Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VRIN Framework (By Birger Wernerfelt) : (To Identify Resources That Give Firms A Competitive Advantage)
VRIN Framework (By Birger Wernerfelt) : (To Identify Resources That Give Firms A Competitive Advantage)
Certain resources give the business a competitive advantage. These have the VRIN
characteristics, which can be discovered by focusing on four essential qualities:
● Value: Resources that can bring value can be a source of competitive advantage. Keep
in mind that not all resources are equally easy to obtain.
● Rareness: Resources that are available to all competitors rarely provide any significant
competitive advantage.
● Imitability: An ideal resource cannot be obtained by competing businesses.
● Non-substitutable: An ideal resource cannot be substituted by any other resource.
Explanation:
● In 1984, Birger Wernerfelt came up with the resource-based view (RBV) as “a basis for
the competitive advantage of a firm that lies primarily in the application of a bundle of
valuable tangible or intangible resources at the firm’s disposal.” This influential theory
has become the basis of several frameworks, including VRIO.
● According to Wernerfelt’s theory, a business is a bundle of resources. Businesses differ
depending on what these resources are and how they are combined with one another.
Resources include but are not limited to processes, capabilities, assets, attributes,
information, and knowledge. Together, they allow businesses to execute their relevant
activities.
Target: What are you trying to measure? Which functions or processes eg: KPIs etc?
Analyst: people who are working have what skillsets and how can they be used?
Consulting firms have added 2 new dimensions to this as techniques and technologies used to
implement and sustain the analytics.
Techniques for data analysis & OTD
model
Output Techniques Data
Techniques:
1. Clustering technique: data reduction technique to cluster data into segments based on
some behaviours and patterns. Generally data is not labelled and hence, is unsupervised
learning. Similarity within segment is high and b/w different segments, its low.
2. Classification: the data is labelled and classified based on the labels. Like credit score of
customer can be one classification metric. Called supervised learning
3. CLV: The lifetime value that a customer generates for the company. NPV of all expected
future cash flow from the customer based on their cluster.
4. Decision tree: used to classify and predict in which data set the customer falls. Generally a
set of if-else statements that can categorise a customer.
5. Logistic regression: Run a regression model on data to figure out a person’ future behaviour
based on past trends and available metrics
Data:
1. Cross-sectional: the values at a particular timepoint for all people. Not useful in real-life
2. Time series data: data for one person over a long span of time.
3. Panel data: combination of both above. Very useful
Supply chain traceability is the process of tracking the provenance and journey of products and their
inputs, from the very start of the supply chain through to end-use. There are many reasons to
pursue traceability, and some sectors have been chasing it for many years—for example in food and
pharmaceuticals, where safety is critical. Traceability provides opportunities to find supply chain
efficiencies, meet regulatory requirements, to connect with and understand the actors in the
upstream supply chain, and of course, to story-tell to consumers about the provenance and journey
of products, often utilizing pictures or scannable QR codes on packaging.
AI Implication grid
Acquiring Information Sys &
Applications
Waterfall model: The waterfall model is a linear project management approach, where
stakeholder and customer requirements are gathered at the beginning of the project, and
then a sequential project plan is created to accommodate those requirements.
Agile (scrum): The development process happens in small milestones or sprints rather than
sequentially. The ‘releases’ happen in pieces rather than complete deployment.
Agile Method focuses more on the core functionality, it is more flexible, and debugging
is comparatively easier, higher customer involvement in development process. Widely accepted
industry standard in most software/hardware roles.
Agile (Kanban): More focussed towards operations(DevOps). Live-tracking and capacity tracking
in real-time. Easier to identify bottlenecks in the process. Generally has a dashboard display to
track processes and progress.
Agile is more flexible than waterfall method and adapts to changes better.
Cost saving in Agile is more due to lesser debugging effort
required
Milestones/releases provide real-time tracking in Agile
1. Size: Can organisation recover from any risk that the implementation poses? Eg: Venso at
high risk due to very small size. If any issues arise, don’t have spare capacity to use.
2. Requirement: underlying profit making/ success mapping principles are same. As an IS
vendor how do you assess risks?
3. Volatility: How to resolve timeline overshooting issues etc.? Is your method of
implementation upto the task of handling volatility? negotiation, emphasis on
organisational changes, both structural and procedural
4. Familiarity with tech: Do u have a project champion or a technology expert in your team?
Core competencies of the team? Client side familiarity with tech and buy-in?
IoT: Inter-connected devices/sensors in the system communicating with each other continuously
with a database running analytics to constantly improve something like energy consumption.
4 basic layers:
1. Selling IoT enabled devices vs just hardware requires much more insight into customer
business
2. Good idea to let new technologies and ideas grow from ground-up rather than top-down.
Best people to ideate are the ones who work on things day-to-day.
3. Need to create platform ecosystem for partner buy-in.