Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Genera Limatula and Limea (Mollusca, Pelecypoda, Limidae) From Deep Waters Off Brazil
The Genera Limatula and Limea (Mollusca, Pelecypoda, Limidae) From Deep Waters Off Brazil
net/publication/266384674
The genera Limatula and Limea (Mollusca, Pelecypoda, Limidae) from deep
waters off Brazil
CITATIONS READS
12 444
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Morfoanatomia de Gastrópodes (Mollusca) Terrestres em Floresta Ombrófila Densa Montana do Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, Rio de Janeiro View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Cleo Oliveira on 11 November 2014.
Abstract
Five species of the genus Limatula and one of Limea were found in a total of 83 samples taken from deep waters (700–
1950 m) off Brazil. Limatula laminifera (Smith, 1885) and Limea lirata Allen, 2004 were not previously reported from
Brazil. Limatula confusa (Smith, 1885) and L. louiseae Clarke, 1974, although already reported for Brazilian waters,
have their distribution extended southward. Limatula domaneschii n.sp. is described from the Campos Basin (˜22° S). It
is diagnosed by concentric lamellae strengthening towards the ventral margin of the shell, and absence of axial ornamen-
tation; an internal median groove is not present. A fifth Limatula species is present, and we strongly suspect that it is also
new to science, but a formal description is delayed until additional specimens are collected.
Key words: Limidae, Limatula, Limea, deep-water, geographic distribution, Southern Atlantic, Brazil, Bivalvia
Introduction
Members of the family Limidae are present in all the world seas and at most depths. This group usually com-
prises pelecypods with conchological variations of the same basic body plan. These shell characters are
important for taxonomy, and their distinguishing features usually include size; shell outline and ornamenta-
tion; internal ridge and/or fold; and, when present, the relative number of axial ribs. Ribs number has been
widely used as a species character in several limid genera (Mikkelsen & Bieler 2003). In 1968, Stuardo car-
ried out an extensive revision including conchological analysis, anatomy, distribution, revision of types, and
introduction of more than 80 new taxa (as manuscript names) to the family Limidae. Unfortunately, only a
small part of this study was published (Stuardo 1982). Nowadays, a considerable number of species have been
studied, with molecular analyses, detailed morphology, reproductive cycles, life history, respiration and filtra-
tion aspects, speciation and dispersal evidence (Gilmour 1974; Morton 1979, 2000; Lodeiros & Himmelman
1999; Page & Linse 2002; Allen 2004; Jarnegren & Altin 2006; Jarnegren et al. 2007). Stuardo (1968) distin-
guished, based on an extensive list of characters, two large groups of limid genera: Limaria-Limatula-Limea
and Ctenoides-Lima-Ancesta-Divarilima. For the Atlantic basin, Limatula and Limea were studied by Allen
(2004) concerning conchological and anatomical aspects.
In spite of the undoubted importance of conchological traits for taxonomy, not uncommonly definitions
based only on shell characters fail to establish clear boundaries among different taxa, even at the genus level.
In 1978, Fleming produced an extensive review and documented the conservative nature of the shell morphol-
ogy of Limatula, which makes the shell characters difficult to use for phylogeny reconstruction. The phyloge-
netic position, even at the family level, of the limids within the pteriomorph pelecypods is still under
The molluscs were taken from northern and southern regions off Brazil (700–1950 meters depth). Most of the
sampling stations were in the Bacia de Campos (Campos Basin) and were visited as part of the program
“Environmental Characterization of Campos Basin, RJ, Brazil”. Samples were obtained with a 0.25 m2 box
core, by the Research Vessel "Astro-Garoupa” belonging to Petrobras S.A. (a public Brazilian oil company).
A total of 82 samples was taken in this region, plus an additional sample from the continental slope off Amapá
State in northern Brazil. Each sample was washed in running seawater through a mesh of 300 μm, and the res-
idue placed in 70% ethanol. In the laboratory, this residue was sorted under magnification and the limids
picked out. Only empty shells were obtained. The generic characterization was adapted from Abbott (1974),
Rios (1994), and Allen (2004). Types were not examined when the original illustration (and/or description)
was good enough to identify the taxon. Since only one species was obtained from Amapá (north Brazil) any
kind of comparison between the two sites is precluded. All material is deposited in the Molluscan Collection
of the Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IBU-
FRJ).
Results
Limatula louiseae Clarke, 1974: p.17, fig. 9; Allen, 2004: p. 2601, fig. 10–12, 45a.
LIMATULA AND LIMEA FROM BRAZILIAN DEEP Zootaxa 1940 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 49
Description: Shell fragile, white or translucent, small (height mean = 1.61mm ± 0.38 s.d.; range 0.91–
2.23mm; n=50), height/length ratio 1.53, equivalve, equilateral, very inflated, elongated, ornamented exter-
nally with unevenly spaced concentric lines that are less apparent in the dorsal region, and many concentric
microscopic striae between these lines. Microscopic diagonal striae, which vary in number, on anterior and
FIGURES 1–5. Limatula louiseae Clarke, 1974. 1—External view, IBUFRJ 17809; 2—Internal view, IBUFRJ 17811);
3—Detail of sculpture, IBUFRJ 17809; 4—Hinge, IBUFRJ 17811; 5—Dorsal view, IBUFRJ 17810. FIGURES 6–9.
Limatula confusa (Smith, 1885). 6—External view, IBUFRJ 17804; 7—External view, IBUFRJ 17807; 8—Internal view,
IBUFRJ 17807; 9—Hinge, IBUFRJ 17807. FIGURES 10–12. Limatula domaneschii n.sp. 10—External view, IBUFRJ
17806 (Holotype); 11—Internal view, IBUFRJ 17801 (Paratype 1); 12—Hinge, IBUFRJ 17801(Paratype 1). Scale bars:
1–5: 250µm; 6–9: 500µm; 10–12: 100µm.
LIMATULA AND LIMEA FROM BRAZILIAN DEEP Zootaxa 1940 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 51
Limatula confusa (Smith, 1885)
Figures 6–9
Description: Shell fragile, white, small (height mean = 3.28mm ± 2.06 s.d.; range 1.10–6.30mm; n=14),
height/length ratio 1.41, equivalve, slightly unequilateral, very inflated, outline suboval, thin axial ribs cover
entire shell, but axial ribs not evenly spaced. The axials are closer to each other on the dorsal side, and slowly
increase in the distance between them towards the ventral side, very fine concentric striae present, forming
small nodules where they cross the axial ribs. Internal axial ridge absent. Auricles small, with few ornaments,
subauricular sinus present, ventral region rounded or angled. Prodissoconch smooth (mean 177.50μm ± 16.69
s.d.; range 160–200 μm; n=14), interdissoconch hardly distinguishable in some specimens (mean 805.00μm
± 33.38 s.d.; range 760–860 μm; n=14). Umbones prominent, hinge plate large, ligamental pit broad, triangu-
lar.
Geographic range: North Carolina to the West Indies, off Azores, Northeast Brasil, off Pernambuco
State. Depths ranging between 60 to 2650 meters. Adapted from Abbott (1974), Rios (1994) and Allen (2004).
Campos Basin (this study), is the southernmost record in the Atlantic Ocean.
Material examined: IBUFRJ 17802, off Bacia de Campos (21°57'27" S, 39°40'34" W, 1942 m),
27.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17803, off Bacia de Campos (21°52'41" S, 39°46'17" W, 1688 m), 26.VI.03, [1
valve]; IBUFRJ 17804, off Bacia de Campos (22°11'17" S, 39°43'45" W, 1950 m), 25.XI.02, [1 valve]; IBU-
FRJ 17807, off Bacia de Campos (21°58'36" S, 39°46'30" W, 1700 m), 10.VIII.01, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17812,
off Bacia de Campos (22°31'37" S, 39°55'14" W, 1630 m), 16.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17813, off Bacia de
Campos (22° 24'32" S, 39°57'28" W, 1050 m), 20.XI.02, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17814, off Bacia de Campos
(22°36'12" S, 39°58'23" W, 1670 m), 13.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17815, off Bacia de Campos (22°31'28" S,
40°03'50" W, 1043 m), 18.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17816, off Bacia de Campos (21°57'27" S, 39°40'34" W,
1942 m), 27.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17817, off Bacia de Campos (22°04'45" S, 39°46'32" W, 1643 m),
27.VI.03, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17818, off Bacia de Campos (22°11'04" S, 39°47'05" W, 1650 m), 25.XI.02, [1
valve]; IBUFRJ 17819, off Bacia de Campos (22°10'54" S, 39°52'19" W, 1050 m), 10.XII.02, [1 valve]; IBU-
FRJ 17820, off Bacia de Campos (22°05'45" S, 39°45'55" W, 1730 m), 09.V.02, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17821, off
Bacia de Campos (22°05'04" S, 39°50'02" W, 1230 m), 09.V.02, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17822, off Bacia de Cam-
pos (22°39'34" S, 40°08'22" W, 1200 m), 15.V.02, [1 valve].
Remarks: Apparently this species has not been collected since its description (from the Challenger Expe-
dition material), and a part of the type series was destroyed (Allen 2004, p. 2644). However, the description
and especially the type illustration in plate 24, figs. 6-6a (Smith 1885 p. 292), are good enough to allow us to
identify it. In our description we include details that were not mentioned in the original description because of
the limitations in optics of the period.
Limatula margaretae Allen, 2004 is the most similar taxon to L. confusa in the Atlantic basin: both spe-
cies share the same outline and type of ornamentation, but can be distinguished by the presence of axial ribs
over all the shell including the auricles in L. confusa (fig. 6–7), while the auricles are devoid of axial ribs and
the central and postero-central axial ribs are barely visible in L. margaretae. Besides that, the umbones at L.
margaretae are more prominent than in L. confusa.
Description: Shell fragile, white, small (height mean = 1.07mm ± 0.15 s.d.; range 0.90–1.20mm; n=3),
height/length ratio 1.43, slightly inequilateral, moderately inflated, outline suboval, ornamented with rela-
Limatula sp.
Figures 13–15
Description: Shell very fragile, white, small (height mean = 1.10mm ± 0.14 s.d.; range 1.00–1.20mm; n=2),
height/length ratio 1.47, slightly inequilateral, little inflated, outline suboval, dorso-central region smooth or
LIMATULA AND LIMEA FROM BRAZILIAN DEEP Zootaxa 1940 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 53
with irregularly spaced concentric cordlets, region near the edge of the shell ornamented with strong axial ribs
and concentric striae that cross the axial ribs, generating rounded nodules. The axial ribs are relatively equi-
distant and more visible on the ventral portion of the shell. Internally there are two slender axial ridges at the
middle of the shell. Auricles small, symmetrical and slightly inclined in relation to the antero-posterior axis,
forming an angle with the anterior and posterior margins. Subauricular sinus absent, anterior and posterior
margins approximately symmetrical. Ventral margin somewhat rounded. Prodissoconch smooth, with con-
spicuous edge (mean 122.50μm ± 7.50 s.d.; range 115–130 μm; n=2). Interdissoconch not distinguishable.
Umbones moderately prominent. Hinge plate large, without teeth. Ligamental pit broad, triangular.
Geographic range: Restricted to Campos Basin, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.
Material examined: IBUFRJ 17800, off Bacia de Campos (22°41'32" S, 40°00'47" W, 1906 m),
12.VI.03, [2 valves].
FIGURES 13–15. Limatula sp. 13—External view, IBUFRJ 17800; 14—Internal view, IBUFRJ 17800; 15—Hinge,
IBUFRJ 17800. Fig. 16. Limatula laminifera (Smith, 1885), External view, IBUFRJ 17808. Fig. 17–19: Limea lirata
Allen, 2004. 17—External view, IBUFRJ 17805; 18—Internal view, IBUFRJ 17805; 19—Hinge, IBUFRJ 17805. Scale
bars: all 250µm.
Remarks: The main diagnostic characters are: (a) the axial ribs, which are evenly spaced but restricted to
the mid-ventral edge of the valve (a view from inside is instructive, because the edge of the valve is crenulated
only in this region and smooth in the remaining part); (b) there is an internal axial fold at the middle of the
shell, barely visible externally; (c) the presence of a very large and smooth larval shell, not observed in any
Lima (Limatula) laminifera Smith, 1885: p. 293, pl. XXIV, fig. 7, 7a.
Limatula laminifera: Stuardo, 1968: p. 226. pl. 14, fig. 65; Abbott, 1974: p. 454; Allen, 2004: p. 2616. fig. 29–32, 46b.
Description: Shell fragile, white, small (height mean = 2.15mm ± 0.17 s.d.; range 2.04–2.40mm; n=4),
height/length ratio 1.37, equivalve, slightly inequilateral, moderately inflated. Ornamented with very fine,
irregularly spaced concentric striae and slender concentric lamellae, which become more foliaceous toward
the ventral margin. Internally with two thickened axial ridges, which correspond to two internal grooves in the
opposite valve. Auricles relatively small, subauricular sinus hardly visible. Dorsal margin straight and little
inclined from antero-posterior axis. Prodissoconch barely visible (mean 95.00μm ± 5.77 s.d.; range 90–
100μm; n=4), interdissoconch not distinguishable. Umbones prominent and triangular. Hinge plate narrow,
edentulous, with an elongated triangular ligamental pit.
Geographic range: Western North Atlantic, Florida to the West Indies, off the Azores, off Fernandina,
off Sombrero Island, off Culebra Island. Depths ranging between 137 to 1590 meters. Adapted from Smith
(1885), Abbott (1974), Allen (2004). Campos Basin (this study) represents the first record of this species for
the Brazilian coast and for the southeastern Atlantic Ocean.
Material examined: IBUFRJ 17808, off Bacia da Foz do Amazonas (03º25 'N, 48º03' W, 700 m),
14.XII.05, [1 valve]; IBUFRJ 17823, off Bacia da Foz do Amazonas (03º25 'N, 48º03' W, 700 m), 14.XII.05,
[4 valves].
Remarks: Both the original description of L. laminifera (Smith 1885) and a later redescription (Allen
2004) pointed out the near absence of axial sculpture, except for very faint lirae that may occur on the central
portion of the valves. In fact, the axial sculpture is barely visible in our specimens.
Description: Shell small, white, usually fragile, ovate or suborbicular, slightly inflated, concentric striae or
even lamellae, axial ornamentation present, beaks prominent, auricles small, margins crenate, hinge with
series of short teeth on either side of resilifer.
Description: Shell very fragile, translucent, small (height mean = 1.15mm ± 0.07 s.d.; range 1.10–1.20mm;
n=2), height/length ratio 1.28, slightly inequilateral, little inflated, oval outline, ornamented with numerous
and quite slender concentric lines that are positioned close to each other and cover the entire shell, though the
LIMATULA AND LIMEA FROM BRAZILIAN DEEP Zootaxa 1940 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 55
lines are somewhat less evident toward the dorsal region. Axial ornamentation absent, fine internal axial ridge
and groove on both valves, and not perceptible on the external side. Auricles small, subauricular sinus absent,
postero and antero-dorsal margin curved in the hinge region, ventral margin strongly rounded. Prodissoconch
smooth (mean 153.00μm ± 3.00 s.d.; range 150–156 μm; n=2), interdissoconch not distinguishable. Umbones
prominent, hinge plate slender, ligamental pit rounded.
Geographic range: Restricted to North American Basin, at 2095 meters. Adapted from Allen (2004).
Campos Basin (this study) represents the southernmost and the shallowest (1044m) record of this species,
with the first record for Brazilian coast and the southeastern Atlantic Ocean.
Material examined: IBUFRJ 17805, off Bacia de Campos (21°52'43" S, 39°40'42" W, 1941 m),
26.VI.03, [2 valves].
Remarks: Although this is a rare species in our samples, with only three valves, the characteristic con-
centric ornamentation with the very conspicuous fine internal axial ridge and groove on both valves makes
this a distinct species.
Previously restricted to the North American Basin by Allen (2004) who collected 171 specimens from
only one station; since then, this species had not been cited. Our record, the first for the Brazilian and South
American coast, expands the area of occurrence to the South Atlantic.
The characterization of the genus Limea includes some characters, such as axial ornamentation and mar-
ginal crenulation, which are absent in L. lirata. But, since, as mentioned earlier, the definition of the limid
subgroups may be obscure and they probably do not form natural groups and even overlap one another, we
prefer not relocate this species now, avoiding the increase of unwarranted taxonomic mistakes.
TABLE 1. Diagnostic characters of Brazilian deep water Limatula and Limea. The symbol “_” means absence.
Discussion
Allen (2004) reported the variability of shell characters but stressed the importance of shell ornamentation to
distinguish species. We agree with him, but unfortunately even the axial ribs are sometimes very variable and
a secure identification based only on empty shells may be a difficult task. For example, L. margaretae is said
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. John Allen for a very useful exchange of ideas, bibliography support and the type pho-
tos of Limatula margaretae, to Dr. Franklin Noel dos Santos who kindly gave us the specimens of Limatula
laminifera, to CENPES (Centro de Pesquisas da Petrobras (Brazilian Petroleum Co.)) for the SEM photo-
graphs and, finally, to Dra. Paula Mikkelsen and one anonymous reviewer for their critique and suggestions
that improved this manuscript.
This study was partially supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tec-
nológico) from Brazilian government and FAPERJ (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Jan-
eiro) from State of Rio de Janeiro government.
References
Abbott, R.T. (1974) American Seashells. 2nd.Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 411 pp.
Allen, J.A. (2004) The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with
particular reference to those in deep water. Journal of Natural History, 38, 2591–2653.
Clarke, A.H. Jr. (1974) Molluscs from Baffin Bay and the northern Atlantic Ocean. Publications in Biological Oceanog-
raphy, National Museums of Canada. 7, 1–23.
Fleming, C.A. (1978) The bivalve mollusc genus: Limatula: a list of described species and a review of living and fossil
species in the southwest Pacific. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 8, 17–91.
Gilmour, T.H.L. (1974) The structure, ciliation, and function of the lips of some bivalve molluscs. Canadian Journal of
Zoology. 52, 335–343.
Giribet, G. & Wheeler, W. (2002) On bivalve phylogeny: a high-level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on com-
bined morphology and DNA sequence data Invertebrate Biology. 121(4), 271–324.
Jarnegren, J. & Altin, D. (2006) Filtration and respiration of the deep living bivalve Acesta excavata (J.C. Fabricius,
1779) (Bivalvia; Limidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 334(1), 122–129.
Jarnegren, J.; Rapp, H.T. & Young, C.M. (2007) Similar reproductive cycles and life history traits in congeneric limid
bivalves with different modes of nutrition. Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective. 28(1), 183–192.
Lodeiros, C. & Himmelman, J. (1999) Reproductive cycle of the rock scallop Lima scabra (Pterioida: Limidae) and its
association with environmental conditions. Revista de Biología Tropical. 47(3), 411–418.
Mikkelsen, P.M., & Bieler, R. (2003) Systematic revision of the western Atlantic file clams, Lima and Ctenoides
(Bivalvia: Limoida: Limidae). Invertebrate Systematics. 17(5), 667–710.
Morton, B.S. (1979) A comparison of lip structure and function correlated with others aspects of the functional morphol-
ogy of Lima lima, Limaria (Platilimaria) fragilis, and Limaria (Platilimaria) hongkongensis sp. nov. (Bivalvia:
Limacea). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 57(4), 728–742.
Morton, B.S. (2000) The pallial eyes of Ctenoides floridanus (Bivalvia: Limoidea). The Journal of Molluscan Studies.
66(4), 449–455.
LIMATULA AND LIMEA FROM BRAZILIAN DEEP Zootaxa 1940 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 57
Page, T.J. & Linse, K. (2002) More evidence of speciation and dispersal across the Antarctic Polar Front through molec-
ular systematics of Southern Ocean Limatula (Bivalvia: Limidae). Polar Biology. 25(11), 818–826.
Rios, E.C. (1994) Seashells of Brazil, 2nd. Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 368 pp.
Smith, E.A. (1885) Report on the Lamellibranchiata collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Chal-
lenger Reports, Zoology. 13, 1–341, 1–25 pls.
Steiner, G. & Hammer, S. (2000) Molecular phylogeny of the Bivalvia inferred from 18S rDNA sequences with particu-
lar reference to the Pteriomorphia. In: Harper, E.M.; Taylor, J.D. & Crame, J.A. (Eds.), The evolutionary biology of
the Bivalvia. The Geological Society of London, London, pp. 11–29.
Stuardo, J. (1968) On the phylogeny, taxonomy and distribution of the Limidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). PhD thesis, Har-
vard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 327 pp.
Stuardo, J. (1982) A new species of Ctenoides from the central Atlantic (Bivalvia: Limidae). Boletín de la Sociedad de
Biología de Concepción. Chile, 53, 145–149.
Waller, T.R. (1998) Origin of the molluscan clas Bivalvia and a phylogeny of major groups. In: Johnston, P.A. & Hag-
gart, J.W. (Eds), Bivalves: an Eon of Evolution; Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell. University of
Calgary Press, Calgary, 1–45 pp..