Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decarbonizing UK School Ventilation
Decarbonizing UK School Ventilation
com
s
ion
iss
Em
Se
cu
Cost
rity
Decarbonizing
UK School Ventilation
Decarbonizing UK School Ventilation
Emissions
2
sav-systems.com
The problem
With almost 33,000 schools in the UK(c), we must acknowledge that educational
buildings have a part to play in meeting the targets set.
Other
7%
Computing
8%
Catering
10%
Heating
50%
Lighting
25%
The average UK primary school is said to consume The latest edition of "BB101: Guidelines on ventilation,
119 kWh per m2 per year(d), and with classrooms typically thermal comfort and indoor air quality in schools"(f)
being 60 m2, each could be consuming 7,140 kWh annually. recommends more passive cooling methods, such as
increased thermal mass and brise soleil. Heating, however,
The Carbon Trust estimates that 58% of energy use in
remains intrinsically linked to the fresh air requirements
a school is by heating(e). Therefore, by reducing heating
and, due to inefficient ventilation systems, results in high
consumption in classrooms we could substantially
classroom heat losses. We must also acknowledge that
reduce carbon emissions.
the school year, by design, is largely during winter and
Energy consumption in classrooms largely comprises spring; the coldest times of year and the heating
of electrical devices, computing, lighting and space season (October to April).
heating. There has long been a focus on reducing the
energy consumption of electrical equipment, such
that these technologies contribute little to the school’s
energy demand. Schools are unlikely to be equipped
with active cooling (air conditioning), which could
have high electricity consumption.
3
Decarbonizing UK School Ventilation
The compromise
Numerous new schools and those being refurbished are being supplied with natural
or hybrid ventilation units, but these terms are a misnomer. In fact, the term hybrid
suggests that one specialises in neither natural nor mechanical and therefore an
engineering compromise must be made.
Hybrid solutions are more likely to retain heat in the Indeed, BB101 alludes to the difference in energy
form of stale, CO2-laden, air which must inevitably be consumption commenting that, “systems with low initial
replaced. By focussing, mechanical ventilation maximises capital costs may have unaffordable running costs (g).”
its efficiency all year round. At source, the energy (BB101 pg. 62, Life cycle and maintenance), often
consumption of an opening window or hybrid ventilation in the form of supplementary heating.
unit is low. However, a more holistic view is required: what
are the losses associated with this form of ventilation? The solution
Fabric losses aside, each classroom has a base heating For mechanical ventilation units with heat recovery or
load needed to maintain a certain room temperature. Smart Mechanical Ventilation units (SMVs), 80% to 90%
Once brought up to temperature, the occupants negate of the heat being extracted from the room will be
some of the load due to their own heat output, typically recovered by a heat exchanger.
measured as 70 W per person. For hybrid or natural ventilation units this must be sourced
To maintain low CO2 concentration in a classroom (daily from additional heating in the room as, by their very
average of no more than 1,000 ppm) the air in the space nature, these systems do not contain heat exchangers.
must be changed multiple times per hour at low velocity Therefore, any heat retention would be achieved by
and close to room temperature to avoid draughts. mixing stale room air, effectively limiting fresh air,
and diminishing indoor air quality.
When the external temperature is lower than the required
inlet temperature (typically 16°C for natural and naturally
driven hybrids, and 19°C for mechanical and mechanically
driven hybrids), the incoming air must be warmed up,
requiring a source of heat energy.
4
sav-systems.com
For a typical classroom, hybrids could use as little as 0.09 W/l/s whereas SMVs consume 0.8 W/l/s.
If classrooms are to have equal standards of indoor air quality, 200 l/s of ventilation would be required.
This results in electricity consumption of 0.02 kW for the hybrid, and 0.16 kW for the SMV. Assuming both
heat gains and fabric losses are equal in classroom, then the following diagram describes the overall system
energy requirement to achieve a steady energy state in the room of 3 kW, maintaining 21°C in the room.
Ventilation
Loss
Ventilation 3.0 kW
Loss
0.6 kW
Space
Input Heating Input
3.76 kW Demand 6.02 kW
3 kW
Electrical Electrical
Consumption Consumption
0.16 kW 0.02 kW
5
Decarbonizing UK School Ventilation
Mechanical vs Hybrid
The ventilation losses associated with hybrid ventilation are substantial. The result
is that the hybrid ventilation consumes 60% more energy than the SMV.
Considering annual results, the following table illustrates the energy consumption of two ventilation system
types including the top-up heating required to mitigate ventilation loss. The data is based on the London and
Leuchars, Scotland weather files with a flow rate of 200 l/s to achieve a daily average of 1,000 ppm of CO2 in
the classroom. It is pragmatic to assume, in the future, that BB101 will hold mechanical, natural and hybrid
ventilation systems to the same standards as pupils deserve equal environments regardless of the type of
equipment installed. The SMV in this case has a heat recovery efficiency of 84% and the hybrid, none.
Difference (%) 77 78
Heat Recovered (kWh/year) 2,959 0 3,645 0
As illustrated, by using an SMV, energy consumption due to ventilation could be reduced by as much as
78% when compared to a hybrid system. If a hybrid system were designed such that the amount of fresh
air is reduced and mixed with a higher proportion of recirculated room air during cold periods, the heating
consumption would reduce. However, the consequence would be significantly reduced indoor air quality.
3500
2959
3000
SMV
Energy Consumption (kWh/year)
2500 Traditional
2000
1500
1000 831
575
500
256
29 0
0
Annual Heating Annual Electrical Total Energy Consumption Heat Recovered
Consumption (kWh/year) Consumption (kWh/year) (kWh/year) (kWh/year)
6
sav-systems.com
Conclusion
Taking average classroom energy consumption of 7,140 kWh per year, and factoring
in heat recovery ventilation, energy consumption could be reduced to approximately
4,180 kWh per year in London classrooms, a 41% reduction. The data speaks for
itself: to decarbonize school heating systems the logical choice for ventilation
must be heat recovery.
ct Air
Extra
Air
ply
Sup
r
de Ai
Outsi
ir
au st A
Exh
References
(a) Net Zero The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming Committee on Climate Change. (2019) [online].
Available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Net-Zero-The-UKs-contribution-to-stopping-global-warming.pdf
(b) The City of Edinburgh Council Finance and Resource Committee (2019) Minutes of The City of Edinburgh Council Finance and Resource
committee meeting 10 October 2019 [online]. Available at: https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=9352
(c) BESA. (2017). Key UK education statistics - BESA [online]. Available at: https://www.besa.org.uk/key-uk-education-statistics/
(d) Energy Consumption In Non-Domestic Buildings: A Review of Schools. (2011) [online].
Available at: https://ep.liu.se/ecp/057/vol3/034/ecp57vol3_034.pdf
(e) Ctv019 schools. (2012) [online]. Available at: https://www.carbontrust.com/media/39232/ctv019_schools.pdf
(f) BB101: Guidelines on ventilation, thermal comfort and indoor air quality in schools (2018) [online]
Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/735063/BB101_
Guidelines_on_ventilation_thermal_comfort_and_indoor_air_quality_in_schools.docx
(g) BB101: Guidelines on ventilation, thermal comfort and indoor air quality in schools (2018) [online].
Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/735063/BB101_
Guidelines_on_ventilation_thermal_comfort_and_indoor_air_quality_in_schools.docx p. 62
(h) AirMaster A/S (2020). Estimation of energy consumption and return air ratio, United Kingdom, London [online]
Available at: https://sav-systems.workbooks.com/resources/=UDN3ADN/aca3bdb7f1b1ab72061d12eb84b30335.pdf
(i) AirMaster A/S (2020). Estimation of energy consumption and return air ratio, Leuchars, Scotland [online]
Available at: https://sav-systems.workbooks.com/resources/=UDN3ADN/bbfddbb934a02ccfe4098e9dc33ae7e2.pdf
7
Industry Views
www.sav-systems.com/industry-views
www.sav-systems.com/stories