Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 19 Indian Economy
Session 19 Indian Economy
Session 19 Indian Economy
Partha Ray
April 2, 2021
1
Schedule of Sessions: Post Mid term (March 5 – April 7)
11 Asia: Emergence of China BPA Mar 5 12 China and Global Trade War PR Mar 10
13 Russia and the Second BPA Mar 12 14 Russia and the CIS Economies PR Mar 17
Cold War
15 Politics of the Middle East and North BPA Mar 19 16 Middle East and Oil Prices PR Mar 24
Africa (MENA)
17 India and its Neighbours BPA Mar 26 19 Emergence of India as an Economic PR April 2
Power
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
4
2018
2019
2020
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0.0
5.0
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
China
1997
1998
1999
India
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
United States
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Share in Global GDP (at PPP) (%)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
5
2018
2019
2020
Per Capita GDP at PPP(USD)
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Among the BRICS, China (28th) is by far the best performer, ahead of the Russian Federation(43th), 32 places ahead of South Africa (60th)
and some 40 places ahead of both India (68th) and Brazil (71st). 9
Transparency International’s Corruption Transparency International’s Corruption
Perception Index of Select Countries: Ranking in Perception Index of Select Countries: Global Scores
2018
Country Rank Country Rank
Country 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Denmark 1 Israel 34
New Zealand 2 Poland 36
Finland 3 Spain 41 New Zealand 87 89 90 91 91 91 90
Singapore 3 Italy 53
Sweden 3 Oman 53
Denmark 88 88 90 91 92 91 90
Switzerland 3 Mauritius 56
Norway 7 Saudi Arabia 58
Netherlands 8 Greece 67 Finland 85 85 89 90 89 89 90
Canada 9 South Africa 73
Luxembourg 9 India 78 Norway 84 85 85 88 86 86 85
Germany 11 China 87
United Kingdom 11 Indonesia 89
Switzerland 85 85 86 86 86 85 86
Australia 13 Sri Lanka 89
Austria 14 Philippines 99
Hong Kong 14 Thailand 99 Singapore 85 84 84 85 84 86 87
Iceland 14 Brazil 105
Belgium 17 Pakistan 117 China 39 41 40 37 36 40 39
Ireland 18 Vietnam 117
Japan 18 Russia 138
India 41 40 40 38 38 36 36
France 21 Bangladesh 149
United States of America 22 Syria 178
United Arab Emirates 23 Somalia 180 Brazil 35 37 40 38 43 4210 43
Table I: Rankings of Eight Asian Economics as per Different Indices
1 China 27 19 87 10
2 India 42 45 78 18
3 Indonesia 51 63 89 16
4 Thailand 34 25 99 7
5 Malaysia 35 28 99 25
6 Philippines 64 33 61 6
8 Vietnam 45 57 117 12
11
HDI: How is it Calculated?
• Life expectancy at birth The HDI is calculated as the geometric mean (equally-
• Mean years of schooling weighted) of life expectancy, education, and GNI per capita,
as follows: The education dimension is the arithmetic mean
• Expected years of schooling of the two education indices (mean years of schooling and
• Gross national income (GNI) per capita expected years of schooling).
12
HDI Ranks in Select Countries in 2019
HDI rank Country HDI rank Country
Very high human development High human development
1 Norway 72 Sri Lanka
2 Ireland 74 Mexico
2 Switzerland 79 Thailand
4 Iceland 84 Brazil
6 Germany 85 China
7 Sweden 107 Indonesia
8 Australia 107 Philippines
8 Netherlands 114 South Africa
10 Denmark 117 Viet Nam
11 Finland Medium human development
11 Singapore 129 Bhutan
13 United Kingdom 131 India
14 Belgium 133 Bangladesh
14 New Zealand 142 Nepal
16 Canada 143 Kenya
17 United States 144 Cambodia
18 Austria 154 Pakistan
19 Israel Low human development
19 Japan 161 Nigeria
23 Korea (Republic of) 163 Tanzania (United Republic of)
25 Spain 169 Afghanistan
26 France 170 Sudan
29 Italy 172 Gambia
40 Saudi Arabia 188 Central African Republic
46 Argentina 189 Niger 13
52 Russian Federation
14
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day
(2011 PPP) (% of population)
India World
15
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
Top 1% Share
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Bottom 50% Share
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Income Inequality in India: Share in Pre-tax National Income
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
16
Economic Growth
17
Growth and Crisis in the Indian Economy: GDP Growth
Year Growth Year Growth • 1957-58 - BoP
crisis
1991-92 1.4 2009-10 8.6
• 1965-66 -
8.9 Drought + Indo-
1992-93 5.4 2010-11
(8.5)* Pakistan war
1993-94 5.7 2011-12
6.7 • Early 1970s -
(5.2)* First Oil Shock
1994-95 6.4 2012-13
4.5 • 1979-80 -
[5.5]* Second Oil
4.7 Shock (IMF
1995-96 7.3 2013-14 Loan)
[6.4]*
1996-97 8.0 2014-15 7.4* • 1991-92 - BoP /
1997-98 4.3 2015-16 8.0*
Fiscal crisis?
(IMF Loan)
1998-99 6.7 2016-17 8.3*
1999-00 6.4 2017-18 7.0*
2000-01 4.1 2018-19 6.1*
*: Data with the
New series 2011-
2001-02 5.4 2019-20 4.2* 12 base at Market
2002-03 3.9 2020-21 -7.8* price
2003-04 8.0
2004-05 7.1
2005-06 9.5
Drought Years: 1951,
2006-07 9.6 1965, 1966, 1971, 1972,
2007-08 9.3 1974,181979, 1982, 1987,
2008-09 6.7 2002, 2009
Source: CSO, Government of India.
Economic Structure
19
Structure of GDP: Two Ways to Classify
• GDP (Y) [ at market price] = C + I + G + X-M
• GDP (Y) [GVA at basic price] = GDPAgri + GDPInd + GDP Services
Consumption (C)
Agriculture
Investment (I)
Industry
Govt Expenditure (G)
2000-01 64.0 12.7 76.7 23.5 0.7 13.3 14.2 -0.9 100.0
2010-11 54.7 11.0 65.7 37.6 1.1 22.4 26.9 -4.5 100.0
2019-20 57.2 11.3 68.5 31.6 1.3 19.3 21.4 -2.0 100.0
1a. Household final consumption (C) 35.7 36.5 37.2 37.4 38.1 39.1
1b. Government final Consumption (G) 13.1 13.4 13.7 13.8 13.6 14.1
22
Structure of the Indian Economy
1950-51 1960-61 1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11 2019-20
1. Agriculture & allied activities 55.3 50.8 44.3 37.9 31.4 23.9 18.3 14.8
a) Mining & Quarrying 1.4 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.7 2.3 4.1 2.4
c) Electricity, Gas & Water Supply 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.3
3. Services (Including Construction) 34.1 36.0 40.2 44.6 48.8 56.1 57.6 63.1
b) Trade, Hotel, Transport and Communications 11.3 13.1 14.7 17.4 18.3 22.3 17.2 19.4
c) Finance, Insurance, Real Estate & Business Services 7.7 7.0 6.8 7.5 10.6 13.0 19.0 13.8
d) Community, Social & Personal Services 10.6 10.4 12.0 13.1 13.8 15.0 12.4 16.0
4. GDP at Factor Cost / GVA at basic price 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Electricity, Gas & Water Supply 0.3 2.3 0.3 2.1 0.3 2.0
4.9
1982-83
7.6
1983-84
6.4
1984-85
4.5
1985-86
5.8
1986-87
8.2
1987-88
7.5
1988-89
7.4
1989-90
WPI Inflation
1990-91
10.3
1991-92
13.7
1992-93
10.0
8.3
1993-94
1994-95
12.6
8.0
1995-96
4.6
1996-97
4.4
1997-98
5.9
1998-99
3.3
1999-00
7.1
2000-01
3.6
2001-02
3.4
2002-03
5.5
2003-04
6.5
2004-05
4.5
2005-06
6.6
2006-07
4.7
2007-08
8.1
2008-09
3.8
2009-10
9.6
2010-11
8.9
2011-12
6.9
2012-13
5.2
2013-14
1.3
2014-15
-3.7
2015-16
1.7
2016-17
2.9
2017-18
25
4.3
2018-19
1.7
2019-20
Inflation has come down: Good Policy and Good Luck
Headline CPI Inflation (%) Sub-components of Supply Shocks
CPI Inflation (%)
Mean Standard Median Maximum Minimum Food and Fuel and Ex-Food and Agricultural International
Deviation Beverages Light (6.8) Fuel (Core) GVA Growth Crude Oil Prices
(45.9) (47.3) (%) (USD/Barrel)
2012-13 10.0 0.5 10.1 10.9 9.3 11.2 9.7 9.0 1.5 103.2
2013-14 9.4 1.3 9.5 11.5 7.3 11.9 7.7 7.2 5.6 103.7
2014-15 5.8 1.5 5.5 7.9 3.3 6.5 4.2 5.4 -0.2 83.3
2015-16 4.9 0.7 5.0 5.7 3.7 5.1 5.3 4.6 0.6 46.1
2012-16 (Apr-12 7.3 2.4 7.1 11.5 3.3 8.7 6.7 6.5 1.9 84.0
to Sep-16)
2016-17 4.5 1.0 4.3 6.1 3.2 4.4 3.3 4.8 6.8 47.9
2017-18 3.6 1.2 3.4 5.2 1.5 2.2 6.2 4.6 6.6 55.7
2018-19 3.4 1.1 3.5 4.9 2.0 0.7 5.7 5.8 2.6 67.3
2019-20 4.8 1.8 4.3 7.6 3.0 6.0 1.3 4.0 4.3 58.6
2016-20 (Oct-16 3.9 1.4 3.6 7.6 1.5 3.3 4.1 4.8 5.1 57.4
to Mar-20)
Note: Figures in brackets are weights in the CPI basket. GVA: Gross Value Added.
Source: Report on Currency and Finance, 2020-21, RBI; pp. 25 -26. 26
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
Trends in Fiscal Deficit (=Government Borrowing) (% of GDP)
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
27
2019-20
2020-21
-12.0
3.0
8.0
-7.0
-2.0
13.0
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
Trade Balance
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
Invisibles Balance
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
Trends in India’s BoP (% of GDP)
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
Current Account Balance /GDP
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Foreign Investment
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
28
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Pandemic & the Indian Economy
30
Context - Macro Policy Context
• Macro Indicators
• Growth in downswing with associated adverse impact Saving and Capital Formation (% of GDP)
on employment
• Migrant Labourers suffered due to the sudden and 42.0
unplanned lockdown
• Inflation – Inflation targeting Central Bank and Partial
40.0
success notwithstanding some upswings due to
structural factors
• Downturn in Savings and Investment 38.0
• Financial Indicators
• (Irrational) Exuberance in the Stock Market 36.0
• Shaky domestic banking sector saddled with growing
NPAs
• External Sector 34.0
2019-20
2008-09
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
• Policy Complexity
• IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India)
• Increasing NPA of the Banking Sector
Gross savings Gross Capital Formation
• Huge improvement in Doing Business Indicators
• Stagnant Human Development Indictors
31
2021 GDP slowdown will be the 4th year of slowing GDP Growth Rate
5
4.2
4
3.1
3
34
Economic Stimulus
No Type of Support Amount (in crore) % of Nominal GDP (of 2019-20)
I Monetary Stimulus: Reserve Bank of India Measures 9,57,000 4.68
II Fiscal Stimulus 5,80,450 2.84
2. Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Package 1,70,000 0.83
3. Health Sector Package 15,000 0.07
4. Revenue loss due to tax concessions 7,800 0.04
5. Income transfer/support 3,87,650 1.90
a) Fund of Funds for MSME 50,000 0.24
b) EPF Support for Business & Workers 2,800 0.01
c) Reduction in EPF rates 6,750 0.03
d) Reduction in TDS/TCS rates 50,000 0.24
e) Free Food grain for Migrant Workers 3,500 0.02
f) Interest Subvention- MUDRA Loans 1,500 0.01
g) Credit facility for street vendors 5,000 0.02
h) Food Micro Enterprises 10,000 0.05
i) Housing CLSS MIG 70,000 0.34
j) Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana 20,000 0.10
k) Agriculture and Animal Husbandry related 1,20,000 0.59
l) Viability Gap funding 8,100 0.04
m) Additional MGNREGS allocation 40,000 0.20
III Others 7,15,000 3.50
6. Non-guarantee liquidity schemes 2,30,000 1.13
a) Emergency WC through NABARD 30,000 0.15
b) Additional credit through KCC 2,00,000 0.98
7. Fully / Partially Guaranteed Liquidity Schemes 4,85,000 2.37
a) Working Capital facility for MSME 3,00,000 1.47
b) Subordinate debt for MSME 20,000 0.10
c) Special Liquidity Scheme for NBFCs/HFCs/MFIs 30,000 0.15
d) Partial credit guarantee for NBFCs 45,000 0.22
e) Liquidity Injection for DISCOMs 90,000 0.44
IV Total 22,52,450 11.02
35
Monetary Policy – Feb 5, 2021
Policy Repo Rate 4.0% Base Rate 7.40% - 8.80%
CRR 3% MCLR (Overnight)
Reverse Repo Rate 3.35% 6.65% - 7.10%
[Marginal Cost of Funds based Lending Rate]
Marginal Standing Facility Savings Deposit Rate 2.70% - 3.00%
4.25% SLR 18%
Rate Term Deposit Rate > 1 Year 4.90% - 5.50%
Repo Rate
6.50%
6.25%
6.00% 6.00%
5.75%
5.50%
5.40%
5.15%
5.00%
4.50%
4.40%
4.00% 4.00%
3.50%
• Monetary policy was already in an accommodative mode before the outbreak of COVID-19, with a cumulative repo rate cut of 135 basis points between
February 2019 and the onset of the pandemic.
• Consistent with this policy stance, liquidity conditions were also kept in ample surplus all through since June 2019.
• The liquidity measures announced by the RBI since February 2020 aggregate to about ₹9.57 lakh crore (equivalent to about 4.7 per cent of 2019-20
nominal GDP).
• “All members of the MPC … unanimously voted for keeping the policy repo rate unchanged at 4 per cent. Furthermore, all members of the MPC voted
to continue with the accommodative stance as long as necessary – at least during the current financial year and into the next financial year – to revive
growth on a durable basis and mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the economy, while ensuring that inflation remains within the target going
36
forward”.
Unpleasant Budgetary Arithmetic: 2019-20, 2020-21(BE & RE) & 2021-22 (BE)
2020-21 2021-22 (BE)
Budget Estimate (BE) Revised Estimate (RE) Difference % increase in
2019-20 (A) [in Feb 2020] [in Feb 2021] between 2021-22 (BE)
Rs. Crore % to Total
RE & BE (Rs. over 2020-
Rs. Crore % of Total Rs. Crore % of Total Crore) 21(RE)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
1 Revenue Receipts 16,84,059 20,20,926 66.4 15,55,153 45.1 -4,65,773 17,88,424 51.3 15.0
2. Tax Revenue (Net to Centre) 13,56,902 16,35,909 53.8 13,44,501 39.0 -2,91,408 15,45,396 44.4 14.9
3. Non Tax Revenue 3,27,157 3,85,017 12.7 2,10,652 6.1 -1,74,365 2,43,028 7.0 15.4
4 Capital Receipts 10,02,271 10,21,304 33.6 18,95,152 54.9 8,73,848 16,94,812 48.7 -10.6
5 Recovery of Loans 18,316 14,967 0.5 14,497 0.4 -470 13,000 0.4 -10.3
6 Other Receipts 50,304 2,10,000 6.9 32,000 0.9 -1,78,000 1,75,000 5.0 446.9
7 Borrowings and Other Liabilities 9,33,651 7,96,337 26.2 18,48,655 53.6 10,52,318 15,06,812 43.3 -18.5
8 Total Receipts (1+4) 26,86,330 30,42,230 100.0 34,50,305 100.0 4,08,075 34,83,236 100.0 1.0
9 Total Expenditure (10+13) 26,86,330 30,42,230 100.0 34,50,305 100.0 4,08,075 34,83,236 100.0 1.0
10 On Revenue Account 23,50,604 26,30,145 86.5 30,11,142 87.3 3,80,997 29,29,000 84.1 -2.7
11. Interest Payments 6,12,070 7,08,203 23.3 6,92,900 20.1 -15,303 8,09,701 23.2 16.9
12 Grants in Aid for creation of capital assets 1,85,641 2,06,500 6.8 2,30,376 6.7 23,876 2,19,112 6.3 -4.9
13 On Capital Account 3,35,726 4,12,085 13.5 4,39,163 12.7 27,078 5,54,236 15.9 26.2
14 Revenue Deficit (10-1) 6,66,545 6,09,219 14,55,989 8,46,770 11,40,576
% of GDP 3.3 2.7 7.5 5.0 5.1
15 Fiscal Deficit [9-(1+5+6)] 9,33,651 7,96,337 18,48,655 10,52,318 15,06,812
% of GDP 4.6 3.5 9.5 6.0 6.8
Higher Fiscal Deficit: Possible implications
Complications:
1. FRBM Act / Rules
2. Fiscal Fundamentalism from International Institutions
3. Fear of Rating Downgrade
4. Implications for exchange rate
5. Implications for the Equity Market Players – Mutual Funds / FPI 38
Fiscal and Monetary
Policy Coherence
• Implications of Higher Market Borrowing:
• Can there be Crowding Out?
• RBI Cannot directly buy securities from the
government
• RBI had to intervene with massive Open Market
Operations to buy securities from the secondary
market so that there is space created for new
securities to be sold by the government
Infrastructure
• Creation of a development finance institution called the National Bank for Financing
Infrastructure and Development, with a capital base of ₹ 20,000 crore and a lending
target of ₹ 5 lakh crore
• we all know the reasons for the failure of erstwhile DFIs in India and the limited
capability of commercial banks to extend term loans, a proposal was mooted by RBI
in April 2017 to establish Wholesale and Long-Term Finance (WLTF) Banks.
• What would be sources of financing for this DFI,
• How far is this DFI close to the idea of WLTF Banks?
• The budget gave a boost to the capital goods sector
• The government also provided an additional ₹ 2 lakh crore to states for capital
expenditure over and above.
• Special infrastructure projects for states of Assam, West Bengal, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.
• A whooping 1.03 lakh crore has been set aside for Tamil Nadu,
• Kerala has been earmarked ₹ 65,000 crore
• Assam has received ₹ 34,000 crore.
• Electoral Gains?
Banking Sector
• Gross non-performing assets (a euphemism for bad Gross NPA (% of Gross Advances)
loans) ratio (i.e., as a percentage of total advances) 13.5
of scheduled commercial banks might increase
• from 7.5 per cent in September 2020 to 13.5 per cent 11.2
• Bad Bank / Stressed asset resolution : An asset 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
41
Budget and the External
Sector
• India has inverted duty structure where custom duties on raw
materials and primary goods are higher than final goods
• In the last 4-5 years, the Union Budget routinely increased import
duties and tries to correct this distortion
• This budget is no exception. Import duties have been raised on a
large number of items.
• This is largely in line with the Atmanirbhar India initiative of
promoting domestic industries
liked it
20000.00
25000.00
30000.00
35000.00
40000.00
45000.00
55000.00
50000.00
Why the “Market”
2020-01-01
2020-02-01
2020-03-01
2020-04-01
2020-05-01
2020-06-01
2020-07-01
2020-08-01
2020-09-01
BSE 30 (SENSEX)
2020-10-01
2020-11-01
• No new taxes
2020-12-01
2021-01-01
2021-02-01
• Increased transparency
2021-03-01
• Government spends more
5.8
5.85
5.9
5.95
6.05
6.1
6.15
6.2
6.25
6.3
Moody’s Fitch
Date Rating Outlook Date Rating Outlook
Dec-11 Baa3 Stable Dec-11 BBB- Stable
Apr-15 Baa3 Positive Dec-15 BBB- Stable
Nov-16 Baa3 Positive Jul-16 BBB- Stable
Nov-17 Baa2 Stable May-17 BBB- Stable
Nov-19 Baa2 Negative Dec-19 BBB- Stable
Jun-20 Baa3 Negative Jun-20 BBB- Negative
Note: Standard and Poor’s has been maintaining India’s outlook as stable since September 2014.
48
49
To sum up….
• India has come a long way and emerged as the fifth largest economy
• Pluses
• Given the size, demography and inherent dynamism India is going ahead
• Inflation is under control
• Government finance has been careful
• BoP situation is under control with decent forex reserves ($580.3 billion as of March 5, 2021)
• Minuses
• However, given the vast population, there are issues related to distributive justice – India’s per capita
income at USD 2000 is quite low. Number of India’s poor people is also large.
• Even independent of Covid, of late growth has been decelerating and savings / investment rates have been
coming down
• Banking sector’s NPA has been another cause of concern
• Need a three pronged approach
• Prudent monetary and fiscal policy to handle the deceleration in growth / business cycles
• Dynamic Structural Policies to impart the growth impetus – kick-start the investment cycles
• Specific policies relating to transfer of income, health and education for distributive justice.
• All these to be implemented within a framework of democracy.
50
Thank You
51