JCSP

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No.

02, 2015 277

Green Synthesis, Thermal Analysis and Degradation Kinetics of


Cross-Linked Potato Starch
1
Azhar Abbas, 1 Muhammad Ajaz Hussain*, 1 Muhammad Amin, 1 Rizwan Nasir Paracha,
1
Muhammad Ameer and 2 Mazhar Hussain
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
2
Institute of Chemical Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60800 Multan, Pakistan.
majaz172@yahoo.com*

(Received on 7th April 2014, accepted in revised form 11th August 2014)

Summary: Succinylation of starch was carried out with succinic anhydride homogeneously using
N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) at 70°C for 24 h. Starch succinates (SS) were then cross-linked
using 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI). This green method for cross-linking of SS using CDI is being
reported for the first time. The SS and cross-linked starch succinate (CLSS) were characterized by
FTIR spectroscopy and thermal analysis. The CLSS was found thermally more stable than SS as
degradation maxima (Tdm) of CLSS (311°C) was 70°C higher than Tdm of SS (241°C) noted for
first and major step of degradation. Additionally, initial (Tdi) and final (Tdf) degradation
temperatures of CLSS were higher than SS which is indicative of extra thermal stability imparted
after cross-linking of starch via succinylation. Thermal degradation kinetics were calculated using
Friedman, Broido and Chang methods. Energy of activation (Ea) was calculated for each step of
degradation for SS and CLSS. Order of reaction (n) was calculated from Chang model and it was
found that degradation in first step follows first order kinetics in SS and CLSS.

Keywords: Cross-linking, Degradation kinetics, Starch, Succinic anhydride, Thermal analysis.

Introduction

Starch and its cross-linked derivatives are activating agent, i.e., CDI. The succinyl moiety also
widely used in various commercial applications like acts as a spacer arm and may enhance thermal
paper making, pharmaceutical and medicinal fields stability of starch after cross-linking. We are also
[1-4]. In order to improve thermal stability and focused on thermogravimetric analysis and
mechanical properties, starch is modified by blending degradation kinetics to elucidate thermal behavior of
with other materials [5], esterification [6-8], SS and its cross-linked products, i.e., CLSS.
oxidation and cross-linking [9-15].
Experimental
The cross-linked starch has several desirable
features, e.g., high temperature resistance, tensile Reagents and chemicals
texture, improved viscosity, high shear force, etc [16-
20]. The cross-linking of starch is usually carried out Potato starch (Uni-Chem) was dried under
using glutaraldehyde as cross-linking agent. But, vacuum at 50°C overnight before use. 1,1′-
glutaraldehyde gives aldehyde side products which carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), N,N-dimethylacetamide
are toxic hence not desirable. Alternatively, (DMAc) and DMF were obtained from Sigma-
activated-dicarboxylic acids are being used as cross- Aldrich and used as such. Lithium chloride was
linking agents for polysaccharide materials [21, 22]. obtained from Guangdong Gaunghua, China.
Such cross-linked polysaccharides are used in Succinic anhydride, other reagents and solvents
pharmaceutical and food industries, ion separation (Fluka) were of analytical grade.
filters and membranes, antibody and enzyme
separation membranes [23]. One major drawback in Measurements
dicarboxylic acid mediated cross-linking of
polysaccharides is low DS due to less reactivity and IR Prestige-21 (Shimadzu, Japan) was used
necessary work up procedure. Therefore, need was to acquire FTIR spectra. Thermal decomposition
felt to look for more efficient cross-linking temperatures of the starch succinate (SS) and cross-
methodology. linked starch succinate (CLSS) were analyzed using
TA Instruments equipped with a thermo-balance
Herein, we present novel and green (SDT Q600 USA). Temperature effects on samples
synthesis of cross-linked starch via succinylated were noted thermogravimetrically at heating rate of
intermediate using a green in situ carboxylic acid 10°C/min under N2.
*
To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 278

Dissolution of starch in DMAc/LiCl step in SS and CLSS. Friedman (eq. 1) [24], Chang
(eq. 2) [25] and Broido (eq. 3) [26] models were used
Dried starch (1.0 g, 6.16 mmol) was added
to calculate kinetic parameters.
in DMAc (30 mL) and heated at 100°C for 1 h.
Lithium chloride (0.5 g) was added and reaction
mixture was further heated at 135°C for 45 min. the
resultant starch solution was optically clear and used
for chemical modifications.
Succinylation of starch using succinic anhydride
Succinic anhydride (3.70 g, 37.0 mmol) was
added in parts to starch solution and reaction
proceeded for 24 h at 70°C. The reactions mixture
was precipitated and subsequently washed thrice with
2-propanol. The SS obtained was dried under vacuum
at 50°C. where, in eq. 1-3, dα/dt (rate of weight loss) was
Yield: 1.27 g (70%); DS: 1.32; FTIR (KBr): taken from DTG curve; n is the reaction order; Ea is
3444 (OH), 2947 (CH2), 1726 (CO Ester), 1458 the activation energy; R is the gas constant; Z is
(CH2) cm-1. frequency factor of decomposition reaction; T is the
absolute temperature recorded; 1-α is the weight of
Cross-linking of starch-succinate using 1,1′- sample left at a certain temperature; y is (wt-w∞)/(w0-
carbonyldiimidazole w∞); w∞ is final weight; w0 is initial weight; wt is
The SS (1.0 g, 3.38 mmol) was dissolved in weight at a given time t.
DMAc (25 mL). CDI (548 mg, 3.38 mmol) was
added and reaction was preceded at 80°C for 24 h.
The reaction mixture was precipitated and washed Results and Discussion
thrice with 2-propanol. The product obtained as white
powder was dried under vacuum at 50°C. Synthesis and characterization
Yield: 1.12 g (62%); DS: 1.30; FTIR (KBr): Succinylation of starch was performed under
3421 (weak signal, OH), 2951 (CH2), 1724 (CO homogenous reaction conditions. Starch was reacted
Ester), 1453 (CH2) cm-1. with succinic anhydride [27, 28]. The starch
Degree of substitution (DS) succinates obtained were cross-linked using CDI.
CDI first reacts with free COOH groups on succinyl
SS (100 mg) was dissolved in 1M aq.NaOH moieties attached on starch to make their
(50 mL) and stirred overnight. pH of reaction mixture imidazolides [29-31]. Imidazolide groups generated
was adjusted at 7 with help of HCl (0.01 M aq.). in situ react with free OH of starch to yield cross-
Afterwards, measured amount of 1M aq.NaOH was linked product. Additionally, CDI if remains
added. Extra amount of NaOH was back titrated unreacted towards COOH, it may cross-link starch
against 0.1M HCl solution to restore pH at 7. DS of hydroxyls in the form of ester which is an additional
succinylation was then calculated using following benefit of the reagent. The reaction scheme for the
formula; synthesis of starch succinate (SS) and cross-linked
starch succinate (CLSS) is depicted in Fig. 1 and
=[ . × ( )]/[ − ( )× . )] results are accumulated in Table-1.
where, n.NaOH is moles of NaOH added after
saponification, M (Ru) is molar mass of repeating
Table-1: The conditions and results of starch (1g)
anhydroglucose unit, Ms is the mass of sample and
with reagents to form esters of starch.
Mr (RCO-) is molar mass of ester as a substituent. Yield
Samples Molar ratio DS Solubility
(g/ %)
Thermal analysis and degradation kinetics SS 1:6a 1.32 1.27/70 DMAc, DMF, DMSO
CLSS 1:1b 1.30 1.12/62 DMAc, DMF, DMSO
DTG curves were drawn from TG curves. a
Anhydroglucose unit : Succinic anhydride; bStarch succinate :
From TG and DTG curves, Tdi, Tdm and Tdf were CDI
assessed for comparison of thermal stability of each
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 279

O O
OH
O O
O O O
O
HO O O
OH
O O
O O
O RO RO
O O
70oC, 24 h N O
O O O
O
N C N
N
O
OH o
80 C, 24 h
O O O
O O O
O O
O O
O RO O
O O RO
O
O O
HO O O
OH
O O O
O O

R = H or Succinate O O

Fig. 1: Synthesis of starch-succinate from succinic anhydride and its crosslinking.

COEster

CH2
CH2
OH

COC, CO
(a)

(b)
Transmittance, %

(c)

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500


Wavenumber, cm-1
Fig. 2: FTIR (KBr) spectra of pure starch (a), SS (b) and CLSS (c).

The degree of substitution (DS) was found The SS and CLSS were characterized using
1.32 for SS as calculated from acid-base titration FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectrum of SS showed a
after saponification. Both SS and CLSS were soluble distinct ester peak at 1726 cm-1 indicating successful
in DMSO, DMAc and DMF. However, SS was succinylation of starch. Other characteristic peaks of
partially soluble in water while CLSS was water free OH were found at 3444 cm-1 as a broad signals
insoluble even upon heating. and COC of polymer backbone centered at 1029 cm-1
while CH2 stretching appeared at 1458 cm-1.
However, FTIR spectrum of CLSS showed still intact
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 280

and distinct ester peak at 1724 cm-1 and all other thermal stability imparted to SS after cross-linking.
characteristic peaks were comparable with SS as Thermal data of SS and CLSS is reported in Table-2.
expected. Distinct ester peak along with all
characteristic signals of starch indicated successful
formation of SS and CLSS. An overlay FTIR
spectrum of starch, SS and CLSS is shown in Fig. 2.

Thermal Analysis and Degradation Kinetics

Cross-linking is an important parameter to


enhance heat resistant properties in biopolymeric
materials. Such heat resistant biopolymers are used
for film formation and coating applications.
Therefore, it is important to study thermal properties
of cross-linked starch derivatives. Thermal analysis
and degradation kinetic of SS were studied before
and after cross-linking. Thermal decomposition
temperatures, Tdi, Tdm and Tdf were drawn from TG Fig. 4: Overlay DTG curves of SS(--) and CLSS( ̶ ).
and DTG curves. Thermal analysis has revealed two
step degradation profiles for SS and CLSS where 2nd Table-2: Results of thermogravimetric analysis for
step corresponds to furfural formation in starch-succinate at10°C/min.
Tdi Tdm Tdf Weight loss Char yield
polysaccharides [30] and is not being discussed here. Sample Steps
(°C) (°C) (°C) % at Tdf Wt. (%)
Therefore, first and major degradation step of SS and SS
I 114.27 241.26 387.78 64.55 4.81 at
CLSS was compared for thermal properties. The II 543.18 653.29 743.87 89.11 845.10°C
I 176.43 311.41 407.31 60.56
overlay TG and differential TG (DTG) curves of SS CLSS II 552.06 639.08 728.77 83.80
0.36 at
916°C
and CLSS are shown in Figs. 3, 4, respectively. III 764.29 846.88 893.05 98.30
Tdi, Tdm, Tdf = Initial, maximum, final thermal decomposition
temperatures in °C.

Thermal kinetics was also calculated using


three different kinetic models, i.e., Friedman, Broido
and Chang. Friedman, Broido and Chang plots of SS
and CLSS are shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7, respectively.

The different kinetic parameters, e.g., order


of reaction (n), activation energy (Ea) and frequency
factor (Z) were drawn from thermal data. The Ea
values for the first step degradation of SS as
calculated from Friedman (28.42 kJ/mol) and Chang
(29.47 kJ/mol) models were in good agreement.
CLSS showed Ea values of 35.94 and 38.51 kJ/mol
for first step degradation as calculated by Friedman
and Chang models, respectively. The relatively
Fig. 3: Overlay TG curves of SS (--) and CLSS ( ̶ ). higher Ea values for CLSS as compared to SS
indicate higher thermal stability in the cross-linked
Degradation started at 114°C (Tdi) and product. Order of reaction (n) was also calculated
completed at 388°C (Tdf) with Tdm 241°C for first from Chang model and found that degradation
step of thermal degradation of SS where total weight follows first order kinetics for SS and CLSS. Hence,
loss observed was 65%. Whereas, in CLSS, it is confirmed from thermal analysis and degradation
degradation started and ended later as Tdi and Tdf kinetics that CLSS has higher thermal stability than
appeared at 176 and 407°C, respectively. Similarly, SS. The results of thermal kinetics of SS and CLSS
Tdm (311°C) of CLSS was 70°C higher than SS are summarized in Table-3.
(Tdm 241°C) which is indicative of significant
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 281

-2.46
-2.54
-2.21
-2.56 -2.475
-2.26

ln(dα/dt)
ln(dα/dt)
ln(dα/dt)

-2.58 -2.49
-2.31 -2.6
-2.36 -2.505
-2.62
-2.41 -2.64 -2.52
2.4 2.45 2.5 1.179 1.186 1.193 0.956 0.960 0.964
1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1)

Fig. 5: Friedman plots ln dα/dt vs. 1000/T (K-1) of step I, II and III (left to right) of thermal degradation of SS
(∆) and CLSS (□).

-2.07 -0.57
-0.72
-2.15 -0.62
-0.79
-2.23 -0.67

ln (ln1/y)
ln (ln1/y)

-0.87
ln (ln1/y)

-2.31 -0.94 -0.72


-2.39 -1.02 -0.77
-2.47 -1.09 -0.82
2.24 2.26 2.28 1.120 1.125 1.130 0.914 0.917 0.920
1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1)

Fig. 6: Broido plots ln (ln1/y) vs. 1000/T (K-1) of step I, II and III (left to right) of thermal degradation of SS
(∆) and CLSS (□).

-1.7 -1.81 -1.26


ln[(dα/dt)/(1-α)n]
ln[(dα/dt)/(1-α)n]

ln[(dα/dt)/(1-α)n]

-1.75 -1.86 -1.31


-1.8 -1.92 -1.36
-1.85 -1.97 -1.41
-1.9 -2.03 -1.46
-1.95 -2.08 -1.51
2.24 2.26 2.28 1.120 1.125 1.130 1.135 0.897 0.900 0.903
1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1) 1000/T (K-1)

Fig. 7: Chang plots ln [(dα/dt)/(1- α)n] vs. 1000/T (K-1) of step I, II and III (left to right) of thermal
degradation of SS (∆) and CLSS (□).

Table-3: Kinetics parameters of starch-succinate under nitrogen atmosphere.


Sample Step Method |r| n Ea (kJ/mol) lnZ ∆H* ∆S* ∆G*
Friedman 0.999 - 28.42 6.06 24.14 222.31 138.44
I Broido 0.999 - 39.48 - 35.21 199.87 137.97
Chang 0.999 1 29.47 6.39 25.20 219.26 137.93
SS
Friedman 0.999 - 138.47 17.32 130.77 130.20 251.36
II Broido 0.999 - 139.27 - 131.57 125.50 247.80
Chang 0.999 1 137.16 16.17 129.46 130.28 250.12
Friedman 0.999 - 35.94 6.84 31.09 217.06 157.88
I Broido 0.999 - 56.57 - 51.68 175.71 154.32
Chang 0.997 1 38.51 7.53 33.66 210.75 156.76
Friedman 0.994 - 75.95 8.14 68.36 211.15 260.96
CLSS II Broido 0.999 - 82.16 - 75.25 205.93 263.09
Chang 0.999 1 86.69 9.78 78.78 210.08 270.40
Friedman 0.999 - 267.02 29.03 257.36 35.21 298.42
III Broido 0.999 - 269.13 - 259.43 33.07 297.99
Chang 0.999 1 265.90 27.42 256.20 46.55 310.49
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 282

Conclusion 10. S. Jobling, Improving starch for food and


industrial applications. Curr. Opinion Plant
Succinylation of starch was achieved under Biol., 7, 210 (2004).
homogeneous reaction conditions using succinic 11. Y. Xu, V. Miladinov and M. A. Hanna,
anhydride. Moreover, cross-linking of succinylated Synthesis and characterization of starch acetates
starch was achieved using CDI. Result of thermal with high substitution, Cereal Chem., 81, 735
studies and degradation kinetics has revealed that (2004).
thermal properties of the starch succinate were 12. J. B. Hirsch and J. L. Kokini, Understanding the
significantly improved after cross-linking. Due to Mechanism of Cross-Linking Agents (POCl3,
extra ordinary thermal stability imparted after cross- STMP, and EPI) Through Swelling Behavior and
linking, CLSS could be a material of choice for Pasting Properties of Cross-Linked Waxy Maize
surface coating applications. Starches, Cereal Chem., 79, 102 (2002).
13. R. Kavitha and J. N. BeMiller, Characterization
References of hydroxypropylated potato starch, Carbohydr.
Polym., 37, 115 (1998).
1. L. Belard, P. Dole and L. Averous, Current 14. S. Richardson, A. Cohen and L. Gorton, High-
progress on biodegradable materials based on performance anion-exchange chromatography–
plasticized starch, Aust. J. Chem., 58, 457 electrospray mass spectrometry for investigation
(2005). of the substituent distribution in
2. G. Davis and J. H. Song, Biodegradable hydroxypropylated potato amylopectin starch, J.
packaging based on raw materials from crops Chromatogr., 917, 111 (2001).
and their impact on waste management, Ind. 15. S. Takahashi, T. Fujimoto, T. Miyamoto and H.
Crop. Prod., 23, 147 (2006). Inagaki, Relationship between distribution of
3. H. Roper, Renewable Raw Materials in Europe- substituents and water solubility of O-methyl
Industrial Utilisation of Starch and Sugar, cellulose, J. Polym. Sci., 25, 987 (1987).
Starch-Stärke, 54, 89 (2002). 16. N. Jyothi, S. N. Moorthy and V. Rajasekharan,
4. H. F. Zobel and A. M. Stephen, Starch: Effect of cross-linking with epichlorohydrin on
Structure, analysis, and Application, Food Sci. the properties of cassava (Manihot esculenta
Technol., 160, 25 (2006). Crantz) starch, Starch-Stärke, 58, 292 (2006).
5. K. Petersen, P. V. Nielsen and M. B. Olsen, 17. S. Ayoub and S. S. H. Rizvi, An overview on the
Physical and mechanical properties of biobased technology of cross-linking of starch for nonfood
materials starch, polylactate and applications, J. Plast. Film Sheet., 25, 2 (2009).
polyhydroxybutyrate, Starch-Stärke, 53, 356 18. M. Kim and S. J. Lee, Characteristics of
(2001). crosslinked potato starch and starch-filled linear
6. L. A. Bello-Perez, E. Agama-Acevedo, P. B. low-density polyethylene films, Carbohydr.
Zamudio-Flores, G. Mendez-Montealvo and S. Polym., 50, 331 (2002).
L. Rodriguez-Ambriz, Effect of low and high 19. K. P. Nair, V. Breedveld and M. Weck,
acetylation degree in the morphological, Complementary hydrogen bonded
physicochemical and structural characteristics of thermoreversible polymer networks with tunable
barley starch, Food Sci. Technol., 43, 1434 properties, Macromolecules, 41, 3429 (2008).
(2010). 20. A. Omari, Kinetic gelation of the
7. A. B. Das, G. Singh, S. Singh and C. S. Riar, polyacrylamide-glyoxal system, Polymer, 35,
Effect of acetylation and dual modification on 2148 (1994).
physico-chemical, rheological and 21. P. A. Seib, In: Proceeding of the 3rd CAFST
morphological characteristics of sweet potato International Symposium on Granular and
(Ipomoea batatas) starch, Carbohydr. Polym., Molecular Structure of Starch (pp. 117-163),
80, 725 (2010). Seoul, Korea (1997).
8. A. Lopez-Rubio, J. M. Clarke, B. Scherer, D. L. 22. Nawrath, Y. Poirier and C. Somerville, Plant
Topping and E. P. Gilbert, Structural polymers for biodegradable plastics: Cellulose,
modifications of granular starch upon starch and polyhydroxyalkanoates, Mol.
acylation with short-chain fatty acids, Food Breeding, 1, 105 (1995).
Hydrocolloids, 23, 1940 (2009). 23. J. C. P. Meloa, E. C. S. Filhob, S. A. A. Santanac
9. J. N. BeMiller, Starch modification: Challenges and C. Airoldi, Synthesized cellulose/succinic
and prospects, Starch-Stärke, 49, 127 (1997). anhydride as an ion exchanger. Calorimetry of
divalent cations in aqueous suspension,
Thermochim. Acta, 524, 29 (2011).
Azhar Abbas et al., J.Chem.Soc.Pak., Vol. 37, No. 02, 2015 283

24. H. L. Friedman, Kinetics of thermal degradation acetic anhydride with iodine, J. Serb. Chem.
of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Soc., 75, 165 (2010).
Application to a phenolic plastic, J. Polym. Sci. 29. M. A. Hussain, D. Shawar, M. N. Hassan, M. N.
Part C: Polym. Symp., 6, 183 (1964). Tahir, M. S. Iqbal and M. Sher, An efficient
25. W. L. Chang, Decomposition behavior of esterification of pullulan using activated
polyurethanes via mathematical simulation, J. carboxylic acid anhydrides with iodine, Collect.
Appl. Polym. Sci., 53, 1759 (1994). Czech. Chem. Commun., 75, 133 (2010).
26. A. Broido, A simple, sensitive graphical method 30. M. S. Iqbal, J. Akbar, S. Saghir, A. Karim, A.
of treating thermogravimetric analysis data, J. Koschella, T. Heinze and M. Sher, Thermal
Polym. Sci. Part A-2: Polym. Phys., 7, 1761 studies of plant carbohydrate polymer hydrogels,
(1969). Carbohydr. Polym., 86, 1775 (2011).
27. O. S. Lawal, Succinylated Dioscorea cayenensis 31. M. A. Hussain, T. F. Liebert and T. Heinze,
starch: Effect of reaction parameters and Acylation of cellulose with N,N’-
characterisation, Starch-Stärke, 64, 145 (2012). carbonyldiimidazole-activated acids in the novel
28. M. A. Hussain, D. Shawar, M. N. Tahir, M. solvent dimethylsulfoxide/ tetrabutylammonium
Sher, M. N. Hassan and Z. Afzal, An efficient fluoride, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 25, 916
acetylation of dextran using in situ activated (2004).

You might also like