Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Early Method of Detecting Deception
Early Method of Detecting Deception
Early Method of Detecting Deception
TRIAL BY COMBAT
Originated from India and one of the examples of this: a rich man or accuser could hire
somebody or bigger one to fight the accused. After the fight the loser is adjudged guilty of
crime. KING HENRY III of England abolished all legal ordeals except ordeal of combat.
It is significant that, with few exceptions, the historical accounts of detecting deception
from the days of Christ, through the Middle Ages, are the history of the Ordeal. Superstition so
swayed the minds of people that it was rule for them to ask for the ordeal to prove their
innocence. The accuser was not looking, evidently, for suspicious clues in the face or actions of
the individual, for apparently the psychology of deceit did not exist. Even the religious of
Europe, as late as the 16th century, taught that proof of innocence or guilt would be furnished
from on high in a variety of mystical modes. People did not consider that proof lay within or on
the surface of suspect himself.
1. RED HOT IRON ORDEAL – This form of trial was used among the hill tribes of Rajhamal
in the north of Bengal India where the accused was apt to be told to prove his innocence by
applying his tongue to red hot iron nine times. If burned, he was put to death, the sense
of guilt made the mouth dry.
2. ORDEAL OF BALANCE – This is the practiced of testing the veracity of the accused by
placing him on one scale of balance. It merely this, in one scale the accused was in the
other, a counterbalance. The accused then stepped out of the scale, listened to a judge
deliver an exhortation to the balance and got back in. If he were found to lighter than
before, he was acquitted. This is practice in the institute of Vishnu, India.
This type of ordeal, the water was symbolic of the flood of the old testament, washing sin
from the face of the earth, allowing only the righteous minority to survive.
5. ORDEAL OF THE RED WATER – The accused fasts for twelve hours, swallow a small
amount of rice, then imbibes of the dark colored water sometimes as much as a gallon. If this
acts as an emetic and the suspect ejects all of the rice, he is considered innocent of the charged,
otherwise he is judged guilty. Their explanation is that a fetish of the victim enters the mouth
with the emetic red water, examine the heart of the drinker, and if it finds him innocent brings up
the rice in evidence.
The ordeal of “sassy bark” or red water is used in the wide region of Eastern Africa.
6. DONKEY’S TAIL ORDEAL – Psychological theory, the donkey placed in one room alone
and observed it, and if the donkey cried is a judged of guilty of crime, because deep inside and
conscience he is guilty. Method of ordeal where all accused persons will be instructed to select a
cage with a donkey, using a donkey’s tail they will strike the donkey and whichever cries first
will be adjudged guilty.
7. WAGER OF BATTLE – The judgment of God was thought to determine the winner, and the
defeated party was allowed to live as a recreant, that is, on retracting the perjury that had been
sworn.
9. TEST OF EUCHARIST – This was applied chiefly among the Clergy and Monks. Angel
Gabriel will descend from heaven to prevent the accused from taking in the poisonous drink.
10. ORDEAL BY BIER – (by Shakespeare in Richard III) – It was an ancient belief that the
slain dead could point their killer.
11. ORDEAL OF THE NEEDLE – This is practiced in Wanaka, Eastern Africa. A red hot
needle was made to pierce the lower lip of the alleged criminal and if blood flowed from the
wound, he is guilty.
12. ORDEAL BY HEAT AND FIRE – The accused considered innocent when he is unharmed
while walking through the fire.
13. TRIAL OF THE CROSS – The accuser and the accused were placed under the cross with
their arms extended or crosswise and the first to fall was held guilty.
14. TRIAL OF THE WAXEN SHIRT – The accused was dressed in cloth covered with wax and
walked barefoot over burning coals. If he was unhurt the fire and the wax did not melt, he is
innocent.
15. HEREDITARY SIEVE METHOD – Hans Gross, Father of Criminalistics, in his famous
book in criminal investigation in which beans were thrown into a sieve as the name of the
suspect was called, mentioned this ordeal. The deception criteria were described as follows--- “If
the bean jumps out of the sieve, the owner of the name pronounced is innocent, if the bean
remains in the sieve, the person named is the thief.
16. ORDEAL OF THE TIGER (Siam, India) –Both parties are place inside a cage of a tiger, if
the tiger spare on of them, he is innocent.
BURMA
Both parties are furnished with candles of equal size and lighted simultaneously, the
owner of the candle that outlast the other is adjudged to have won his cause.
MADAGASCAR
The supposed criminal was made to drink a poisonous fruit called Tangena, a small dose
can be fatal.
BORNEO
Both parties were present shellfish placed on a plate. An irritating fluid was then poured
on the shellfish and the litigant whose shellfish moved first was adjudged winner.
GREECE
A suspended axe was spun at the center of a group of suspects, whoever was in the line
with the axe blade when stopped was supposed to be guilty out by the Divine Providence.
NIGERIA
The priest greased a cock’s feather and pierced the tongue of the accused. If feather
passed through the tongue easily, he was deemed innocent.
In the middle of the 13th century, the ordeal has died out in England and on other
countries.
3. WORD ASSOCIATION
The basic practice is to present orally or visually, a group of words, each word
sufficiently separated in time from the others so that the subject responses to it. The essential
element in a typical word associations test is that one word or idea is reminiscent of another, and
the expression of their association forms a meaningful picture.
Accordingly, giving the subject a long list of carefully selected stimulus words or objects
with other pictures interspersed with other irrelevant words, objects or pictures with the
instruction to respond with the first word that may cone to the Subject’s mind
Dr. Carl Gustav Jung was able to observe how the thinking reactions were linked into
emotional habit of his subject. The theory behind this method us that, one word or idea is
reflective of another word or idea and expression of their association forms a meaningful picture.
FRANCIS GALTON –who started in 1879 the use of word association in detecting
deception.
4. POLYGRAPHY
A modern scientific examination technique in detecting deception whether the subject is
telling the truth or not with the use of polygraph machine.