History is the study of change over time covering all aspects of human society. It provides identity and explains past events using records like primary sources, secondary sources, tertiary sources, documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, oral histories, paintings, and recorded sounds from the time period. Historians evaluate these sources to extract and study history.
An anachronism refers to something misplaced in time, either by being too old or new for the given time period. It involves attributing something to a time when it could not have actually existed yet.
The RA 1425 did not mention Rizal as the national hero because declaring him as such during that time would have been anachronistic, as R
History is the study of change over time covering all aspects of human society. It provides identity and explains past events using records like primary sources, secondary sources, tertiary sources, documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, oral histories, paintings, and recorded sounds from the time period. Historians evaluate these sources to extract and study history.
An anachronism refers to something misplaced in time, either by being too old or new for the given time period. It involves attributing something to a time when it could not have actually existed yet.
The RA 1425 did not mention Rizal as the national hero because declaring him as such during that time would have been anachronistic, as R
History is the study of change over time covering all aspects of human society. It provides identity and explains past events using records like primary sources, secondary sources, tertiary sources, documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, oral histories, paintings, and recorded sounds from the time period. Historians evaluate these sources to extract and study history.
An anachronism refers to something misplaced in time, either by being too old or new for the given time period. It involves attributing something to a time when it could not have actually existed yet.
The RA 1425 did not mention Rizal as the national hero because declaring him as such during that time would have been anachronistic, as R
1. What is history and what are the sources of History?
Every day we create history. According to Valdosta (n.d.), history is the study of change over time and covers all aspect of human society. Basically, history is the records of the past that provides us identity of who we are and the happenings around us. History is not something we can bring or recreate detail by detail today but is something that gives us glimpse and explains our fundamentals. Records of history won’t be possible without the help of historians. Historians are the one who weigh the credibility of sources, may it be primary, secondary or tertiary sources. Historians are able to extract and evaluate the history because of the documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, features, oral transmission, paintings, recorded sounds, images (Wikipedia, n.d.), and other witnesses that are still existing on the time period of evaluation of the history.
2. Explain the concept of the “anachronism of the past”
Anachronism is usually associated with the words “old-fashioned” and “futuristic”. Anachronism is a Greek word the directly translates as “backward time”. It is explained as misplaced of existence that rather tagged as inappropriate or something that belongs to other period of time rather than the one existing. It is sometimes a mistake or intentionally giving a series of event that is unlikely to happen or impossible to occur in the given era or time.
3. Explain why the RA # 1425 never mentioned Rizal as the “national hero”. What are your thoughts?