Age Upper Limit-7 Labels

38 40
50
30-40
41-50

42
60 51-60
70 61-70

44 80
90
71-80
81-90

47
100 91-100

51
51 Bin Frequency Cumulative %

51 40
50
1
3
2.00%
8.00%

54 60
70
10
15
28.00%
58.00%

55 80
90
10
7
78.00%
92.00%

55 More
100 4
0
100.00%
100.00% Histogram

56 16

14
120

56 12
100

60
80.
10
Frequency

60
8 60.

6
40.

61 4
20.

62
2

0 0.0
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 More

64 Bin

65
65
65
65
66
66
66
67
68
68
68
69
70
71
73
74
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
82
82
82
83
83
84
87
88
91
92
98
99
 Upper Limit-13 Labels
40 35-40 A) As can be understood fr
45 41-45
50 46-50 B) There is not any signifi
55 51-55 question from either the 7
60 56-60 as both have a interval of 5
65 61-65 Bin Frequency Cumulative %
70 65-70 40 1 2.00%
75 71-75 45 2 6.00%
80 76-80 50 1 8.00%
85 81-85 55 6 20.00%
90 86-90 60 4 28.00%
95 91-95 65 6 40.00%
100 95-100 70 9 58.00%
75 5 68.00%
80 5 78.00%
85 5 88.00%
90 2 92.00%
95 2 96.00%
100 2 100.00%
Histogram More 0 100.00%
Histogram
10 12
120.00%
9
10
100.00% 8
7
80
80.00% 6
5 60
Frequency

Frequency
60.00% 4
Cumulative %
40
3
40.00%
2
20
1
20.00%
0 0.0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 e
0.00% 1 or
M
0 90 100 More
n Bin
) As can be understood from the given Histogram that the given data is not in compliance wit

) There is not any significant difference in answering the above

uestion from either the 7 intervals or13 intervals table/graph
s both have a interval of 50 which exactly pinpoints the required percentage.

C) It can be better calculated with the graph of 13 different intervals as there is a

particular interval for 45 -50 is given whilst in other one it is a subset of much bigger 5

Histogram
120.00%

100.00%

80.00%

60.00%
Frequency
Cumulative %
40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
70 75 80 85 90 95 00 e
1 or
M

Bin
 is not in compliance with the state policy as only 8 % of the people are below 50 years of age

centage.

t intervals as there is a
a subset of much bigger 51-60 subset
are below 50 years of age and more than 90 % are above 50 so required ratio of 1:1 for people
ed ratio of 1:1 for people above 50: people older than 50 can't be achived.
Speed Upper Limit 5
25
15 36
47
18 58
69
18
29 Bin Frequency Cumulative %
25 3 6.67%
29 36 4 15.56%
47 12 42.22%
31 58 18 82.22%
69 8 100.00%
32
37
38
38
39 Histogram
39
42
20 120.00%
42 18
16 100.00%
Frequency
Cumulative %
14 80.00%
44
Frequency

12
10 60.00%
8
40.00%
45 6
4 20.00%
2
46 0
25 36 47 58 69
0.00%

Bin
47
47
48
48
48
48
49
49
49
52
52
52
55
55
55
56
56
58
58
58
61
61
62
62
64
68
69
69
 Upper limit 11
20 A) As can be understood from the g
25 55 while other 29% were driving abo
30 county transportaion isn't in compli
35
40 B) Second distribution with 11 inter
45
50
55
60 C) Percentage of people who drive b
65 percentage of people who drive abo
70

SO
Bin Frequency Cumulative %
20 3 6.67%
25 0 6.67%
30 2 11.11%
35 2 15.56%
40 5 26.67%
45 4 35.56%
50 10 57.78%
55 6 71.11%
60 5 82.22%
65 5 93.33%
70 3 100.00%

Frequency
Cumulative %
Histogram
12 120.00%

10 100.00%

8 80.00%
Frequency

Frequency
6 60.00%
Cumulative %

4 40.00%

2 20.00%

0 0.00%
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Bin
Fre
4 40.00%

2 20.00%

0 0.00%
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Bin
As can be understood from the graph with 11 limits about 71% people reported below
while other 29% were driving above 55. So the driving pattern of Orange
unty transportaion isn't in compliance with national driving pattern

Second distribution with 11 intervals is more effective

Percentage of people who drive below 59 is 82.22

rcentage of people who drive above 36 is 15.56
So 82.22-15.56= 66.66

66.66 of the people drive between safest speed limit for US highways

120.00%

100.00%

80.00%

Frequency
60.00%
Cumulative %

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
Shipping Records Upper Limit
4 6
5 12
6 18
6 24
7
7
8 Bin Frequency Cumulative %Relative Frequency
10 6 4 20.00% 0.2
11 12 8 60.00% 0.4
11 18 4 80.00% 0.2
11 24 4 100.00% 0.2
12 Total 1
13
13
14
15
19 Histogram
19 9
20
8
24
7

5
Frequency

0
6 12 18 24
Bin
 B) It can be easily analysed from the given frequency distribution that majority of the orders
i.e. 40% are processed in between 7-12 days. Also, most of the orders i.e. 80% are processed
by 18th day.

C) It is not possible to exactly determine if half the orders are finished by 10 th day as given
the class interval of 6-12 the 11 th and 12th day have occurred numerous times in distribution

D) Relative Frequency Distribution help to get the comparative study of the data Just like
histogram which is not possible by only looking at the frequency distribution. Using it we get
a estimate of percentage/weight of that particular interval in the whole data distribution
which isn’t easy to determine using only frequency distribution

Histogram
120.00%

100.00%

80.00%

Frequency
60.00%
Cumulative %

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
18 24 Total
Bin
Catch Weight Upper Limit

2000 A) Break Even is at 5000, so 1

2,000 2500 B) 11th +12th= 5600+6000=1
3000

3,400 3500 C) 20% => 4 values.

4000 Initial four values are 2000,340
3,600 4500 100-20=80%
5000

4,200 5500 So 80% of the catche

6000
4,500 6500
7000
4,600 7500
8000
4,800 8500
9000
5,000
5,400
Bin
5,600 2000
2500
6,000 3000
3500
6,500 4000
4500
6,500 5000
5500
6,700 6000
6500
7,000 7000
7500
7,000 8000
8500
7,500 9000
More
8,000
8,100
9,000
Even is at 5000, so 100-40 = 60% of the trips do break even for Homer wills
12th= 5600+6000=11600/2= 5800

=> 4 values.
r values are 2000,3400,3600, 4200

o 80% of the catches are done above the limit of "4200"

3.5

Frequency Cumulative %
Histogram
3
1 5.00%
0 5.00%
0 5.00% 2.5
1 10.00%
1 15.00%
2
2 25.00%
Frequency

3 40.00%
1 45.00% 1.5
2 55.00%
2 65.00% 1
3 80.00%
1 85.00%
0.5
1 90.00%
1 95.00%
1 100.00% 0
0 100.00% 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 Mo
Bin
Bin
ven for Homer wills

120.00%

Histogram
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

Frequency
40.00% Cumulative %

20.00%

0.00%
00 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 More
in
in
Regula MBA X-M (X-M)2 MBA
23 -1.8 3.24
29 4.2 17.64
27 2.2 4.84 Regular
22 -2.8 7.84
24 -0.8 0.64 Evening
21 -3.8 14.44
25 0.2 0.04
26 1.2 1.44
27 2.2 4.84
24 -0.8 0.64
248 55.6 As the CV of Evening batch is less so

mean=24.8 Variance=5.56

Evening MBA
27 -3.4 11.56
34 3.6 12.96
30 -0.4 0.16
29 -1.4 1.96
28 -2.4 5.76
30 -0.4 0.16
34 3.6 12.96
35 4.6 21.16
28 -2.4 5.76
29 -1.4 1.96
304 74.4

mean30.4 Variance=7.44
 SD Coefficient of variance

2.35 9.4

2.7 8.88

the CV of Evening batch is less so it will be more homogenous than the Regular batch. Thus, evening batch will be easier to tea
evening batch will be easier to teach
 Title First Weekend US Gross Worldwide Gross
Sorcerer's Stone 90.295 317.558 976.458
Chamber of Secrets 88.357 261.988 878.988
Prisoner of Azkaban 93.687 249.539 795.539
Goblet of Fire 102.335 290.013 896.013
Order of the Phoenix 77.108 292.005 938.469
Half-Blood Prince 77.836 301.460 934.601
Deathly Hallows Part I 125.017 295.001 955.417
Deathly Hallows Part II 169.189 381.011 1328.111
823.824 2388.575 7703.596

Mean 102.978 298.572 962.9495

Answer A
Relationship Covariance
FW-US 779.013728
FW-WG 3501.55897
US-WG 5289.87611

Answer B
Relationship Coefficient of Corelation
FW-US 0.728417481
FW-WG 0.823319135
US-WG 0.96419656
C) The coefficient of Corelation is more effficient in terms of seeing a relationship between all three as we were already prett
realtionship between them will be linear in positive direction but coeefient of corelation helped us to really understand that U
are most closely related to each other. We can even simply conclude that first weekend income of any HP movies isn't as linea
Thus CoC helped us to understand not just the direction of relation but also the strength and effectivness of relation between

D) Based on A & B we can say that Harry potter movies are in theaters for long time as relation between first weekend income
gross incomes isn't as strong. Also the US populaton contribute a lot to net gross Worldwide income as there relation is very s
(other relations and observations are are already explained in part C)

Column1
 ee as we were already pretty much sure that the
to really understand that US gross and World gross
any HP movies isn't as linear(good) as there gross income
tivness of relation between all three variables.

ween first weekend income with anyy of the two

e as there relation is very strong.