Professional Documents
Culture Documents
My Paper Planes (Kenneth Wee) - Summary & Analysis
My Paper Planes (Kenneth Wee) - Summary & Analysis
Summary
Firstly, their relationship was not very close because their personalities were totally contrasting
each other. While the older brother was pessimistic, pragmatic and rigid, the younger one was
an optimist, who dared to dream. Hence, there was no common interest between the two
siblings, and both of them could not relate to each other. Besides, since the older brother was
so caught up with "homework and a thousand other things", he could not be bothered with his
sibling, much less spend time with him. He was even "siding with mom" when his unworldly
brother failed to prioritize between work and play. The speaker remembered his brother for his
"planes swirling with grace", and "bubbling laughter's pace", some qualities that he himself did
not possess. After the death of his younger brother, it then dawned on the speaker that the
earth did not seem as "dull" as he made it out to be, and that his brother understood the ways
of the world better than he. Thus, their relationship was more of mutual admiration and
respect, rather than true compassionate sibling love. When they were young, the younger
brother was obliged to respect the speaker, but after his death, the tables were turned and the
speaker in turn looked up to his younger brother for his rosy prospect of life.
Secondly, the age gap between the two brothers also posed as a barrier for development of
their relationship. Being older, the speaker had different priorities compared to his brother. For
instance, he felt that imagining and dreaming were childish and insignificant. However, after his
brother died, the speaker then started to relish the memories of his brother and threw the
paper planes for him. After all, those "poor pieces of paper" are all he had left of his brother.
The poet effectively evokes a feeling of regret and loss by using the paper plane as a motif for
his hopes’ conveyance, the metaphor of stricken birds as his entrapment, and the juxtaposition
of flightless realities with soaring dreams.
Possible Argument #1: The poet might be criticizing the materialistic culture of society that
dampens creativity and one’s pursuit of interests.
Related Points and Evidence:
• “Homework” and “a thousand things” that one must complete to better one’s life in
education and job prospects - stifled and procrastinated the persona’s realization to pursue
his interests.
• “defiance of every earthly law” and “imagination’s flight” opposed by the need to “grow
up” and “face the world”.
• The hint that the family was broken up due to this suggests that the materialistic pursuits
and expectations have damaged relationships.
Conclusion: The poet might be criticizing the materialistic culture of society that dampens
creativity and one’s pursuit of interests.
Possible Argument #2: The poet might be criticizing the smothering effect that over protective
parents, or parent with unduly high expectations, have on their children, a trend of our
contemporary times that might have forced the persona’s sibling to commit suicide.
Related Points and Evidence:
• The persona’s echoing of what his parents might have said, to “grow up” and “face the
world”, points to the persona being subsumed by society’s norms.
• The hint that the sibling had left the family while the persona “sided with Mother” can be
extended to mean that he had committed suicide when he followed his paper planes “onto
the brutal road” (jumped off the “tower”), a tragic ending to escape the societal demands.
• The persona’s spirit that cannot fly as high could mean that being smothered since young by
the parents had resulted in his lack of courage to take bold steps.
Conclusion: The poet might be criticizing the smothering effect that overprotective parents
have on their children, a trend of our contemporary times, that might have forced the
persona’s sibling to commit suicide
Analysis
1. Who is the poet speaking to and what do you think has happened to the person he is
speaking to?
2. What are paper planes a symbol of in this poem? The poet’s planes are different from the
ones of the person he is speaking to. Explain what is implied by this.
3. Look at the imagery and the words used to describe the person. What is your impression of
this person? Do you think he did the right thing in escaping? Explain your answer.