Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment of Fluid and Electrolyte
Assessment of Fluid and Electrolyte
607
608 NEBELKOPF ELGART AACN Clinical Issues
Osmolality
2.8 L plasma (intravascular)
11.2 L interstitial Osmolality is the concentration of solute par-
28.0 L intracellular ticles in solution related to the concentration
_____ of water molecules in solution. It is ex-
42.0 L total body water pressed as osmotic activity per volume of
water. The number of osmotically actively
Figure 1. Example fluid distribution of 70 kg adult with particles within any given compartment is
60% water content. between 290 and 310 mOsm/L.
important finding, is not usually apparent Other cardiovascular findings of volume de-
until 2 to 4 kg of fluid have been retained. In pletion may include tachycardia; weak,
patients who are ambulatory, edema is gen- thready pulse; narrow pulse pressure; hy-
erally seen in the lower extremities; in pa- potension; and flat jugular neck veins that
tients who are bedridden, it is often evident represent decreased venous filling. Early
in the sacrum and buttocks. Patients may ex- signs of peripheral vasoconstriction (eg,
hibit dyspnea and auscultation of the lungs cool, clammy, pale skin) may also indicate
may reveal crackles or wheezing. Cardiovas- fluid depletion.3 Other skin findings include
cular signs of volume expansion include dry mucous membranes, absence of axillary
jugular vein distension, increased pulse pres- sweat, and decreased or delayed capillary
sure, hypertension, and an S3 gallop. The refill. Mottled skin is a late finding of hypov-
presence of hepatic congestion—hepato- olemia. Thirst is another finding in fluid vol-
jugular reflux—may be evident. Hepatojugu- ume deficit. The thirst center in the hypo-
lar reflux is an increased jugular venous thalamus is sensitive to changes in
pressure induced by manual pressure over osmolality—an increase in osmolality by
the liver. Patients may also demonstrate only 1 to 2% is sufficient to stimulate thirst.2
vomiting and diarrhea from bowel and in- Decreased skin turgor due to loss of skin
testinal edema (Table 1). elasticity may also be a clinical finding;
however, this is not of diagnostic value in
VOLUME DEPLETION. One of the most sensitive the elderly or chronically ill. Skin turgor is
tests to determine volume depletion is the also difficult to assess in obese
evaluation of orthostatic hypotension (the patients. Neurologic findings related to re-
measurement of the arterial blood pressure duced cerebral perfusion may include dizzi-
and pulse rate of a patient in the supine and ness, weakness, syncope, lethargy, de-
standing positions). A fall in the systolic creased deep tendon reflexes, or coma.
blood pressure by 15 mmHg or an in- Patients may exhibit anorexia, nausea, or
crease in the pulse by 15 beats per minute vomiting. Urine output may be reduced to
immediately after the position change is 0.5 mg/kg/hr or may be absent4 (Table 1).
suggestive of intravascular volume deficit.1 A
repeat reading after 2 to 3 minutes may Laboratory Data
identify orthostatic hypotension not seen in
the first reading.2 Orthostatic hypotension Laboratory studies may be helpful in con-
unrelated to vascular volume can also occur firming physical examination findings, espe-
in patients with Parkinson’s disease, dia- cially when determining volume depletion.
betes mellitus, and other conditions produc-
ing autonomic neuropathy, as well as pa- URINE STUDIES. Urine sodium and chloride
tients taking antihypertensive medications. excretion often reflect renal perfusion. With
Figure 3. Sample fluid challenge algorithms.11-14 RAP, right atrial pressure; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusive
pressure; CI, cardiac index.
End-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) monitor- into account insensible losses, such as those
ing (PetCO2) may also give diagnostic clues resulting from fever, mechanical ventilation,
regarding volume status. During conditions and open wounds.
of low cardiac output, expired CO2 is re-
duced as a consequence of caused by de-
creased pulmonary perfusion. As circulating Evaluation of Electrolytes
volume is restored, PetCO2 should increase.23
Lastly, an often overlooked and underuti- Serum electrolyte concentrations influence
lized tool for assessing volume status in movement of fluid within and between body
acute care patients is daily patient weight. compartments. The major extracellular elec-
Retention of one liter of fluid will result in a trolytes are sodium, calcium, chloride, and
weight gain of approximately 2.2 pounds.24 bicarbonate. The most abundant cation is
Obtaining a weight balance will also take sodium; chloride is the most abundant an-
Vol. 15, No. 4 Oct.-Dec. 2004 FLUIDS AND ELECTROLYTES 613
Saliva 60 20 15 50
Stomach 30-90 4-12 50-150 70-90
Pancreatic 135-155 4-6 60-100 70-90
Bile 135-155 4-6 80-100 35-50
Jejunal 70-125 3.5-6.5 70-125 10-20
Ileostomy 90-140 4-10 60-125 15-50
Diarrhea 25-50 35-60 20-40 35-45
Reprinted with permission from Barke RA. Fluids and electrolytes. In Abrams JH, Cerra FB, eds. Essentials of Surgical Critical
Care (p 481). Copyright by Quality Medical Publishing, Inc.25
ion. Potassium, magnesium, and phosphates cal and medullary collecting tubules in the
are the major intracellular electrolytes, of kidney to reabsorb water. Thus, both the hy-
which potassium is the most plentiful cation pothalamus and kidneys influence homeo-
and phosphate is the most abundant anion. static sodium levels.
Serum electrolyte concentrations affect all The most common cause of hypernatremia
metabolic activity in some way. Abnormal is dehydration—a pure water loss or hypo-
electrolytes may reflect fluid or acid-base im- tonic fluid loss from the body. Increased wa-
balance, or renal, neuromuscular, endocrine ter loss may be caused by insensible losses
or skeletal dysfunction. See Table 2 for com- such as sweat, burn injuries, wounds, or pro-
mon gastrointestinal electrolyte losses.24,25 longed hyperventilation. Gastrointestinal
losses include severe vomiting and diarrhea,
Sodium
and biliary, gastric, or fistula fluid losses. Cen-
tral (neurogenic) and nephrogenic diabetes
Sodium affects body water distribution, pro- insipidus (DI) are both associated with hyper-
motes neuromuscular function, maintains natremia from an inadequate replacement of
acid-base balance, influences chloride and urinary water losses. Central DI is associated
potassium levels, and helps the kidneys reg- with a decrease in ADH secretion, which
ulate water. Serum sodium disorders are al- causes a relatively dilute urine. It may be in-
ways evaluated in relation to the patient’s duced by trauma, pituitary surgery, hypox-
fluid status and may be associated with emia, or ischemic encephalopathy. Nephro-
hypovolemic, hypervolemic, or isovolemic genic DI is classified by normal ADH
states. Normal serum sodium levels are 135 secretion in the presence of renal resistance
to 145 mEq/L. Maintenance of the plasma to ADH’s water-retaining effect. Hyper-
sodium concentration depends on two glycemia, osmotic diuretics (ie, mannitol,
mechanisms: the ability of the kidneys to glycerol), and urinary concentrating defects
regulate water and an intact thirst mecha- can cause an increase in renal water loss, re-
nism with access to water. Arginine vaso- sulting in serum hypernatremia. Hyperna-
pressin or antidiuretic hormone (ADH) is the tremia can also result from aldosteronism,
primary hormone that regulates water excre- steroid administration, or excessive sodium
tion. ADH is synthesized in the supraoptic intake. Additionally, iatrogenic replacement
and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothala- of hypotonic losses with isotonic fluids can
mus. A 1 to 2% reduction in plasma osmolal- result in hypernatremia. Symptoms are most
ity inhibits ADH release, while a 1 to 2% in- prominent with a significantly large or rapid
crease in plasma osmolality (or a 7-10% (over hours) increase in the serum sodium
decrease in blood pressure or volume) stim- concentration and are generally seen when
ulates ADH release. The presence of ADH the sodium exceeds 160 mEq/L26 (Table 3).
causes the luminal membranes of the corti- Symptoms are often attributed to either the
614 NEBELKOPF ELGART AACN Clinical Issues
Systemic findings may include: muscle hypotonic solutions is similar to the distribu-
tetany from hypocalcemia, soft tissue calcifi- tion of water in the body. Thus, two-thirds of
cation, corneal clouding, dysrhythmias or fluid given will disperse to the ICF, while one-
heart failure, nausea, vomiting, or ileus. third will disperse into the ECF. Figure 5 illus-
Treatment includes oral phosphate binders, trates the example of D5W administration.
calcium and vitamin D supplements, glucose Hypotonic fluids will not replace the vascular
and insulin, or hemodialysis. space and cannot be used for volume resusci-
Hypophosphatemia is often multifactor- tation. Because of the significant accumula-
ial. Some identified causes are: chronic al- tion within the cellular space, dextrose is
coholism, acid-base disturbances, alu- rarely used as an intravenous fluid indepen-
minum or calcium-containing antacids, dently, but can be combined with isotonic
diuretic therapy, gastrointestinal losses, dia- fluids to provide minimal glucose calories.
betes, burn injury, hypothermia, and renal D5W may also be used to treat hypernatremia
losses. Clinical manifestations include mus- or increased serum osmolality.35
cle weakness, myalgias, fractures, respira- Isotonic fluids such as 0.9 normal saline
tory muscle weakness, mechanical ventila- (NS) and lactated ringers (LR) have a tonicity
tor dependence, decreased myocardial similar to plasma. When administered, these
contractility, hemolytic anemia, platelet fluids will distribute into the extracellular
dysfunction, parasthesias, ataxia, tremors, space. The interstitial space is three times
and seizures. Treatment is oral or intra- greater than the intravascular space, and fluid
venous phosphate administration. will be dispersed in this ratio (see Figure 5).37
There is a small fluid shift that occurs from
the intracellular space to the extracellular
Assessment of Intravenous Fluids space because NS is actually slightly more hy-
pertonic than the ECF. Evidence suggests that
Intravenous Fluid Administration
after 1 hour of NS administration, approxi-
Intravenous (IV) fluid administration has mately one-quarter of the isotonic fluid re-
several purposes: to replenish fluid com- mains in the intravascular space.36 Thus, iso-
partments, replace renal and insensible tonic solutions are the crystalloid of choice
losses, correct electrolytes, provide glucose for fluid resuscitation or to replace intravascu-
calories, and correct/maintain acid-base bal- lar losses. Combination crystalloids such as
ance.23,34 The composition of commonly 5% dextrose with 0.9% normal saline will be
used crystalloid intravenous fluids can be dispersed as an isotonic fluid once the cells
found in Table 8. have utilized the glucose in the dextrose con-
Fluids are described in terms of their tonic- tent. Similarly, although 5% dextrose with
ity to plasma. Fluids with lower osmolality 0.45% normal saline is slightly hypertonic in
than plasma are considered hypotonic (ie, 5% solution, it becomes hypotonic as an infusion
dextrose in water). The body distribution of after the glucose is metabolized and will be
distributed into the compartments as 50% free and PAOP measurements; however, these
water and 50% isotonic saline.24 parameters are often used as guides to de-
For patients requiring fluid volume replace- termine the effect of fluid administration.
ment, the choice of which isotonic fluid to Sodium is often a key component in deter-
use, NS or LR, is generally a matter of clinician mining fluid distribution within the body.
preference. The sodium content in NS is Electrolyte abnormalities are a common
higher than LR, thus NS may be a better op- finding in critically ill patients and need to
tion for hyponatremic patients. The sodium be continuously evaluated. Isotonic intra-
concentration of NS is 154 mEq/L while LR venous fluids are the fluid of choice to re-
contains 140 mEq/L. It is thought that LR has place intravascular volume losses. Although
an advantage over NS in acidotic patients for hypertonic solutions are effective for vol-
several reasons. First, the pH of LR is 6.5 while ume replacement, further research is re-
the pH of NS is 5.5. Additionally, the added quired to determine benefits and safety of
lactate in LR is converted to bicarbonate in pa- using these solutions routinely.
tients with normal liver function, further rais-
ing the serum pH.36 Lastly, administration of
large amounts of NS can result in a hyper- References
chloremic-induced metabolic acidosis, while
large amounts of LR may result in a metabolic 1. Briggs JP, Signh I, Sawaya BE, Schnermann J.
Disorders of salt balance. In Kokko JP, Tan-
alkalosis.37 nen RL, eds. Fluids and Electrolytes. Philadel-
Hypertonic solutions (eg, 3% saline, 5% phia: Saunders; 1996.
saline, 7.5% saline) are used occasionally for 2. Methany NM. Fluid and Electrolyte Balance.
osmotic therapy or intravascular volume ex- Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2000.
pansion. Administration of hypertonic solu- 3. Lippmann BJ. Fluid and electrolyte manage-
tions causes significant shifts from the intracel- ment. In Ewald GA, McKenzie CR, eds. Man-
lular space to the intravascular space; ual of Medical Therapeutics. New York: Little,
however, cellular dehydration is often the re- Brown; 1995:43-64.
sult of such fluid shifts. Hypertonic solutions 4. Cooper A, Moore M. IV fluid therapy. Part 1.
should only be used with intensive hemody- Water balance and hydration assessment.
Australian Nurs J. 1999;7(5):suppl 1-4.
namic and electrolyte monitoring and further 5. Cohen AJ. Physiologic concepts in the man-
research is needed to determine benefits and agement of renal, fluid and electrolyte disor-
efficacy for the routine use of hypertonic solu- ders in the intensive care unit. In Irwin RS,
tions.38.39 Ripple JM, eds. Intensive Care Medicine.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
2003:837-850.
Summary 6. Lord RC. Osmosis, osmometry and osmoreg-
ulation. Postgraduate Med J. 1999;75(880):67-
Although hemodynamic monitoring and 73.
laboratory studies offer some assistance in 7. Shoemaker WC, Parsa MH. Invasive and non-
determining intravascular volume, clinical invasive monitoring. In Shoemaker WC, Ay-
examination remains a key component in ers SM, Genvik A, Holbrook PR, eds. Text-
the evaluation of fluid status. Controversy book of Critical Care. Philadelphia: Saunders;
exists over the accuracy and validity of RAP 2000:74-91.
Vol. 15, No. 4 Oct.-Dec. 2004 FLUIDS AND ELECTROLYTES 621
8. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic monitoring in the diac output after cardiac surgery by a new
intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. transesophageal doppler device. J Cardiothor
2003;24:549-560. Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(2):217-220.
9. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsive- 23. Marino PL. The ICU Book. Philadelphia:
ness in mechanically ventilated patients: a re- Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
view of indices used in intensive care. Intens 24. Cook LS. IV fluid resuscitation. J Infusion
Care Med. 2003;29:352-360. Nurs. 2003;26(5):296-303.
10. Holmes CL, Walley KR. The evaluation and 25. Barke RA. Fluids and electrolytes. In Abrams
management of shock. Clin Chest Med. JH, Cerra FB, eds. Essentials of Surgical Criti-
2003;24:775-789. cal Care. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publish-
11. Jones DH. Fluid Therapy in the PACU. Crit ing; 1993:480-490.
Care Nurs Clin N Amer. 1991;3(1):109-120. 26. Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Hypernatremia. N
12. Booth FV. Monitoring in resuscitation. Crit Eng J Med. 2000;342(20):1493-1499.
Care Clin. 1992;8(2):449-458. 27. Brown RG. Disorders of water and sodium
13. Imm A, Carlson RW. Fluid resuscitation in cir- balance. Postgraduate Medicine. 1993;93(4):
culatory shock. Crit Care Clin. 1993;9(2):313- 227-246.
333. 28. Kruse JA, Fink MP, Carlson RW. Saunders
14. Kruse JA. Fluid challenge. In Kruse JA, Fink Manual of Critical Care. Philadelphia: Saun-
MP, Carlson RW eds. Saunders Manual of ders; 2003.
Critical Care. Philadelphia: Saunders; 29. Black, RM. Disorders of plasma sodium and
2003:746-748. plasma potassium. In Irwin RS, Rippe JM, eds.
15. Cook CH, Praba AC, Beery PR, Martin LC. Intensive Care Medicine. Philadelphia: Lip-
Transthoracic echocardiography is not cost- pincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:864-887.
effective in critically ill surgical patients. J 30. Androgue HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N
Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care. 2002;52(2): Eng J Med. 2000;342(21):1581-1589.
280-284. 31. Riggs JE. Neurologic manifestations of elec-
16. Boussuges A, Blanc P, Molenat F, Burnet H, trolyte disturbances. Neurol Clin. 2002;
Habib G, Sainty JM. Evaluation of left ven- 20(1):227-239.
tricular filling pressure by transthoracic 32. Papadakis MA. Fluid and electrolyte disorders.
Doppler echocardiography in the intensive In Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis, MA,
care unit. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(2):362- eds. Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment.
367. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1997:800-
17. Vignon P, Mentec H, Terre S, Gastinne H, 826.
Gueret P, Lemaire F. Diagnostic accuracy and 33. Van Zee KJ, Lowry SF. Life-threatening elec-
therapeutic impact of transthoracic and trans- trolyte abnormalities. In Wilmore DW, Cheung
esophageal echocardiography in mechani- LY, Harken AH, Holcroft JW, Meakins JL, Soper
cally ventilated patients in the ICU. Chest. NJ, eds. ACS Surgery: Principles & Practice.
1994;106(6):1829-1834. New York: WebMD corporation; 2002:91-106.
18. Safford RE, Blackshear JL, Kapples EJ. Clinical 34. Shaflee MA, Bohn D, Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML.
utility of transesophageal echocardiography. How to select optimal maintenance intra-
Southern Med J. 1991;84(5):611-618. venous fluid therapy. Qjm. 2003;96(8):601-610.
19. Iregui MG, Prentice D, Sherman G, Schallom 35. Cooper A, Moore M. IV fluid therapy part 2.
L, Sona C, Kollef MH. Physicians’ estimates of IV fluid selection. Australian Nurs J. 2000;
cardiac index and intravascular volume based 7(6):suppl 1-4.
on clinical assessment versus transesophageal 36. Ernest D, Belzberg A, Dodek P. Distribution of
doppler measurements obtained by critical normal saline and 5% albumin infusions in
care nurses. Amer J Crit Care.2003;12(4):336- septic patients. Crit C Med. 1999;27(1):46-50.
342. 37. Rosenthal MH. Intraoperative fluid manage-
20. Dabrowski GP, Steinberg SM, Ferrara JJ, Flint ment—What and how much? Chest. 1999;115
LM. A critical assessment of endpoints of (5)suppl:106s-112s.
shock resuscitation. Surg Clin N Amer. 38. Drobin D, Hahn, RG. Kinetics of isotonic and
2000;80(3):825-844. hypertonic plasma volume expanders. Anes-
21. Darovic GO. Hemodynamic Monitoring: In- thesiology. 2002;96(6):1371-1380.
vasive and Noninvasive Clinical Application. 39. Doyle JA, Davis DP, Hoyt DB. The use of hy-
Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995. pertonic saline in the treatment of traumatic
22. Jaeggi P, Hofer CK, Klaghofer R, Fodor P, brain injury. J Trauma-Injury, Infection Crit
Genoni M, Zollinger A. Measurement of car- Care. 2001;50(2):367-383.