Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week006 PlanningAndDecisionMaking2
Week006 PlanningAndDecisionMaking2
1
Planning and Decision Making 2
Strategic Management
Strategic Management
− is the process through which managers formulate and implement
strategies geared to optimizing goal achievement, given available
environmental and internal conditions.
− set of managerial decisions and actions that determines the long-run
performance of an organization. It entails all of the basic management
function-planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.
Purpose of Strategic management
exploit and create new and different opportunities for tomorrow;
long-range planning, in contrast, tries to optimize for tomorrow the
trends of today.
Strategic Management is important to organizations because it
1. helps organizations identify and develop a competitive advantage, a
significant edge over the competition in dealing with competitive
forces.
2. Provides a sense of direction so that organization members know
where to expend their efforts.
Strategy
The determination of the mission or purpose and the basic long-term
objectives of an enterprise, followed by the adoption of courses of action and
allocation of resources necessary to achieve these aims.
Course Module
Strategic Planning Process
Stages in planning process:
1. Strategy Formulation
2. Strategy implementation
3. Strategy evaluation
Strategy Formulation includes:
developing a vision and mission,
identifying an organization's external opportunities and threats,
determining internal strengths and weaknesses,
establishing long-term objectives,
generating alternative strengths,
choosing particular strategies to pursue.
Strategy Implementation requires the firm to establish annual objectives,
devise policies, motivate employees, and allocate resources so that
formulated strategies can be executed. These are:
developing a strategy-supportive culture,
creating an effective organizational structure
redirecting marketing efforts,
preparing budgets,
developing and utilizing information systems,
linking employee compensation to organizational performance.
Strategy Evaluation is the final stage in strategic planning. Managers need
to know when particular strategies are not working well, strategy evaluation
is the primary means for obtaining this information.
Three fundamental strategy evaluation activities are constantly changing:
1. reviewing external and internal factors that the bases for current
strategies,
2. measuring performance;
3. taking corrective actions.
Strategy evaluation is needed because success today is no guarantee of
success tomorrow.
Strategic planning is a process undertaken by an organization to develop a
plan for achievement of its overall long-term organizational goal.
Organization and Management
3
Planning and Decision Making 2
Environmental Scanning
Strategy Formulation
Strategy Implementation
Course Module
The implementation of the strategy must be monitored and adjustments
made as needed. Evaluation and Control consists of the following steps:
Evaluation and control consists of the following steps:
1. Define parameters to be measured
2. Define target values for those parameters
3. Perform measurements
4. Compare measured results to the pre-defined standard
5. Make necessary changes.
Major Planning Tools and Techniques
The planning tools and techniques that managers use are identified and
described below:
A. FORECASTING: is the process of developing assumptions about the future
that relevant to the predicted level of certain planning variables (i.e.,
company future sales).
Qualitative forecasting uses expert opinions.
Quantitative forecasting uses mathematical and statistical analysis.
All forecast rely on judgment.
Planning involves deciding on how to deal with the implications of
a forecast.
B. CONTINGENCY PLANNING: involves identifying alternative courses of
action that can be implemented, if and when an original plan proves
inadequate because of changing circumstances.
Contingency plans anticipate changing conditions.
Contingency plans contains trigger points.
C. SCENARIO PLANNING: is a long-term version of contingency planning
that involves identifying several alternative future scenarios or states of
affairs that may occur, and then making plans to deal with each scenario
should it actually occur.
Plans made for each future scenario. Increases organization’s
flexibility and preparation for future shocks.
D. BENCHMARKING: is a technique that makes use of internal and external
comparisons to better evaluate current performance and identify possible
actions to improve the future. Adopting best practices of other
organizations that achieve superior performance.
E. BRAK-EVEN ANALYSIS: this is one of the most widely used planning tools
in business. The technique can be used for analyzing the effect on profits
of different pricing strategies or different alternatives in incurring costs.
F. LINEAR PROGRAMMING: is a quantitative tools for determining the
optimal combination of resources and activities. it can be used for
production scheduling, allocation of marketing personnel to territories or
allocation of production inputs to produce an item at minimum cost.
G. SIMULATION MODEL: are mathematical representations of some aspect
of a business operation. Simulation models are used when the planning
variables, as well as their interrelationships, are so numerous and
complex that it is difficult to analytically assess the net effect of a change
in one or a number of the variables involved.
Simulation is useful in complex situations such as predicting product
demand considering the effect of changes in the pricing policies of
Organization and Management
5
Planning and Decision Making 2
Strengths of MBO
1. Aids coordination of goals and plans
2. Helps clarify priorities and expectations
3. Facilitates vertical and horizontal communications
4. Fosters employee motivation
Weaknesses of MBO
1. Tends to falter without strong continual commitment from top
management.
2. Necessities considerable training of managers
3. Can be misused as a punitive device.
4. May cause overemphasis of quantitative goals.
Course Module
MBO Process
1. Superior communicate to subordinate the higher organizational goals
and the expected subordinate accomplishments;
2. Superiors discuss with subordinate
3. Subordinates goals and both parties should agree on a set of
objectives.
4. Resources required to attain goals
5. Periodic reviews should be conducted to monitor performance and to
discuss reasons for deviations of actual performance from targets.
6. Manager or superior discusses evaluation of subordinate the reward
given or punishment.
Decision making
The selection of a course of action from among alternatives.
• Decision making is the core of planning. A plan cannot be said to exist
unless a decision-a commitment of resources, direction, or reputation-
has been made.
• In decision making process managers respond to opportunities and
threats by analyzing options, and making decisions about goals and
courses of action.
Decisions in response to opportunities:
Managers respond to ways to improve organizational performance.
Decisions in response to threats:
Occurs when managers are impacted by adverse events to the organization.
Implement
Choose among Learn from
chosen
alternatives feedback
alternative
Evaluating Alternatives
Legal?
Ethical?
Economical?
Practical?
Figure 5.3
Cognitive Biases
− Suggest decision makers use heuristics to deal with bounded
rationality.
A heuristic is a rule o thumb to deal with complex situations.
If the heuristic is wrong, however, then poor decisions result from its
use
Organization and Management
9
Planning and Decision Making 2
Escalating
Prior hypothesis
commitment
Cognitive
biases
Figure 5.4
Prior hypothesis bias: manager allows strong prior beliefs about
a relationship between variables and makes decisions based on
these beliefs even when evidence shows they are wrong.
Representativeness: decision maker incorrectly generalizes a
decision from a small sample or one incident.
Illusion of control: manager over-estimates their ability to
control events.
Escalating commitment: manager has already committed
considerable resource to project and then commits more even
after indicates problems.
Course Module
Three Approaches for Selecting and Alternative
When selecting from among alternatives, managers can use three basic
approaches:
1. Experience
Reliance on past experience probably plays a larger part than it deserves in
decision making. Experienced managers usually believe, often without
realizing it, that the things they have successfully accomplished and the
mistakes they have made serve as almost infallible guides to the future. This
attitude is likely to be more pronounced the more experience a manager has
had and the higher he or she has risen in an organization.
Relying on past experience as a guide for future action can be dangerous. In
the first place, most people do not recognize the underlying reasons for their
mistakes or failures. In the second place, the lessons of experience may be
entirely inapplicable to new problems. Good decisions must be evaluated
against future events, while experience belongs to the past.
On the other hand, if a person carefully analyzes experience, rather than
blindly following it, and if he or she distills from experience the fundamental
reasons for success or failure, then experience can be useful as a basis for
decision analysis. A successful program, a well-managed company, a
profitable product promotion, or any other decision that turns out well may
furnish useful data for such distillation. Just as scientists do not hesitate to
build upon the research of others and would be foolish indeed merely to
duplicate it, managers can learn much from others.
2. Experimentation
An obvious way to decide among alternatives is to try one of them and see
what happens. Experimentation is often used in scientific inquiry. People
often argue that it should be employed more often in managing and that the
only way a manager can make sure some plans are right— especially in view
of the intangible factors—is to try the various alternatives and see which is
best.
The experimental technique is likely to be the most expensive of all
techniques, especially if a program requires heavy expenditures of
capital
and personnel and if the firm cannot afford to vigorously attempt
several alternatives. Besides, after an experiment has been tried, there may
still be doubt about what it proved, since the future may not duplicate
the present. This technique, therefore, should be used only after
considering other alternatives.
On the other hand, there are many decisions that cannot be made until
the best course of action can be ascertained by experiment. Even
reflections on experience or the most careful research may not assure
managers of correct decisions. This is nowhere better illustrated than in the
planning of a new airplane.
An airplane manufacturer may draw from personal experience and that
of other plane manufacturers and new plane users. Engineers and
Organization and Management
11
Planning and Decision Making 2
(2) intuition,
The second phase, intuition, connects the unconscious with the conscious.
This stage may involve a combination of factors that may seem
contradictory at first. Intuition needs time to work. It requires that people
find new combinations and integrate diverse concepts and ideas. Thus,
one must think through the problem. Intuitive thinking is promoted by
several techniques, such as brainstorming.
Course Module
• Members cannot absorb all information being presented during the
session and can forget their own alternatives.
Nominal group technique: provides a more structured way to generate
alternatives in writing.
• Avoids the production blocking problem.
• Similar to brainstorming except that each member is given time to first
write down all alternatives he or she would suggest.
• Alternatives are then read aloud without discussion until all have been
listed.
• Then discussion occurs and alternatives are ranked.
Delphi technique: provides for a written format without having all
managers meet face-to-face.
• Problem is distributed in written form to managers who then generate
written alternatives.
• Responses are received and summarized by top managers.
• These results are sent back to participants for feedback, and ranking.
• The process continues until consensus is reached.
Delphi technique allow distant managers to participate.
References:
Rodriguez, R.A., "Fundamentals of Management"
Wiehrich, H., Cannice, M.V., Koontz, H., "Management, A Global and Entrepreneurial
Perspective, 13th Ed."
John Schermerhorn's. Management 11th edition, (2010), John Wiley & Sons ISBN: