Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accoustic Induced Vibration-1
Accoustic Induced Vibration-1
Accoustic Induced Vibration-1
F. L. Eisinger
Mem. ASME Fatigue of Piping Systems
Piping systems handling high-pressure and high-velocity steam and various process and
J. T. Francis hydrocarbon gases through a pressure-reducing device can produce severe acoustic
vibration and metal fatigue in the system. It has been previously shown that the acoustic
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, fatigue of the piping system is governed by the relationship between fluid pressure drop
Clinton, NJ 08809-4000
and downstream Mach number, and the dimensionless pipe diameter/wall thickness
geometry parameter. In this paper, the devised relationship is extended to cover acoustic
fatigue considerations of medium and smaller-diameter piping systems.
438 / Vol. 121, NOVEMBER 1999 Copyright © 1999 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
0 I 3.8317 0 2 7.0156
Fatigue limit
boundary 3 0 4.2012 6 0 7.5013
4 0 5.3175 3 1 8.0152
S.0.1
h 1 1 5.3314 1 2 8.5363
Allowable
'§ design limit 11
c
4>
number, thus, when/? = n, and also when the frequencies of these
a. No Failures two modes coincide (complete coincidence).
c Based on structural analysis of the conditions at such coinci-
0.01 —
l 1 1 1 1 — i — i •"" 1 r dences, one can make the following observations:
30 40 50 60 70 80 90100 130 150 200
• The coincidences at lower values of m, n, and thus generally
Pipe geometry parameter, D/t at lower structural frequencies, typically result in higher
stresses (from the same loading) as opposed to stresses at
Fig. 1 Fatigue diagram for piping systems exposed to internal acoustic higher (ra, n) and their higher frequencies.
loading relating acoustic input energy parameter MAp to pipe geometry • For smaller-diameter pipes (or smaller D/t ratios), only a
parameter D/t, based on data in Carucci and Mueller (1982) (taken from few such coincidences occur and the number of coincidences
Eisinger, 1997)
increases with the increase in pipe diameter, with a large
number of coincidences possible at large D/t ratios.
• At each such coincidence condition, a resonant vibratory
{ira.)M = represent solutions to first derivative of Bessel func-
stress amplitude is generated in the pipe wall. This amplitude
tion for different modes, dimensionless (Table 1)
is typically the highest at coincidence with the lowest struc-
c, = speed of sound in medium inside pipe, m/s
tural mode and is lower at higher modes. Numerical analysis
D = pipe inside diameter, m
indicates that the coincidence at the lowest structural mode
The structural modes of the pipe wall are characterized by an results in the governing stress condition, with only generally
axial mode of order m, where m represents the number of pipe wall small contributions from higher modes. This is especially
half-waves distributed along the pipe axis. These could be standing true for smaller-diameter pipes. For medium and large-
waves for a finite pipe length, or traveling waves for an infinitely diameter pipes (large D/t ratio), the higher mode coinci-
long pipe. Circumferential structural modes of order n are distrib- dences contribute more substantially to the stresses at the
uted in the circumferential direction where n represents the num- lower modes, and thus one can say that the more coinci-
ber of pipe wall full waves. dences there are (as is true for large D/t's), the larger total
The interaction of the higher-order diametral acoustic modes stress levels will be produced by a given internal loading and
with circumferential structural modes plays a decisive role in the more vulnerable the pipe becomes from a fatigue point of
dynamic loading of the pipe wall, as there is no strong interaction view.
between the modes in the axial direction (the acoustic modes are
traveling modes, while the structural ones are of a standing wave Numerical Evaluation of Several Pipe Sizes in the Small
type and coincidence is very rare, if at all). The most severe
and Medium-Diameter Range (16 ^ D/t ^ 64)
loading of the pipe wall, and thus the highest vibratory stresses in
the pipe wall, develop when the diametral acoustic mode wave Description of Analysis. A total of eight pipe sizes were
number coincides with the circumferential structural mode wave selected for analysis with a range of inside diameters from 0.127
Nomenclature
c, = speed of sound in medium n = circumferential mode no. of Vj = axial flow velocity inside pipe,
inside pipe, m/s structural pipe mode, dimension- m/s
D = pipe inside diameter, m less £ = structural damping ratio, di-
E = modulus of elasticity of p = no. of plane diametral nodal mensionless
pipe material, Pa surfaces of acoustic mode inside Ap = upstream to downstream pres-
fiM) = acoustic cut-off frequency pipe, dimensionless sure drop across pressure-
of order p, q, Hz q = no. of cylindrical nodal surfaces reducing station, Pa
/(m.n) = structural pipe wall fre- of acoustic mode inside pipe v = Poission's ratio of pipe mate-
quency of order m, n, Hz concentric with cylindrical axis, rial, dimensionless
M = vjc, = Mach no., dimensionless dimensionless (Tra) M = parameter identifying acoustic
m = axial mode no. of structural SRSS = square root of sum of squares (cut-off) frequencies, dimen-
pipe wall mode, dimension- t = pipe wall thickness, m sionless (Table 1)
less
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Structural frequency, Hz Pipe geometry parameter, D/t
Fig. 4 Total maximum (SRSS) resonant stresses in pipe wall versus DIt
Fig. 3 Structural resonant response of a pipe at complete coincidence.
for uncorrelated internal pressure loading of 0.1 MPa. Damping ratio C =
Shown are maximum stresses in pipe wall from 0.1 MPa internal uncor-
0.0025 (see also Table 2).
related pressure loading at all structural frequencies. Damping ratio: £ =
0.0025.
Table 2 Maximum resonant stress intensity amplitudes in pipe wall at complete coincidence with acoustic diametral modes (internal pressure load:
0.1 MPa, uncorrelated with structural modes; structural damping ratio: £ = 0.0025)
Case Pipe Wall D/t Acoustic p, q and Structural in, n Modes at Total
Inside Tliicknes Coincidence and Resultinii Stress in Pipe Wall Stress,
Diameter, s,t (MPa) SRSS*
I) nun (MPa)
in
70.85
2 0.127 7.11 17.9 3,0 4,0 89.19
1,3 6,4
89.17 2.41
3 0.1588 6.35 25 4,0 6,0 82.04
1,4 9,6
81.87 5.28
4 0.1905 6.35 30 4,0 5,0 6,0 8,0 83.96
6,4 1,5 10|6 13,8
45 83 00 10.41 6.73
5 0.222 6.35 35 4,0 5,0 6,0 4,1 8,0 110.12
6,4 1,5 11,6 11,4 5\%
41.87 97.54
7 0.254 5.56 45.7 4,0 6,0 7,0 4,1 91.28
(Relates to Point 6,4 12,6 1,7 11,4
Bl in Fig. 1.)
985 1092 89.17 12.85
8 0.406 6.35 64 4,0 6,0 4,1 8,0 9,0 10,0 11,0 157.70
(Relates to Point 6,4 12,6 11,4 14,8 1,9 1,10 **
C in Fig. 1.) 1,11
26.2 18.2 11.9 11.8 87.07 71.15 104.5
*SRSS = Square root of the sum of the squares
CD Region of Fatigue
a. Failures
, Fatigue limit boundary
(ieast-squares fit)
E 1 -
CO
fi 1Q Fatigue limit boundary
to Allowable design limit 0 *sr
c 8
aioi
o
i—
0)
<D
E Allowable design limit
CO
co 0.1
Q.
>»
S>
©
c
0)
+-*
3
CL
C
0.01 -j 1 1 1—r
differences, we obtain two slightly displaced lines of MAp versus Based on the limit values of MAp, an allowable fatigue limit
Dlt for the range of 16 < Dlt < 64. can be obtained by utilizing a typical safety factor of 2.
Considering a metal fatigue limit for carbon steel of 179 MPa
(26,000 psi), the correlation of the theoretical and experimental
data yields a structural damping value of £ = 0.021 or 2.1 percent Discussion
of critical damping for the piping systems exposed to uncorrelated The numerically derived pipe internal acoustic loading limit
acoustic pressure loading. This damping value appears perfectly values of MAp giving the fatigue limit loading values for medium
plausible, especially if one considers the damping effect of the pipe and smaller-diameter piping systems are a significant extension of
external insulation which is typically provided. the range covered by the available experimentally based (operating
For the test case of the fully correlated acoustic pressure load- experience-based) database. The derived limit values of MAp in
ing, the corresponding average structural damping value would be the range studied are somewhat lower than those which would be
approximately 21 times lower, thus only 0.1 percent of critical. obtained by extrapolating the limited experimental data below
Such a low damping value appears unlikely, and thus leads us to Dlt = 64. The studied range of 16 < Dlt < 64 differs substan-
a conclusion that the base case uncorrelated resonant loading is tially from that of Dlt > 64 well defined by the available exper-
dominant for the medium and smaller-diameter piping systems. imental data (Eisinger, 1997). Here, as can be seen in Fig. 5 and
Figure 5 shows the derived theoretical limit values of MAp as a also in Fig. 1, the limit values of MAp fall off quite rapidly,
function of Dlt. As these values vary somewhat, a least square fit indicating strong vulnerability of larger-diameter piping systems
is also shown, providing a smooth relationship. It can be seen that (with larger D/t's) to internal acoustic loading. Thus, a combina-
for the smaller Dlt values, the MAp values do not rise as steeply tion of this study with the experimentally available data shows that
as would be the case if one had extrapolated the experimentally there is a relatively mild decrease in the acoustically induced
based data. The new data are thus more conservative as lower fatigue resistance of a piping system up to a value of Dlt of about
values of MAp can be tolerated for design purposes in the smaller- 64, in which range an instability-type behavior seems to occur and
diameter or Dlt range. beyond which the fatigue resistance decreases rapidly. The strong