Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Tea

Name of Employee: MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA Name of Rater: MELISSA M. QUIATCHON


Position: TEACHER I Position: DESIGNATED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BATANGAS Date of Review: APRIL 5,2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 TO MARCH 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
7.5% MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1


learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
and Diversity of structure to management management management management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
and Diversity of structure to management management management management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson
hands-on Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 supported by any of
activities within a lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported the acceptable
range of physical by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any MOV
learning 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior management management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of


of the given of the given of the given the given strategies
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
experiences. 7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to meet with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
varied teaching developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts. 7.5%
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1


least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources, learning resources, learning resource,
Submitted at least 4 including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
varied teaching and evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
learning resources, MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
including ICT, as supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
evidently shown in of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1


varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1
Submitted a
combination of at combination of 2 of acceptable MOV
combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the acceptable
the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
7.5%
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related
works/activities related related related work/activities that
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of


different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA MELISSA M. QUIATCHON
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
TMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
MELISSA M. QUIATCHON
DESIGNATED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
APRIL 5,2019

ING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
evidence was
shown

The teacher showed


knowledge of content
and its integration
within and across
subject areas.
No acceptable The teacher
evidence was submitted at least 4
shown lessons.

No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4.000 0.3


evidence was facilitated using
shown different teaching
strategies that
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted at least 4
shown learner-centered
lessons.

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable The teacher used 4 4 4.000 0.300
evidence was different teaching
shown strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking
skills and/or other
HOTS.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted 3 lessons
shown as evidenced

No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3


evidence was
shown The teacher used
classroom
No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
evidence was
shown The teacher used
classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks .
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
The teacher
submitted at least 4
lessons.

No acceptable The teacher applied 4 4 4.000 0.300


evidence was teacher management
shown strategies of learner
behavior that
promote positive and
non-violent discipline.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted at least 4
shown of the given
strategies as
observed in at least 4
lessons

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
evidence was
shown
The teacher applied
differentiated
teaching strategies to
address learner
diversity.
No acceptable The teacher
evidence was submitted 3
shown differentiated
teaching strategies in
at least 2 lessons as
evidenced.

No acceptable The teacher planned 4 4 4.000 0.3


evidence was and implemented
shown developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning process

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted 3
shown developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning process.
Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4.000 0.3
evidence was frequently
shown participated in
LACs/FGDs/meeting
s to discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was participated in 3
shown LACs/FGDs/meeting
s as evidently shown
in any 1 of th

No acceptable The teahcer 4 4 4.000 0.3


evidence was developed and used
shown varied teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted at least 4
shown varied teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, as
evidently

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable The teacher 5 5 5 0.375
evidence was designed, selected,
shown organized and used
diagnostic, formative
and summative
assessment
strategies consistent
with curriculum
requirements.
requirements.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted 3 varied
shown assessment tools as
evidently.

No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4 4.000 0.300


evidence was consistently
shown monitored and
evaluated learner
progress and
achievement using
learner attainment.

No acceptable
evidence was
The teacher
shown
submitted a
combination of 3
No acceptable The teacher
evidence was submitted were
shown distributed across 4
quarters

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4 4 0.3
evidence was consistently showed
shown prompt and clear
communication of the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians.

No acceptable The teacher


evidence was submitted a
shown combination of at
least 4 of the MOV
acceptable MOV
No acceptable The teacher were
submitted were distributed
evidence was
across 4 quarters
shown
No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4.000 0.400
evidence was frequently performed
shown various related
work/activities that
contribute to the
teaching learning
process.

No acceptable The teacher submitted


evidence was 3 different kinds of
shown acceptable MOV
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory 4.0075,

MELISSA M. QUIATCHON LISEO V. VERGARA, D.E.M.


Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA Name of Rater: MELISSA M. QUIATCHON
Position: TEACHER I Position: DESIGNATED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BATANGAS Date of Review: APRIL 5,2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 TO MARCH 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within The teacher showed
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject knowledge of content
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in and its integration
7.5% MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating within and across
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 subject areas.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable The teacher
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was submitted at least 4
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown lessons.
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable The teacher 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was facilitated using
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown different teaching
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading strategies that
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or promote reading
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as writing and/or
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 numeracy skills.
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable The teacher
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was submitted at least 4
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown learner-centered
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the lessons.
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable The teacher used 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was different teaching
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown strategies that
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative develop critical and
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills creative thinking
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable The teacher used 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was different teaching
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown strategies that
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative develop critical and
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills creative thinking
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS skills and/or other
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 HOTS.
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable The teacher
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was submitted 3 lessons
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown as evidenced
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroomUsed classroom evidence was
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown The teacher used
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that classroom
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in management
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as strategies that
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1shown in MOV 1 engage learners in
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4 activities/tasks .
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
hands-on Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 supported by any of evidence was
activities within a lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported the acceptable shown
range of physical by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any MOV The teacher
learning 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other submitted at least 4
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV lessons.
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable The teacher applied 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was teacher management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive and
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent non-violent discipline.
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable The teacher
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was submitted at least 4
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown of the given
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson strategies as
4 lessons lessons lessons observed in at least 4
lessons
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner The teacher applied
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown differentiated
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a teaching strategies to
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner The teacher applied
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown differentiated
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a teaching strategies to
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4 address learner
gender, needs, rating of 6 diversity.
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable The teacher
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was submitted 3
experiences. 7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown differentiated
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as teaching strategies in
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in at least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the evidenced.
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable The teacher planned 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was and implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning process
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to meet with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable The teacher
varied teaching developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was submitted 3
contexts. 7.5%
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown developmentally
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and sequenced teaching
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as and learning process.
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was frequently
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown participated in
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner LACs/FGDs/meeting
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich s to discuss
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as teacher/learner
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV feedback to enrich
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted instruction.
submitted submitted submitted
7.5%
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted instruction.
submitted submitted submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable The teacher


least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was participated in 3
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown LACs/FGDs/meeting
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the s as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV in any 1 of th
the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable The teahcer 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was developed and used
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown varied teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals.
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable The teacher
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was submitted at least 4
learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown varied teaching and
Submitted at least 4 including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as learning resources,
varied teaching and evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in including ICT, as
learning resources, MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the evidently
including ICT, as supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
evidently shown in of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable The teacher 5 5 5 0.375
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was designed, selected,
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown organized and used
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and diagnostic, formative
formative and summative summative summative summative and summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies consistent
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with with curriculum
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum requirements.
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable The teacher
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was submitted 3 varied
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown assessment tools as
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable The teacher
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was submitted 3 varied
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown assessment tools as
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the evidently.
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable The teacher 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was consistently
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown monitored and
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement evaluated learner
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner progress and
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as achievement using
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV learner attainment.
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
Submitted a
combination of at combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
combination of 3 of The teacher
least 4 of the the acceptable shown
the acceptable submitted a
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV combination of 3
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable The teacher
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was submitted were
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown distributed across 4
quarters

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable The teacher 4 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was consistently showed
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown prompt and clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV guardians.
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
7.5%
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable The teacher


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was submitted a
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown combination of at
acceptable MOV MOV MOV least 4 of the MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable The teacher were
submitted were distributed
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable The teacher 5 5 5.000 0.500
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was frequently performed
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown various related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable The teacher 5 5 5.000 0.500
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was frequently performed
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown various related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process.
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable The teacher submitted
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was 3 different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory 4.008

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MELISSA M. QUIATCHON, LPT MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA, LPT LISEO V. VERGARA, D.E.M.
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUM
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA Name of Rater:
Position: TEACHER-1 Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BATANGAS Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 TO MARCH 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q E
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4
Objective 10 7.5% 5 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 4
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4
Fina
Adjectiva

MICHAEL EDWARD N. DE VILLA MELISSA M. QUIATCHON


Ratee Rater
FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
cher)
Name of Rater: MELISSA M. QUIATCHON
DESIGNATED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019

Numerical Ratings
Score
T Ave
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4.000 0.400
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.0075

QUIATCHON LISEO V. VERGARA, D.E.M.


ter Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) fo

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5% of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2


more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given
given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and
Diversity of share effective Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Learners techniques in the shared effective shared effective shared effective
management of classroom classroom classroom
classroom structure to management management management
engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that
individually or in groups, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
in meaningful activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
exploration, discovery done in different done in different done in different
and hands-on activities 7.5% physical learning physical learning physical learning
within a range of environments as environments as environments as
physical learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
environments.environme with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
nts. Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of


the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
learners’ differences in Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
7.5%
gender, needs, lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
strengths, interests and shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
experiences. and supported by and supported by and supported by
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning processes to shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
requirements and varied
7.5%
teaching contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted submitted
and summative 7.5%
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
and achievement. 7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2


different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2


of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2


different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF T
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Ra
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NG TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective evidence was
applications of shown
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching evidence was
strategies to shown
promote critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other
higher-order
thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidently shown evidence was
in MOV 1 and shown
supported by any of
the other MOV
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


evidence was
Modeled and shown
shared effective
classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/ tasks
done in different
physical learning
environments as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive evidence was
behavior shown
management skills
by applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environments
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Applied any of the No acceptable


given strategies as evidence was
observed in only 1 shown
lesson

Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others
colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable


lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
with others

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


applied effective evidence was
strategies showing shown
developmentally-
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidenced by evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher shown
and learner
feedback as
evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative review evidence was
of teacher and shown
learner feedback as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


colleagues in the evidence was
selection, shown
organization,
development and
appropriate use of
teaching and
learning resources
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
as evidenced by
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
with colleagues in evidence was
the interpretation of shown
assessment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the MOV evidence was
shown

Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


in the effective evidence was
communication of shown
learner needs and
progress to parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1
MOV

Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


special tasks and/or evidence was
assignments as shown
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach
Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeri


KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority

You might also like