Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Thomas Kurma
Dr. Thomas Kurma
Dr. Thomas Kurma
Thomas Kurma
Outline
- Intellectual Property Rights
COPYRIGHTS
P PATENTS
R TRADEMARKS
INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS
TRADE SECRETS
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION
COPYRIGHT
T
R
A
D
E
M
A
R
K
Cases with regard to the infringement
- It is highly possible that any consumer would confuse one for the
other and take into consideration that the restaurant was started by
the fashion brand.
- And this what Delhi High Court ruled out. Zara had a presence in
India since 2010 when it opened its first store through a joint
venture and has also applied for a few trademarks in India.
- The restaurant was forced to change its name and now it operates
under the name of Tapas Bar.
Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora & Anr
- It was for the first time that the Delhi High Court held a registered
domain name equivalent to the trademark giving it the entitled, equal
protection.
- The defendant, in this case, was ‘Yahoo India!’ for protecting their
domain name. Now, this was identical and even phonetically similar
to the plaintiff’s trademark ‘Yahoo!’
- The court believed that people will be deceived into thinking that
both the domain will carry the same source.
- Also, Yahoo! was quite renowned even globally and the court
observed that ‘Yahoo India’ of the defendants is almost similar
except that it uses the suffix ‘India’.
- The concern of deception was large and since Yahoo! was the
Plaintiff, the injunction was done in their favor.
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
IPR
Industrial design: In a legal sense, an industrial design
I constitutes the ornamental aspect of an article.
N
- An industrial design may consist of three dimensional features,
D
such as the shape of an article, or two dimensional features, such
U as patterns, lines or color.
S
T Protection under Industrial Design:
R In principle, the owner of a registered industrial design or of
I a design patent has the right to prevent third parties from making,
A selling or importing articles bearing or embodying a design which
L is a copy, or substantially a copy, of the protected design, when
such acts are undertaken for commercial purposes.
D
Products that can benefit from Industrial Design protection:
E Industrial designs are applied to a wide variety of products of
S industry and handicraft items: from packages and containers to
I furnishing and household goods, from lighting equipment to
G jewelry, and from electronic devices to textiles. Industrial designs
N may also be relevant to graphic symbols, graphical user interfaces
(GUI), and logos.
IPR
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
IPR
S - A trade secret owner, however, cannot stop others from using the
E same technical or commercial information, if they acquired or
developed such information independently by themselves through
C
their own R&D, reverse engineering or marketing analysis, etc.
R Since trade secrets are not made public, unlike patents, they do
E not provide “defensive” protection, as being prior art. (For
T example, if a specific process of producing Compound X has been
protected by a trade secret, someone else can obtain a patent or a
utility model on the same invention, if the inventor arrived at that
invention independently.)
IPR
WIPO services for Trade Secrets:
Software algorithms, formulas, recipes, manufacturing processes,
T
lists of clients and business plans, can all be protected by law, but
R only if you can prove you gain economic value from them and that
A you have taken steps to preserve their confidentiality and prevent
D misuse or misappropriation. It is difficult for the owner of a trade
E secret to seek an injunction or claim damages: how can you prove
that you possessed and used a trade secret at a certain point in
S time, if you always kept it secret?
E
C You can solve this problem with WIPO PROOF. It not only
provides evidence that you possessed a trade secret at a given point
R
in time, it can also discourage possible theft or misuse by signaling
E to partners and employees that protective measures are in place.
T
Intellectual Property Laws in India
Copyright
- The Copyright Act, 1957 (amended in1982, 1984,1992, 1994 &
1999)
Patents
- The Patents Act, 1970 (amended in 1999 & 2005)
Trademarks
- Trade Marks Act, 1999 (amended in 1994, 1996 & 2000)
Industrial Designs
- The Designs Act, 2000
- The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000
Geographical Indication
- The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection)
Act, 1999
- The Biological Diversity Act, 2002
- The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001.
Cases of Infringement
Apple v. Samsung
- The patent battle started in 2011
- Resulted in a $1 billion ruling in Apple’s favor.
- But it didn’t end there. A series of appeals pushed the dispute to
the Supreme Court and back, as the companies continually
rehashed which patents were infringed.
- The case revolved around a number of design and utility
patents for basic functions of a smartphone, like
- But while the fight was hashed out using specific patents, the
battle was ultimately about whether Samsung copied Apple in
the early days of smartphones to gain an edge.
- Moreover, both the entities deal with the same type of business
activity i. e. online payments and transactions, which further
widens the conflict between the 2 parties in question.
- One needs to take care that one doesn’t infringe the intellectual
property rights of others and take steps to safeguard one’s own
intellectual property rights by acquiring adequate knowledge
of the laws governing them in a particular country.