Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chorost - Aleph Project - The Nam-Shub of Enki
Chorost - Aleph Project - The Nam-Shub of Enki
The Web site of
aleph · Index
Models
The lethal text
Writing under
erasure
Mesopotamian
myth
The Gilgamesh
legend
The namshub of
Enki
The Tower of Babel
story
The song of the
Sirens
Plato's metaphor of
the cave
"man's insanity is
heaven's sense"
The Ultimate
Melody
Macroscope
The Origin of
Consciousness in the
Breakdown of the Bicameral
Mind
Snow Crash
deoxy >
philosophos
Namshub
Once upon a time, there was no snake, there was no scorpion,
There was no hyena, there was no lion,
There was no wild dog, no wolf,
There was no fear, no terror,
Man had no rival.
In those days, the land Shubur‐Hamazi,
Harmony‐tongued Sumer, the great land of the me of
princeship,
Uri, the land having all that is appropriate,
The land Martu, resting in security,
The whole universe, the people well cared for,
To Enlil in one tongue gave speech.
Then the lord defiant, the prince defiant, the king defiant,
Enki, the lord of abundance, whose commands are trustworthy,
The lord of wisdom, who scans the land,
The leader of the gods,
The lord of Eridu, endowed with wisdom,
Changed the speech in their mouths, put contention into it,
Into the speech of man that had been one.
This is the namshub of Enki, translated from Sumerian cuneiform. It is two
things: it is a story of linguistic disintegration, and it is an incantation which
supposedly causes linguistic disintegration. To hear the tale is to lose the power
of understanding speech. It tells of Enki, who "changed the speech" of the
population to "put contention into it." This, of course, is similar in content to the
Babel legend, where God disrupted the linguistic unity of the people in order to
stop the Tower from being built.
I have quoted this from Neal
Stephenson's Snow Crash (2167).
Stephenson obtained it from Samuel
Noah Kramer and John R. Maier's
Myths of Enki, the Crafty God (New
York, Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1989.) In Snow Crash, a
sinister industrialist has obtained and
translated ancient namshubs and is
using them to wreak linguistic havoc
in the modern world.
Why? Some indication can be found
in Hofstader's discussion of the USE
MENTION dichotomy in information theory.
I find it curious that many stories about lethal texts and/or linguistic viruses
invoke ancient mythology, as if the ancients knew things about language which
have been forgotten in the modern world. Snow Crash posits that Sumerian nam
shubs are being used to wreak linguistic havoc in the modern world. Macroscope
has a character who has the "gift of tongues," and takes its protagonist, Ivo
Archer, back to Mesopotamian times. Julian Jaynes, in The Origin of
Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, posits that new kind of
"unicameral" consciousness swept like a virus through the ancient world,
destroying what had been a kind of Edenic innocence, and cites, as evidence,
Sumerian inscriptions which sound much like namshubs.
index—deoxy