Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FASTRACK 2706 Polymer Emulsion For Waterborne Traffic
FASTRACK 2706 Polymer Emulsion For Waterborne Traffic
FASTRACK™ 2706
Polymer Emulsion for Waterborne Traffic
Marking Paints
Description FASTRACK 2706 is an all-acrylic emulsion designed specifically for use in waterborne
traffic marking paints, especially when application occurs under marginal conditions of
temperature, humidity and air flow. Actual road use studies have proven that traffic
marking paints formulated with FASTRACK 2706 are more resistant.
Formulation Notes:
1. Check the pH. If below 9.7, add 2 lbs. of 28% ammonium hydroxide.
2. TAMOL 901 is the preferred dispersant.
3. Surfynol CT-136 is the preferred wetting agent.
4. Check and adjust pH as needed. Dispersion should be smooth—Hegman gauge 3 or higher.
5. Add the Methanol before the Texanol, and add the Texanol slowly to avoid polymer flocculation.
6. Check and adjust pH as needed. Add water and/or thickener to adjust to 80–85 KU.
Formulation Notes:
1. Check the pH. If below 9.7, add 2 lbs. of 28% ammonium hydroxide.
2. TAMOL 901 is the preferred dispersant.
3. Surfynol CT-136 is the preferred wetting agent.
4. This order of addition is important to disperse the Hansa Yellow pigment.
5. Add the Methanol before the Texanol, and add the Texanol slowly to avoid polymer flocculation.
6. Check and adjust pH as needed. Add water and/or thickener to adjust to 80–85 KU.
Performance FASTRACK 2706 emulsion is a unique waterborne acrylic polymer that dries faster than
on the Road conventional waterborne polymers. This faster rate of dry is particularly evident when the
drying conditions are poor (high humidity, low air flow and low temperatures). The faster
dry-through characteristics of waterborne traffic markings based on FASTRACK 2706 make
them less susceptible to wash-out failure on the road under a wider range of drying
conditions. Furthermore, FASTRACK 2706-based paints are less prone to chipping and
picking failures than are conventional waterborne paints.
The useful life of a traffic marking is measured by how long it remains on the road and by
its retention of daytime and nighttime visibility. The most prevalent failure point of traffic
marking paints is inadequate visibility at night which is a consequence of the loss of the
reflective glass beads from the surface of the paint film.
Glass Bead Glass spheres are generally post-applied or “dropped-on” right after the wet paint is applied.
Selection Normal size ranges from U.S. sieve size 20–80 (180–840 microns); recommended glass
bead usage is 6 pounds per gallon of paint (300 grams per square meter) on a 15 wet mil
(380 micron) wet film thickness. Glass beads treated with a moisture proof (MP) coating to
prevent bead agglomeration perform well on waterborne acrylic paints as shown in Table 2,
but glass beads treated with an adherence promoting coating (AC-07 treated beads from
Potters Industries1) have demonstrated better bead retention. Since the AC-07 treatment
allows better wetting of the glass, more of the bead surface is covered by the waterborne
paints, and thus the initial retro-reflectance is lower. However, these glass beads are
anchored in the film better which contributes to better long-term retention. The data
in Table 2 illustrate this.
1 Potters Industries, Inc., 377 Route 17, Hasbrouck Heights, NJ 07604 (201) 288-4700.
Table 2:
Adherence of Two Types of Glass Beads in FASTRACK 2706
Paints Retro-Reflectance* (mcd) (Mirolux 12)
Moisture Proof Glass Beads AC-07 Treated Glass Beads
(1) (2) (1) (2)
Initial 390 450 310 325
6 months 335 – 295 –
9 months – 180 – 300
14 months 295 255
27 months 190 220
*These readings were taken on transverse lines next to the existing edge line and thus are representative of
glass bead retention under normal traffic wear:
(1) about 6,000 average daily traffic
(2) about 20,000 average daily traffic
Waterborne Paints Waterborne 100% acrylic traffic paints based on FASTRACK 2706 have consistently shown
Based on less chipping failures under the same conditions than those based on conventional
FASTRACK™ 2706 commercial acrylic polymers.
vs. Conventional The photographs below show chipping failures of transverse lines applied in November
Acrylics of 1991 which were exposed to 3 months of winter conditions. In the same formulation,
the waterborne paints based on the two conventional commercial acrylic polymers show
significant chipping failure but the paint based on FASTRACK 2706 displays very little
chipping. Following another year of wear, the amount of chipping remained about the same.
Effect of Paint The pigment loading and the presence of glass beads also have a significant effect on the
PVC and Glass chipping of waterborne paints. Waterborne paints formulated with percent pigment volume
Beads concentrations of 60% (the recommended starting point) are less likely to chip in transverse
line accelerated tests than those formulated to 50% PVC. This difference is illustrated below
with photographs of 14 month old transverse lines (with glass beads) comparing 60% and
50% PVC paints formulated with FASTRACK™ 2706 and a conventional waterborne acrylic.
Also note that the paints based on FASTRACK 2706 are more resistant to chipping. A
significant amount of the chipping failure seen in these photos occurred after a heavy rain
3 weeks following application.
The same paints applied without glass beads show much more chipping failure
as shown below:
Conventional
FASTRACK 2706- Waterborne
Based Paints Paints
(no glass beads) (no glass beads)
It is important to note that in all of the photographs of transverse lines shown, the chipping is
minimal in areas away from the central area of the lane. These are areas of more typical
traffic wear such as centerline and edgeline applications.
Testing of In order to identify waterborne traffic paints with the best drying characteristics or to
Dry Time compare the relative drying rates of waterborne traffic paints, it is important to study drying
under marginal conditions of high relative humidity and low air flow. Studying the drying
characteristics of waterborne paints under good drying conditions can lead to the false
conclusion that one paint performs essentially the same as another. Studying the same
drying characteristics under conditions of higher relative humidity, reduced air flow and low
temperatures, however, can lead to the conclusion that one paint dries significantly faster
than another. The data contained in Tables 3 and 4 illustrate this fact. The data contained
in these charts were generated using a computer-controlled environmental room and a
statistical modeling technique. The use of the environmental room allowed for careful control
of the three variables—relative humidity, air flow, and temperature. Both a “conventional”
acrylic waterborne polymer and FASTRACK 2706 were studied in the same formulation.
The data in Chart 3 illustrate that the dry-through of the conventional waterborne paint is
only 3 minutes slower than the FASTRACK 2706 paint under the favorable drying conditions
of 50% relative humidity and 225 feet per minute air flow (about 2.5 mph). There is a much
more substantial difference (12 minutes) when the humidity is increased to 80% at the same
air flow; and an even greater difference (29 minutes) when, in addition, the air flow is
reduced to 25 feet per minute.
Chart 4 illustrates that reducing the temperature from 75°F to 45°F at 80% relative humidity
and 25 fpm air flow will result in a very substantial difference of 73 minutes in dry-through
time favoring the FASTRACK 2706-based paint.
The following graph further illustrates the drying advantage of FASTRACK™ 2706 paints
from the same temperature, humidity and airflow study. This graph contrasts the differences
in dry-through times of the conventional acrylic emulsion and FASTRACK 2706 (in the same
high solids formulation) at the extremes of drying conditions. Under relatively unfavorable
conditions of temperature (45°F), airflow (25 fpm) and increasing humidity, the difference in
dry-through time is very apparent:
45°, 25 fpm
• Conventional Acrylic
FASTRACK 2706
% Relative Humidity
It should be noted that the dry time numbers determined in laboratory tests cannot be
expected to predict absolute dry times in real life, especially when glass beads are not used
in laboratory tests. The relative differences in dry time shown in these tests, however, are
significant and relevant to real life applications.
Laboratory Drying To study the drying of a waterborne traffic paint under the more difficult conditions of higher
Chamber relative humidity and air flow without the benefit of an environmental chamber, a laboratory
drying chamber has been developed by Dow. The chamber allows the control of humidity by
mixing room air with nearly saturated air in the chamber. This is accomplished by opening
and closing the ports on the chamber until the humidity is equilibrated to the desired level.
The humidity of the room air will influence the degree to which these ports are opened, and
thus will influence the amount of air flow in the box. The room temperature also will
influence the drying of the paints inside the box.
The effect of external room temperature and humidity on the dry-through of the TP-06-02
white formulation based on FASTRACK 2706 is shown in Figure 1. Note that there is more
than a 30 minute difference in dry-through measured at 90% humidity inside the chamber
when the conditions outside of the chamber vary from the extremes of 3% humidity/66°F to
80% humidity/80°F.
Deg F
This variability in dry-through time measurement in the chamber emphasizes the need to
include a control paint of known performance every time a test is run in the chamber. Using
the test chamber in a constant temperature and humidity room also is advised, if possible;
this will minimize variation due to widely varying conditions outside the chamber.
Chamber Operation
1) Fill the bottom of the chamber with 1/4 to 1/2 inch of water. Close all ports and doors
and allow to equilibrate overnight.
2) After overnight equilibration, the relative humidity in the chamber should be close to
100%. By carefully opening and closing the ports on the sides of the chamber, establish
a relative humidity of 90% ± 3% in the chamber.
3) Using clean glass panels (4" x 12"), draw down the test paint and the control paint so
that on complete drying, the film thickness is 7–8 mils (175–200 microns).
4) Promptly place the wet films in the test chamber. The relative humidity will begin to
rise. Adjust the ports on the sides of the chamber to re-establish a 90% ± 3%
relative humidity.
5) Open the door briefly to touch the films at 15 minute intervals and begin dry-through
testing outside the chamber at 15 minute intervals after the films are dry to touch (finger
does not pick up wet paint). The film is dry through if it is not distorted from a 90 degree
thumb twist with no pressure on the film.
6) A control (standard) paint should be tested every day that dry-through time tests are run
in the chamber. The temperature and humidity inside and outside the chamber should
be recorded because these data define the variables that give the drying result.
Figure 6
ASTM Test Method D711
Commercial “C”
Commercial “B”
Commercial “A”
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Minutes
Paints were drawn down over clean cold-rolled steel to a wet film thickness of 11 mils
(275 microns) and dried at 70°F and 63–67% relative humidity. No glass beads applied
to wet film.
Despite considerable variation in drying speed at different air flows, the paints based on
FASTRACK™ 2706 dry much more quickly under the conditions tested.
Dry-Through
Waterborne traffic paints that have dried to the point of no-pickup in the laboratory wheel
test or no-tracking on the road are not at the dry-through point and could wash off if
immediately exposed to rain. The dry-through point indicates the stage of dry where
waterborne paints begin to exhibit some film integrity and resistance to rain. Waterborne
paints based on FASTRACK 2706 are much more water resistant at the dry-through point
than those based on conventional acrylic emulsions which will wash away at the dry-through
point. The laboratory test procedure for dry-through follows ASTM Method D 1640 with the
exception that minimal thumb pressure is used (this test is described in Charts 3 and 4).
The laboratory drying chamber should be used to control the humidity and minimize the
effects of air flow when comparing the dry-through times of waterborne traffic paints.
Maintaining a humidity of 90% in the chamber is recommended so that the dry-through tests
can be run at any laboratory humidity (i.e. room humidity would not be above 90%). Running
the dry-through tests at 90% humidity also will magnify the differences between the
waterborne paint test samples. This is illustrated in Chart 7 where the humidity in the drying
chamber was increased from 50% to 90% and the dry-through times of FASTRACK 2706
were compared to a conventional waterborne polymer in the same formulation.
200
150
100
50
0
50 60 70 80 90
% Relative Humidity
The dry-through test run at 90% humidity in the drying chamber also provides the vendor
and supplier with a way to conduct drying tests under the same conditions, run quality
control tests on drying speed of batches of the same paint, and test the effects of changing
the paint formulation. Again, it is necessary to test a control paint, preferably the same
standard paint sample, every time that the drying chamber is used to evaluate relative dry
times of waterborne paints.
Contact: These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without
North America: 1-800-447-4369 guarantee, as conditions and methods of use of our products are beyond our control. We recommend that the prospective user
Latin America: (+55)-11-5188-9000 determine the suitability of our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.
Europe: (+800)-3-694-6367
Asia-Pacific: (+800)-7776-7776 Suggestions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the citation of specific patents in
http://www.dowcoatingmaterials.com this publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission
or license to use any patents of the Dow Company.