Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian Seed Industry-The Journey So Far and Beyond
Indian Seed Industry-The Journey So Far and Beyond
Indian Seed Industry-The Journey So Far and Beyond
M. Prabhakar Rao,
President, National Seed Association of India &
Managing Director, Nuziveedu Seeds Limited
November 2015
1960’s
1963: National 1970’s
Seed
1972: National
Corporation
commission on
1966: Seed Act
Agriculture
1969: Seed Rules
Journey so far.. 1969:HYVP 1970s- Private
Key Milestones 1990’s
sector started taking
bigger role
1991- 1975-80:
Liberalization SSCA,SSC,& STLs
reforms
1995- TRIPS &
WTO
1980’s
1996-GM crop
1980s-Rapid
trials
growth of private
sector- more focus
on hybrids
1988-New Seed
policy
2000 & present
2001:PVPFRA Act
2002: GM crops
commercialization
2002-Biodiversity
Act
2004- New Seed Bill
Source: NSAI data
Key legislations/Policies that shaped Indian seed industry
Systematic plant breeding, production, product evaluation and release processes driven
by both Public and private sectors
Supportive Government policy and regulatory environment for creation of a vibrant seed
sector and a huge unmet demand for quality seed of improved varieties & Hybrids
4
Leveraging Strengths in R&D
Small and medium private sector seed companies active in multiplying and
distributing varieties developed by private and public sector breeding system.
Elaborate VCU testing system of NARS and private sector Product evaluation
and technology development programs
5
Seed production Vs Food grain production
300 4
150 2
130
1.5
108
100
82
1
0.86
50 50
0.6
0.5
0.2
0 0 0.02 0.05 0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014 2020
Food Grain (mil tons) 50 82 108 130 176 197 242 257 280
Seed Production ( million tons) 0 0.02 0.05 0.2 0.6 0.86 2.57 3 3.5
6
Source: Planning commission data 2013
Preference to quality of seeds of improved varieties-SRR growth
15%
10%
5%
0%
Wheat Rice Gram Blackgram Greengram Redgram Groundnut Soybean
Sl No. Crops 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Elaborate Biosafety mechanism institutionalized for evaluation, approval and release of GM crops
under Cartagena protocol. Given below are GM technologies launched in India
Technology well accepted by the farmers leading to 93% of the area converted into GM Cotton in a
span of a decade. (2002-2012)
From 2002 to 2015 : Production increased from 2.0 to 3.9 million bales and productivity from 302 kg
lint/ha to 550 kg lint/ha.
10 70%
66%
60%
8
50%
6 42%
40%
4 30%
20%
2 15%
10%
6%
0 1% 1% 0%
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Total Cotton area (Mil ha) GM crop area (Mil ha) % adoption
0 0
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Challenges:
• Yield stagnation after first 4 years (530-550 kg lint/ha). Indian Yields lower than global
average (770 kg lint/ha) & much lower than advanced Cotton growing countries (1000-
2000 kg lint/ha).
• Complaints of High cost of seeds due to high trait value by farmers
• Increasing labour costs affecting Cotton production/Relative profitability.
• Adoption of hybrids also increased from 40% in 2002 to 95% presently in tandem with GM
crops.
• Challenges to resistance management. Resurgence of minor pests and epidemics
increasing crop protection costs again to pre Bt era.
• Disputes among parties of technology licensing agreements leading to demand for
regulation Source: CCI & ICAC data
12
Outlook for adoption on new technologies
Extensive testing including biosafety testing essential for getting approvals is necessary.
In balance with overall public interest and farmer interests, open access to technology
to all eligible industry participants in line with ITPGRFA recommendations is essential.
Promotion of R&D on Molecular markers and New Plant breeding technologies (NPBTs)
which can produce desired heritable outcomes without gene/genetic modification.
13
Significant achievements for the industry
• With Public sector system laying foundation, supported by CGIAR and Private sector, a
strong R&D setup developed for the seed industry.
R&D • An extensive VCU testing, Biosafety and PVPFR evaluation framework developed
• Since Seed Act 1966, A well organized institutional setup for Seed certification and
quality enforcement. Institutional setup for other enabling regulation under EPA,
PVPFR, NBA, etc.
Regulation • Affordable Seed pricing for providing quality seeds of improved varieties and hybrids
to farmers due to adequate competition
• Production capacities with state of the art Processing systems, Quality assurance,
Seed technology machinery , Seed protectants, Seed storage developed across the
Production country to cater to both domestic and global demand
& Quality • Seed testing laboratories & quality standards in line with Seed Act, OECD ,ISTA, etc.
systems
• Increased demand for High quality seeds of improved varieties and hybrids due to
superior performance led to increased SRR, hybrid & GM traits adoption
• Pan-India market & distribution channels.
Market &
• Systems and processes including seed testing, SPS measures, & international trade
Farmers
for servicing global markets well developed
14
Key challenges
Increasing labour and production and processing costs for seed companies
High entry barriers for access of advanced GM technology and traits for small and medium
seed companies
Limited resources for evaluation and VCU testing in certain crops and states
Delayed rollout of OECD testing and international quality standard testing schemes leading
to competitiveness of Indian Seed exports
Delays and lack of synergy between seed testing , SPS and regulatory processes for exports
15
Future growth prospects
Potential for increase in area under hybrids Corn, Rice, several vegetables etc.
Scope for increased yields and seed rate enhancement in Cotton through HDP
agronomy
Significant potential to export quality hybrid seeds to other Asian countries and Africa
Ideal destination for quality hybrid seed production to the Americas and Europe
Increasing seed replacement rates opening up potential for quality seed of improved
varieties in OPVs in cereal, pulses etc.
16
Way Forward- Strategic Actions required
• Public private partnership models to further deliver the public sector R&D
output to farmers
• Development of knowledge networks for sharing of information /
Biotechnology resources across seed industry
R&D • Simplified processes to be developed for utilization of genetic/bio-diversity
without impact of business potential
17
Way forward: Key strategic actions
• Strengthening VCU testing and aligning with PVPFR DUS testing
• Public private partnerships , Accredited Private sector institutions for
development and increasing capacities of of Seed testing and evaluation
Evaluation & • Capacity enhancement of Government testing network for OECD testing and for
testing preparedness for the New Seed Act
18
Thank you
19