Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Syed Ali Shahzaib Rizvi CBL Assigmment

    Uploaded by

    Ali Shahzaib
    10 views1 page
    The promise to make a bonus payment is enforceable according to the case Stilk v Myrick because the promiser received a practical benefit from the offer. Additionally, the promise was made without any duress as it was the promiser's own idea to offer extra payment. Finally, the appellant gained practical benefit by avoiding a penalty clause, so the promise for extra pay was enforceable by law.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The promise to make a bonus payment is enforceable according to the case Stilk v Myrick because the promiser received a practical benefit from the offer. Additionally, the promise was made without any duress as it was the promiser's own idea to offer extra payment. Finally, the appellant gained practical benefit by avoiding a penalty clause, so the promise for extra pay was enforceable by law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views1 page

    Syed Ali Shahzaib Rizvi CBL Assigmment

    Uploaded by

    Ali Shahzaib
    The promise to make a bonus payment is enforceable according to the case Stilk v Myrick because the promiser received a practical benefit from the offer. Additionally, the promise was made without any duress as it was the promiser's own idea to offer extra payment. Finally, the appellant gained practical benefit by avoiding a penalty clause, so the promise for extra pay was enforceable by law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Syed Ali Shahzaib Rizvi

    20191-25952

    The promise to make bonus payment is enforceable according to Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317
    because the promiser get practical benefit from the offer. Secondly, the promise was made without any
    duress. It was Roffey Bros own idea to offer extra payment, so there was no duress. Appellant gained
    practical benefit by avoiding the penalty clause. Therefore, the promise for extra pay was enforceable by
    law.

    You might also like