Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychosis Arciniegas
Psychosis Arciniegas
Psychosis Arciniegas
Psychosis
Address correspondence to
Dr David B. Arciniegas, Baylor
College of Medicine, 1333
Moursund Street, Houston,
David B. Arciniegas, MD TX 77030,
david.arciniegas@bcm.edu.
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr Arciniegas receives funding
ABSTRACT from the National Institute of
Purpose of Review: Psychosis is a common and functionally disruptive symptom of Mental Health, which in part
supports the development of
many psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, neurologic, and medical conditions and an this work. Dr Arciniegas
important target of evaluation and treatment in neurologic and psychiatric practice. receives royalties from American
The purpose of this review is to define psychosis, communicate recent changes to Psychiatric Publishing, Inc,
Cambridge University Press, and
the classification of and criteria for primary psychotic disorders described in the Demos Medical Publishing, and
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), and receives travel, meeting, and
summarize current evidence-based approaches to the evaluation and management accommodation compensation
from the International Brain
of primary and secondary psychoses. Injury Association.
Recent Findings: The DSM-5 classification of and criteria for primary psychotic disorders Unlabeled Use of
emphasize that these conditions occur along a spectrum, with schizoid (personality) Products/Investigational
Use Disclosure:
disorder and schizophrenia defining its mild and severe ends, respectively. Psychosis is also Dr Arciniegas discusses the
identified as only one of several dimensions of neuropsychiatric disturbance in these unlabeled/investigational use
disorders, with others encompassing abnormal psychomotor behaviors, negative of acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors and antipsychotics
symptoms, cognitive impairments, and emotional disturbances. This dimensional for psychotic symptoms
approach regards hallucinations and delusions as arising from neural systems subserving associated with neurologic
perception and information processing, thereby aligning the neurobiological framework conditions and repetitive
transcranial magnetic
used to describe and study such symptoms in primary psychotic disorders with those used stimulation for auditory verbal
to study psychosis associated with other neurologic conditions. hallucinations in schizophrenia.
Summary: This article provides practicing neurologists with updates on current approaches * 2015, American Academy
to the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of primary and secondary psychoses. of Neurology.
KEY POINT
h The American Psychiatric and medical conditions. Across these con- in its classification of mental disorders
Association and the World ditions, psychosis is both a contributor to while deliberately making no attempt
Health Organization disability and a barrier to productivity and to define these terms.8 As a result, the cate-
emphasize the presence participation.1Y4 Psychosis is, therefore, gory of psychotic disorders in the early edi-
of hallucinations without an important target of evaluation and tions of the DSM and in the ICD-9 were
insight or delusions in treatment among patients receiving care overly inclusive and, with respect to clinical,
their current definitions from neurologists and psychiatrists. research, and epidemiologic endeavors,
of psychosis. This article also defines psychosis and ultimately proved impracticable.6,8
reviews the essential clinical features of In their current conceptualization of
primary psychotic disorders and psycho- psychosis, both the APA5 and the World
ses secondary to neurologic conditions. Health Organization8 define psychosis
The criteria for psychotic disorders narrowly by requiring the presence of
included in the DSM-5,5 which have hallucinations (without insight into their
been revised substantially relative to pathologic nature), delusions, or both
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual hallucinations without insight and de-
of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, lusions.6 In both of these current diag-
Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR),6 are a major nostic classification systems, impaired
focus of this review. The revised diag- reality testing remains central conceptu-
nostic criteria for secondary psychoses ally to psychosis. In contrast to earlier
(those due to neurologic or medical diagnostic classification systems, the cur-
conditions, substance use, and medica- rent systems5,8 operationalize impaired
tions) also are reviewed briefly and the reality testing by identifying the symp-
psychoses associated with common neu- toms that provide evidence of such
rologic conditions tabulated. Finally, impairment. Delusions (ie, fixed false
practical and evidence-based suggestions beliefs), by definition, are evidence of
for the evaluation and treatment of impaired reality testing: delusional beliefs
primary and secondary psychotic disor- are ones maintained steadfastly even in
ders are presented. the face of evidence contradicting them
incontrovertibly. Similarly, hallucinations
DEFINING PSYCHOSIS (ie, perceptions occurring in the absence
In early editions of the American of corresponding external or somatic
Psychiatric Association’s (APA’s) Diag- stimuli) are evidence of impaired reality
nostic and Statistical Manual of Men- when the individual experiencing them
tal Disorders (DSM),7 psychosis was is unable to recognize the hallucinatory
defined broadly as ‘‘gross impairment nature of such experiences. Both the cur-
in reality testing’’ or ‘‘loss of ego bound- rent APA5 and the World Health Organi-
aries’’ that interferes with the capacity to zation8 classification systems acknowledge
meet the ordinary demands of life. This that ‘‘formal thought disorder’’ (ie, disor-
approach to defining psychosis empha- ganized thinking, including illogicality,
sized the presence of functional limita- tangentiality, perseveration, neologism,
tions over the symptoms putatively thought blocking, derailment, or some
responsible for them6 and too often combination of these disturbances of
rendered the distinction between psy- thought) is one of several commonly co-
chotic and nonpsychotic mental disor- occurring features of psychotic disorders.
ders ambiguous. Concurrently, the The DSM-55 allows formal thought dis-
International Classification of Diseases, order to supplant hallucinations and
Ninth Revision ([ICD-9], published in delusions in the diagnosis of a psychotic
1975) employed the then-traditional divi- disorder when it is accompanied by
sion between ‘‘neurosis’’ and ’’psychosis’’ grossly disorganized behavior, catatonia
716 www.ContinuumJournal.com June 2015
Phenomenon Description
Hallucination Sensory perception in the absence of a stimulus;
described according to the sensory domain in which it
occurs (eg, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory,
nociceptive, themoceptive, proprioceptive, equilibrioceptive);
may be unformed (ie, nonspecific sensory perceptions
within a sensory domain) or formed (ie, people, objects,
voices making comments or commands)
Illusion Misperception of a sensory stimulus; described
according to the sensory domain in which it occurs
(eg, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory,
nociceptive, themoceptive, proprioceptive, equilibrioceptive)
Palinopsia Persistent perception of a visual stimulus after that
stimulus is no longer present (ie, an afterimage)
Synesthesia Perception of a stimulus outside the sensory modality
in which that stimulus is presented (eg, hearing colors,
tasting sounds) or that adds perceptual features not
normally perceived within a sensory modality (eg, black
numbers or letters evoking the perception of color)
Derealization Perceiving/experiencing the external world as unreal
Depersonalization Perceiving/experiencing oneself as detached from
(ie, as if an outside observer of) one’s mental
processes or body
Autoscopy Seeing one’s body from a position outside the body
(ie, out-of-body experience)
Déjà vu Perceiving/experiencing a novel image or
scene as one previously witnessed or experienced
Déjà entendu Perceiving/experiencing a novel sound as one
previously witnessed or experienced
Jamais vu Perceiving/experiencing a familiar image or scene
as unfamiliar
Jamais entendu Perceiving/experiencing a familiar sound as unfamiliar
a
Adapted with permission from Arciniegas DB, Cambridge University Press.10 B 2013 Cambridge
University Press.
divided into two types: ordinary and statements) has an ordinary delusion
bizarre. Ordinary delusions derive from (more specifically, an ordinary perse-
misinterpretation of everyday experi- cutory delusion). Bizarre delusions in-
ences and, as such, are understandable volve phenomena that are physically
but not accepted by other members of impossible or that most people in that
the person’s culture or subculture (ie, person’s culture would regard as en-
are not articles of religious faith). For tirely implausible. The DSM-IV-TR pro-
example, a patient who believes that an vided as an example of bizarre delusion
unknown group of conspirators is the belief that a stranger removed
diverting his savings to a terrorist one’s internal organs and replaced
group despite being presented with them with another person’s organs
evidence to the contrary (eg, bank without leaving any wounds or scars.6
Delusion Description
Persecutory Fixed false belief that one is being harmed or that such harm is impending and that the
perpetrators of that harm are causing it intentionally; common examples include the
belief that one is being followed, tricked, spied on, poisoned or drugged, tormented,
ridiculed, cheated, conspired against, or that one’s goals are being obstructed
Grandiose Insightless and unshakable conviction that one possesses special powers, talents,
knowledge, or abilities; is famous (or a famous person or character); or holds a
special relationship to a famous person or deity
Religious Any delusion with religious content, especially beliefs that one is God, an angel, a devil,
the son or daughter of God, a saint, or otherwise deific (subtypes of grandiose delusions)
Referential Fixed false belief that remarks, objects, events, or other phenomena are directed at or are
about oneself
Thought control Fixed false belief that one’s thoughts, feelings, or behaviors are being controlled by
an external force, person, or group
Thought insertion Delusion that thoughts are being inserted into one’s mind (‘‘thoughts are not my own’’)
Thought withdrawal Delusion that an outside force, person, or group is removing or extracting one’s thoughts
Thought broadcasting Delusion that one’s thoughts are being broadcast to others or can be heard aloud by others
Delusional perception Linking a normal percept to a bizarre conclusion (eg, seeing the sunrise signifies to
the patient that he or she is the messiah)
Mind being read Delusion that one’s mind can be or is being read by another person or group;
does not entail ‘‘broadcasting’’ one’s thoughts or that one’s thoughts can be heard
aloud by others; may be a subtype of persecutory (paranoid) delusions
Jealousy Fixed false belief that a spouse or lover is unfaithful; also referred to as
delusion of infidelity
Erotomania Delusion that one is loved by another person (usually one of higher status)
Theft Fixed false belief that one’s valuables are being stolen, often by an unseen thief;
tends to develop in the context of declarative memory impairments (eg, Alzheimer disease)
Phantom intruder Delusion that a stranger, usually unwanted, is in one’s home
Somatic A delusion that pertains to the appearance or functioning (including smell) of one’s
body, usually involving the fixed false belief that one’s body is abnormal, diseased,
or changed in some manner
Parasitosis Fixed false belief that one is infested with insects, bacteria, mites, lice,
fleas, spiders, worms, or other organisms (also known as Ekbom syndromeb)
Nihilistic Delusion that one does not exist or is dead; also described as delusion of negation
a
Adapted with permission from Arciniegas DB, Cambridge University Press.10 B 2013 Cambridge University Press.
b
Ekbom syndrome should not be confused with Willis-Ekbom disease (ie, restless legs syndrome).
KEY POINTS
h Delusions are distinct Delusions are contrasted with over- tors may, with sufficient exposure to
from confabulation, valued ideas, which are unreasonable risk-modifying social and environmen-
which refers to the beliefs or ideas that are held with strong, tal factors, be prone to developing
automatic and but not delusional, conviction. When a persistent psychotic symptoms.14Y16
nondeceitful fabrication false belief involves a value judgment, it This psychosis proneness-persistence
of information, usually of may be regarded as delusional only model may explain, at least in part,
an autobiographic or when the judgment made is so extreme the development of hallucinations and
episodic nature, by a that it is not credible. Delusions are delusions across the broad range of
patient with concurrent distinct from confabulation, which refers psychiatric disorders with which they
declarative memory to the automatic and nondeceitful fabri- are associated. It also may yield in-
impairments and
cation of information, usually of an auto- sights into the risk factors for and
executive dysfunction.
biographical or episodic nature, by a patient mechanisms of psychosis associated
h Although delusional with concurrent declarative memory with neurologic conditions. This model
misidentification impairments and executive dysfunc- aligns well with the National Institute
syndromes occur
tion.11 Confabulated information (even of Mental Health (NIMH) Research
commonly among
when fantastic in character) may be Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework,
patients with psychiatric
illnesses, especially
firmly believed in the moment that it is within which phenomena such as de-
primary psychotic offered but is usually soon forgotten lusions and hallucinations are studied
disorders, as many as and, as such, is false but not fixed and, in relation to the operations of under-
20% to 40% occur in hence, not delusional. lying neural systems across the condi-
the context of neurologic Delusional misidentification syn- tions in which they occur, rather than
conditions affecting the dromes. Delusional misidentification in relation to the categorical psychiatric
right hemisphere. syndromes (Table 8-310) share the disorders with which they may be
Accordingly, the theme of doubles (ie, duplication of associated.17,18
presence of these types self, others, or the environment). They In this light, it is not surprising that
of delusions should are associated with impairments in psychosis is listed as a feature of multiple
prompt evaluation for
facial processing and are closely related psychiatric disorders presented in the
potentially treatable
to and sometimes co-occur with redupli- DSM-5. Although psychosis is the defining
or arrestable
neurologic conditions.
cative paramnesia.12,13 Phenomenologically, feature of the schizophrenia spectrum
delusional misidentification syndromes disorders (ie, schizophrenia, schizoaffec-
may be divided into two types: delusional tive disorder, delusional disorder,
hypoidentification (eg, Capgras syndrome) schizophreniform disorder, and brief
or delusional hyperidentification (eg, psychotic disorder), it also occurs in
Frégoli, intermetamorphosis, subjective some people with bipolar disorder
doubles syndromes). Although delusional during either a manic or depressive
misidentification syndromes occur com- episode as well as in some individuals
monly among patients with psychiatric during a major depressive episode
illnesses, especially primary psychotic associated with major depressive dis-
disorders, as many as 20% to 40% occur order. In those conditions, the psy-
in the context of neurologic conditions chotic symptoms (usually delusions)
affecting the right hemisphere.12,13 may be thematically either congruent
Accordingly, the presence of these types or incongruent with the prevailing
of delusions should prompt evaluation mood. Psychotic symptoms (ie, hallu-
for potentially treatable or arrestable cinations without insight, delusions) may
neurologic conditions. develop during either intoxication or with-
drawal from substances and, in some
PRIMARY PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS cases, may become chronic sequelae of
A subset of the population with genetic, prior substance use (substance-induced
epigenetic, and developmental risk fac- psychotic disorder). When individuals
720 www.ContinuumJournal.com June 2015
KEY POINT
h Disorders along the consideration as one of several psy- use (www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/
schizophrenia spectrum chotic disorders existing on a spectrum Practice/DSM/DSM-5/ClinicianRated
differ from one another of psychopathology. Disorders along DimensionsOfPsychosisSymptomSeverity.
by the type, number, the schizophrenia spectrum differ from pdf ).19 The provision of this measure
complexity, severity and one another by the type, number, is coupled with the request that clini-
duration of the complexity, severity, and duration of cians and researchers provide further
psychotic symptoms and the psychotic symptoms and associated data on the instrument’s usefulness in
associated features that features that define them. Symptoms of characterizing patient status and im-
define them. schizophrenia spectrum disorders in- proving patient care by submitting
clude hallucinations, delusions, dis- feedback at www.dsm5.org/Pages/
organized thinking (formal thought Feedback-Form.aspx. Given the emerg-
disorder, usually inferred from an in- ing nature of this measure, the DSM-5
dividual’s speech), grossly disorganized encourages, but does not require, using
or abnormal motor behavior (including the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psy-
catatonia), and negative symptoms. The chosis Symptom Severity scale to specify
number, complexity, and duration of severity of illness in the schizophrenia
symptoms required for a given diagno- spectrum disorders.
sis increase with movement from the Schizotypal (personality) disorder.
mild to the severe ends of the schizo- At the mild end of the schizophrenia
phrenia spectrum. spectrum disorders is schizotypal dis-
Consistent with this essentially di- order (also known as schizotypal
mensional approach to the evaluation personality disorder). Schizotypal dis-
of psychotic symptoms, the DSM-5 order is characterized by social and
introduced the Clinician-Rated Dimen- interpersonal deficits that reduce the
sions of Psychosis Symptom Severity capacity for, and produce marked
scale in Section III, ‘‘Emerging Mea- discomfort with, close relationships.
sures and Models.’’8,19 This scale is an These deficits are often accompanied by
eight-item measure that rates the se- unusual perceptual experiences (illu-
verity of each symptom that defines sions) and cognitive distortions (ideas of
the schizophrenia spectrum disorders reference, suspiciousness or paranoia,
(hallucinations, delusions, disorganized odd beliefs, or magical thinking that are
speech, abnormal psychomotor behav- held without delusional conviction) simi-
ior, negative symptoms) as well as co- lar to, but less severe than, those experi-
occurring cognitive, depressive, and enced by people with schizophrenia. As
manic symptoms during the week prior noted by Chemerinski and colleagues,20
to assessment on a scale from 0 (not schizotypal disorder and schizophrenia
present) to 4 (present and severe). feature cognitive, social, and attentional
Assessment of this constellation of deficits based in neurodevelopmentally
symptoms with these measures is de- mediated temporal and prefrontal corti-
scribed in the DSM-5 as useful for cal pathology. These deficits are milder
characterizing these conditions, pre- in people with schizotypal disorder than
dicting important aspects of the illness in those with schizophrenia, possibly as a
(eg, cognitive and neurobiological defi- result of preserved capacity in the
cits), informing treatment planning and schizotypal brain to recruit related brain
prognosis, and monitoring symptom se- regions and thereby compensate for
verity over time. The severity of the dis- dysfunctional areas. Additionally, people
orders in this section of the DSM-5 may with schizotypal disorder appear to be
be assessed with this scale, which the less vulnerable to psychosis as a result of
APA has made freely available for clinical the preservation of protective factors
722 www.ContinuumJournal.com June 2015
KEY POINT
h The DSM-5 eliminates
the presence of
Case 8-1
A 19-year-old previously healthy man was brought in by his parents for
first-rank hallucinations
evaluation of paranoid ideation. The parents reported that the patient had
or delusions as grounds
always been a loner, worked from home as a computer programmer, and spent
for reducing the
most of his leisure time in his room browsing the Internet, watching detective
number of symptoms
shows on television, and listening to a police scanner. A little over 1 month prior
required for the diagnosis
to presentation, he began refusing to leave his room, keeping the curtains
of schizophrenia.
drawn constantly, and taking copious notes about the comings and goings of his
neighbors. After a week of these new behaviors, his parents asked him to explain
the changes to his routine. He told them that a black sedan had begun parking
across the street from their home each evening and departing early each morning,
leading him to conclude that he was the subject of surveillance by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation. When his parents informed him that the car was recently
purchased by their longtime next-door neighbor and family acquaintance, he then
concluded that the neighbor was the federal agent surveilling him. Despite
repeated attempts to convince him otherwise, including a conversation with
the neighbor, who explained his recent purchase of a luxury car to ease
his long daily commutes, the patient’s paranoid beliefs remained unchanged.
Physical and neurologic examinations were normal, and mental status
examination was remarkable only for the patient’s delusion. Serum laboratory
studies, urine toxicology, and MRI of the brain were normal.
Comment. The patient presented with a nonbizarre delusion as his sole
symptom. The presence of this type of delusion for more than 1 month
in the absence of prominent hallucinations, when not better explained by
a known psychotic disorder or mood disorder with psychotic features and
not attributable to the physiologic effects of a substance or another
medical condition, is consistent with a provisional diagnosis of delusional
disorder (297.1), current severity of delusions: 4 (present and severe).
specifier and related coding note have must be associated with impaired func-
been added to indicate the presence of tioning in one or more major life areas
comorbid catatonia. such as self-care, work, interpersonal rela-
Schizophrenia. The DSM-5 includes tions, or academics.
substantive changes to the diagnostic The DSM-IV-TR permitted diagnosing
criteria for schizophrenia. The core schizophrenia when first-rank delusions
criteria continue to require the pres- or auditory hallucinations occurred in
ence of two or more psychotic and the absence of other symptoms. How-
related symptoms (delusions, halluci- ever, first-rank symptoms are not spe-
nations, disorganized speech reflecting cific to schizophrenia and may occur in
formal thought disorder, abnormal manic and depressive episodes with
psychomotor behavior such as grossly psychotic features, temporal lobe epi-
disorganized or catatonic behavior, lepsy, dissociative identity disorder, and
negative symptoms)Vat least one of other psychiatric conditions.21 Accord-
which must be delusions, hallucina- ingly, the DSM-5 eliminates the pres-
tions, or disorganized speechVthat ence of first-rank hallucinations or
have been present for at least 6 months delusions as grounds for reducing the
(including 1 month, or less if treated number of symptoms required for the
successfully, of active psychotic and re- diagnosis of schizophrenia. This change
lated symptoms). These symptoms also is coordinated with the DSM-5 revised
KEY POINT
h New in the DSM-5 is the disorder necessitate a fully informed Unspecified schizophrenia spectrum
instruction to use the longitudinal perspective on the totality and other psychotic disorder. The
‘‘unspecified schizophrenia of a patient’s symptoms that often will DSM-5 replaces ‘‘psychotic disorder not
spectrum and other not be arrived at easily, if at all, in many otherwise specified’’ with ‘‘unspecified
psychotic disorder’’ clinical practices. schizophrenia spectrum and other psy-
diagnosis in circumstances Other specified schizophrenia and chotic disorder.’’ As in the DSM-IV-TR,
in which the clinician other psychotic disorders. The DSM-5 this diagnosis applies to presentations
chooses not to specify the introduces this subcategory to provide in which functionally disabling or sub-
reason that the criteria are for the diagnosis of four conditions jectively distressing symptoms character-
not met for another involving psychotic symptoms that do istic of schizophrenia spectrum and
schizophrenia spectrum or not meet full criteria for any of the other psychotic disorders predomi-
psychotic disorder.
schizophrenia spectrum disorders but nate but do not meet full criteria for
nonetheless are issues of clinical con- another condition in this category. It also
cern. Below are examples of clinical applies to presentations about which
presentations to which the ‘‘other insufficient information exists to make
specified’’ designation applies. a more specific diagnosis. New in the
& Persistent auditory hallucinations, DSM-5 is the instruction to use the
denoting the persistent presence ‘‘unspecified schizophrenia spectrum
of auditory hallucinations occurring and other psychotic disorder’’ diagnosis
in the absence of other psychotic in circumstances in which the clinician
features. chooses not to specify the reason that
& Delusions with significant the criteria are not met for another
overlapping mood episodes, which schizophrenia spectrum or psychotic
is most appropriately used when a disorder. The practical usefulness of this
patient otherwise meeting criteria diagnosis is not established.
for delusional disorder also
experiences overlapping mood SECONDARY PSYCHOTIC
episodes for a substantial portion DISORDERS
of the delusional disturbance. The DSM-5 notes the common co-
occurrence of psychotic symptoms (ie,
& Attenuated psychosis syndrome,
hallucinations without insight, delusions)
which describes a condition in
in people with neurocognitive disorders
which psychotic-like symptoms
due to Alzheimer disease, Parkinson
are present but are less severe
disease, diffuse Lewy body disease,
and more transient than in
frontotemporal lobar degeneration,
schizophrenia, and for which insight
Huntington disease, prion disease, cereb-
is relatively maintained.
rovascular disease, traumatic brain in-
& Delusional symptoms in a partner jury, HIV, and substances/medications,
of individual with delusional among others. When psychotic symp-
disorder (formerly named shared toms develop in association with
psychotic disorder, also known as cognitive impairments due to these
folie à deux), a rare condition in conditions, the DSM-5 suggests qualify-
which delusions develop in an ing the neurocognitive disorder diag-
individual who is involved in a close nosis with the specifier ‘‘with behavioral
relationship with an individual with disturbance (psychosis)’’ rather than
prominent delusions. The previously offering a concurrent schizophrenia
unaffected partner’s delusions take spectrum disorder diagnosis. When hal-
on the content of the dominant lucinations or delusions predominate
partner’s delusions. the clinical presentation, are not better
a,b
TABLE 8-4 Examples of Neurologic Conditions Associated With Psychosis
a,b
TABLE 8-4 Examples of Neurologic Conditions Associated With Psychosis Continued from page 727
a,b
TABLE 8-4 Examples of Neurologic Conditions Associated With Psychosis Continued from page 729
KEY POINTS
h Systematic reviews moderate, j1 to j2 SD; 4: severe, less for psychosis that persists despite
and meta-analyses than j2 SD).19 Neuropsychological and stepwise reductions in prodopa-
demonstrate that typical occupational therapy consultations con- minergic medications),52 and limited
(first-generation) and tribute usefully to cognitive and function- for most other neurologic conditions.
atypical (second-generation) al assessments and should be performed While acknowledging the limits of the
antipsychotics are similar when feasible. evidence base for the treatment of
with respect to their psychosis associated with neuro-
beneficial effects on Treatment logic conditions, individual patients
the frequency and Systematic reviews and meta-analyses experiencing secondary psychosis may
severity of hallucinations demonstrate that typical (first-genera- benefit, nonetheless, from judicious
and delusions.
tion) and atypical (second-generation) administration of antipsychotic medica-
h Meta-analyses suggest antipsychotics are similar with respect tions, especially when other medications
that repetitive transcranial to their beneficial effects on the and nonpharmacologic interventions do
magnetic stimulation over frequency and severity of hallucina- not provide adequate relief from psy-
the left temporoparietal
tions and delusions.38,39 Clozapine is chotic symptoms.53,54
region (in the area of
particularly effective in treatment- Whether used to treat primary or
T3-P3 in the International
10-20 System of
resistant populations and reduces sui- secondary psychoses, antipsychotic
Electrode Placement) is an cide risk.39,40 Among patients with treatmentYrelated pretreatment evalua-
effective treatment for schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotics tion of weight; metabolic status; cardiac,
the auditory verbal improve cognition41 and life satisfac- sexual, and neurologic (especially mo-
hallucinations that are tion42 and may modestly contribute to tor) function; and hematologic health
refractory to treatment improvements in functional status.43 as well as periodic monitoring for changes
with antipsychotics. Meta-analyses suggest that repetitive in these areas during treatment is re-
h Acetylcholinesterase transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) commended.27 The specific risks and
inhibitors, adjunctively or over the left temporoparietal region (in parameters requiring monitoring differ
alternatively, may reduce the area of T3-P3 in the International between antipsychotics.38,55 Readers are
psychosis in patients with 10-20 System of Electrode Placement) encouraged to review the manufacturer’s
Alzheimer disease, is an effective treatment for the auditory product information for any specific medi-
Parkinson disease verbal hallucinations that are refractory cation prescribed as well as the recom-
dementia, diffuse Lewy to treatment with antipsychotics.44 How- mendations on antipsychotic medication
body disease, and, to a
ever, rTMS does not appear to be an safety monitoring offered in the report
lesser extent, schizophrenia
effective treatment for other symptoms of the Mount Sinai Conference on the
and related conditions.
of schizophrenia.45 Pharmacotherapy of Schizophrenia,56
h Evidence of benefit Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, ad- and by the 2013 Scottish Intercolle-
from antipsychotic
junctively or alternatively, may reduce giate Guidelines Network (SIGN).30
treatment of psychotic
psychosis in patients with Alzheimer Among elderly patients with dementia
symptoms is mixed in
patients with psychosis
disease,46 Parkinson disease demen- and psychosis, the benefits of antipsy-
associated with Alzheimer tia,47 diffuse Lewy body disease,48 chotic treatment must be balanced
disease, modest in and, to a lesser extent, schizophrenia against the risk of serious adverse
Parkinson disease (for which and related conditions.49 However, events. Informed consent requires ac-
clozapine and quetiapine antipsychotics remain commonly used knowledgement of the 1.5 to 1.8 times
are the preferred agents to treat psychotic symptoms associated increased mortality associated with anti-
for psychosis that persists with neurologic disorders. Evidence of psychotic treatment in elderly patients
despite stepwise benefit from antipsychotic treatment of with dementia, the risk of which appears
reductions in psychotic symptoms is mixed in pa- similar for both the typical and atypical
prodopaminergic tients with psychosis associated with antipsychotics54 (www.fda.gov/Drugs/
medications), and limited
Alzheimer disease,50,51 modest in DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafety
for most other
Parkinson disease (for which clozapine InformationforPatientsandProviders/
neurologic conditions.
and quetiapine are the preferred agents ucm124830.htm).57
732 www.ContinuumJournal.com June 2015
KEY POINT
The APA offers the Clinician-Rated Dimen- 2. Rabinowitz J, Berardo CG, Bugarski-Kirola D,
h Psychosocial interventions Marder S. Association of prominent positive
also are essential elements sions of Psychosis Symptom Severity scale and prominent negative symptoms and
of the treatment for without cost for clinical use, but requests functional health, well-being, healthcare-related
patients with primary and that clinicians and researchers provide data quality of life and family burden: a CATIE
analysis. Schizophr Res 2013;150(2Y3):339Y342.
secondary psychoses, on the instrument’s usefulness by submit- doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.014.
especially during the ting feedback at the website below.
3. Vilalta-Franch J, Lopez-Pousa S, Calvo-Perxas L,
stable phase of illness. dsm5.org/Pages/Feedback-Form.aspx Garre-Olmo J. Psychosis of Alzheimer disease:
prevalence, incidence, persistence, risk
The APA also offers practice guidelines factors, and mortality. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
that provide evidence-based recom- 2013;21(11):1135Y1143. doi:10.1016/
mendations for the assessment and j.jagp.2013.01.051.
treatment of psychiatric disorders. 4. Forsaa EB, Larsen JP, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al.
A 12-year population-based study of
psychiatryonline.org/guidelines psychosis in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol
2010;67(8):996Y1001. doi:10.1001/archneurol.
Agency for Healthcare Research and 2010.166.
Quality. The Agency for Healthcare 5. American Psychiatric Association DSM-5
Research and Quality maintains the Na- Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual
tional Guideline Clearinghouse website, a of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
public resource for evidence-based clini- Association, 2013.
cal practice guidelines.
6. American Psychiatric Association Task Force
www.guideline.gov on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual
of mental disorders, 4th edition text revision
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American
NPI screens for multiple types of dementia. Psychiatric Association, 2000.
7. American Psychiatric Association Committee
npitest.net on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic
and statistical manual of mental disorders,
The Mount Sinai Conference on the 2nd edition (DSM-II). Arlington: American
Pharmacotherapy of Schizophrenia. Psychiatric Association, 1968.
This report provides guidance on the pre- 8. World Health Organization. The ICD-10
scription and monitoring of antipsychotic classification of mental and behavioural disorders:
medications, and it is available as a free clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines.
Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.
full text download from Oxford Journals.
9. Schneider K. Clinical psychopathology.
schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/ New York: Grune & Stratton, 1959.
content/28/1/5.long 10. Arciniegas DB. Mental status examination.
In: Arciniegas DB, Anderson CA, Filley CM, eds.
The Scottish Intercollegiate Guide- Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry.
lines Network (SIGN). SIGN 131, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University
Management of Schizophrenia, pro- Press; 2013:344Y393.
vides a current set of guidelines on 11. Bonhoeffer K. Die akuten Geisteskrankheiten
the evaluation and treatment of schizo- der Gewohnheitstrinker. Jena: G. Fischer, 1901.
17. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research 30. Guidelines. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines
domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new Network. www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/
classification framework for research on index.html. Accessed April 9, 2015.
mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167(7): 31. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Agency for
748Y751. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379. Healthcare Research and Quality.
18. Ford JM, Morris SE, Hoffman RE, et al. www.guideline.gov. Accessed April 9, 2015.
Studying hallucinations within the NIMH RDoC 32. Stahl SM, Morrissette DA, Citrome L, et al.
framework. Schizophr Bull 2014;40(suppl 4): ‘‘Meta-guidelines’’ for the management of
S295YS304. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu011. patients with schizophrenia. CNS Spectr 2013;
19. Clinician-rated dimensions of psychosis symptom 18(3):150Y162. doi:10.1017/S109285291300014X.
severity. American Psychiatric Association. 33. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. World
www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Practice/ Federation of Societies of Biological
DSM/DSM-5/ClinicianRatedDimensionsOf Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological
PsychosisSymptomSeverity.pdf. Published 2013. Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update
Accessed April 9, 2015. 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia
20. Chemerinski E, Triebwasser J, Roussos P, and the management of treatment resistance.
World J Biol Psychiatry 2012;13(5):318Y378.
Siever LJ. Schizotypal personality disorder.
J Pers Disord 2013;27(5):652Y679. doi:10.1521/ doi:10.3109/15622975.2012.696143.
pedi_2012_26_053. 34. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. World
Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry
21. Saddichha S, Kumar R, Sur S, Sinha BN. (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of
First rank symptoms: concepts and diagnostic schizophrenia, part 2: update 2012 on the
utility. Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg) 2010;13(4):
long-term treatment of schizophrenia and
263Y266. doi:10.4314/ajpsy.v13i4.61874. management of antipsychotic-induced side
22. Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, et al. effects. World J Biol Psychiatry 2013;14(1):
Definition and description of schizophrenia 2Y44. doi:10.3109/15622975.2012.739708.
in the DSM-5. Schizophr Res 2013;150(1):3Y10. 35. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric
doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.028. rating scale. Psychol Rep 1962;10:799Y812.
23. Braff DL, Ryan J, Rissling AJ, Carpenter WT. 36. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and
Lack of use in the literature from the last negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
20 years supports dropping traditional Schizophr Bull 1987;13(2):261Y276.
schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and
37. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al. The
ICD-11. Schizophr Bull 2013;39(4):751Y753.
Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive
doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt068.
assessment of psychopathology in dementia.
24. Abrams DJ, Rojas DC, Arciniegas DB. Is Neurology 1994;44(12):2308Y2314.
schizoaffective disorder a distinct categorical doi:10.1212/WNL.44.12.2308.
diagnosis? A critical review of the literature.
38. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4(6):1089Y1109. efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs
25. McAllister TW, Arciniegas DB. Pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments
of behavioral disturbances. In: Arciniegas DB, meta-analysis. Lancet 2013;382(9896):951Y962.
Anderson CA, Filley CM, eds. Behavioral doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3.
47. Wood LD, Neumiller JJ, Setter SM, Dobbins 56. Marder SR, Essock SM, Miller AL, et al.
EK. Clinical review of treatment options for The Mount Sinai conference on the
select nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia.
disease. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2010;8(4): Schizophr Bull 2002;28(1):5Y16.
294Y315. doi:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.08.002. 57. Information for Healthcare Professionals:
48. Ballard C, Aarsland D, Francis P, Corbett A. Conventional Antipsychotics. US Food and
Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/Drugs/
dementias associated with cortical Lewy DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafety
bodies: pathophysiology, clinical features, InformationforPatientsandProviders/
and pharmacological management. Drugs ucm124830.htm. Accessed April 14, 2015.
Aging 2013;30(8):603Y611. doi:10.1007/ 58. Herrmann N, Gauthier S. Diagnosis and
s40266-013-0092-x. treatment of dementia: 6. Management of
49. Singh J, Kour K, Jayaram MB. Acetylcholinesterase severe Alzheimer disease. CMAJ 2008;179(12):
inhibitors for schizophrenia. Cochrane 1279Y1287. doi:10.1503/cmaj.070804.