Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.snehA A Study On Work Safety For Emloyee in Clinic Lab
S.snehA A Study On Work Safety For Emloyee in Clinic Lab
S.snehA A Study On Work Safety For Emloyee in Clinic Lab
The practices of safety measures by the clinical laboratory workers in hospitals are
necessary for the prevention of occupational hazards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
effect of safety training program for laboratory workers' regarding prevention of occupational
hazards. Design: A quasi-experimental design was used in carrying out this study. Setting: The
study was conducted at four governmental hospitals in Benha City: - are Benha University
Hospital, Benha Teaching Hospital, Health Insurance Hospital, and Fever Hospital which
included clinical laboratory. The sample of this study included convenient laboratory workers
(100) whom are working at four hospitals were participated in this study. Tools: 1- A structured
and their knowledge regarding occupational hazards, 2- An observational checklist for safe
occupational hazards. Results: Showed a significant positive effect of the program on knowledge
and practices of the laboratory workers (P < 0.001). This study concluded that the program has
positive effect to upgrade the laboratory workers' knowledge and improving their practices
regarding prevention of occupational hazards (P < 0.001). The study recommended that
regulatory training program should be strengthened to ensure basic lab safety practices in
hospitals, and providing training courses for large number of hospitals laboratory workers about
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Due to rapid industrialization, industrial workers are exposed to several types of hazards
and accidents. Every year lakhs of workers are injured due to mechanical, chemical, electrical
and radiation hazards and it leads to partial or total disablement. So in recent years, greater
attention is given to health and safety due to pressure from government, trade unions, labour
laws and awareness of employers.
The efficiency of workers depends to a great extends on the environment in which the
work. Work environment consists of all the factors, which act and react on the body and mind of
an employee. The primary aim is to create an environment, which ensures the greatest ease of
work and removes all causes of worries.
Occupational health and safety is a discipline with a broad scope involving many specialized
fields. In its broadest sense, it should aim at:
a) The promotion and maintenance of the highest degree of physical, mental and social
well-being of workers in all occupations.
b) The prevention among workers of adverse effects on health caused by their working
conditions.
c) The protection of workers in their employment from risks resulting from factors adverse
to health.
d) The placing and maintenance of workers in an occupational environment adapted to
physical and mental needs.
e) The adaptation of work to humans.
Successful occupational health and safety practice requires the collaboration and
participation of both employers and workers in health and safety programmes, and involves the
2
consideration of issues relating to occupational medicine, industrial hygiene, toxicology,
education, engineering safety, ergonomics, psychology, etc.
Work plays a central role in people's lives, since most workers spend at least eight hours
a day in the workplace, whether it is on a plantation, in an office, factory, etc. Therefore, work
environments should be safe and healthy. Unfortunately some employers assume little
responsibility for the protection of workers' health and safety. In fact, some employers do not
even know that they have the moral and often legal responsibility to protect workers.
3
Statutory provisions:
According to factories Act, 1948, the statutory provisions regarding the health of the
workers are stated in the sections 11 to 20. They are
5
Spittoons (sec 20):
A sufficient number of spittoons must be provided at convenient places, in a clean and
hygienic condition. The State Government may take rules regarding their number, location and
maintenance.
Statutory provisions:
According to factories Act, 1948, the statutory provisions regarding the safety of the
workers are stated in the sections 21 to 41. They are
Fencing of machinery (Sec 21):
6
In every factory, every dangerous part of any machinery, every moving part of a prime
mover and every flywheel connected to prime mover the head-race and tail-race of every water
wheel and water turbine, and every part of an electric generator, motor or rotary converter, every
part of transmission machinery, must be securely fenced by safeguards of substantial
construction.
Striking gear and devices for cutting off power (Sec 24):
In every factory, suitable striking gear or other efficient mechanical appliance has to be
provided, maintained and used to move driving belts.
Prohibition of employment of women and children near cotton openers (Sec 27):
7
Women and child workers are prohibited to be employed in any part of a factory for
pressing cotton in which a cotton opener is at work.
8
No person is to be employed in any factory to lift, carry or move any load as heavy as is
likely to cause him injury.
9
Every factory should adopt the measures to ensure the safety of the buildings and
machinery. The factory must employ the required safety officers according to the number of
workers working in the factory.
Power to make rules (Sec 41):
The state government has the power to make rules to supplement the provisions relating
to safety contained in the act.
Occupational accidents/disease:
Work-related accidents or diseases are very costly and can have many serious direct and
indirect effects on the lives of workers and their families. For workers some of the direct
costs of an injury or illness are:
a) the pain and suffering of the injury or illness;
b) the loss of income;
c) the possible loss of a job;
d) Health-care costs.
10
It has been estimated that the indirect costs of an accident or illness can be four to ten times
greater than the direct costs, or even more. An occupational illness or accident can have so many
indirect costs to workers that it is often difficult to measure them. One of the most obvious
indirect costs is the human suffering caused to workers' families, which cannot be compensated
with money.
Identifying hazards in the workplace:
Use a variety
of sources
for
information
about
potential or
existing
hazards in
your
workplace
Some occupational diseases have been recognized for many years, and affect workers in
different ways depending on the nature of the hazard, the route of exposure, the dose, etc. Some
well-known occupational diseases include:
a) Asbestosis (caused by asbestos, which is common in insulation, automobile brake linings,
etc.)
11
b) Silicosis (caused by silica, which is common in mining, sandblasting, etc.)
c) Lead poisoning (caused by lead, which is common in battery plants, paint factories, etc.)
d) Noise-induced hearing loss (caused by noise, which is common in many workplaces,
including airports, and workplaces where noisy machines, such as presses or drills, etc.)
A successful
health and
safety
programme
requires
strong
management
commitment
and worker
participation
In order to develop a successful health and safety programmed, it is essential that there be
strong management commitment and strong worker participation in the effort to create and
maintain a safe and healthy workplace. An effective management addresses all work-related
hazards, not only those covered by government standards.
All levels of management must make health and safety a priority. They must
communicate this by going out into the worksite to talk with workers about their concerns and to
12
observe work procedures and equipment. In each workplace, the lines of responsibility from top
to bottom need to be clear, and workers should know who is responsible for different health and
safety issues.
Importance of training:
Effective
training is
a key
component
of any
health and
safety
programme
Workers often experience work-related health problems and do not realize that the problems
are related to their work, particularly when an occupational disease, for example, is in the early
stages. Besides the other more obvious benefits of training, such as skills development, hazard
recognition, etc., a comprehensive training programmed in each workplace will help workers to:
a) Recognize early signs/symptoms of any potential occupational diseases before they
become permanent conditions.
b) Assess their work environment.
c) Insist that management make changes before hazardous conditions can develop.
Some Facts
India’s healthcare industry is currently worth Rs 73,000 core which is roughly 4 percent
of the GDP. The industry is expected to grow at the rate of 13 percent for the next six
years which amounts to an addition of Rs 9,000 cores each year.
The national average of proportion of households in the middle and higher middle
income group has increased from 14% in 1990 to 20 % in 1999.
The population to bed ratio in India is 1 bed per 1000, in relation to the WHO norm of 1
bed per 300.
Over the last five years, there has been an attitudinal change amongst a section of Indians
who are spending more on healthcare.
14
Corporate hospitals mushroomed in the late eighties. The boom remained short-lived and out of
the 22 listed hospital scraps, most are being trading below par. An increasingly fragmented
market, lack of statistics, capital intensive operations and a long gestation period are all wise
reasons to shy away from investing in the healthcare industry. Government and trust hospitals
dominate the scene. Many of the trust hospitals suffer from poor management. Good corporate
hospitals are still too few to amount to a critical mass.
Corporate hospitals failed a decade ago because they emerged in isolation and weren’t part of a
larger phenomenon. However, now, there are the insurance companies, the hospital hardware and
the software companies that have come together to create the boom.
Recognition as an industry: In the mid 80’s, the healthcare sector was recognized as an
industry. Hence it became possible to get long term funding from the Financial Institutions. The
government also reduced the import duty on medical equipment’s and technology, thus opening
up the sector.
Since the National Health Policy (the policy’s main objective was ‘Health for All’ by the Year
2000) was approved in 1983, little has been done to update or amend the policy even as the
country changes and the new health problems arise from ecological degradation. The focus has
been on epidemiological profile of the medical care and not on comprehensive healthcare.
Socio-Economic Changes: The rise of literacy rate, higher levels of income and increasing
awareness through deep penetration of media channels, contributed to greater attention being
paid to health. With the rise in the system of nuclear families, it became necessary for regular
health check-ups and increase in health expenses for the bread-earner of the family.
Brand Development: Many family run business houses have set-up charity hospitals. By
lending their name to the hospital, they develop a good image in the markets which further
improves the brand image of products from their other businesses.
15
Extension to Related Business: Some pharmaceutical companies like Lockhart and Max India,
have ventured into this sector as it is a direct extension to their line of business.
Opening of the Insurance Sector: In India, approx. 60% of the total health expenditure comes
from self paid category as against government’s contribution of 25-30 %. A majority of private
hospitals are expensive for a normal middle class family. The opening up of the insurance sector
to private players is expected to give a shot in the arms of the healthcare industry. Health
Insurance will make healthcare affordable to a large number of people. Currently, in India only 2
million people (0.2 % of total population of 1 billion), are covered under Medicaid, whereas in
developed nations like USA about 75 % of the total population are covered under some
insurance scheme. General Insurance Company has never aggressively marketed health
insurance. Moreover, GIC takes upto 6 months to process a claim and reimburses customers after
they have paid for treatment out of their own pockets. This will give a great advantage to private
players like Cigna which is planning to launch Smart Cards that can be used in hospitals, patient
guidance facilities, travel insurance, etc.
The Consultants, Financiers and Insurance Agencies are to benefit from this boom. The insurers
will use PPOs that will grow into HMOs, to assume insurance risks on client’s behalf. Medical
Equipments, Medical Software and Hospitals will see the biggest boom.
A. Primary objective:
B. Secondary objective:
1) To study the awareness of the workers about health and safety in the work place.
16
3) To identify the role of management in implementing health and safety.
4) To find out the satisfaction level of the respondents towards health and safety
measures.
Health and Safety measures are inevitable to any organization where workers are
involved. It’s an organization’s responsibility to provide to its workers beyond the payment of
wages for their services. The worker’s health and safety on and off the job within the
organization is a vital concern of the employer. The working environment in a factory adversely
affects the worker’s health and safety because of the excessive heat or cold, noise, odors, fumes,
dust and lack of sanitation and pure air etc., which leads to accident or injury or disablement or
loss of life to the workers. Providing a health and safer environment is a pre-requisite for any
productive effort. These must be held in check by providing regular health check-up, protective
devices and compensatory benefits to the workers. This research deals with the study on the
health and safety measures provided to the workers at Amravati Hospital Karuk.
This study would give an overview of the health and safety measures existing at
Amravati Hospital Karuk. Since health and safety are two important elements essential for
improving the productivity of an organization, a study on the existing health and safety measures
17
would help the organization to perform better. This study would throw light on the perception of
the workers regarding health and safety. Amravati hospital can identify the areas where it can be
improved, so as to improve the performance of the workers. This study would also help to
analyze the satisfaction level of the workers towards health and safety measures and suggest
provisions to improve health and safety.
1) The study is applicable only to Amravati Hospital Karuk. Therefore the results cannot be
generalized for the whole industry.
2) Due to time constraints the sample size had to be confined to 100.
3) The respondents have replied to the queries recalling from their memory. Therefore recall
bias and personal bias are possible.
4) Since the data was collected using a schedule, the interviewer unable to understand and
record the responses correctly.
5) The respondents were unable or unwilling to give response.
Chapter 1 deals with introduction which gives brief description of the study. It also deals with
company profile, objectives, need, scope, importance and limitations of the study.
Chapter 2 deals with review of literature. Literature review is a discussion of the literature in a
given study, argued, and established about area of study. It is a concise overview of the topic,
and it is usually chronologically or thematically. A literature review is written in essay format.
Chapter 3 deals with research methodology. It also deals with the Research design, sampling
design, nature of data, Method of data collection, and the tools applied in the study.
18
Chapter 5 deals with the findings, suggestions, and conclusion of the study. Findings from each
analysis have been listed separately. Suitable suggestions were given by the researcher.
Conclusion gives the result of the study for which the study was conducted.
CHAPTER 2
ABOUT COMPANY:
Amravati Hospital
19
Amravati hospital was started in the year 1980 at karat with less than 10 in-patient beds.
In the earlier days, we were concentrating only on medical and pediatric branches. Later
on, other branches like surgery, trauma care and other branches were added. Now this
hospital is functioning with 75 beds capacity as multi specialty hospital.
In the peripheral town of karat we introduced ventilator facility in the year 1985 itself.
In the area of critical care facilities we are increasing the manpower and equipments step
by step over the years, to match with modern developments in the field of health care.
The role of private sector hospitals is quite significant to fulfill the inadequacies in the
need for medical treatment. Amravati hospital has taken all efforts to update equipments
which are mentioned in subsequent sections. In our hospital 40 qualified staff nurses and
5 duty doctors are working round the clock for 24 hours. We have provided training to
25 nursing students every year. Specially working as cash less treatment center for more
than 30 insurance companies in successful manner.
Our institution has been functioning for the past 30 years in Karur District. Consequent to the
qualitative improvement, the admission of patients increased many fold and the number of beds
had to be increased to cope up with the existing demand. The hospital is now in a position to
cater to the requirements of the general public who are in need of good treatment and nursing
care. We hope that we will expand our treatment facilities in future to tackle new problem of
medicine. I wish to thank all the well-wishers of this institution for their continued support and
hope for their support in future for continuous development of this institution.
Services:
Emergencies Managed In ICU
Critical Care Unit
Surgery & Neurology
Orthopaedics And Traumatology
General Surgery
ENT Services
20
Facio Maxillary
Ophthalmology
Oncology
Plastic Surgery
Amaravati Pathological Laboratory
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Anesthesia
Psychiatry
Cashless Treatments
Echo Cardiography
Fetal Heart Monitor Coddle Graph
Charitable Hospital
Chest Tubes
Stretcher Trolley (Folding
CHAPTER 3
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1) Johannson B; Rask K; Stenberg M (2010)1, this study was to carry out a broad survey and
analysis of relevant research articles about piece rate wages and their effects on health and
safety. A total of 75 research articles were examined extensively and 31 of these were found
relevant and had sufficient quality to serve the purpose of this study. The findings of these
21
relevant articles are summarized and analysed in the survey. More recent research shows a
clear interest for health, musculoskeletal injuries, physical workload, pains and occupational
injuries. The fact that 27 of the 31 studied articles found negative effects of piece rates on
different aspects of health and safety does not prove causality, but together they give very
strong support that in most situations piece rates have negative effects on health and safety.
2) Tompa, Emile PhD; Dolinschi, Roman MA; de Oliveira (2009)2, we reviewed the
occupational health and safety intervention literature to synthesize evidence on financial
merits of such interventions. A literature search included journal databases, existing
systematic reviews, and studies identified by content experts. We found strong evidence that
ergonomic and other musculoskeletal injury prevention intervention in manufacturing and
warehousing are worth undertaking in terms of their financial merits. The economic
evaluation of interventions in this literature warrants further expansion. The review also
provided insights into how the methodological quality of economic evaluations in this
literature could be improved.
22
associated with poor mental health status, self-reported hypertension, job dissatisfaction,
smoking, shortage of sleep. Among women it was only related to smoking and to shortage of
sleep. The association of overtime with different health indicators among men and women
could be explained by their role as the family breadwinner.
5) Dee W. Edington; Alyssa B. Schultz (2008) 5, The aim was to present the literature which
provides evidence of the association between health risks and the workplace economic
measures of time away from work, reduced productivity at work, health care costs and
pharmaceutical costs. A search of PubMed was conducted and high quality studies were
selected and combined with studies known to the authors. A strong body of evidence exists
which shows that health risks of workers are associated with health care costs and
pharmaceutical costs. A growing body of literature also confirms that health risks are
associated with the productivity measures. The paper shows that measures of success will
continue to be important as the field of worksite health management moves forward.
6) David E. Cantor (2008)6, The purpose of this paper was to review the literature and call for
additional research into the human, operational, and regulatory issues that contribute to
workplace safety in the supply chain. This paper identifies several potential research
opportunities that can increase awareness of the importance of improving a firm's workplace
safety practices. This paper identifies 108 articles which informs, how the logistics and
transportation safety has evolved. The paper identifies 14 future research opportunities within
the workplace safety in the supply chain, that have been identified can have a positive effect
on practitioners confronted with safety issues.
7) Lucia Artazcoz; Imma Cortes; Vincenta Escriba-aguir; Lorena Cascant (2007) 7, To
provide a framework for epidemiological research on work and health that combines classic
occupational epidemiology and the consideration of work in a structural perspective focused
on gender inequalities in health. Gaps and limitations in classic occupational epidemiology,
when considered from a gender perspective, are described. Classic occupational
epidemiology has paid less attention to women’s problems than men’s. Research into work
related gender inequalities in health has rarely considered either social class or the impact of
family demands on men’s health. The analysis of work and health from a gender perspective
23
should take into account the complex interactions between gender, family roles, employment
status and social class.
8) Shouji Nagashima; Yasushi Suwazono; Yasushi Okubo; Mirei Uetani (2007)8, The aim
was to clarify the influence of working hours on both mental and physical symptoms of
fatigue and use the data obtained to determine permissible working hours. The survey of day-
shift male workers, using the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Cumulative Fatigue
Symptoms Index (CFSI). A total of 715 workers participated. In the group working 260–279
h/month, the odds ratios for SDS and ‘irritability’ and ‘chronic tiredness’ of the CFSI were
increased. In the group working 280 h/month, the odds ratios on CFSI for ‘general fatigue’,
‘physical disorders’, ‘anxiety’ and ‘chronic tiredness’ were likewise increased. The research
clarified that working hours should be <260 h/month in order to minimize fatigue symptoms
in male day workers.
10) A Baker; K Heiler; S A Ferguson (2002)10, The occupational health and safety implications
associated with compressed and extended work periods have not been fully explored in the
mining sector. Absenteeism and incident frequency rate data were collected over a 33 month
period that covered three different roster schedules. The only significant change in
absenteeism rates was an increase in the maintenance sector in the third data collection
24
period. The current study did not find significant negative effects of a 12-hour pattern, when
compared to an 8-hour system. However, when unregulated and excessive overtime was
introduced as part of the 12-hour/5-day roster, absenteeism rates were increased in the
maintenance sector.
25
published complaints have come from the manufacturing sector where the closest and most
voluminous contact occurs. Based on the weight of the evidence, NIOSH is anticipated to
conclude that CCP is not a hazard to workers and has only a small possibility of producing
mild and transient skin irritation.
14) Karen J.M. Niven (2000)14, A literature review was described which aimed to evaluate
economic evaluations of health and safety interventions in healthcare. Problems were
identified with valuing benefits in health and safety because they frequently take many years
to emerge and are difficult to measure. Understanding of economic techniques within the
health and safety professions was limited, resulting in wide-ranging assumptions being made
as to the positive economic impact of health and safety interventions. Healthcare managers,
health economists, and health and safety professionals have not traditionally worked together
and have inherent misunderstandings of each other roles. The review concludes that the aim
of future research should be to assist the National Health Service (NHS) to make valid
decisions about health and safety investment and risk control methods.
16) Simon Chapple and Tracy Mears (1996)16, Most OECD countries rely on a mixture of
market forces, tort liability, compulsory insurance and government regulation to deal with
workplace safety and health issues. There are also other non-efficiency reasons for
government involvement in workplace safety and health. However, while markets may not be
26
efficient, government intervention can fail to make any improvement and/or not satisfy cost-
benefit criteria. While the empirical evidence is not clear cut, the balance of the evidence
suggests that wages may include some consideration for health and safety risks. Evidence
also suggests that workers’ compensation systems increase the frequency and duration of
claims for non-fatal injuries, but may decrease the number of fatal injuries.
17) Peter Hasle and Hans Jorgen Limborg (1995)17, The scientific literature regarding
preventive occupational Health and Safety Activities in Small Enterprises has been reviewed
in order to identify effective preventive approaches and to develop a future research strategy.
There is a lack of evaluation of intervention studies, both in terms of effect and practical
applicability. However, there is sufficiently strong evidence to conclude that workers of small
enterprises are subject to higher risks than the larger ones, and that small enterprises have
difficulties in controlling risk. The most effective preventive approaches seem to be simple
and low cost solutions, disseminated through personal contact. It is important to develop
future intervention research strategies, which study the complete intervention system of the
small enterprises.
18) International Council on Nanotechnology, Rice University 18, The report, "Current
Knowledge and Practices regarding Environmental Health and Safety in the Nanotechnology
Workplace", offers a review and analysis of existing efforts to develop "best practices." This
report finds that efforts to catalogue workplace practices have not systematically documented
current environment, health and safety practices in a variety of workplace settings and
geographies. Moreover, it finds that some existing documents are not publicly available.
19) Maynard, Andrew D19, Article from newsletter by Andrew Maynard summarizing the
current level of development and government investment in nanotechnology research and
development, how nanotechnology presents a potential challenge to conventional approaches
to understanding health hazards in the workplace, and how the United States National
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health is working to address current and potential
adverse health impacts in the workplace from nanotechnology.
27
20) Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, and Health 20, This article seeks to address
a number of important questions concerning the potential health and workplace safety risks
raised by the manufacturing, handling, and distributing of engineered nanoparticles. The
article addresses the following questions; (1) the hazards classification of engineered
nanoparticles, (2) exposure metrics, (3) the actual exposures workers may have to different
engineered nanoparticles in the workplace, (4) the limits of engineering controls and personal
protective equipment in protecting workers in regard to engineered nanoparticles, (5) the
kind of surveillance programs that should be put in place to protect workers, (6) whether
exposure registers should be established, and (7) if engineered nanoparticles should be
treated as new substances and evaluated for safety and hazards.
CHAPTER 5
28
3.2 SAMPLING DESIGN:
3.2.1 Population:
Workers of Amaravathi Hospital Karur. i.e., 660.
Limitations:
(i) Due to time and cost constraints, the study was restricted to chennai only.
(ii) The duration available for survey per day was 3 hours only. i.e., 2:00pm to 5:00pm.
(iii) Due to refusals and rejections only 135 interview schedule questionnaires could be
Collected.
Secondary data consist of information that already exists somewhere and have been
collected for specific purpose in the study. The secondary data for this study are newspapers,
journals, magazines, internet etc.
The study area taken for this study was Amaravathi Hospital Karur.
Statistical tools.
30
Respondent Profile : 03
TOTAL : 26
Chi-square analysis
Correlation
Anova
A Below 25 - -
B 26 - 30 36 27
C 31 – 35 72 53
D 36 – 40 27 20
E Above 40 - -
31
4.1.1 Figure showing the age of the respondents
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than one-fifth of the respondents are comes under the age limit of
26 – 30 years and nearly three-fifth of the respondents are having the age limit of 31 – 35 years
and the remaining one-fifth respondents falls between the age limit of 36 – 40 years. There are
no respondents having the age limit, Below 25 and Above 40 in the survey.
A Below 5 - -
B 6 - 10 58 43
C 11 – 15 63 47
D 16 – 20 14 10
32
E Above 20 - -
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than two-fifth of the respondents are having the experience of 6 – 10
years and nearly three-fifth of the respondents are having the experience of 11 – 15 years and the
33
remaining some respondents are having experience of 16 – 20 years. There are no respondents
having the experience, Below 5 and Above 20 in the survey.
A YES 63 47
B NO 72 53
INFERENCE:
34
In the survey, only less than half of the respondents are aware of the health and safety
measures but more than half of the respondents respond that they are not aware of the health and
safety measures adopted in the company.
4.1.4 Table showing the effective arrangements for communicating health and safety
matters
A YES 49 36
B NO 86 64
4.1.4 Figure showing the effective arrangements for communicating health and safety
matters
35
INFERENCE:
In the survey, only one-third of the respondents say that they have effective arrangements
for communicating health and safety matters but nearly two-third of the respondents says that
they have no effective arrangements for communicating health and safety matters in the
company.
4.1.5 Table showing the medical facility
A YES 72 53
B NO 63 47
36
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than half of the respondents say that the company is providing
medical facilities to the workers but less than half of the respondents respond the company is not
providing any medical facilities to the workers.
A YES 72 53
B NO 63 47
37
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than half of the respondents respond that they attended the health and
safety training programme conducted in the company but less than half of the respondents says
that they are not attended any health and safety training programme conducted in the company.
A Once in 5 year 32 24
B Once in 3 year 76 56
C Yearly once 27 20
D Monthly - -
E Rarely - -
38
4.1.7 Figure showing the frequency of training offered
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than one-fifth of the respondents say that the training is offered once
in 5 years and nearly three-fifth of the respondents respond that the training is offered once in 3
years and the remaining one-fifth respondents says that the training is offered yearly once. No
respondents say that the training is offered monthly or rarely.
A Always 14 10
B Sometimes 67 50
C Often 45 33
D Rarely 9 7
39
E Not at all - -
INFERENCE:
40
In the survey, less than one-fifth of the respondents say that always they have proper
drinking water and half of the respondents respond that sometimes they have proper drinking
water and more than one-fifth respondents says often they have proper drinking water and some
of the respondents says rarely they have proper drinking water facility inside the work place.
A Always 9 7
B Sometimes 45 33
C Often 72 53
D Rarely 9 7
E Not at all - -
41
INFERENCE:
In the survey, only very few respondents say that always they have stress and nearly
two-fifth of the respondents respond that sometimes they have stress and nearly three-fifth of the
respondents says often they have stress and very few respondents says rarely they have stress
towards work.
4.1.10 Table showing the awareness about first aid activities and contents of the first aid kit
B Agree 22 16
C Neutral - -
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
42
4.1.10 Figure showing the awareness about first aid activities and contents of the first aid
kit
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than four-fifth of the respondents strongly agrees that they are aware
about the first aid activities and contents of the first aid kit but less than one-fifth respondents
simply agrees that they are aware about the first aid activities and contents of the first aid kit. No
respondents say that they are not aware about the first aid activities and contents of the first aid
kit.
43
4.1.11 Table showing the effective disciplinary procedures implementation
A Strongly agree 76 56
B Agree 59 44
C Neutral - -
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
44
INFERENCE:
In the survey, nearly three-fifth of the respondents strongly agrees that the company
implements effective disciplinary procedures but more than two-fifth respondents simply agrees
that the company implements effective disciplinary procedures to maintain health and safety in
the organization. No respondents say that the company is not implementing effective disciplinary
procedures.
A Strongly agree 32 24
B Agree 103 76
45
C Neutral - -
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
INFERENCE:
46
In the survey, more than one-fifth of the respondents strongly agree that the working
temperature is reasonable to work but nearly four-fifth respondents simply agree that the
working temperature is reasonable to work. No respondents say that the working temperature is
not reasonable to work.
A Strongly agree 22 16
B Agree 81 60
C Neutral 32 24
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
47
INFERENCE:
In the survey, less than one-fifth of the respondents strongly agree that they have enough
space to work but three-fifth respondents simply agree that they have enough space to work and
more than one-fifth of the respondents say that they have no idea about the overcrowding. No
respondents say that they are not having enough space to work.
4.1.14 Table showing the latrines and urinals are cleaned and maintained properly
A Strongly agree 22 16
B Agree 77 57
C Neutral 36 27
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
INFERENCE:
In the survey, less than one-fifth of the respondents strongly agree that the latrines and
urinals are cleaned and maintained properly but nearly three-fifth respondents simply agree that
the latrines and urinals are cleaned and maintained properly and more than one-fifth of the
49
respondents say that they have no idea about the maintenance of latrines and urinals. No
respondents say that the latrines and urinals are not cleaned and maintained properly.
A Strongly agree 54 40
B Agree 45 33
C Neutral 36 27
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
50
INFERENCE:
In the survey, two-fifth of the respondents strongly agree that their environment is safe to
work but less than two-fifth respondents simply agree that their environment is safe to work and
more than one-fifth of the respondents say that they have no idea about their environment is safe
to work. No respondents say that their environment is not safe to work.
4.1.16 Table showing the enough training given to workers before handling the machines
A Strongly agree 63 47
B Agree 50 37
C Neutral 22 16
D Disagree - -
E Strongly disagree - -
51
4.1.16 Figure showing the enough training given to workers before handling the machines
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than two-fifth of the respondents strongly agree that enough training
is given to the workers but less than two-fifth respondents simply agree that enough training is
given to the workers and less than one-fifth of the respondents say that they have no idea about
enough the training given to the workers. No respondents say that enough training is not given to
the workers before handling machines.
52
4.1.17 Table showing the health checkup for workers
A Yearly - -
B Half yearly 32 24
C Quarterly 94 69
D Monthly 9 7
E Rarely - -
53
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than one-fifth of the respondents say that the company provides
health check-up half yearly and more than three-fifth of the respondents respond that the
company provides health check-up quarterly and less than one-fifth respondents says that the
company provides health check-up monthly. No respondents say that the health check-up was
provided yearly or rarely.
A Always 4 3
B Sometimes 54 40
C Often 63 47
D Rarely 14 10
E Not at all - -
54
4.1.18 Figure showing the machines maintained properly
INFERENCE:
In the survey, only very few respondents say that always they are maintaining the
machines properly and two-fifth of the respondents respond that sometimes they are maintaining
the machines properly and more than two-fifth respondents says often they are maintaining the
machines properly and less than one-fifth of the respondents says rarely they are maintaining the
machines properly.
55
4.1.19 Table showing the accidents happened
A Always 4 3
B Sometimes 23 17
C Often 81 60
D Rarely 27 20
E Not at all - -
INFERENCE:
56
In the survey, only very few respondents say that always the accidents are happened and
less than one-fifth of the respondents respond that sometimes the accidents are happened and
three-fifth respondents says often the accidents are happened and one-fifth of the respondents
says rarely the accidents are happened.
B Finger injuries 50 37
C Electric shocks 63 47
D Fire accidents 18 13
INFERENCE:
In the survey, only very few respondents ranked fallen from height are occurred and less
than two-fifth of the respondents ranked finger injuries are occurred but more than two-fifth of
57
the respondents ranked electric shocks are happened and less than one-fifth of the respondents
ranked fire accidents are happened.
A YES 99 73
B NO 36 27
INFERENCE:
In the survey, nearly four-fifth of the respondents say that the company is providing
safety requirements for work and more than one-fifth of the respondents only respond that the
company is not providing any safety requirements for work.
58
4.1.22 Table showing the safety committee formed
A YES 41 31
B NO 94 69
INFERENCE:
In the survey, nearly two-fifth of the respondents respond that the safety committee is
formed in the company but more than three-fifth of the respondents say that the safety committee
is not formed in the company.
59
4.1.23 Table showing the safety inspections held in the company
A Yearly 27 20
B Monthly 90 67
C Weekly 18 13
D Daily - -
E Rarely - -
60
INFERENCE:
In the survey, one-fifth of the respondents say that the safety inspections are held yearly
once and more than three-fifth of the respondents respond that the safety inspections are held
monthly once and less than one-fifth respondents says that the safety inspections are held weekly
once. No respondents say that the safety inspections are held daily or rarely in the company.
4.1.24 Table showing the satisfactory level of workers towards health and safety measures
B Satisfied 117 87
C Neutral 18 13
D Dissatisfied - -
E Highly dissatisfied - -
4.1.24 Figure showing the satisfactory level of workers towards health and safety measures
61
INFERENCE:
In the survey, more than four-fifth of the respondents say that they are simply satisfied
with the health and safety measures adopted in the company and less than one-fifth of the
respondents say that they have no idea about the satisfaction level from health and safety
measures. No respondents are very much satisfied and dissatisfied with the health and safety
measures adopted in the company.
4.1.25 Table showing the role of management in implementing health and safety
62
S NO RANGE NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE %
A Excellent - -
B Best 54 40
C Better 67 50
D Good 14 10
E Poor - -
4.1.25 Figure showing the role of management in implementing health and safety
INFERENCE:
In the survey, two-fifth of the respondents say that the role of management in
implementing health and safety is best and more than two-fifth of the respondents say that the
role of management is better and less than one-fifth of the respondents respond that the role of
management in implementing health and safety is good. No respondents say that the role of
management in implementing health and safety is excellent or poor.
63
4.2 CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS:
4.2.1 Analysis between awareness of workers and Health and safety training.
Null hypothesis (H0): There is a relationship existing between the awareness of workers and the
Health and safety training.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no relationship existing between the awareness of
workers and the Health and safety training.
4.2.1.1 Table showing the awareness of workers and health and safety training.
Yes No Total
Number Of
63 72 135
Respondents
72 63 135
FORMULA:
χ2 = ∑ (Oi -Ei )2 / Ei
Where,
O = Observed Frequency
64
E = Expected Frequency = Row Total x Column Total
Grand Total
i = 1, 2, 3………n
4.2.1.2 Table showing the analysis between awareness of workers and health and safety
training.
Total 1.2
Degree of freedom:
= (r - 1) (c -1)
= (2-1) (2-1)
=1
INFERENCE:
Hence, there is a relationship between the awareness of workers and the Health and safety
training.
4.2.2 Analysis between effective disciplinary procedures and safe work environment.
65
Null hypothesis (H0): There is a relationship existing between the effective disciplinary
procedures and safe working environment.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no relationship existing between the effective disciplinary
procedures and safe working environment.
4.2.2.1 Table showing the effective disciplinary procedures and protected working
environment.
Strongly Strongly
Agree Neutral Disagree Total
Agree Disagree
Number Of
76 59 0 0 0 135
Respondents
54 45 36 0 0 135
FORMULA:
χ2 = ∑ (Oi -Ei )2 / Ei
Where,
O = Observed Frequency
E = Expected Frequency = Row Total x Column Total
Grand Total
i = 1, 2, 3………n
4.2.2.2 Table showing the analysis between effective disciplinary procedures and protected
working environment.
66
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
54 65 -11 121 1.861
45 52 -7 49 0.942
36 18 18 324 18
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Total 41.606
Degree of freedom:
= (r - 1) (c -1)
= (2-1) (5-1)
=4
INFERENCE:
Hence, there is no relationship existing between the effective disciplinary procedures and safe
working environment.
67
4.3.1 Table showing the analysis between the maintenance of machines and the accidents
happened.
X Y X2 Y2 XY
4 4 16 16 16
0 0 0 0 0
FORMULA:
r= (N ∑xy - ∑x ∑y)
√ (N ∑x2 – (∑x) 2) √ (N ∑y2 – (∑y) 2)
INFERENCE:
4.4.1 Table showing the analysis between the health check-up provided and stress towards
work.
X Y R1 R2 D = R1 – R2 D2
0 9 4.5 3.5 1 1
32 45 2 2 0 0
94 72 1 1 0 0
TOTAL 1.5
FORMULAE:
When the ranks are equal,
69
Therefore,
r = 1 – 6 (1.5 + 1/12(23 – 2) + 1/12(23 - 2)
5 (52 – 1)
= 1 – 0.125
= 0.875
INFERENCE:
VALUE RESULT
Health check-up provided and stress towards work.
0.875 GOOD
CHAPTER 5
5.1 FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS
70
2) 47% of the respondents are having the experience of 11 – 15 years and 43% of the
respondents are having the experience of 6 – 10 years and only 10% of the respondents
are having the experience of 16 – 20 years.
3) 53% of the respondents respond that they are not aware of the health and safety measures
and only 47% of the respondents are aware of the health and safety measures.
4) 64% of the respondents say that they have no effective arrangements for communicating
health and safety matters; only 36% agrees that they have effective arrangements for
communicating health and safety matters.
5) 53% of the respondents say that the company is providing medical facilities but 47% of
the respondents respond that the company is not providing medical facilities to the
workers.
6) 53% of the respondents respond that they attended the health and safety training
programme but 47% of the respondents says that they are not attended any health and
safety training programme conducted in the company.
7) 56% of the respondents respond that the training is offered once in 3 years and 24% of
the respondents respond that the training is offered once in 5 years and 20% of the
respondents say that the training is offered yearly once.
8) 50% of the respondents respond that sometimes they have proper drinking water and 33%
of the respondents says often they have proper drinking water and 10% of the
respondents say that always they have proper drinking water and 7% of the respondents
says rarely they have proper drinking water facility inside the work place.
9) 53% of the respondents says often they have stress and 33% of the respondents respond
that sometimes they have stress and 7% of the respondents say that always they have
stress and only 7% of the respondents says rarely they have stress towards work.
10) 84% of the respondents strongly agree that they are aware about the first aid activities
and contents of the first aid kit and 16% of the respondents simply agree that they are
aware about the first aid activities and contents of the first aid kit.
11) 56% of the respondents strongly agree that the company implements effective
disciplinary procedures and 44% of the respondents simply agree that the company
implements effective disciplinary procedures.
71
12) 76% of the respondents simply agree that the working temperature is reasonable to work
and 24% of the respondents strongly agree that the working temperature is reasonable to
work.
13) 60% of the respondents simply agree that they have enough space to work and 24% of the
respondents have no idea about the overcrowding and 16% of the respondents strongly
agree that they have enough space to work.
14) 57% of the respondents simply agree that the latrines and urinals are cleaned and
maintained properly and 27% of the respondents have no idea about the maintenance of
latrines and urinals and 16% of the respondents strongly agree that the latrines and urinals
are cleaned and maintained properly.
15) 40% of the respondents strongly agree that their environment is safe to work and 33% of
the respondents simply agree that their environment is safe to work and 27% of the
respondents say that they have no idea about the safe working environment.
16) 47% of the respondents strongly agree that enough training is given to the workers and
37% of the respondents simply agree that enough training is given to the workers and
16% of the respondents say that they have no idea about enough the training given to the
workers.
17) 69% of the respondents respond that the company provides health check-up quarterly and
24% of the respondents say that the company provides health check-up half yearly and
7% of the respondents say that the company provides health check-up monthly.
18) 47% of the respondents says often they are maintaining the machines properly and 40%
of the respondents respond that sometimes they are maintaining the machines properly
and only 10% of the respondents says rarely they are maintaining the machines properly
and 3% of the respondents say that always they are maintaining the machines properly.
19) 60% of the respondents say often the accidents are happened and 20% of the respondents
say rarely the accidents are happened and 17% of the respondents respond that sometimes
the accidents are happened and only 3% of the respondents say that always the accidents
are happened.
72
20) 47% of the respondents ranked electric shocks are happened and 37% of the respondents
ranked finger injuries are occurred and 13% of the respondents ranked fire accidents are
happened and only 3% of the respondents ranked fallen from height are occurred.
21) 73% of the respondents say that the company is providing safety requirements for work
but 27% of the respondents respond that the company is not providing any safety 5.1.2
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
1) The company has to create the awareness for the workers regarding health and safety.
2) They have to provide effective arrangements to the workers for communicating their
health and safety matters.
3) It is better to provide frequent health and safety training, atleast once in a year.
4) The company has to provide enough drinking water facility available at all the time.
5) The management has to take necessary steps to reduce the stress level of the workers.
73
6) Orientation programmers can be conducted to make the workers to feel that their work
environment is safe to work.
7) The maintenance department has to maintain the machines properly to reduce lead-time.
8) Proper training has to be given to the workers to avoid frequent accidents.
9) Meditation practices can be given to avoid electric shocks, finger injuries etc. due to lack
of concentration.
10) Safety committee has to be formed to monitor the health and safety issues.
11) The company has to conduct the regular inspections to ensure higher level of safety in the
workplace.
12) Cordial relationship has to be maintained between the management and the workers to
implement the health and safety policies and measures in a smooth manner.
5.3 CONCLUSION
It is revealed from the study that, the health and safety measures adopted in Amaravathi
Hospital Karur are provided to the workers according to the provisions of the factories act. It
reveals that the awareness of the workers about health and safety in the workplace is inadequate.
Also repeated accidents like electric shocks, finger injuries are occurred in the workplace.
Suitable ideas were suggested to avoid those accidents and to improve the health and safety
measures. The role of management in implementing health and safety in the organization is very
74
effective. Most of the workers were satisfied with the health and safety measures adopted in the
company. If the company implements effective disciplinary procedures; it will help the company
to go with their policies and also to maintain health and safety in the organization.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
1) Arun monappa (1994), “Industrial relations”, 8th edition.
2) Ajay garg (1995), “Labour laws”, 8 th revised edition.
3) C.B.Mamoria, Satish mamoria, Gankar (2009), “Dynamics of industrial relations”, 19th
edition.
4) C.B.Guptha (2000), “Human Resource management".
5) C.R.Kothari (1997), “Research methodology- methods and techniques”, 2nd edition.
75
6) Joseph M Putti (1980), “The management of securing and maintaining the
workforce”, S Chand & Co Ltd. Ram Nagar, New Delhi.
7) O.R.Krishnaswami, M.Ranganatham, “Methodology of research in social sciences”,
Himalaya publishing house.
8) P.N.Arora, S.Arora, "Statistics for management" Himalaya publishing house.
9) Richard I. Levin, David S. Rubin (2002), “Statistics for Management”, 7th edition.
10) Sewa singh chauhan (1993), “Labour welfare administration in India”, 1st edition.
Websites:
1) www.hr.com
2) www.humanresources.about.com
3) www.ilo.com
4) www.britannica.com
5) www.definition-info.com
References:
1) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20106469
2) http://journals.lww.com/joem/Abstract/2009/09000/A_Systematic_Review_of_Occupatio
nal_Health_and.6.aspx
3) http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/47
4) http://jech.bmj.com/content/63/7/521.abstract
5) http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=9F2CDBC6B511
1CA6756D2D26B9121610?contentType=Article&contentId=1718276
6) http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?
contentType=Article&contentId=1728145
76
7) http://jech.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/ii39.abstract
8) http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/6/449
9) http://oem.bmj.com/content/63/9/608.abstract
10) http://oem.bmj.com/content/60/1/43.abstract
11) http://jech.bmj.com/content/55/5/316.abstract
12) http://www.monash.edu.au/muarc/reports/muarc166.html
13) http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1519328
14) http://ethics.iit.edu/NanoEthicsBank/popular_search.php?
cmd=search&words=workplace+safety&mode=normal
15) http://oem.bmj.com/content/54/6/367.abstract
16) http://www.dol.govt.nz/publication-view.asp?ID=53
17) http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-123/pdfs/2007-123.pdf
18) http://cohesion.rice.edu/CentersAndInst/ICON/emplibrary/Phase%20I
%20Report_UCSBICON%20Final.pdf
19) http://www.icohweb.org/newsletter/icoh_newsletter_2004_04.pdf
20) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu bmed/19030766?dopt=Abstract
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
1) Name (Optional) :
2) Age
(a) Below 25 (b) 26-30 (c) 31-35 (d) 36-40 (e) Above 40
4) Are you aware of the health and safety measures adopted in the company?
77
(a) Yes (b) No
5) Do you have effective arrangements for communicating health and safety matters?
(a) Yes (b) No
7) Have you attended any health and safety training in your company?
(a) Yes (b) No
9) Do you have proper drinking water facility inside your work place?
(a) Always (b) Sometimes (c) Often (d) Rarely (e) Not at all
78
Do you have enough space to
14)
work?
The latrines and urinals are
15) cleaned and maintained
properly?
Do you think that your
16)
environment is safe to work?
Is enough training given to the
17) workers before handling the
machines?
18) How often the company provide health checkup for workers?
(a) Yearly (b) Half yearly (c) Quarterly (d) Monthly (e) Rarely
79
22) Are they providing the safety requirements for work?
(a) Yes (b) No
24) How often the safety inspections are held in your company?
(a) Yearly (b) Monthly (c) Weekly (d) Daily (e) Rarely
25) Satisfactory level of the health and safety measures taken in the company?
(a) Very much satisfied (b) Satisfied (c) Neutral (d) Dissatisfied (e) Highly dissatisfied
80