Professional Documents
Culture Documents
75FR14496
75FR14496
48 CFR Part 1352 Executive Order 12866: This rule has ■ On pages 10594 through 10616, in
been determined to be not significant for part 1352, correct the clause heading of
[Document Number: 080730954–0129–03] purposes of Executive Order 12866, each section by revising each reference
Regulatory Planning and Review. to ‘‘(DATE)’’ to read ‘‘(APR 2010)’’.
RIN 0605–AA26 Administrative Procedure Act/ Dated: March 17, 2010.
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Pursuant to 5 Scott Quehl,
Commerce Acquisition Regulation
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Department finds Assistant Secretary for Administration.
(CAR); Correction
good cause to waive prior notice and [FR Doc. 2010–6730 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
AGENCY: Department of Commerce opportunity for public comment BILLING CODE P
(DOC). otherwise required by the section
ACTION: Final rule; correction. because it is unnecessary. The
Department takes this action to correct
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
SUMMARY: We, the Department of an error in the headings that appear for
Commerce, issue a final rule to bring the each clause in subpart 1352.2. In the Fish and Wildlife Service
Commerce Acquisition Regulation in final rule published on March 8, 2010,
alignment with the Federal Acquisition the Department included a reference to 50 CFR Part 17
Regulation (FAR) and to streamline ‘‘DATE’’ in each clause heading in
DOC’s internal policy and guidance. subpart 1352 to serve as a placeholder [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2010–0021;
92220–1113–0000; C6]
DATES: This rule is effective April 7, for the month and year when the rule is
2010. published so that each clause may have RIN 1018–AW97
ADDRESSES: The final rule is available a reference point. This placeholder was
inadvertently retained rather than Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
on the DOC Web site http:// and Plants; Reinstatement of
www.doc.gov, or http:// updated with the month and year of the
final rule when the rule becomes Protections for the Grizzly Bear in the
www.regulations.gov, or by contacting Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in
the Department of Commerce: Room effective. This final rule corrects this
typographical error by adding the month Compliance With Court Order
1854, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. and year when the rule is to become AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
effective, which is April 2010. This Interior.
Virna Evans, 202–482–3483. amendment is a purely technical, non- ACTION: Final rule.
substantive change to the regulations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
No aspect of this action is controversial. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
8, 2010, the Department of Commerce This rule does not change any Wildlife Service (Service) are issuing
published a final rule to amend the CAR procurement practices or procedures this final rule to comply with a court
to update the regulations since its last
made by the March 8, 2010 rule. The order that has the effect of reinstating
revision on September 12, 1995. That
error should be corrected immediately the regulatory protections under the
rule updated the CAR to bring it into
to eliminate potential confusion by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA),
alignment with the current provisions of
regulated public. as amended, for the grizzly bear (Ursus
the FAR and added numerous new
For the reasons stated above, the arctos horribilis) in the Greater
clauses that correspond to the new
Department finds good cause under 5 Yellowstone Area (GYA) and
procedural requirements added to the
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day surrounding area. This rule corrects the
CAR. For a detailed description of the
delay in effective date. grizzly bear listing to reinstate the
changes by CAR Part, see the final rule
listing of grizzly bears in the GYA. This
published on March 8, 2010 in the Because prior notice and opportunity final rule also takes administrative
Federal Register (75 FR 10568). The for public comment are not required for action to correct two associated special
document is also available at http:// this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other rules.
www.Regulations.gov under Docket law, the analytical requirements of the
Number: DOC–2009–0003–0001. DATES: This action is effective March 26,
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
Upon publication of the regulations, 2010. However, the court order had
et seq., do not apply.
the Department identified a legal effect immediately upon being
Paperwork Reduction Act: This rule filed on September 21, 2009.
typographical error in the clause
does not impose any new information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
headings that appear in subpart 1352.2.
collections subject to review and Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear
In each clause heading, the Department
included a reference to ‘‘DATE’’ to serve approval by OMB under the Paperwork Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and
as a placeholder for the month and year Reduction Act. Notwithstanding any Wildlife Service, at our Missoula office
when the rule is published so that each other provision of the law, no person is (see ADDRESSES above) or telephone
clause may have a reference point. required to respond to, nor shall any (406) 243–4903. Individuals who are
However, this placeholder was not person be subject to a penalty for failure hearing-impaired or speech-impaired
updated before the final rule was to comply with, a collection of may call the Federal Relay Service at
published. This final rule corrects this information subject to the requirements (800) 877–8337 for TTY assistance.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:47 Mar 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM 26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 14497
GYA and surrounding area and removed correct the Yellowstone grizzly bear GYA are listed as a threatened species
this DPS from the List of Threatened population’s listing status. under the ESA. Because the Court
and Endangered Wildlife (72 FR 14866). The United States is considering vacated the entire delisting rule and
In that rule, we determined that the whether to appeal this decision. remanded it to the Service, there is no
Yellowstone grizzly bear population Regardless, this final rule is necessary longer a GYA grizzly bear DPS. Thus, all
was no longer an endangered or because this process, should we move grizzly bears in the lower 48 States are
threatened population pursuant to the forward with an appeal, would likely again listed as threatened (50 CFR
ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), based on take several years to complete. 17.11(h)). An existing 4(d) rule again
the best scientific and commercial data The grizzly bear is a member of the
applies to this population (50 CFR
available. Robust population growth, brown bear species (U. arctos) that
17.40(b)).
coupled with State and Federal occurs in North America, Europe, and
cooperation to manage mortality and Asia; the subspecies U. a. horribilis is This rule will not affect the grizzly
habitat, widespread public support for limited to North America (Rausch 1963, bear’s Appendix II status under the
grizzly bear recovery, and the p. 43; Servheen 1999, pp. 50–53). The Convention on International Trade of
development of regulatory mechanisms, original 1975 grizzly bear listing (40 FR Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
brought the Yellowstone grizzly bear 31734–31736, July 28, 1975) established Flora (CITES).
population to the point where making a the listed entity as U. a. horribilis.
However, the entry for grizzly bear in List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
change to its status was appropriate.
Subsequently, three lawsuits the List of Endangered and Threatened Endangered and threatened species,
challenging our decision were filed in Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11(h) was later Exports, Imports, Reporting and
Federal courts in Boise, Idaho, and in modified inadvertently to U. arctos with recordkeeping requirements,
Missoula, Montana. Legal briefings in a historic holarctic range. We corrected Transportation.
these cases were completed in 2008. the listed entity back to its original form
In the Montana case, the plaintiff in the March 29, 2007, final rule (72 FR Regulation Promulgation
presented four claims including: (1) The 14866), which again set forth the listed
entity as U. arctos horribilis with a ■ Accordingly, in order to comply with
regulatory mechanisms to protect the
grizzly once it is delisted are historic range of North America. With the court orders discussed above, we
this final rule, we make this same amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter
inadequate; (2) the Service did not
correction to the special regulations I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
adequately consider the impacts of
found at 50 CFR 17.40(b) and 17.84(l). Regulations, as set forth below:
global warming and other factors on
whitebark pine nuts, a grizzly food Administrative Procedure
PART 17—[AMENDED]
source; (3) the population is This rulemaking is necessary to
unacceptably small and dependent on comply with the September 21, 2009, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 17
translocation of outside animals for court order. Therefore, under these continues to read as follows:
genetic diversity; and (4) the Service did circumstances, the Director has
not properly consider whether the Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b),
grizzlies were recovered across a 1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
that prior notice and opportunity for
significant portion of their range. 625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
public comment are impractical and
On September 21, 2009, the Montana unnecessary. The Director has further
District Court issued an order in which ■ 2. Amend § 17.11 by revising the entry
determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
plaintiffs prevailed on the first and in the table at paragraph (h) for ‘‘Bear,
that the agency has good cause to make
second counts, while the United States grizzly’’ as follows:
this rule effective upon publication.
prevailed on the third and fourth § 17.11 [Amended]
counts. The court’s order vacated the Effects of the Rule
delisting and remanded it to the Service. As of the filing of the respective court * * * * *
Thus, this final rule is required to order, any and all grizzly bears in the (h) * * *
Mammals
* * * * * * *
Bear, grizzly ............ Ursus arctos North America ........ U.S.A., T 1, 2D, 9, 759 NA 17.40(b)
horribilis. conterminous
(lower 48) States,
except where list-
ed as an experi-
mental population.
Do ............................ do ........................... do ........................... U.S.A. (portions of XN 706 NA 17.84(l)
ID and MT, see
17.84(l)).
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:47 Mar 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM 26MRR1
14498 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
specifications for groundfish of the GOA determined that the 2010 Atka mackerel
(75 FR 11749, March 12, 2010). A season TAC allocated to vessels
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i), participating in the Amendment 80
the Regional Administrator has limited access fishery in the Central
determined that the 2010 TAC of Aleutian District of the BSAI will soon
pollock in the West Yakutat District of be reached. Therefore, the Regional
the GOA will soon be reached. Administrator is establishing a directed
VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:47 Mar 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM 26MRR1