Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KA-Modern Analyitical Chreymistry - David Harvey - 1
KA-Modern Analyitical Chreymistry - David Harvey - 1
Figure 10.42
Difference between singlet and triplet states.
phosphorescence spin states, is called phosphorescence. Because the average lifetime for phosphores-
Emission of a photon when the analyte cence ranges from 10–4 to 104 s, phosphorescence may continue for some time after
returns to a lower-energy state with the removing the excitation source.
opposite spin as the higher-energy state.
The use of molecular fluorescence for qualitative analysis and semiquantitative
analysis can be traced to the early to mid-1800s, with more accurate quantitative
methods appearing in the 1920s. Instrumentation for fluorescence spectroscopy
using filters and monochromators for wavelength selection appeared in, respec-
tively, the 1930s and 1950s. Although the discovery of phosphorescence preceded
that of fluorescence by almost 200 years, qualitative and quantitative applications of
molecular phosphorescence did not receive much attention until after the develop-
ment of fluorescence instrumentation.
S2
vr
vr
vr S1
vr vr
ic vr
vr T1
vr isc
vr
vr
ic vr
and
ec
ec
vr vr
Figure 10.43
Energy level diagram for a molecule showing
S0 vr vr pathways for deactivation of an excited
vr vr state: vr is vibrational relaxation; ic is internal
vr vr conversion; ec is external conversion, and isc
is intersystem crossing. The lowest
vibrational energy level for each electronic
Fluorescence Phosphorescence state is indicated by the thicker line.
where k is a constant accounting for the efficiency of collecting and detecting the
fluorescent emission. From Beer’s law we know that
PT
= 10 −εbC 10.30
P0
where C is the concentration of the fluorescing species. Solving equation 10.30 for
PT and substituting into equation 10.29 gives, after simplifying
If = kΦfP0(1 – 10–εbC) 10.31
For low concentrations of the fluorescing species, where εbC is less than 0.01, this
equation simplifies to
If = 2.303kΦfP0εbC 10.32
The intensity of fluorescence therefore, increases with an increase in quantum effi-
ciency, incident power of the excitation source, and the molar absorptivity and con-
centration of the fluorescing species.
Fluorescence is generally observed with molecules where the lowest energy ab-
sorption is a π → π* transition, although some n → π* transitions show weak fluo-
rescence. Most unsubstituted, nonheterocyclic aromatic compounds show favorable
fluorescence quantum yields, although substitution to the aromatic ring can have a
significant effect on Φf. For example, the presence of an electron-withdrawing
group, such as —NO2, decreases Φf, whereas adding an electron-donating group,
such as —OH, increases Φf. Fluorescence also increases for aromatic ring systems
and for aromatic molecules with rigid planar structures.
A molecule’s fluorescence quantum yield is also influenced by external vari-
ables such as temperature and solvent. Increasing temperature generally decreases
Φf because more frequent collisions between the molecule and the solvent increases
external conversion. Decreasing the solvent’s viscosity decreases Φf for similar rea-
sons. For an analyte with acidic or basic functional groups, a change in pH may
change the analyte’s structure and, therefore, its fluorescent properties. Changes in
both the wavelength and intensity of fluorescence may be affected.
As shown in Figure 10.43, fluorescence may return the molecule to any of sev-
eral vibrational energy levels in the ground electronic state. Fluorescence, therefore,
occurs over a range of wavelengths. Because the change in energy for fluorescent
emission is generally less than that for absorption, a molecule’s fluorescence spec-
trum is shifted to higher wavelengths than its absorption spectrum.
Emission intensity
Excitation
spectrum
spectrum
10G.2 Instrumentation S0 S2
The basic design of instrumentation for monitoring molecular fluores-
cence and molecular phosphorescence is similar to that found for other
spectroscopies. The most significant differences are discussed in the fol-
lowing sections.
Wavelength
Molecular Fluorescence A typical instrumental block diagram for molec-
Figure 10.44
ular fluorescence is shown in Figure 10.45. In contrast to instruments for Example of molecular excitation and
absorption spectroscopy, the optical paths for the source and detector are emission spectra.
usually positioned at an angle of 90°.
Chopper
Excitation
Source wavelength Sample
selector
Emission
wavelength
selector
Two basic instrumental designs are used for measuring molecular fluorescence.
In a fluorometer the excitation and emission wavelengths are selected with absorp-
fluorometer tion or interference filters. The excitation source for a fluorometer is usually a low-
An instrument for measuring pressure mercury vapor lamp that provides intense emission lines distributed
fluorescence that uses filters to select the throughout the ultraviolet and visible region (254, 312, 365, 405, 436, 546, 577, 691,
excitation and emission wavelengths.
and 773 nm). When a monochromator is used to select the excitation and emission
spectrofluorometer
wavelengths, the instrument is called a spectrofluorometer. With a monochroma-
An instrument for measuring tor, the excitation source is usually a high-pressure Xe arc lamp, which has a contin-
fluorescence that uses a uum emission spectrum. Either instrumental design is appropriate for quantitative
monochromator to select the excitation work, although only a spectrofluorometer can be used to record an excitation or
and emission wavelengths. emission spectrum.
The sample cells for molecular fluorescence are similar to those for optical
molecular absorption. Remote sensing with fiber-optic probes (see Figure 10.30)
also can be adapted for use with either a fluorometer or spectrofluorometer. An an-
alyte that is fluorescent can be monitored directly. For analytes that are not fluores-
cent, a suitable fluorescent probe molecule can be incorporated into the tip of the
fiber-optic probe. The analyte’s reaction with the probe molecule leads to an in-
crease or decrease in fluorescence.
Chopper Chopper
Excitation Emission
Source wavelength Sample wavelength
selector selector
Detector
Signal
processor
(a) Excitation
Chopper Chopper
From To
Sample detector
source
(b) Emission
Chopper Chopper
From To
Sample detector
Figure 10.46 source
Block diagram for molecular
phosphorescence spectrometer with inset
showing how choppers are used to isolate
excitation and emission.
1400-CH10 9/8/99 4:19 PM Page 429
in the inset, the two choppers are rotated out of phase, such that fluorescent emis-
sion is blocked from the detector when the excitation source is focused on the sam-
ple, and the excitation source is blocked from the sample when measuring the phos-
phorescent emission.
Because phosphorescence is such a slow process, provision must be made to
prevent deactivation of the excited state by external conversion. Traditionally, this
has been accomplished by dissolving the sample in a suitable organic solvent, usu-
ally a mixture of ethanol, isopentane, and diethyl ether. The resulting solution is
frozen at liquid-N2 temperatures, forming an optically clear solid. The solid matrix
minimizes external conversion due to collisions between the analyte and the sol-
vent. External conversion also is minimized by immobilizing the sample on a solid
substrate, allowing the measurement of phosphorescence at room temperature. One
approach is to place a drop of solution containing the analyte on a small filter paper
disk mounted on a sample probe. After drying the sample under a heat lamp, the
sample probe is placed in the spectrofluorometer for analysis. Other solid surfaces
that have been used include silica gel, alumina, sodium acetate, and sucrose. This
approach is particularly useful for the analysis of thin-layer chromatography plates.
Inorganic Analytes Except for a few metal ions, most notably UO2+, most inor-
ganic ions are not sufficiently fluorescent to allow a direct analysis. Many metal OH HO
ions can be determined indirectly by reacting with an organic ligand to form a
HO N N
fluorescent, or less commonly, a phosphorescent metal–ligand complex. One ex-
ample of a chelating ligand is the sodium salt of 2,4,3′-trihydroxyazobenzene-5′-
alizarin garnet R SO3Na
sulfonic acid, also known as alizarin garnet R, which forms a fluorescent
metal–ligand complex with Al3+ (Figure 10.47). The analysis is carried out using (a)
an excitation wavelength of 470 nm, with fluorescence monitored at 500 nm.
O
Other examples of chelating reagents that form fluorescent metal–ligand com- Al3+
plexes with metal ions are listed in Table 10.12. A few inorganic nonmetals are O
N
determined by their ability to decrease, or quench, the fluorescence of another
HO N
species. One example is the analysis for F–, which is based on its ability to quench SO3Na
the fluorescence of the Al3+–alizarin garnet R complex.
fluorescent complex
Organic Analytes As noted earlier, organic compounds containing aromatic (b)
rings generally are fluorescent, but aromatic heterocycles are often phosphores- Figure 10.47
cent. Many important biochemical, pharmaceutical, and environmental com- Structure of (a) alizarin garnet R, and (b) its
pounds are aromatic and, therefore, can be analyzed quantitatively by fluorometry metal–ligand complex with Al3+.
1400-CH10 9/8/99 4:19 PM Page 430
or phosphorometry. Several examples are listed in Table 10.13. When an organic ana-
lyte is not naturally fluorescent or phosphorescent, it may be possible to incorporate it
into a chemical reaction that produces a fluorescent or phosphorescent product. For
example, the enzyme creatine phosphokinase can be determined by using it to catalyze
the formation of creatine from phosphocreatine. The creatine that is formed reacts
with ninhydrin, producing a fluorescent product of unknown structure.
1400-CH10 9/8/99 4:19 PM Page 431
Standardizing the Method Equations 10.32 and 10.33 show that the intensity of
fluorescent or phosphorescent emission is proportional to the concentration of the
photoluminescent species, provided that the absorbance of radiation from the exci-
tation source (A = εbC) is less than approximately 0.01. Quantitative methods are
usually standardized using a set of external standards. Calibration curves are linear
over as much as four to six orders of magnitude for fluorescence and two to four
orders of magnitude for phosphorescence. Calibration curves become nonlinear for
high concentrations of the photoluminescent species at which the intensity of emis-
sion is given by equation 10.31. Nonlinearity also may be observed at low concen-
trations due to the presence of fluorescent or phosphorescent contaminants. As dis-
cussed earlier, the quantum efficiency for emission is sensitive to temperature and
sample matrix, both of which must be controlled if external standards are to be
used. In addition, emission intensity depends on the molar absorptivity of the pho-
toluminescent species, which is sensitive to the sample matrix.
Representative Methods
Procedure. Transfer a 2.00-mL sample of urine to a 15-mL test tube, and adjust
the pH to between 9 and 10 using 3.7 M NaOH. Add 4 mL of a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of
chloroform and isopropanol, and shake the contents of the test tube for 1 min.
Allow the organic and aqueous (urine) layers to separate, and transfer the organic
phase to a clean test tube. Add 2.00 mL of 0.05 M H2SO4 to the organic phase, and
shake the contents for 1 min. Allow the organic and aqueous layers to separate, and
transfer the aqueous phase to the sample cell. Measure the fluorescent emission at
450 nm, using an excitation wavelength of 350 nm. Determine the concentration of
quinine in the urine sample using a calibration curve prepared with a set of external
standards in 0.05 M H2SO4 and a distilled water blank. The external standards are
prepared from a 100.0-ppm solution of quinine in 0.05 M H2SO4.
Questions
1. Chloride ion is known to quench the intensity of quinine’s fluorescent
emission. For example, the presence of 100 ppm NaCl (61 ppm Cl–) gives an
emission intensity that is only 83% of that without chloride, whereas the
presence of 1000 ppm NaCl (610 ppm Cl–) gives a fluorescent emission that is
only 29% as intense. The concentration of chloride in urine typically ranges
from 4600 to 6700 ppm Cl–. How is an interference from chloride avoided in
this procedure?
2. Samples of urine that do not contain quinine still contain a small amount of
fluorescent material after the extraction steps. How can the quantitative
procedure described earlier be modified to take this into account?
—Continued
1400-CH10 9/8/99 4:19 PM Page 432
From equation 10.32, If is a function of k, Φf, P0, ε, b, and C. Since Φf, b, and C
are the same for either excitation wavelength, and ε is larger for a wavelength
of 250 nm, the greater If for an excitation wavelength of 350 nm must be due to
larger values for P0 or k at a wavelength of 350 nm. In fact, P0 at 350 nm for a
high-pressure Xe arc lamp is about 170% of that at 250 nm. In addition, the
sensitivity of a typical photomultiplier transducer (which contributes to the
value of k) at 350 nm is about 140% of that at 250 nm.
10G.4 Evaluation
Scale of Operation Molecular photoluminescence can be used for the routine
analysis of trace and ultratrace analytes in macro and meso samples. Detection limits
for fluorescence spectroscopy are strongly influenced by the analyte’s quantum yield.
For analytes with Φf > 0.5, detection limits in the picomolar range are possible when
using a high-quality spectrofluorometer. As an example, the detection limit for qui-
nine sulfate, for which Φf is 0.55, is generally between 1 ppb and 1 ppTr (part per
trillion). Detection limits for phosphorescence are somewhat poorer than those for
fluorescence, with typical values in the nanomolar range for low-temperature phos-
phorometry and in the micromolar range for room-temperature phosphorometry
using a solid substrate.
Precision When the analyte’s concentration is well above the detection limit, the
relative standard deviation for fluorescence is usually 0.5–2%. The limiting instru-
mental factor affecting precision is the stability of the excitation source. The preci-
sion for phosphorescence is often limited by reproducibility in preparing samples
for analysis, with relative standard deviations of 5–10% being common.
Sensitivity From equations 10.32 and 10.33 we can see that the sensitivity of a flu-
orescent or phosphorescent method is influenced by a number of parameters. The
importance of quantum yield and the effect of temperature and solution composi-
tion on Φf and Φp already have been considered. Besides quantum yield, the sensi-
tivity of an analysis can be improved by using an excitation source that has a greater
1400-CH10 9/8/99 4:19 PM Page 433
From
source
(a) To
detector
From
source
Figure 10.48
Use of slit orientation to change the volume
To from which fluorescence is measured:
(b)
detector (a) normal; (b) rotated 90°.
Time, Cost, and Equipment As with other optical spectroscopic methods, fluores-
cent and phosphorescent methods provide a rapid means of analysis and are capa-
ble of automation. Fluorometers are relatively inexpensive, ranging from several