in source of supply (internal or external),
elimination or incorporation into another item”.
A better and more economical way to do the job without reducing the quality of the
job done is simple statement of the aim of VA.
b. Value Analysis:-
If the value engineering is not possible then VA is used unlike VE, VA take place after a
product has been produced or after a process has been implemented. As such VA is
reactive & provides less opportunity to reduce total costs over the lifetime of a design or
process. However the opportunity to reduce costs is still greater in common approach in
most industries.
VE/VA Techniques although different companies stress the different variation of the
fundamental idea, two general conceptual tools are basic to the operation of a VE/VA of
programme.
Design analysis
Cost analysis
Both design and cost analysis focus on the same required product, part material process.
However, design analysis focuses strictly on the feature, function and for use from the
prospective of the customer. Cost analysis links the design feature to numerical value
that can be easily compared. Design feature must be coupled with cost to evaluate the
value.
c. Development of Technique:
According to Lee and Dobler “the technique of value analysis represent a potential
powerful set of tools which can be used by management in controlling materials costs.
The fundamental objective of all value analysis activities is the procurement (for
manufacture) of materials representing the best buy, in terms of synonymous with a
longstanding objective of good purchasing. The unique feature of current value analysis
programs however, lies the systematic and through approach used in attaining this
objective”.
This views the requirement in terms of the functions intended. VA attempts to obtain the
necessary function at the lowest possible costs. An example of this is given below.
A television manufacturer had designed a light weight portable TV. The designer specified
a stainless steel handle, which cost about $2.50 each. The cost was high compared to the
cost of the set, the handle was clumsy and heavy and cut into the hand of the holder. The
question was asked what would do it well? The answer was a commercially available
luggage handle that cost 22 US cents each. It added decorativeness and handling ease as
well.
The material, the product or the part is defined in terms of its functional characteristics.
These are described in their order of relative importance, as viewed by the customer or
the market buyers encourage functional analysts when they seek from
production/engineering functional type specifications these entail the description of
performance and reliability requirement. By investigating proposals on the basis of
functional specifications the buyer solicits the creative efforts of the supplier.
This accepts the product part or design concept, but within that limitation, strives for
cost reduction through more economical methods of processing and manufacture. The
cost approach involves the development of cost estimates for how much the part or
product will cost by a reasonably efficient producer incurring reasonable labour and
material costs, overheads and profit. Cost are studied and analyzed. i.e. direct cost
variable costs, semi-variable costs, and over- heads-in order to identify high cost areas.
Cost should also be studied in terms of their variance by quantity, rate of production and
load distribution, and also in terms of time. What may seem to be an unimportant
element of cost on a per unit basis may become quite significant when viewed in terms
of annual requirements.
This is the organized effort to reduced purchased materials costs, through proper
sourcing, pricing and contractual means. This exercise entails techniques of promoting
and developing new and alternate sources such as
The commercial approach to value analysis falls almost exclusively within the domain of
purchasing.
Analysis
1.Determine and compare feasibility Is it better than that?
Phase
2. Determine and compare suitability How much better ?
3. Determine and compare costs why ?
Evaluation
1. Audit effectiveness of the selection
Phase
2. Use operating experience to effect further improvement
4
3.1.2 Information Phase
Under this phase all pertinent facts are collected, such as cost, drawing, specification,
productions production methods, markets suppliers, etc.
Under this phase; generate every possible solution to the problem. Consult others who
might help. Systematically explore various materials. Encourage free use of the
imagination. Record every suggestion that seem remotely possible in this connection the
following observations are relevant;
“Let the value analysis team have a brainstorming session in this, as many suggestions as
possible must be made, and although the object is to cut the cost of performing the
function (rather than the cost of making the thing in the present form), do not look at
cost at this stage. It is also important also in brainstorming not to breathe a word of
criticism of even the most crackpot ideas not a hint, not even a quizzical facial expression
is allowed to inhibit creativity. You have got to accentuate the positive, eliminate the
negative; so that the team members share off ideas from each other. This exercise in
enthusiasm and patience should be kept up until at least half a dozen ideas preferably
many more, have been jotted down. Only one really good idea is actually wanted, but the
freewheeling creative stage, and the analytical evaluation stage, which is the phase in the
job plan”
Under this monetary value of each idea is estimated. All ideas with probability of
accomplishment are developed with emphasis being placed in proportion of their value
and a program is set up to vigorously pursue ideas with most promises.
Under this the job is broken down into a progression of functional areas, e.g. a fastening
job, and electrical contact job, a dust protection job, etc and a selection is made of a few
top vendors for each functional area of the product.
Under this the top function desire is shown, and discussed and suggestions
solicited from specialists. Suggestions of specialists and the co- operation and
practical suggest ional of suppliers are obtained then the problem is thrashed out
with the suppliers and specialists and a workable idea is reached.
Having reached a workable idea the best value for money option,
recommendation is made to the management. This should be quite brief but
comprehensive, giving the advantages of the proposal, cost and function wise.
5
3.1.8 Implementation phase
4.0 VA COMMITTEE
5.2 The National Association of Purchasing Management has suggested the following general
check list for design analysis:
First, determine the function of the item and then determine:
6
Are suppliers being asked for suggestions to reduce cost?
6.0 CONCLUSION
At least three quarters value analysis program now undertaken is in respect of bought-
out parts and components. Process industries offer less scope for value analysis than
manufacturing industries. In face of severe competitions of the market for manufactured
goods, business enterprises have to embark on program designed and to engineer
unnecessary costs out of existing products. VA possesses great profit making potential. It
is stressed by Lee and Dobler that, if VA potential is to be realized, those responsible for
administration of the value analysis program must adopt a broad management
viewpoint. This is essential because VA is accompany-wide activity whose purpose is to
optimize returns to the total business operation. The author further stress that in its
most basic form the administrative problem becomes one of human relations and
motivation more than anything else. Management must not over look the fact that in the
long run that it is the attitude of the participants that largely determine the degree of
success achieved by any program. Value analysis concepts must be understood, accepted
and practiced by a majority of the various functional specialists involved in the
programme if such a program is to be fully effective.
Question
ABC Engineering Pvt Ltd is a Construction company, well established in the industry. It carries out island
wide operation, currently involved in 10 major construction sites around the country. Purchasing Material
pool consists of around 15000 items. These items include, stationary material, building materials, Plant
and Equipment related to building construction, janitorial services to miscellaneous services, Labor
services, design and consultancy services etc.
Purchasing department of ABC Engineering Pvt Ltd, frequently call quotations for stationary materials
and Janitorial services. According to past experience of 12 months, purchasing dept has called quotations
for different stationary materials nearly 30 times. As a percentage, 30% of tender calling happened to
purchase stationary and Janitorial services. It also noted 20% of value at the moment in inventory related
to Stationary Materials. There are various Stationary Materials, nearly 150 types of different categories.
According to purchasing process of ABC, its include, receive Purchase Requisition from User Department,
Justify the Purchasing, Calling Quotation from at least 10 suppliers , Evaluate the prospective supplier and
award the tender.
7
a) Explain the Value Analysis / Value Engineering Term related to ABC with an example. ( 4 Marks )
b) Briefly explain the three approaches of Value Analysis ( 6 Marks )
c) Explain the Steps of Value Analysis Job Plan to implement Value Analysis at ABC Engineering Pvt
Ltd. ( Note: You have to provide a detail answer for each steps, with solution for current
purchasing process and inventory issues at ABC ) ( 10 Marks )