Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 60

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/341182699

Appendix 4.3 to Neo-Newtonian Mechanics; Part 1: Non-Radiative Effects;


Horizontal Impact at Velocity 3.243 m/sec

Preprint · May 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 3

1 author:

Dennis P. Allen Jr.

63 PUBLICATIONS   22 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Applied Number Theory View project

Gravitational and Inetial Masses Characterized Electromagnetically Leading To An Intuitive Explanation of the Two Neo-Newtonian Mechanical Universal Constants, "C" and
"K", In Terms of Well Known Electromagnetic Effects View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Dennis P. Allen Jr. on 06 May 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#1: CaseMode := Sensitive

#2: InputMode := Word

We consider a steel spherical ball having radius R = 0.00235


meter and a massive steel plate just beginning in collision; and
we attempt a Neo-Newtonian mechanical, Timoshenko and Goodier,
"The Theory of Elasticity", analysis of their contact and the
pressure between them at any time during the collision process.
We see the ball as having its center at y = R at t = 0. We then
have that the ball's mass, m, is equal to ((4/3)(0.00235)^3) ¹
¿), where "¿" is the density of (mild) steel (7.85 10^3 kg/meter
cubed) so that its diameter is 0.0047 meter. The ball is
initially immobile at t = 0 and and is then centered at y = R,
where "y" parameterizes the (approximate) straight line
trajectory during the collision process. The polished steel
plate is fixed in either a horizontal position or else in a
vertical position. Thus, the two are just touching at t = 0 and
the collision is beginning then at the ball having velocity v0 <
0 by assumption as the ball is either dropped on the horizontal
plate or else spring ejected againt the plate that is vertical
and fixed. The range of impact velocities is -4.0 < v0 < -2.0
meters per second. (This situation is the case discussed in
"Inequalities of the Coefficients of Restitution for Vertical and
Horizontal Quasielastic Impacts of a Ball Against a Massive
Plate" (2002) by Prof. Alexander L. Dmitriev and published in the
academic journal, "International Applied Mechanics", Vol. 38,
No.6, 2002.)

There are, then, two cases: the first case is when the straight
line is vertical with increasing "y" meaning increase in heigth
so the ball is falling at negative velocity "v0" at t = 0, and
the second is that the line is horizontal. We consider herein
the second case.

Now there are seven distinct points (8 in total) on Prof.


Dmitriev's plot, and there are two situations: one for the
vertical impact augmented by gravity and one for a horizontal
impact, (apparently) not involving gravity as he explains in his
second to last paragraph. The two situations have a point on the
graph in common. The points for vertical impact (augmented WITH
gravity) are about (0.6239, 2.253), (0.5927, 2.751), (0.5710,
3.243), and (0.5610, 3.752), where the first coordinate is the
restitution coefficient and the second being the impact velocity
magnitude in meters per second. The first of these four points
is also on the plot for horizontal impact (apparently without
gravity). And there also is the points (0.5811, 3.752), (0.5800,
3.243),(0.5939, 2.751), and (0.6239, 2.253) on the plot of

Page: 1
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

horizontal impact (apparently) not connected with gravity; and we


will use Neo-Newtonian mechanics in both these cases ... which
then does subtly involve gravity in the (apparently) without
gravity case as well ... as we suspect that this situation is
somewhat more complex than Prof. Dmitriev, the experimenter,
realized.

We are given the radius and material (mild) steel that the ball
that impacts is composed of; and so in order to quantify the
modeled steel ball of mass "m", we let the ball have radius R.
When the ball impacts the massive steel plate, it sends out a
shock wave in the plate; but since he measures the collision
duration as between 16 and 18 µsec, and so only the portion of
the plate that is reached by this shock wave can matter. And
Timoshenko and Goodier point out that the shock wave reached
region is a region that has the property that the shock wave
intensity is strongest in magnitude at a point makes a smaller
angle with the impact velocity direction. Also, Prof. Dmitriev
points out that the reflection of the shock wave off the far edge
of the plate will just barely have time to reach the collision
area before the collision process terminates.

Our key idea here is that this quasi-elastic situation of the


ball against the plate may be correctly modeled as a case of
simple damped motion. The simple classical damping involves a
(passive) force "(- Const v)" with positive "Const" being the
appropriate damping constant (taking into account the measured
coefficient of restitution for a steel ball and the steel plate)
added on to the right side of the Newtonian ODE that then
becomes: "m a = P - Const v", and finally we re-write this by
adding variable inertial mass to bring us to our Neo-Newtonian
mechanics. This damping, then, corrects for the very different
radii of the steel ball and of the (infinite) radius of the
massive steel plate.

And here, we are only tryng to suggest that if the reader should
run into an anomalous situation like the one in this experiment
of Prof. Dmitriev's in his (or her) work, then help MIGHT be
available; NOT that our Neo-Newtonian mechanics is -- in view of
the below -- obviously both correct and complete ... and
therefore is, in fact, actually "perfect."

We note that the ball of mass "m" is made of mild steel as well;
and this then means that we CAN use the same Poissons's ratio and
Young's modulus of elasticity figures for both the ball and the
plate. But these two must be supplemented by damping because of
the very different radii just mentioned.

Now for our analysis {see Timosheko & Goodier's, "The Theory of

Page: 2
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

Elasticity", pages 409-414 & equations (229), for our notation


and facts}:

2
1 - þ
#3: k = ————————
¹·E
2
1 - þ
#4: ————————
¹·E
This just above is k.

Substituting into #4 for þ and E for mild steel:

2
1 - 0.303
#5: —————————————
9
¹·(210·10 )
Simplifying:

-12
#6: 1.3766·10
This just above is "k".

#7: R :− Real [0, –)


#8: PrecisionDigits := 30
€ 2 2 ‚1/3
¦ 9·¹ ·P 2 R1 + R ¦
#9: ¦—————————·(2·k) ·————————¦
 16 R1·R ƒ
This just above is "©", the distance (R - y), namely, the
collision compression depth. And R1 is the hypothetical radius
of another steel ball, but one whose radius is going to plus
infinity to indicate a flat steel surface or plate. Also, "P" is
the force between the ball and plate during the collision process
that is a function of time as is "©". Note that "P" is
determined solely by a static analysis according to Timoshenko
and Goodier (see pages 420-421).

€ 2 2 ‚1/3
¦ 9·¹ ·P 2 R1 + R ¦
#10: lim ¦—————————·(2·k) ·————————¦
R1˜+–  16 R1·R ƒ
Simplifying:

Page: 3
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.666666666666666666666666666666
2.81078366640190908359613191109·¦P·k¦
#11: ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
0.333333333333333333333333333333
R

This just above may be rewritten as:

2/3 2/3
2.81078366640190908359613191109·P ·k
#12: ———————————————————————————————————————————
1/3
R
Our Newtonian ODE from classical mechanics is:

#13: m·a = P - g·m - Const·v


The "(- Const v)" is the damping (passive) force, "P" is the
(statically calculated) impact force, and (- g m) is the
gravitational force.

P - g·m - Const·v
#14: ———————————————————
m
This just above is the acceleration "a" according to Newton.

We have that (R - y) is the distance between the center of the


ball of radius R and the plate during the collision process, and
it equals "©" {see equation (229) of Timoshenko & Goodier on page
412}.

2/3 2/3
2.81078366640190908359613191109·P ·k
#15: ——————————————————————————————————————————— = R - y
1/3
R
€ 2/3 2/3 ‚
¦ 2.81078366640190908359613191109·P ·k ¦
#16: SOLVE¦——————————————————————————————————————————— = R - y, P¦
¦ 1/3 ¦
 R ƒ
€ 1.5 ‚
¦ 0.212206590789193781025178351163·‹R·(R - y) ¦
#17: P = IF¦y - R “ 0, ————————————————————————————————————————————————¦
 k ƒ
Thus, since (R - y) is non-negative:

1.5
0.212206590789193781025178351163·‹R·(R - y)
#18: ————————————————————————————————————————————————
k

Page: 4
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

This just above is "P" [that is non-negative], and it's holding


true for (R - y) being non-negative, that is, during the
collision process.

(Note that if (R - y) < 0, then the collision is over and the


analysis no longer holds, and that complex numbers that are not
real will then be expected to begin to occur.)

We set some parameters and functions:

#19: PrecisionDigits := 30
We use 30 digit precision throughout.

Setting some values and Derive 5 functions to be used below:

#20: v0 := -3.243

WE SET OUR IMPACT VELOCITY HERE TO BE (IN MAGNITUDE) 3.243 m/sec


THROUGHT THIS SPREAD SHEET.

#21: g := 9.806
#22: FF(x) := x
#23: EULL(n) := [EUL55(n), EUL44(n), EUL33(n), EUL22(n), EUL11(n)]
#24: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, R]

The just below five functions calculate the time elasped, the
surge corresponding to this time, the acceleration, the velocity,
and the position of the ball center with respect to the plate
during contact, respectively.

Setting up our functions' existances:

#25: ssss(s, a, v, y) := 1
#26: aaaa(s, a, v, y) := 1
Setting up our five Derive integration functions:
Page: 5
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

EUL11(n) :=
Prog
CC11 := BBBpr
991t := 0
i1 := 0
Loop
If i1 ’ 1
RETURN ©11
ss := FF(CC11™2)
aa := FF(CC11™3)
#27: vv := FF(CC11™4)
yy := FF(CC11™5)
991t := FF(CC11™1)
©15 := 9t + 991t
©14 := ssss(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©13 := aaaa(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©12 := aa·9t + vv
©11 := vv·9t + yy
BBBpr := FF([©15, ©14, ©13, ©12, ©11])
i1 := i1 + 1

EUL22(n) :=
Prog
CC22 := BBBpr
992t := 0
i2 := 0
Loop
If i2 ’ 1
RETURN ©22
ss := FF(CC22™2)
#28: aa := FF(CC22™3)
vv := FF(CC22™4)
yy := FF(CC22™5)
992t := FF(CC22™1)
©25 := 9t + 992t
©24 := ssss(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©23 := aaaa(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©22 := aa·9t + vv
©21 := vv·9t + yy
i2 := i2 + 1

Page: 6
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

EUL33(n) :=
Prog
CC33 := BBBpr
993t := 0
i3 := 0
Loop
If i3 ’ 1
RETURN ©33
ss := FF(CC33™2)
#29: aa := FF(CC33™3)
vv := FF(CC33™4)
yy := FF(CC33™5)
993t := FF(CC33™1)
©35 := 9t + 993t
©34 := ssss(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©33 := aaaa(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©32 := aa·9t + vv
©31 := vv·9t + yy
i3 := i3 + 1

EUL44(n) :=
Prog
CC44 := BBBpr
994t := 0
i4 := 0
Loop
If i4 ’ 1
RETURN ©44
ss := FF(CC44™2)
#30: aa := FF(CC44™3)
vv := FF(CC44™4)
yy := FF(CC44™5)
994t := FF(CC44™1)
©45 := 9t + 994t
©44 := ssss(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©43 := aaaa(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©42 := aa·9t + vv
©41 := vv·9t + yy
i4 := i4 + 1

Page: 7
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

EUL55(n) :=
Prog
CC55 := BBBpr
995t := 0
i5 := 0
Loop
If i5 ’ 1
RETURN ©55
ss := FF(CC55™2)
#31: aa := FF(CC55™3)
vv := FF(CC55™4)
yy := FF(CC55™5)
995t := FF(CC55™1)
©55 := 995t + 9t
©54 := ssss(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©53 := aaaa(ss, aa, vv, yy)
©52 := aa·9t + vv
©51 := vv·9t + yy
i5 := i5 + 1

We see that we need to introduce a classical damping term into


our Neo-Newtonian ODE to reduce the exit velocity of the steel
ball to be in line with the Dmitriev data for the case
(apparently) without gravity (i.e. when gravitional acceleration
is normal to the impact velocity), and so we add a term {- Const
v / (f m)), where "m" is the rest mass of the ball and "f" is the
mass change factor mentioned above so that this constant is as
independent of the ball's (variable) inertial mass as possible.

Initializing:

#32: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


The Derive 5 function for the acceleration function (just below)
is a recursive formula for the acceleration, "a", since the mass
change percentage is assumed to be small and the absolute value
of acceleration, "a", on the right (in the denomerator) makes a
non-recursive solution for "a" to be difficult. And this will
turn out to cause the restitution coefficients generated below to
be somewhat unstable as we will see below. Thus, we need to
calculate a number of restitution coefficients and then average
(i.e. smooth) the resulting coefficients to obtain a more
"stable" result.

Page: 8
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#33:
aaaa(s, a, v, y) :=

1.5
0.212206590789193781025178351163·‹0.00235·(0.00235 - y)
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
-12
1.3766·10
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— -
€ 4 3 3 ‚
¦———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )¦·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSSQ©(s, a))
 3 ƒ

Const·v
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
4 3 3
———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSSQ©(s, a))
3

Using the chain rule, we calculate the time derivative of


(recursive) "a" to obtain "s"; however, we do not (by convention)
partial differentiate with respect to "a" on the right of the
(recursive) formula for "a" since it only appears as part of the
mass change factor which we must rule out now.

1.5
0.212206590789193781025178351163·‹0.00235·(0.00235 - y)
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
-12
#34: 1.3766·10
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— -
€ 4 3 3 ‚
¦———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )¦·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSSQ©(s, a))
 3 ƒ

Const·v
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
4 3 3
———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSSQ©(s, a))
3

Page: 9
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

€ 1.5
¦ 0.212206590789193781025178351163·‹0.00235·(0.00235 - y)
¦ ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
¦ -12
#35: d ¦ 1.3766·10
—— ¦—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— -
dy ¦ € 4 3 3 ‚
¦ ¦———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )¦·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSQa)
  3 ƒ


¦
¦
¦
Const·v ¦
————————————————————————————————————————————————¦
4 3 3 ¦
———·¹·0.00235 ·(8.75·10 )·(1 - b102·¦a¦·COSQa) ¦
3 ƒ

11 4
1.66633012655034372979411566484·10 ·‹(47 - 2·10 ·y)
#36: ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

11 4
1.66633012655034372979411566484·10 ·‹(47 - 2·10 ·y)
#37: ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————·v
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

€ 11 4 ‚
d ¦ 1.66633012655034372979411566484·10 ·‹(47 - 2·10 ·y) ¦
#38: —— ¦——————————————————————————————————————————————————————·v¦
dv  COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1 ƒ

2102.32449688714064648664984551·Const
#39: ———————————————————————————————————————
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

2102.32449688714064648664984551·Const
#40: ———————————————————————————————————————·a
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

We do NOT take the partial derivative with respect to "a" (or of


"COSSQ©", which stands for the square of the cosign of the angle
between the acceleration vector and the surge vector) of the
acceleration "a" as well as part of the total time derivative the
acceleration in using the chain rule here by convention since
exampes show that this must be avoided because the time
derivative of the mass change function "f" must not be taken, but
only the time derivative of the rest inertial mass is taken ...
which vanishes herein (since it is fixed herein).

Summing according to the chain rule for multivariables:

Page: 10
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

11 4
1.66633012655034372979411566484·10 ·‹(47 - 2·10 ·y)
#41: ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————·v +
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

2102.32449688714064648664984551·Const
———————————————————————————————————————·a
COSSQ©(b102)·¦a¦ - 1

#42: ssss(s, a, v, y) :=

11 4
1.66633012655034372979411566484·10 ·‹(47 - 2·10 ·y)
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————·v +
COSSQ©(s, a)·b102·¦a¦ - 1

2102.32449688714064648664984551·Const
———————————————————————————————————————·a
COSSQ©(s, a)·b102·¦a¦ - 1

This just above is the Derive 5 function for the surge "s".

We have a recursive formula for COSSQ© (since it is defined in


terms of the acceleration of the steel ball with has a recursive
formula):

2 -15
([a, 9.806]·[s, 0]) + 10
#43: COSSQ©(s, a) := ——————————————————————————————
2 2 -15
[9.806, a] ·[0, s] + 10
The 10^-15 is a very slight bias to avoid 0/0 type indeterminacy
problems.

We are now ready to go with our generating of restitution


coefficients for the impact velocity magnitude of 3.243 m/sec for
the case that Prof. Dmitriev felt was "without gravity" since the
impact velocity of the steel ball was horizontal but gravity was
vertical; however, we believe that Neo-Newtonian mechanics also
applies here; and so gravity does then play a (small) role none-
the-less.

NOW WE CAN BEGIN IN EARNEST:

Page: 11
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We set up our RCA:

#44: RCA := [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,


0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We now begin to generate our data points using the above by first
setting N = 1, where all parameters (see the 8 steps just below)
will be the same except that the value of the dampling constant,
"Const", will be very slightly varied by using the function,
"FUNT(N)" that as a function of "N" is added to the base value
for "Const" that equals 31.25005. This, then, will allow us to
generate (via numerical integration using these parameters) a
number of nearby values of our restitution coefficient that we
may average to reduce (i.e. smooth) the instability involved in
this integration process that was discussed above.

We begin by setting N = 1.

#45: N := 1
N -6
#46: FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#47: Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
#48: Const
Evaluating our "Const":

#49: 31.25005
This just above is the value of our damping constant, "Const" for
N = 1.

-6.4054
#50: b102 := 10
This just above is our trial value for "b102" determining the
inertial mass change after (above mentioned) power series
truncation of our mass change factor "f" so as to involve only
"b102".

-8
#51: at := 10
This just above is our time step length for numerically
integrating our ODE (#36 above).

Page: 12
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

Initializing:

#52: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


We will have to numerically integrate out ODE for the collision
process by trial & error because imaginary numbers will indicate
that (R - y)^3/2 has become imaginary as then (R - y) < 0, and so
the collision if over. Derive 5 has limited functional capacity
that results in this trial & error methodology as we can only
know that the collision process is over by the appearence of
imaginary numbers in the output.

We now numerically integrate #36 (above) for one collision:

#53: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 5 †
#54: …10 , 0, 2.13057789123323330142237248091·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#55: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#56: …2·10 , - 2.56425008092029458192430289238·10 ,
5
2.32638025760993432132654807977·10 ,

-3.24086942210876676669857762751, 0.00234993514‡
#57: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1260)
„ -5 10
#58: …1.262·10 , - 1.32016867696024041781300946535·10 , -
5
1.18437979552399853871950845444·10 , 1.74661900363141290167758482875,

0.0023497731402151232487056930478‡
#59: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 10)
„ -5 9
#60: …1.272·10 , - 3.13892337326115384601179876358·10 , -
5
1.19353551401264461274885620169·10 , 1.73472545008062014819585239198,

0.00234994726771126543942665886076‡
#61: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

Page: 13
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

„ -5 9
#62: …1.273·10 , - 1.62226629858851425796202740503·10 , -

5
1.1937960075142599496127106298·10 , 1.73353191456660750358310353578,


0.00234996461496576624562814081929‡

#63: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#64: …1.274·10 , 1.66236748948143292006211604443·10 , -

5
1.1938849575794440953719217919·10 , 1.73233811855909324363349082515,


0.00234998195028491191170317665032‡

#65: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#66: …1.275·10 , 2.47515773251947088023936712914·10 , -

5
1.19376390088443631570028278191·10 , 1.73114423360151379953811890335,


0.00234999927366609750263561298523‡

#67: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#68: …1.276·10 , 7.07540540220190027193845205737·10 , -

5
1.19333145995597941218136411155·10 , 1.72995046970062936322241862057,


0.00235001658510843351777360836642‡

-5
1.275·10
#69: ————————————
9t

#70: 1275

#71: 1.73114423360151379953811890335

1.73114423360151379953811890335
#72: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#73: 0.533809507740213937569571046361

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little

Page: 14
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#74: RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,


0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 2:

#75: N := 2
#76: Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#77: FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#78: Const
Evaluating:

-6.4054
#79: b102 := 10
-8
#80: at := 10
#81: 31.250051
Initializing:

#82: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#83: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#84: …10 , 0, 2.13057795941161673547234364647·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#85: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#86: …2·10 , - 2.5642598658248670487102222505·10 ,
5
2.32638033882843720316101772226·10 ,

Page: 15
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


-3.24086942204058838326452765635, 0.00234993514‡

#87: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1260)

„ -5 10
#88: …1.262·10 , - 1.32016905298326196808572655328·10 , -

5
1.18437980230382031847870013957·10 , 1.7466189749832273683449998443,


0.0023497731401138737932513824877‡

#89: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 10)

„ -5 9
#90: …1.272·10 , - 3.13893126094458421263876795857·10 , -

5
1.19353552627105036367102350769·10 , 1.73472542134322208523697436521,


0.00234994726760714757767081487432‡

#91: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#92: …1.273·10 , - 1.62227551230852021935145697046·10 , -

5
1.19379602066209551171978844727·10 , 1.73353188581695103487330334171,


0.00234996461486136100989166724406‡

#93: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#94: …1.274·10 , 1.66225341597608058951736486376·10 , -

5
1.19388497179218561550162650941·10 , 1.73233808979628893936158355326,


0.00234998195018021917940201597709‡

#95: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#96: …1.275·10 , 2.47514150147080314158119648822·10 , -

5
1.19376391649249447424698377643·10 , 1.73114420482449675374608192675,


0.00234999927356111714229140959293‡

Page: 16
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#97: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#98: …1.276·10 , 7.07532243218118937261035829767·10 , -

5
1.19333147837449022142334467137·10 , 1.72995044090800425927183494297,


0.00235001658500316538725894705375‡

-5
1.275·10
#99: ————————————
9t

#100: 1275

#101: 1.73114420482449675374608192675

1.73114420482449675374608192675
#102: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#103: 0.533809498866634830017293224406

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#104:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 3:

#105:N := 3
#106:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#107:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#108:Const
Evaluating:

Page: 17
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#109: 31.250048

-6.4054
#110: b102 := 10

#111: 31.250051

Initializing:

#112:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#113:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#114: …10 , 0, 2.13057775487646643332243014979·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#115:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#116:…2·10 , - 2.56423051111226004882779869447·10 ,
5
2.32638009517292998342682369357·10 ,

-3.24086942224512353356667756985, 0.00234993514‡
#117:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)
„ -5 9
#118:…1.272·10 , - 3.13890759787390051380152962013·10 , -
5
1.19353548949581566629718118204·10 , 1.73472550755541832467006761505,

0.00234994726791950117506458471874‡
#119:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#120:…1.273·10 , - 1.62224787111774670815685612308·10 , -
5
1.19379598121856879605362703115·10 , 1.73353197206592250900377043387,

0.00234996461517457672924783141942‡
#121:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 8
#122:…1.274·10 , 1.66259563704259603849337927108·10 , -
5
1.19388492915393680805667879345·10 , 1.73233817608470394020771680683,

Page: 18
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


0.00234998195049429738847292145712‡

#123: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#124: …1.275·10 , 2.47519019476539808383771686312·10 , -

5
1.19376386966828663766635554505·10 , 1.73114429115555000339966012804,


0.00234999927387605823551232353429‡

#125: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#126: …1.276·10 , 7.07557136033635262164734414165·10 , -

5
1.19333142311880227944404553785·10 , 1.7299505272858817167619937725,


0.00235001658531896979101235753089‡

-5
1.275·10
#127: ————————————
9t

#128: 1275

#129: 1.73114429115555000339966012804

1.73114429115555000339966012804
#130: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#131: 0.533809525487372804008529179167

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#132:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0]

Page: 19
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We set N = 4:

#133:N := 4
#134:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#135:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#136:Const
Evaluating:

#137:31.250053
-6.4054
#138:b102 := 10
-8
#139:at := 10
#140:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#141:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#142: …10 , 0, 2.1305780957683836035722859776·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#143:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#144:…2·10 , - 2.56427943563512238277363947284·10 ,
5
2.32638050126544439259919276352·10 ,

-3.24086942190423161639642771402, 0.00234993514‡
#145:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)
„ -5 9
#146:…1.272·10 , - 3.1389470362910524214356236257·10 , -
5
1.1935355507878444209303170797·10 , 1.73472536386842800987543688481,

0.00234994726739891186628536360373‡
#147:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#148:…1.273·10 , - 1.62229393971777666525221884147·10 , -

Page: 20
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
1.1937960469577466066222166805·10 , 1.73353182831764016545450656773,


0.00234996461465255055056546235809‡

#149: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#150: …1.274·10 , 1.66202526951583035754040680847·10 , -

5
1.19388500021764440876371704005·10 , 1.73233803227068241884788435105,


0.00234998194997083372696711690316‡

#151: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#152: …1.275·10 , 2.475109039522057245286795305·10 , -

5
1.19376394770857743055466863864·10 , 1.73114414727046477443912063401,


0.002349999273351156433791305382‡

#153: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#154: …1.276·10 , 7.07515651022626347098306123395·10 , -

5
1.19333151521135634395600843153·10 , 1.72995038332275619700856596537,


0.00235001658479262913843904977321‡

-5
1.275·10
#155: ————————————
9t

#156: 1275

#157: 1.73114414727046477443912063401

1.73114414727046477443912063401
#158: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#159: 0.53380948111947726624703072279

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

Page: 21
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#160:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 5:

#161:N := 5
#162:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#163:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#164:Const
Evaluating:

#165:31.250046
#166:31.250051
-8
#167:at := 10
Initializing:

#168:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


#169:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#170: …10 , 0, 2.13057761851969956522248781866·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡

#171:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#172:…2·10 , - 2.56421094130570604967674853791·10 ,
5
2.32637993273592754655269136242·10 ,

-3.24086942238148030043477751218, 0.00234993514‡

Page: 22
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#173: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)

„ -5 9
#174: …1.272·10 , - 3.13889182245945695031650864289·10 , -

5
1.19353546497896346033931968649·10 , 1.73472556503021923521988252977,


0.00234994726812773692687082933387‡

#175: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#176: …1.273·10 , - 1.6222294436059714554505790295·10 , -

5
1.19379595492285093665703851267·10 , 1.73353202956524027175954321009,


0.00234996461538338722906318153269‡

#177: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#178: …1.274·10 , 1.66282378533770913775548735301·10 , -

5
1.19388490072839719125563758135·10 , 1.73233823361031742082288617157,


0.00234998195070368288146589912813‡

#179: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#180: …1.275·10 , 2.47522265720945044956487321934·10 , -

5
1.19376383845209247817198074141·10 , 1.73114434870958902363163053399,


0.00234999927408601898464010735699‡

#181: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#182: …1.276·10 , 7.07573734260356409007030665732·10 , -

5
1.19333138628141776995691784371·10 , 1.72995058487113693115345855325,


0.00235001658552950608053034367329‡

Page: 23
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

-5
1.275·10
#183: ————————————
9t

#184: 1275

#185: 1.73114434870958902363163053399

1.73114434870958902363163053399
#186: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#187: 0.533809543234532538893503094045

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#188:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 6:

#189:N := 6
#190:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#191:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#192:Const
Evaluating:

#193:31.250055
-6.4054
#194:b102 := 10
#195:31.250051
Initializing:

Page: 24
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#196: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#197: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 5 †
#198: …10 , 0, 2.13057823212515047167222830872·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡

#199: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 8
#200: …2·10 , - 2.5642990054468582508474866874·10 ,

5
2.32638066370245348306304328983·10 ,


-3.24086942176787484952832777169, 0.00234993514‡

#201: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)

„ -5 9
#202: …1.272·10 , - 3.13896281161033069695471621147·10 , -

5
1.19353557530461521877262164479·10 , 1.73472530639363666858853670397,


0.00234994726719067617106822635919‡

#203: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#204: …1.273·10 , - 1.62231236708602600884473052151·10 , -

5
1.1937960732533709958199422399·10 , 1.73353177081833205336976408233,


0.00234996461444374010743491224456‡

#205: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#206: …1.274·10 , 1.66179712378951399347747845969·10 , -

5
1.19388502864307087277406799066·10 , 1.73233797474507868237394414009,


0.0023499819497614482907554459422‡

#207: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#208: …1.275·10 , 2.47507657777142793008093044312·10 , -

Page: 25
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
1.19376397892461590602113841499·10 , 1.7311440897164356115011700721,


0.00234999927314119574154226968164‡

#209: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#210: …1.276·10 , 7.07499061237795806695774139312·10 , -

5
1.19333155204801516294710946079·10 , 1.72995032573751099559514893368,


0.00235001658458209290589838469334‡

-5
1.275·10
#211: ————————————
9t

#212: 1275

#213: 1.7311440897164356115011700721

1.7311440897164356115011700721
#214: ————————————————————————————————
3.243

#215: 0.533809463372320570922346614893

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#216:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 7:

#217:N := 7

Page: 26
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#218: Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)

N -6
#219: FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10

#220: Const

Evaluating:

#221:31.250044
-6.4054
#222:b102 := 10
#223:31.250051
Initializing:

#224:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#225:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#226: …10 , 0, 2.13057748216293269712254548754·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#227:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#228:…2·10 , - 2.56419137150063258444516204323·10 ,
5
2.32637977029892701070411771433·10 ,

-3.24086942251783706730287745451, 0.00234993514‡
#229:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#230:…1.274·10 , 1.66305193436677866318210521575·10 , -
5
1.19388487230282524487517329695·10 , 1.73233829113593368547947267779,

0.00234998195091306839068211156382‡
#231:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#232:…1.275·10 , 2.47525511985163141001143993135·10 , -
5
1.19376380723585383696945799379·10 , 1.73114440626363086023459750449,

Page: 27
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


0.00234999927429597975001896635855‡

#233: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#234: …1.276·10 , 7.0759033490140033583417937331·10 , -

5
1.19333134944382585441447191557·10 , 1.7299506424563950063976280465,


0.00235001658574004238632756870452‡

-5
1.275·10
#235: ————————————
9t

#236: 1275

#237: 1.73114440626363086023459750449

1.73114440626363086023459750449
#238: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#239: 0.533809560981693142224667747298

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#240:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 8:

#241:N := 8
#242:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)

Page: 28
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

N -6
#243: FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10

#244: Const

Evaluating:

#245:31.250057
#246:31.250051
-8
#247:at := 10
Initializing:

#248:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#249:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#250: …10 , 0, 2.13057836848191733977217063985·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#251:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#252:…2·10 , - 2.56431857526007465295775427557·10 ,
5
2.32638082613946447455260267318·10 ,

-3.24086942163151808266022782936, 0.00234993514‡
#253:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)
„ -5 9
#254:…1.272·10 , - 3.13897858690241915839328771174·10 , -
5
1.19353559982136275723361592514·10 , 1.73472524891884806137588886728,

0.00234994726698244049201940124827‡
#255:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#256:…1.273·10 , - 1.62233079441326849036196531679·10 , -
5
1.19379609954896867936608549422·10 , 1.73353171331902669861865525136,

0.00234996461423492968050001500716‡
#257:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

Page: 29
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

„ -5 8
#258: …1.274·10 , 1.66156897879712505232877014247·10 , -

5
1.19388505706846500762630140922·10 , 1.73233791721947772993928916586,


0.00234998194955206287076700119371‡

#259: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#260: …1.275·10 , 2.4750441162189117637219766779·10 , -

5
1.19376401014060990089407871322·10 , 1.73114403216240926493166286445,


0.0023499992729312350655443005866‡

#261: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#262: …1.276·10 , 7.07482473862583092471166704414·10 , -

5
1.19333158888446670765775981883·10 , 1.72995026815226865503076878574,


0.00235001658437155668963694990323‡

-5
1.275·10
#263: ————————————
9t

#264: 1275

#265: 1.73114403216240926493166286445

1.73114403216240926493166286445
#266: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#267: 0.533809445625164744043065946484

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#268:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,

Page: 30
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,

0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,

0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 9:

#269:N := 9
#270:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#271:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#272:Const
Evaluating:

#273:31.250042
#274:31.250051
-8
#275:at := 10
Initializing:

#276:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#277:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#278: …10 , 0, 2.13057734580616582902260315642·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#279:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#280:…2·10 , - 2.56417180169703965310704883194·10 ,
5
2.32637960786192837588106937728·10 ,

-3.24086942265419383417097739684, 0.00234993514‡
#281:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)

Page: 31
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

„ -5 9
#282: …1.272·10 , - 3.13886027154899865271992193416·10 , -

5
1.19353541594518926976232010607·10 , 1.73472567997982925854785126435,


0.00234994726854420847898828240531‡

#283: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#284: …1.273·10 , - 1.62219258845939688036707399716·10 , -

5
1.19379590233133510013886070271·10 , 1.73353214456388406927808894424,


0.00234996461580100827728086788382‡

#285: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 8
#286: …1.274·10 , 1.66328008412981106020230028063·10 , -

5
1.19388484387722096882166027799·10 , 1.73233834866155273417795008354,


0.00234998195112245391612156066471‡

#287: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#288: …1.275·10 , 2.47528758269194439786773986286·10 , -

5
1.19376377601957071381108270417·10 , 1.73114446381767551320912842326,


0.00234999927450594053164890244421‡

#289: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#290: …1.276·10 , 7.07606937957814668062086635508·10 , -

5
1.1933313126060265034984931232·10 , 1.72995070004165594249531734056,


0.0023500165859505787084040345355‡

-5
1.275·10
#291: ————————————
9t

Page: 32
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#292: 1275

#293: 1.72995070004165594249531734056

1.72995070004165594249531734056
#294: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#295: 0.533441473956724003236298902423

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#296:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 10:

#297:N := 10
#298:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#299:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#300:Const
Evaluating:

#301:31.250059
-6.4054
#302:b102 := 10
#303:31.250051
Initializing:

Page: 33
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#304: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#305:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#306: …10 , 0, 2.13057850483868420787211297097·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#307:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#308:…2·10 , - 2.56433814507477158913043261946·10 ,
5
2.32638098857647736706790428559·10 ,

-3.24086942149516131579212788702, 0.00234993514‡
#309:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1270)
„ -5 9
#310:…1.272·10 , - 3.13899436216731792494769062438·10 , -
5
1.19353562433808703634897849148·10 , 1.73472519144406218823710841831,

0.00234994726677420482913888637852‡
#311:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#312:…1.273·10 , - 1.62234922169950435003451237038·10 , -
5
1.19379612584453965731376650956·10 , 1.73353165581972410120075943982,

0.00234996461402611926976076874961‡
#313:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 8
#314:…1.274·10 , 1.66134083453865708918987766232·10 , -
5
1.19388508549382681341403854038·10 , 1.73233785969387956154344567331,

0.0023499819493426774670017807572‡
#315:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#316:…1.275·10 , 2.47501165486450531406801070963·10 , -

Page: 34
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
1.19376404135655941542117092094·10 , 1.73114397460838573473003163477,


0.00234999927272127440579739619166‡

#317: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#318: …1.276·10 , 7.07465888895944734704524593575·10 , -

5
1.19333162572071100733640729668·10 , 1.72995021056702917531461046385,


0.00235001658416102048965474349197‡

-5
1.275·10
#319: ————————————
9t

#320: 1275

#321: 1.73114397460838573473003163477

1.73114397460838573473003163477
#322: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#323: 0.533809427878009785609013763419

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#324:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

Page: 35
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We set N = 11:

#325:N := 11
#326:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#327:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#328:Const
Evaluating:

#329:31.25004
-6.4054
#330:b102 := 10
#331:31.250051
Initializing:

#332:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#333:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#334: …10 , 0, 2.13057720944939896092266082529·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#335:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#336:…2·10 , - 2.56415223189492725563641852579·10 ,
5
2.32637944542493164208351297929·10 ,

-3.24086942279055060103907733917, 0.00234993514‡
#337:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#338:…1.274·10 , 1.663508234626812774340532421·10 , -
5
1.19388481545158436300147205974·10 , 1.7323384061871745669187921491,

0.00234998195133183945778424833129‡
#339:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#340:…1.275·10 , 2.47532004573039284592381643133·10 , -

Page: 36
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
1.19376374480324310844914605494·10 , 1.73114452137172298255579067704,


0.00234999927471590132952991751921‡

#341: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#342: …1.276·10 , 7.07623543430647789176334559322·10 , -

5
1.19333127576801968787805212965·10 , 1.72995075762691973944734153098,


0.00235001658616111504675974307711‡

-5
1.275·10
#343: ————————————
9t

#344: 1275

#345: 1.73114452137172298255579067704

1.73114452137172298255579067704
#346: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#347: 0.533809596476016954226269095602

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#348:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

Page: 37
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We set N = 12:

#349:N := 12
#350:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#351:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#352:Const
Evaluating:

#353:31.250061
#354:31.250051
-8
#355:at := 10
Initializing:

#356:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


#357:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#358: …10 , 0, 2.13057864119545107597205530209·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#359:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#360:…2·10 , - 2.56435771489094905939151210166·10 ,
5
2.32638115101349216060898149904·10 ,

-3.24086942135880454892402794469, 0.00234993514‡
#361:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#362:…1.274·10 , 1.66111269101410365925175215109·10 , -
5
1.19388511391915629023089982345·10 , 1.73233780216828417718593990675,

0.00234998194913329207945978273215‡
#363:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#364:…1.275·10 , 2.47497919370820514907680084233·10 , -

Page: 38
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
1.19376407257246444985009220427·10 , 1.73114391705436502089570900693,


0.00234999927251131376230155459155‡

#365: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#366: …1.276·10 , 7.07449306336838016776452182756·10 , -

5
1.19333166255674809121884455711·10 , 1.72995015298179255644585891472,


0.00235001658395048430595176354864‡

-5
1.275·10
#367: ————————————
9t

#368: 1275

#369: 1.73114391705436502089570900693

1.73114391705436502089570900693
#370: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#371: 0.533809410130855695620015111603

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#372:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0]

Page: 39
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We set N = 13:

#373:N := 13
#374:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#375:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#376:Const
Evaluating:

#377:31.250038
-6.4054
#378:b102 := 10
#379:31.250051
Initializing:

#380:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


#381:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 5 †
#382: …10 , 0, 2.13057707309263209282271849417·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#383:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#384:…2·10 , - 2.56413266209429539200728074738·10 ,
5
2.32637928298793680931141514835·10 , -3.2408694229269073679071772815,

0.00234993514‡
#385:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#386:…1.274·10 , 1.66373638585779025121667178111·10 , -
5
1.1938847870259154273209813744·10 , 1.73233846371279918370247263496,

0.00234998195154122501567017646404‡
#387:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

Page: 40
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

„ -5 9
#388: …1.275·10 , 2.47535250896698018706944105155·10 , -

5
1.19376371358687102063593500801·10 , 1.73114457892577326827515165359,


0.00234999927492586214366201348877‡

#389: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#390: …1.276·10 , 7.07640151320948841500399253517·10 , -

5
1.19333123892980537820949568886·10 , 1.72995081521218639725451571858,


0.00235001658637165140139469624029‡

-5
1.275·10
#391: ————————————
9t

#392: 1275

#393: 1.72995081521218639725451571858

1.72995081521218639725451571858
#394: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#395: 0.533441509470301078401022423243

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#396:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,

Page: 41
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 14:

#397:N := 14
N -6
#398:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#399:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
#400:Const
Evaluating:

#401:31.250063
-6.4054
#402:b102 := 10
-8
#403:at := 10
Initializing:

#404:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#405:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#406: …10 , 0, 2.13057877755221794407199763322·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#407:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#408:…2·10 , - 2.56437728470860706376698310542·10 ,
5
2.32638131345050885517586768555·10 ,

-3.24086942122244778205592800236, 0.00234993514‡
#409:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#410:…1.274·10 , 1.66088454822345831780084157029·10 , -
5
1.19388514234445343817050490668·10 , 1.73233774464269157686629812108,

Page: 42
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


0.00234998194892390670814100521815‡

#411: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#412: …1.275·10 , 2.47494673275000783680582252676·10 , -

5
1.19376410378832500442851552052·10 , 1.73114385950034712342812761617,


0.00234999927230135313505677388113‡

#413: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#414: …1.276·10 , 7.07432726184220974407369789352·10 , -

5
1.19333169939257798852821827528·10 , 1.72995009539655879842369910065,


0.0023500165837399481385280081624‡

-5
1.275·10
#415: ————————————
9t

#416: 1275

#417: 1.73114385950034712342812761617

1.73114385950034712342812761617
#418: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#419: 0.533809392383702474075895040447

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#420:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,

Page: 43
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,

0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,

0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0]

We set N = 15:

#421:N := 15
#422:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#423:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#424:Const
Evaluating:

#425:31.250036
-8
#426:at := 10
-6.4054
#427:b102 := 10
Initializing:

#428:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]


#429:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 5 †
#430: …10 , 0, 2.13057693673586522472277616304·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#431:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#432:…2·10 , - 2.56411309229514406219364511981·10 ,
5
2.32637912055094387756474251248·10 ,

-3.24086942306326413477527722383, 0.00234993514‡
#433:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)

Page: 44
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

„ -5 8
#434: …1.274·10 , 1.66396453782274993654597847034·10 , -

5
1.19388475860021416168656015021·10 , 1.73233852123842658452946530197,


0.00234998195175061058977934696348‡

#435: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#436: …1.275·10 , 2.47538497240170985429411315294·10 , -

5
1.19376368237045445012373230397·10 , 1.73114463647982637036777874182,


0.00234999927513582297404519225813‡

#437: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#438: …1.276·10 , 7.07656761629767726964866586886·10 , -

5
1.19333120209138354513643743514·10 , 1.72995087279745591591765500951,


0.00235001658658218777230889593592‡

-5
1.275·10
#439: ————————————
9t

#440: 1275

#441: 1.73114463647982637036777874182

1.73114463647982637036777874182
#442: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#443: 0.533809631970344240014732883694

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#444:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,

Page: 45
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,

0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,

0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,

0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,

0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,

0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 16:

#445:N := 16
#446:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#447:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#448:Const
Evaluating:

#449:31.250065
-8
#450:at := 10
-6.4054
#451:b102 := 10
Initializing:

#452:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#453:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#454: …10 , 0, 2.13057891390898481217193996434·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#455:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#456:…2·10 , - 2.56439685452774560228283601466·10 ,

Page: 46
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

5
2.32638147588752745076859621712·10 ,


-3.24086942108609101518782806003, 0.00234993514‡

#457: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)

„ -5 8
#458: …1.274·10 , 1.66065640616671462021880338987·10 , -

5
1.19388517076971825732647261746·10 , 1.73233768711710176058404655761,


0.00234998194871452135304544631462‡

#459: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#460: …1.275·10 , 2.47491427198990994541221482922·10 , -

5
1.19376413500414107940410959193·10 , 1.73114380194633204232672008499,


0.00234999927209139252406305215508‡

#461: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#462: …1.276·10 , 7.07416148437052394897723914808·10 , -

5
1.19333173622820072847503824151·10 , 1.7299500378113279012473159754,


0.00235001658352941198738347542229‡

-5
1.275·10
#463: ————————————
9t

#464: 1275

#465: 1.73114380194633204232672008499

1.73114380194633204232672008499
#466: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#467: 0.533809374636550120976478595433

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

Page: 47
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#468:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 17:

#469:N := 17
#470:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#471:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#472:Const
Evaluating:

#473:31.250034
-8
#474:at := 10
-6.4054
#475:b102 := 10
Initializing:

#476:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#477:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#478: …10 , 0, 2.13057680037909835662283383192·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡

Page: 48
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#479: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 8
#480: …2·10 , - 2.56409352249747326616952126687·10 ,

5
2.32637895811395284684346169968·10 ,


-3.24086942319962090164337716616, 0.00234993514‡

#481: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)

„ -5 8
#482: …1.274·10 , 1.66419269052169827613913513016·10 , -

5
1.19388473017448056600457951396·10 , 1.73233857876405676940024391315,


0.00234998195195999618011176173009‡

#483: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#484: …1.275·10 , 2.4754174360345852806870691178·10 , -

5
1.19376365115399339666481646428·10 , 1.73114469403388228883423933363,


0.00234999927534578382067945573253‡

#485: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#486: …1.276·10 , 7.07673374358155107877654777977·10 , -

5
1.19333116525275415928974866502·10 , 1.72995093038272829543757451717,


0.00235001658679272415950234407493‡

-5
1.275·10
#487: ————————————
9t

#488: 1275

#489: 1.73114469403388228883423933363

1.73114469403388228883423933363
#490: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

Page: 49
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#491: 0.533809649717509185579475588538

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#492:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 18:

#493:N := 18
#494:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#495:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#496:Const
Evaluating:

#497:31.250067
-8
#498:at := 10
-6.4054
#499:b102 := 10
Initializing:

Page: 50
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#500: BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#501: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 5 †
#502: …10 , 0, 2.13057905026575168027188229547·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡

#503: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -8 8
#504: …2·10 , - 2.56441642434836467496506121381·10 ,

5
2.32638163832454794738720046576·10 , -3.2408694209497342483197281177,


0.00234993514‡

#505: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)

„ -5 8
#506: …1.274·10 , 1.66042826484386612198278628793·10 , -

5
1.19388519919495074779242099121·10 , 1.73233762959151472833871146711,


0.0023499819485051360141731041211‡

#507: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#508: …1.275·10 , 2.47488181142790804315281562259·10 , -

5
1.19376416621991267502453893127·10 , 1.73114374439231977759091904612,


0.00234999927188143192932038750821‡

#509: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#510: …1.276·10 , 7.07399573094291816369223271629·10 , -

5
1.19333177306361634025718649313·10 , 1.72994998022609986491589450719,


0.0023500165833188758525181634174‡

-5
1.275·10
#511: ————————————
9t

#512: 1275

Page: 51
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#513: 1.73114374439231977759091904612

1.73114374439231977759091904612
#514: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#515: 0.533809356889398636321590825198

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#516:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,
0.533809356889398636321590825198, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 19:

#517:N := 19
#518:Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)
N -6
#519:FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10
#520:Const
Evaluating:

#521:31.250032

Page: 52
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

-8
#522: 9t := 10

-6.4054
#523: b102 := 10

Initializing:

#524:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#525:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#526: …10 , 0, 2.13057666402233148852289150079·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#527:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#528:…2·10 , - 2.56407395270128300390891881284·10 ,
5
2.32637879567696371714753933795·10 ,

-3.24086942333597766851147710849, 0.00234993514‡
#529:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#530:…1.274·10 , 1.66442084395464171590220325398·10 , -
5
1.19388470174871464018140978735·10 , 1.73233863628968973831528223123,

0.00234998195216938178666742266437‡
#531:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#532:…1.275·10 , 2.4754498998656098994372795782·10 , -
5
1.19376361993748786001146178794·10 , 1.73114475158794102367510082144,

0.0023499992755557446835648058172‡
#533:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#534:…1.276·10 , 7.07689989507162407695236114119·10 , -
5
1.19333112841391719128754910592·10 , 1.72995098796800353581508935965,

Page: 53
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


0.0023500165870032605629750425682‡

-5
1.275·10
#535: ————————————
9t

#536: 1275

#537: 1.73114475158794102367510082144

1.73114475158794102367510082144
#538: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#539: 0.533809667464674999591458779352

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#540:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,
0.533809356889398636321590825198, 0.533809667464674999591458779352,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We set N = 20:

#541:N := 20

Page: 54
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

#542: Const := 31.25005 + FUNT(N)

N -6
#543: FUNT(N) := ((N - 1)·(-1) )·10

#544: Const

Evaluating:

#545:31.250069
-8
#546:at := 10
-6.4054
#547:b102 := 10
Initializing:

#548:BBBpr := [0, 0, 0, v0, 0.00235]

#549:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 5 †
#550: …10 , 0, 2.13057918662251854837182462659·10 , -3.243, 0.00234996757‡
#551:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -8 8
#552:…2·10 , - 2.56443599417046428183964908799·10 ,
5
2.32638180076157034503171380346·10 ,

-3.24086942081337748145162817537, 0.00234993514‡
#553:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1272)
„ -5 8
#554:…1.274·10 , 1.66020012425490637866527281009·10 , -
5
1.19388522762015090966196725603·10 , 1.73233757206593048012981909769,

0.00234998194829575069152397673708‡
#555:ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)
„ -5 9
#556:…1.275·10 , 2.47484935106399869838413634397·10 , -
5
1.19376419743563979153746382846·10 , 1.73114368683831032922015713044,

Page: 55
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM


0.00234999927167147135082877803527‡

#557: ITERATE(EULL(n), n, 1, 1)

„ -5 9
#558: …1.276·10 , 7.07383000154899527007029055218·10 , -

5
1.19333180989882485305992640849·10 , 1.72994992264087468942861966661,


0.00235001658310833973393207023684‡

-5
1.275·10
#559: ————————————
9t

#560: 1275

#561: 1.73114368683831032922015713044

1.73114368683831032922015713044
#562: —————————————————————————————————
3.243

#563: 0.53380933914224802011105677781

This (without gravity) should be about 0.5800, and so is a little


small.

We enter this restitution coefficient into our RSA:

#564:RCA := [0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,
0.533809356889398636321590825198, 0.533809667464674999591458779352,

Page: 56
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.53380933914224802011105677781, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

We calculate the mean and then the variance of the above 20


generated data points:

#565:AVERAGE(0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,
0.533809356889398636321590825198, 0.533809667464674999591458779352,
0.53380933914224802011105677781)
Calculating:

#566: 0.53377269282718725138446576811
This just above is the mean (or average) of our 20 generated data
points. It should be about 0.5800, and so is a little small.

#567:VARIANCE(0.533809507740213937569571046361,
0.533809498866634830017293224406, 0.533809525487372804008529179167,
0.53380948111947726624703072279, 0.533809543234532538893503094045,
0.533809463372320570922346614893, 0.533809560981693142224667747298,
0.533809445625164744043065946484, 0.533441473956724003236298902423,
0.533809427878009785609013763419, 0.533809596476016954226269095602,
0.533809410130855695620015111603, 0.533441509470301078401022423243,
0.533809392383702474075895040447, 0.533809631970344240014732883694,
0.533809374636550120976478595433, 0.533809649717509185579475588538,

Page: 57
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

0.533809356889398636321590825198, 0.533809667464674999591458779352,

0.53380933914224802011105677781)

Calculating:

-8
#568: 1.28297375861218808654857594967·10
-8
1.28297375861218808654857594967·10
#569:——————————————————————————————————————
0.53377269282718725138446576811
Simplifying:

-8
#570: 2.40359571752682385544011631858·10
This just above is the ratio of the variance to the mean (without
gravity) so that the variance is about 2.4/10^8 of the value of
the mean, and so this ratio is quite small.

This means that the instability that caused us to have to


generate 20 data point by numerically integrating our ODE using a
narrow set of different damping constants and then to calculate
the mean and variance seems not to be a real problem in this case
above of (smaller) impact velocity 3.243 m/sec ... at least in
the (apparently) without gravity case just calculated.

We next subtract the mean with gravity from the mean without
gravity in the case of impact velocity 3.243 m/sec:

#571:0.53377269282718725138446576811 - 0.533823125005067588037223811345
Simplifying:

-5
#572: - 5.04321778803366527580432350378·10
This is so small that it can be taken to be zero. It actually
should be about: 0.5800 - 0.5710 = 0.0090.

This is, of course, disapointing; however, on closer analysis,


there appears to be a problem with Prof. Dmitriev's data
(perhaps) in this case of impact velocity being 3.243 m/sec and
also (apparently) without gravity ... because the restitution
coefficients for the four impact velocities are (when listed in
decending impact velocity order) are: [0.5811, 0.5800, 0.5939,
0.6239]; and so the 0.5800 one (considered above) is smaller than
the 0.5811 first restitution coefficient although one would
naturally expect that these four coefficients would be in

Page: 58
File: NeoN BAMP Hor impkt21.dfw Date: 5/5/2020 Time: 10:56:30 AM

increasing order ... just as the corresponding coefficients in


the with gravity case are found to be in increasing order (when
listed in decending impact velocity order): [0.5610, 0.5710,
0.5927, 0.6239] ... since this increasing order of restitution
coefficients would seem to correspond to a smaller percentage of
impact energy being turned into heat with smaller impact
velocity. That is, as the impact velocities decrease (either
with gravity or without gravity throughout), then the
corresponding restitution coefficients would be expected to
increase due to energy considerations. Or, it even could be that
the first restitution coefficient, 0.5811, is in error, and
should actually be smaller; and also it might be that both of
these two coefficients are slightly off.

Thus, in conclusion, we suspect that (perhaps) both the


restitution coefficients, 0.5811 and 0.5800, (without gravity)
may be in error ... unless, of course, there is more than meets
the eye here.

Page: 59

View publication stats

You might also like