Beams: Deformation by Superposition

Third Edition
LECTURE
BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY
SUPERPOSITION
• A. J. Clark School of Engineering •Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
19 by
Dr. Ibrahim A. Assakkaf
SPRING 2003
Chapter ENES 220 – Mechanics of Materials
9.7 – 9.8 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of Maryland, College Park
LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 1

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Deflection by Superposition
Method of Superposition
– When a beam is subjected to several loads
(see Fig. 18) at various positions along the
beam, the problem of determining the
slope and the deflection usually becomes
quite involved and tedious.
– This is true regardless of the method used.
– However, many complex loading
conditions are merely combinations of
1
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
relatively simple loading conditions
P P
y y w2
w1
x x
L a b
Figure 18 (a) (b)

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
– Assumptions:
• The beam behaves elastically for the combined
loading.
• The beam also behaves elastically for the each
of the individual loads.
• Small deflection theory.
2
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
If it is assumed that the beam behaves
elastically for the combined loading, as well
as for the individual loads, the resulting final
deflection of the loaded beam is simply the
sum of the deflections caused by each of the
individual loads.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
– This sum may be an algebraic one (Figure
19) or it might be a vector sum as shown in
Figure 20, the type depending on whether
or not the individual deflection lie in the
same plane.
– The superposition method can illustrated
by various practical examples.
3
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Figure 19
Method of Superposition P
y w2
y P
P x
w1 a b
L
x
y || P
x
y || y +w
P u
x x
y
+ y +
wt
x x

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Principle of Superposition:
• Deformations of beams subjected to • Procedure is facilitated by tables of
combinations of loadings may be solutions for common types of
obtained as the linear combination of loadings and supports.
the deformations from the individual
loadings
4
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Figure 20
w
y
A
P δy A
δ = δ y2 + δ z2
δz z

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Illustrative Example for the Use of

Superposition
– Consider the beam shown in Fig. 21, with
a flexural rigidity of EI = 100 MN⋅m.
y 150 kN
2m
20 kN/m
Figure 21 x
•D
L=8m
5
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– If we are interested on finding the slope
and the deflection, say of point D, then we
can use the superposition method to do
that as illustrated in the following slides.
– First we find the slope and deflection due
the effect of each load, i.e., w, P, etc.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Superposition
– The resulting final slope and deflection of
point D of the loaded beam is simply the
sum of the slopes and deflections caused
by each of the individual loads as shown in
Figure 22.
– We need to find both the slope and
deflection caused by the concentrated load
(120 kN) and distributed load (20 kN/m)
6
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Superposition
150 kN 150 kN
y y y
2m 2m
= +
20 kN/m 20 kN/m
x x x
D D D
L=8m L=8m L=8m
Figure 22. Original Loading is Broken into Two Individual Loads

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

150 kN Superposition150 kN
y y y
2m 2m 2m
20 kN/m 20 kN/m
x x x
D
D D
L=8m L=8m L=8m
δD = δP + δw
δ D = δ D −due to P + δ D −due to w
Figure 23. Original Deflection is Broken into Two Individual Deflections
7
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– Slope and Deflection caused by P
• By either the direct integration or the singularity
functions method, it can be seen that the slope
and deflection (due to P) of point D of this
particular loaded beam are given, respectively,
as 2
3PL3
(θ D )P = − PL and ( y D )P =
32 EI 256 EI

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– Slope and Deflection caused by P
• Therefore,
PL2 150 × 103 (8) 2
(θ D )P = − = = −0.003 rad (25a)
32 EI 32(100 × 106 )
( yD )P = − 3PL3
=
(
3 150 × 103 (8)) 3
= −0.009 m (25b)
256 EI 256(100 × 106 )
8
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– Slope and Deflection caused by w
• By either the direct integration or the singularity
functions method, it can be seen that the slope
and deflection (due to w) of point D of this
particular loaded beam are given, respectively,
as
(θ D )P = w (− 4 x 3 + 6 Lx 2 − L3 ) (26a)
24 EI
( yD )P = w (− x 4 + 2 Lx 3 − L3 x ) (26b)
24 EI

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– Slope and Deflection caused by w
• With w = 20 kN/m, x = 2 m, and L = 8 m, thus
20 ×103
(θ D )P = w
24 EI
( )
− 4 x 3 + 6 Lx 2 − L3 =
( )
24 100 × 106
(− 356) = −0.00293 rad
20 × 10
( )
3
w
( yD )P = − x 4 + 2 Lx 3 − L3 x = (− 912) = −0.0076 m
24 EI (
24 100 ×106)
9
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

Superposition
– Combining the slopes and deflections
produced by the concentrated (P) and
distributed (w) loads, the results are
θ D = (θ D )P + (θ D )w = −0.003 − 0.00293 = −0.00593 rad
y D = ( y D )P + ( y D )w = −0.009 − 0.0076 = 0.0166 m = 16.6 mm

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Superposition
150 kN 150 kN
y y y
2m 2m 2m
20 kN/m 20 kN/m
x x x
D
D D
L=8m L=8m L=8m
δD = (δ D )P + (δ D )w
(θ D )P
θD θ D = (θ D ) p + (θ D )w and y D = ( y D ) p + ( y D )w (θ D )w
Figure 24. Total Slope and Deflection of Point D
10
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
General Procedure of Superposition
– It is evident from the last results that the
slope or deflection of a beam is the sum of
the slopes or deflections produced by the
individual loads.
– Once the slopes or deflections produced
by a few typical individual loads have been
determined by one of the methods already

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
General Procedure of Superposition
– Presented, the superposition method
provides a means of quickly solving a wide
range of more complicated problems by
various combinations of known results.
– As more data become available, yet a
wider range of problems can be solved by
the method of superposition.
11
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Slope and Deflection Tables

– To facilitate the task of practicing
engineers, most structural and mechanical
handbooks include tables giving the
deflections and slopes of beams for
various loadings and types of support.
– Such a table can be found in the textbook
(Table B19) and provided herein in the
next few viewgraphs (Table 1 and 2).

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Slopes and Deflection Tables
Table 1a
12
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 1b

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 1c
13
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 1d

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 2a
(Beer and Johnston 1992)
14
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 2b

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 2c
15
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Use of Slopes and Deflection Tables
– Notice that the slope and deflection of the
beam of Figures 21 and 24 (repeated here)
of the illustrative example could have been
determined from the table (Table 1)
y 150 kN
2m
20 kN/m
Figure 21 • x
D
L=8m

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
150 kN 150 kN
y y y
2m 2m 2m
20 kN/m 20 kN/m
x x x
D
D D
L=8m L=8m L=8m
δD = (δ D )P + (δ D )w
(θ D )P
θD θ D = (θ D ) p + (θ D )w and y D = ( y D ) p + ( y D )w (θ D )w
Figure 24. Total Slope and Deflection of Point D
16
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
– Indeed, given the information given under
cases 5 and 6 of Tables 2c, the slope and
deflection for any value x ≤ L/4 could have
been expressed analytically.
– Taking the derivative of the expression
obtained in this way, would have yielded
the slope of the beam over the same
interval.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
– The slope at both ends of the beam may
be obtained by simply adding the
corresponding values given in the table.
– However, the maximum deflection of the
beam of Fig. 21 cannot be obtained by
adding the maximum deflections of cases 5
and 6 (Table 2c), since these deflections
occur at different points of the beam.
17
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
– Applying case 5 on the illustrative example
to find both the slope and deflection of
point D of the beam (Fig. 21), yields
( y D )P = Pb 3
6 EIL
[ )] ((
x − L2 − b 2 x =
) [ (
150 ×103 (6) 3
6 100 × 106 (8)
) ]
2 − 82 − 6 2 (2 ) = −0.009 m
(θ ) = dy = Pb [3x − (L − b )] = 150 ×10 (6) [3(2) − (8 − 6 )] = −0.003 rad

3
2 2 2 2 2 2
6(100 × 10 )(8)
D P 6
dx 6 EIL
– These values confirm the results obtained

using Eq. 25 of the integration method.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 6
Use the method of superposition to find the
slope and deflection at point B of the
beam. y
w
C B
A x
L L
2 2
18
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 6 (cont’d)
The given loading can be obtained by
superposing the loadings shown in the
following “picture equation” (Fig. 25). The
beam AB is, of course, the same in each
part of the figure.
For each the loadings 1 and 2, the slope
and deflection at B can be determined by
using the Tables 1 or 2. (Textbook Table
B-19)

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Figure 25
Loading 1 Loading 2
w C w
A
L
C
L
B
= A
L L
B
+ A
L
C
w
L
B
2 2 2 2 2 2
(θ B )2
=
C
+
C B
A A B A
C
yB ( yB )1 ( yB )2
θB (θ B )1
19
Problem 6 (cont’d)
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
For the beam and loading shown,

determine the slope and deflection at
point B.
SOLUTION:
Superpose the deformations due to Loading I and Loading II as shown.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Loading 1:
• From Table 1a or Table 2a (also Table B-19 of
the textbook),
3 4
(θ B )1 = − wL and ( y B )1 = − wL (27a)
6 EI 8EI
Loading 2:
• From the same tables:
w(L / 2) w(L / 2)
3 4
wL3 wL4
(θ C )2 =+ =+ and ( yC )2 =+ = (27b)
6 EI 48 EI 8 EI 128EI
20
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Figure 26
Loading 2 In portion CB, the bending moment for loading 2
C is zero, thus the elastic curve is a straight line:
A B
wL3
w (θ B )2 = (θ C )2 = + (28)
L L 48 EI
2 2 ( yB )2 = ( yC )2 + L (θ C )2 (29)
(θ C )2 (θ B )2 Slope = (θ C )2
2
A B ( yB )2
C
( yC )2
( yC )2 ( yB )2 L
2

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Total slope and deflection:
• Slope of Point B:
wL3 wL3 7 wL3
θ B = (θ B )1 + (θ B )2 = − + =−
6 EI 48EI 48EI
• Deflection of Point B:
wL4 L  wL3  7 wL4
( y B )2 = ( yC )2 + L (θ C )2 = +   = +
2 128 EI 2  48EI  384 EI
wL4 7 wL4 41wL4
y B = ( y B )1 + ( y B )2 = − + =−
8 EI 384 EI 384 EI
21
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 7
Use the method of superposition,
determine the deflection at the free end of
the cantilever beam shown in Fig. 27 in
terms of w, L, E, and I.
y wL
w
Figure 27 A x
B C
L L

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Figure 28
wL Loading 1 wL Loading 2
w w
A
B C = A
B C + A
B
C
L L L L L L
Straight Line
=
B
+
B C
A A C A
B
δC (δ C )1 (δ C )2
θC (θ C )1 (θ C )2
22
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Using the solutions listed in Table 1a.
Cases 1 and 2 (Textbook Table B-19) with
P = wL
δ C = (δ C )1 + (δ C )2 = (δ C )1 + (δ B )2 + L(θ B )2
P (2 L)3  wL4  wL3 
=− + − − L 
3EI  8 EI  6 EI 
wL(2 L )  wL4  wL3 
3
71wL4
=− + − − L  = −
3EI  8EI  6 EI  24 EI

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 8
For the simply supported beam of Fig. 29,
use the method of superposition to
determine the total deflection at point C in
terms of P, L, E, and I.
y P P
A D
Figure 29 • • x
B C
L/4 L/4
L
23
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Loading 1 Loading 2
y P P y P y P
A
B
• •
L/4 L/4
C D
=
x A
B
• •
L/4 L/4
C D
x
+ A
B
• •
L/4 L/4
C D
x
L L L
From Table 1c (Text B-19) From Table 1b (Text B-19)
Case 6 Case 5
x = L/2 a = 3L / 4, b = L / 4
Figure 30
Pb(3L2 − 4b 2 )
PL3 ycenter = −
ycenter =− 48 EI
48 EI

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Table 1b
24
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 8 (cont’d) Table 1c

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Deflection due to Loading 1:
PL3
( yC )1 =
48 EI
Deflection due to Loading 2:
( y ) = − Pb(3L − 4b ) = − P(L / 4)[3L − 4(L / 4) ] = − 11PL
2 2 2 2 3
C 2
48 EI 48 EI 768 EI
Therefore, total deflection of point C

PL3 11PL3 9 PL3
yC = ( yC )1 + ( yC )2 = − − =−
48 EI 768 EI 256 EI
25
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 9
Using the method of superposition, find the
deflection at a point midway between the
supports of the beam shown in the figure in
terms of w, L, E, and I.
y wL/4
w
A x
B C D
Figure 31 L/2 L 3L/4

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
The deflection at a point midway between
the supports can be determined by
considering the beam shown in Fig. 32.
Note that since the shear forces VB and VC
do not contribute to the deflection at any
point in span BC, the mid-span deflection
can be expressed as
δ mid = δ M + δ M B C
(28)
26
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
y Figure 32 wL/4
w
A x
B C D
L/2 L 3L/4
yV B =
wL
VC =
wL
2 4
wL  L 
MB =  
2 4 x
wL2 B C
= wL  3L  3wL
8 MC =  =
L 4  4  16

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Using the solutions listed in Table 1, Table
2, or Table B-19 of the textbook with
MB = wL2/8 and MC = 3wL2/16
δ mid = δ M + δ M =
(wL / 8)(L ) + (3wL
2 2 2
)( )
/ 16 L2
B C
16 EI 16 EI
4
5wL
=
256 EI
27
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 9 (cont’d) Table 1d

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 10
For the beam in Fig. 33, determine the
flexural stress at point A and the deflection
of the left-hand end.
w = 5 psi A
6 in
A 80 in
Figure 33 E = 2.4 ×106 psi
4 in P = 600 lb
28
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
The stress at point A is a combination of
compressive flexural stress due to the
concentrated load and a tensile flexural
stress due to the distributed load, hence,
σA = − =
[ −
]
M z (3) M y (2 ) 5(4 )(80 ) / 2 (3) 600(80 )(2 )
2
4(6 ) / 12 6(4 ) / 12
3 3
Iz Iy
= 2,666.7 + 3000.0 = −333.3 psi (compression)

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
w = 5 psi A
E = 2.4 ×106 psi
6 in
A 80 in
4 in P = 600 lb
y
δy A
δ = δ y2 + δ z2
Figure 34
δz z
29
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
The deflection at the end of a cantilever
beam with uniformly distributed load is
given by (see Table 1a, case 2)
5(4 )(80)
4
wL4
y0 = = = 0.5926 in
( )[
8EI z 8 2.4 ×10 6 4(6)3 / 12 ]
and with concentrated load at the end is
given by (see Table 1a, case 1)
600(80 )
3
PL3
z0 = = = 1.3333 in
3EI 3(2.4 ×106 ) [6(4)3 / 12]

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 10 (cont’d) Table 1a
30
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Superimposing the results for the
deflections due to the concentrated and
distributed loads, the deflection at the free
end is the vector sum:
δ = y02 + z02 = (0.5626)2 + (1.3333)2
= 1.447 in

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Statically Indeterminate
Transversely Loaded Beams
The Superposition Method
– The concept of the superposition, which
states that a slope or deflection due to
several loads is the algebraic sum of the
slopes or deflections to each individual
loads acting alone can be applied to
statically indeterminate beams.
– The superposition can provide the
additional equations needed in the
analysis.
31
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
The Superposition Method
– Procedure
• Selected restraints are removed and replaced by
unknown loads, e.g., forces and couples.
• Sketching of the deformation (deflection)
diagrams corresponding to individual loads (both
known and unknown).
• Adding up algebraically the individual of
components of slopes or deflections to produce
the known configuration.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Illustrative Example using Superposition
Determine the reactions at the supports for
the simply supported cantilever beam
(Fig.35) presented earlier for the
integration method.
w
A B
32
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
– First consider the reaction at B as
redundant and release the beam from the
support (remove restraint).
– The reaction RB is now considered as an
unknown load (see Fig. 39) and will be
determined from the condition that the
deflection at B must be zero.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
w w B
A B = A
B
+ A
L L RB ( y B )R
( y B )w
B
RB
(b) (c)
(a)
Figure 39. Original Loading is Broken into Two Loads
33
Application of Superposition to Statically ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Indeterminate Beams
• Method of superposition may be • Determine the beam deformation

applied to determine the reactions at without the redundant support.
the supports of statically indeterminate
beams. • Treat the redundant reaction as an
unknown load which, together with
• Designate one of the reactions as the other loads, must produce
redundant and eliminate or modify deformations compatible with the
the support. original supports.

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
In reference to Table 1a cases 1 and 2
(Table B19 of Textbook):
RB L3 4
( y B )R =+ and ( y B )w = − wL (37)
B
3EI 8 EI
The deflection at B in the original structural

configuration must equal to zero, that is
y B = ( y B )RA + ( y B )w = 0 (38)
34
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Slopes and Deflection Tables Table 1a

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
Substituting Eq. 37 into Eq. 38, gives
RB L3 wL4
+ − =0 (39)
3EI 8 EI
Solving for RB, the result is
3 (40)
RB = + wL
8
35
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
From the free-body diagram for entire
beam (Figure 40), the equations of
equilibrium are used to find the rest of the
reactions.
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0; RAy + RB − wL = 0
∴ RAy = wL − RB (41)

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
wL
L/2
MA w
A
RAx B
RAy x RB
Figure 40. Free-body Diagram for the Entire Beam
36
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
3
But RB = wL from Eq. 40, therefore
8
3 5 (42)
RA = wL − wL = wL
8 8
L
+ ∑ M A = 0; - M A − RB L + (wL ) = 0
2
1 3  1
∴ M A = − RB L + wL2 =  wL  L − wL2
2  8  2
1 (43)
= wL2
8

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Method (cont’d)
From Eqs.40, 42, and 43,
5
RAx = 0 RAy = wL
8
1 3
M A = wL2 RB = wL
8 8
Which confirms the results found by using the
integration method.
37
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 12
A beam is loaded and supported as shown
in the figure. Determine (a) the reaction at
supports A and B in terms of w and L, and
(b) the deflection at the left end of the
distributed load in terms of w, L, E, and I.
2wL
w
A
B
C
L 2L

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Example 12 (cont’d) Figure 41
2wL
The portion AC in Figs. 41a and B is a straight line.
w
A
L
C
2L
B
=
δ AP
θ AR A
δ AR δ CR
δ Cw 2wL
A
A
+ +
w
C A C
A B B A B
C
θ Cw
δ CP θ CP θ CR
δ Aw θ AP RA
A
θ Aw (a) (b) (c)
38
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Note that the portion AC of the beam in
Figs. 41a and 41b is a straight line,
therefore
(a) Using the solution listed in Table 1a
with P = 2wL
δ A = δ Cw + θ Cw (L ) + δ CP + θ CP (L ) + δ AR = 0
A
(44)
w(2 L ) w(2 L )
(L ) − 2wL(2 L ) − 2wL(2 L ) (L ) + RA (3L ) = 0
4 3 3 2 3
− −
8 EI 6 EI 3EI 2 EI 3EI

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Slopes and Deflection Tables Table 1a
39
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
2wL From which (Eq. 44),
38wL
w RA = +
C 27
A B
L 2L MB Equilibrium equations give

RA RB + ↑ ∑ Fy = 0; RA − P − w(2 L ) + RB = 0
FBD 38wL
− 2 wL − 2 wL + RB = 0
3EI
70 wL
∴ RB =
27

ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
2wL
+ ∑M B = 0; R A (3L ) − P(2 L ) − w(2 L )(L ) + M B = 0
w 38wL
C (3L ) − 4wL2 − 2wL2 + M B = 0
A B 27
L 2L MB 16 wL2
∴MB =
RA RB 9
(b) Deflection at left end of distributed load (at C):
FBD RC = R A =
38wL
27
2
38wL
M C = R A (L ) = (L ) = 38wL
27 27
δ C = δ CRC + δ CM C + δ CP + δ Cw
(38wL / 27 )(2 L )3 + (38wL2 / 27 )(2 L )2 − 2wL(2 L )3 − w(2 L )4 =−
62 wL4
3EI 2 EI 3EI 8 EI 81EI
40
ENES 220 ©Assakkaf
Slopes and Deflection Tables Table 1b
41

Beams: Deformation by Superposition

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Beams: Deformation by Superposition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Third Edition

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 1

Figure 18 (a) (b)

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 3

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 5

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 7

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 9

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 11

Figure 22. Original Loading is Broken into Two Individual Loads

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 13

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 15

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 17

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

 Illustrative Example for the Use of

y D = ( y D )P + ( y D )w = −0.009 − 0.0076 = 0.0166 m = 16.6 mm

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 19

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 21

 Slope and Deflection Tables

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 23

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 25

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 27

(Beer and Johnston 1992)

(Beer and Johnston 1992)

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 29

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 31

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 33

(θ ) = dy = Pb [3x − (L − b )] = 150 ×10 (6) [3(2) − (8 − 6 )] = −0.003 rad

– These values confirm the results obtained

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 35

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 37

For the beam and loading shown,

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 39

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 41

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 43

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 45

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 47

 Example 8 (cont’d) Table 1c

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 49

Therefore, total deflection of point C

Figure 31 L/2 L 3L/4

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 51

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 53

 Example 9 (cont’d) Table 1d

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 55

= 2,666.7 + 3000.0 = −333.3 psi (compression)

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 57

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 59

 Example 10 (cont’d) Table 1a

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 61

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 63

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 65

Figure 39. Original Loading is Broken into Two Loads

Application of Superposition to Statically ENES 220 ©Assakkaf

• Method of superposition may be • Determine the beam deformation

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 67

The deflection at B in the original structural

LECTURE 19. BEAMS: DEFORMATION BY SUPERPOSITION (9.7 – 9.8) Slide No. 69

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Illustrative Example for the Use of

Slope and Deflection Tables

Example 8 (cont’d) Table 1c

Example 9 (cont’d) Table 1d

Example 10 (cont’d) Table 1a