Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anti-Asian Racism During Coronavirus: How The Language of Disease Produces Hate and Violence Paula Larsson
Anti-Asian Racism During Coronavirus: How The Language of Disease Produces Hate and Violence Paula Larsson
violence
Paula Larsson
Confusing Increased racist rhetoric by politicians, like President Donald Trump’s erroneous use
What does the of the term “China Virus” for COVID-19, is often the first step to racialized violence.
word “rhetoric” Trump recently agreed to stop using the racist label, acknowledging in series of tweets
means? And the (@realDonaldTrump): “It is very important that we totally protect our Asian
word from Donal American community in the United States ... the spreading of the Virus ... is NOT
Trump is their fault in any way, shape, or form.”
confusing. What
But more than 100 years ago, white spokespeople in North America had labelled
does he mean
Chinese people as “dangerous to the white,” living in “most unhealthy conditions”
when he agreed
with a “standard of morality immeasurably below ours.”
to stop using the
racist label but Since then, white settler resentment of Chinese presence has consistently boiled over
use the terms into outright racism and violence. Seminal work by Peter S. Li, professor emeritus of
“China Virus” for sociology at the University of Saskatchewan, highlights such incidences throughout
COVID19? Canada’s history, while historian Roger Daniels explores the rise of anti-Asian
movements within the United States.
Difficult Despite this, both the public and many politicians continued to connect disease with
What does this race. The Chinese were consistently accused of being carriers of infection. In the
sentence mean? Royal Commission report, it was a common belief that syphilis, leprosy and
This sentence especially smallpox were “communicated to the Indians and the white population”
should use an easy from Chinese communities. This despite the fact that at the time China legally
word for better required inoculation for all its citizens, and the physicians interviewed by the
understanding. commission declared having “never seen a case of leprosy amongst them.”
By 1885, Canada had passed the Chinese Immigration Act which placed a “head tax”
on all Chinese immigrants. Quarantine officers at the ports were ordered to inspect all
on board of Chinese origin, stripping down and examining any Chinese person
suspected to be sick. Over the next 20 years, recurring smallpox epidemics were
erroneously blamed on Chinese communities.
Such sentiments were accompanied by violence. In 1886, anti-Asian riots broke out in
Vancouver, resulting in violent attacks on Asian workers. Similar riots occurred again
in 1907, after the formation of a Canadian branch of the American Asiatic Exclusion
League in Vancouver. The group organized public, inflammatory speeches against the
“filth” of British Columbia’s Asian residents. On Sept. 7, 1907, a mob violently
attacked Asian shops and homes in Vancouver’s Chinese and Japanese quarters.
Interesting
These historical incidents of discrimination clearly demonstrate how the language of
We should not put
disease is often encoded with underlying racial prejudice.
a prejudicial
treatment to “Viruses know no borders and they don’t care about your ethnicity or the colour of
people from any your skin or how much money you have in the bank,” said Dr. Mike Ryan, executive
kind of ethnics director of the World Health Organization’s health emergencies program.
because viruses
know no borders. Yet language can easily spark discrimination in times of fear, with dire consequences.