Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legarda vs. de Castro
Legarda vs. de Castro
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 1 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
126
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 2 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
127
Same; Same; Same; One cannot say that half a million votes
were illegally obtained based on unclear evidence of cheating in less
than ten thousand.·As pointed out by protestee, even assuming
arguendo that all the votes in the 497 precincts included in the pilot
areas for the First Aspect with approximately 99,400 votes are
considered in favor of protestant, still the protestant would not be
able to overcome the lead of the protestee. The margin in favor of
protestee adds up to a total of 881,722 votes, and it would take
much more than a hundred thousand votes to overcome this lead.
This is what the protestant had set out to do in her protest before
the Tribunal, but unfortunately she failed to make out her case. In
fact, Taraka and Balindong, the only two municipalities on which
protestant anchors her arguments for the First Aspect, would only
yield an additional 9,931 votes (4,912 votes for Taraka and 5,019
votes for Balindong), a mere fraction of the lead of protestee over
protestant. To say that she could have shown that such fraudulent
machination was replicated in several other municipalities of Lanao
del Sur and other provinces, such as Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi,
Maguindanao, Sultan Kudarat and Lanao del Sur if she had enough
time, is mere conjecture and can not be considered convincing by
this Tribunal. It is the protestant herself who admits that she was
able to adduce evidence only in Taraka and Balindong, for lack of
time. But this Tribunal has been liberal in granting her plea for
time extension. To say that the protestant had shown enough
evidence to prove that the whole or even half (440,862) of the lead of
the protestee over the protestant is spurious, would go against the
grain of the evidence on hand. One cannot say that half a million
votes were illegally obtained based on unclear evidence of cheating
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 3 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
in less than ten thousand. The protestant has been afforded ample
opportunity to adduce evidence in her behalf for the First Aspect of
the protest but the evidence presented is simply insufficient to
convince the Tribunal to render invalid all or even half of the
881,722 votes that protestee had over her in the last elections for
Vice-President.
128
RESOLUTION
QUISUMBING, J.:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 4 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
129
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 5 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
in due time.
Considering that we find the protest sufficient in form and
substance, we must again stress that nothing as yet has been
proved as to the veracity of the allegations. The protest is only
sufficient for the Tribunal to proceed and give the protestant the
opportunity to prove her case pursuant to Rule 61 of the PET Rules.
Although said rule only pertains to revision of ballots, nothing
herein prevents the Tribunal from allowing or including the
correction of manifest errors, pursuant to the TribunalÊs rule-
making power under Section 4, Article VII of the Constitution.
On a related matter, the protestant in her reiterating motion
prays for ocular inspection and inventory-taking of ballot boxes, and
appointment of watchers. However, the Tribunal has already
ordered the protection and safeguarding of the subject ballot boxes;
and it has issued also the appropriate directives to officials
concerned. At this point, we find no showing of an imperative need
for the relief prayed for, since protective and safeguard measures
are
_______________
5 Id., at p. 511.
130
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 6 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
131
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 7 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
xxxx
A. Hearing Commissioner·
132
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 8 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
President/General
12
Manager of Ernest Printing
Corporation and
_______________
GREETINGS:
133
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 9 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
then Commission
13
on Elections Chairman Benjamin
Abalos. On August 28, 2006, a preliminary conference was
called by
_______________
GREETINGS:
134
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 10 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
taining to, the Municipalities of Balindong and Taraka, Lanao del Sur as well
as the Province of Lanao del Sur;
(2) bring with you to the Tribunal the following documents, therein below
specified:
You shall also testify on the various election documents above enumerated in
respect to their printing, their genuineness and authenticity, and on the
presence of SECURITY FEATURES contained, placed and/or embedded
therein, should there be any.
FAIL NOT UNDER PENALTY OF LAW.
WITNESS the Honorable Bernardo P. Pardo, Ret. Associate Justice, this
13th day of September 2006.
(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA
Clerk of the Tribunal
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 11 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
135
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 12 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
136
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.‰
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 13 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
137
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 14 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
138
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 15 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
139
Surely, the parties do not harbor the idea that the retabulation of
election returns and revision of ballots is the end of the election
protest. They are merely the first phase of the process and must
still pass closer scrutiny by the Tribunal.
The great public interest at stake behooves the Tribunal to
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 16 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
exercise its power and render judgment free from public pressure
and uninterrupted by the partiesÊ penchant for media mileage.
Therefore, in view of the foregoing reports where press statements
of both parties appeared as an attempt to influence the proceedings,
convince the public of their version of facts, and create bias,
prejudice and sympathies, the Tribunal resolves to WARN both
parties and counsels from making public comments on all matters
that are sub judice.
Finally, acting on the pleadings filed in this electoral protest
case, the Tribunal further Resolves to
140
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 17 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
141
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 18 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
RULE 33. Effect of failure to make cash deposit.·If a party fails to make the
cash deposits or additional deposits herein required within the prescribed time
limit, the Tribunal may dismiss the protest or counter-protest, or take such
action as it may deem equitable under the circumstances.
142
22 23
pursuant to Rule 61 of the PET Rules.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 19 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
On August 2, 24
2007, by counsel protestant submitted her
memorandum. On August 16,25 2007, also by counsel
protestee filed his memorandum.
On October 1, 2007, Hearing Commissioner Bernardo P.
Pardo submitted his Final Report of the Proceedings on the
First Aspect. After a thorough analysis of the partiesÊ
memoranda and the results of the proceedings on the 26
protest, he recommended the dismissal of the First Aspect.
_______________
RULE 61. When submitted; contents.·Within twenty days from receipt of the
TribunalÊs ruling on the last offer of evidence by the protestee, the parties shall
simultaneously submit their respective memoranda setting forth briefly:
143
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 20 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 21 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
29 Id.
30 Id.
31 Id.
144
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 22 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
32 Id.
33 Id.
145
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 23 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
146
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 24 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
147
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 25 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
148
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 26 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
term if she would succeed in proving in the instant protest that she
was the true winner in the 1992 elections. In assuming the office of
Senator then, the Protestant has effectively abandoned or
withdrawn this protest, or at the very least, in the language of
Moraleja, abandoned her „determination to protect and pursue the
public interest involved in the matter of who is the real choice of the
electorate.‰ Such abandonment or withdrawal operates to render
moot the instant protest. Moreover, the dismissal of this protest
would serve public interest as it would dissipate the aura of
uncertainty as to the results of the 1992 presidential election,
thereby enhancing the all-[too] crucial political stability of the
nation during this period of national recovery.
It must also be stressed that under the Rules of the Presidential
Electoral Tribunal, an election protest may be summarily
dismissed, regardless of the public policy and public interest
implications thereof, on the following grounds:
_______________
149
(3) The filing fee is not paid within the periods provided for in
these Rules;
(4) The cash deposit, or the first P100,000.00 thereof, is not
paid within 10 days after the filing of the protest; and
(5) The petition or copies thereof and the annexes thereto filed
with the Tribunal are not clearly legible.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 27 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
150
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 28 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
151
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 29 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 30 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
152
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 31 of 32
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 542 02/10/2016, 2:59 PM
153
··o0o··
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015784360ca8e05bb51f003600fb002c009e/p/AQS555/?username=Guest Page 32 of 32