INVENTORY LOCATION PAVEMENT CONDITION YEAR - -

OF ROADS
MAJOR KALAYAAN ASPALT GOOD 1989- - -
ROADS AVE, PRSENT
CARLOS P
GARCIA AVE
ALL CONCRETE GOOD 1913-1952 -
SECONBDARY
ROADS
EARTH BAD - - -
GRAVEL BAD - - -
UNKNOW - - - -
N
MINOR ROAD SERGEANT F. CONCRETE GOOD 1963-1968
YABUT
CIRCLE
STREET
MAGSAYSAY CONCRETE GOOD 1963-1968
AVE

INVENTORY LOCATION TYPE CAPACITY CONDITION YEAR QUANTITY

OF BRIDGES
KALAYAAN CONCRETE 10 TONS GOOD 1963- 4
AVE 1968
CARLOS P CONCRETE 20 TONS GOOD 1989- 3
GARCIA AVE 2001

J.P. RIZAL CONCRETE 10 TONS GOOD 1989- 2

EXTENSION 2001

GUADALUPE STEEL, 20-22 TONS GOOD 1963-

BRIDGE CONCRETE 1968
INVENTORY LOCATION YEAR TYPE - - -
OF
RAILWAYS
GUADALUPE, 1999-2000 MRT - - -
EDSA

ROADS LOCATION NOT - - - -

ACCIDENTS INDICATED
TRANSPORT - NOT - - - -
RELATED INDICATED
PROJECTS

TRANSPORTATION

1. CEMBO MAKATI
B. Determine the felt needs, aspirations and issues of the

community relative to transportation services through consultations

such as general assembly, focus group discussion, barangay

consultation or other consultative meetings with identified

stakeholders.

18%

41%
12%

29%

Residents working outside Cembo Residents working within Cembo Unemployed Residents
Students living in Cembo
 Survey Result as of Sept. 20, 2020
(40% of target number of respondents)
How well do you know the historcial significance of barangay Cembo?

How would you rate the barangay Cembo with another barangay you’ve been?

How convenient are the structures on barangay Cembo with your own experience?

How would you rate the efficiency of livelihood in barangay Cembo?

From different barangay’s you’ve been, how well does barangay Cembo provides sanitations, roadworks, flood control, etc. for the residents?

How hard did you expect living in barangay Cembo?

1 2 3 4 5

C. Gather additional data/information if warranted by the results of

the consultations/ meetings conducted.

 Population growth rate and density in the barangay is increasing

 Crowded residential zones
 Obliterated historical, educational, and cultural value of the barangay
 Possible economic development of the barangay
 Need for the sanitations, roadworks, and flood control
 Insufficient livelihood for the community, especially to the residents in the slum
area.

II. Data Analysis

Assess the prevailing situation of transportation services and facilities in the

locality in terms of the following:

1. Accessibility within the locality and with the neighboring localities by outlining the origin-
destination or node/transit points within the locality and the interrelation/integration with regional
road network system.

Only pedicabs and motorcycles are allowed to circulate within the boundaries of Cembo
while Jeepneys, PUV's and private vehicles travels only through the National roads; J.P.
Rizal Extension and Kalayaan Avenue.
 Areas of Cembo is held together by narrow roads and alley streets.

2. Existing condition of roads and bridges and determine any isolated areas or gaps in the road
network system that require linkage/connection to the urban core/city/municipal proper
and other outlying areas.

Secular nature of movement of roads is not that busy since there's no major roads in
cembo that much.

3. Number of public utility vehicles servicing the LGU population and the location, type, capacity,
general condition of the terminals difficulty in funding projects.

• limited road capacity

• poor road maintenance
• difficulty in right-of-way acquisition
• disorderly loading and unloading on streets
• inadequate/disorderly parking
• increased use of automobiles
• heavy trucks in urban center
• accidents
• Vehicle queues mostly are pedicabs and motorcycles.

4. Capacity, frequency and efficiency of service of rail, sea or air transportation system available in
the locality. Describe the state/condition of these facilities. Relate the capacity and demand and
discuss the contributions to the city/municipality’s economic activities.
 Rail roads is not present and traffic control facilities are seen on the major roads.

5. Roads and transportation facilities affected by hazards.

No proper signages for traffic controls that tends on delays and traffic not only to the
commuters but also to the road users.

6. Adequacy of existing drainage and sewerage system to contain Floodwaters.

In District 2, its operations on around 34,844 linear meters of drainage in 12 barangays

have yielded about 435 metric tons of solid waste. Covered were barangays Pembo, Rizal,
Comembo, West Rembo, Guadalupe Viejo, Pitogo, Cembo, Pinagkaisahan, Guadalupe
Nuevo, East Rembo, South Cembo, and Guadalupe Nuevo.

7. Traffic problems (flooding, road accidents, etc.)/congestion areas within the urban core and other
identified parts of the LGU.

Usual possible causes of road congestion really based on how the areas are being so intact
and even gutters are being used as residential lot spaces.

8. Trend in traffic situation in the Central Business District. Discuss the possible causes of congestion,
and its cycle (particular times of day it occurs). Determine also if congestion is related to the capacity
of roads to contain the traffic volume, among any other causes. Urban or urbanizing areas
experiencing traffic problems may do well to undertake a more detailed traffic management
planning.

*Areas of Cembo is held together by narrow roads and alley streets.

*Secular nature of movement of roads is not that busy since there's no major roads in
cembo that much.
*Vehicle queues mostly are pedicabs and motorcycles.
*PUV such as jeepneys and those provate cars are channeled mostly in major/national
roads located in JP Rizal extension and Kalayaan Ave.
*Rail roads is not present and traffic control facilities are seen on the major roads.
*Usual possible causes of road congestion really based on how the areas are being so
intact and even gutters are being used as residential lot spaces.
*No proper signage’s for traffic controls that tends on delays and traffic not only to the
commuters but also to the road users.

9. Determine road capacity. Road capacity (supply) is the maximum number of vehicles per unit time
such that there is uninterrupted flow of traffic. The volume is the actual number of vehicles passing
through a specific road section or intersection. The ratio of volume to capacity (V/C, i.e., demand to
supply) is the measure of level of service of the road or intersection. The lower the value of this
ratio, the higher is the level of service or efficiency of the road or intersection.
Kalayaan avenue and j.p. rizal street is congested.

• disorderly loading and unloading on streets

• inadequate/disorderly parking
 • limited road capacity
• increased use of automobiles
• traffic congestion
• disorderly movement at intersections
• difficulty in right-of-way acquisition
• lack of/ineffective public transport terminals
• disorderly public transport system

10. Exposure and vulnerability of transportation facilities to hazards (refer to CCA and DRR section of
Volume 2 and Supplemental Guidelines on Mainstreaming Climate and Disaster Risks in the CLUP)

a. Adequacy of Total Road Length against Population Served (Current Road

Requirements)
• Urban Road Requirements
Urban Population = 27,998
Standard Road/Population Ratio = 2.4 km per 1000 population
Existing Urban Road Requirement = 28,363 kms
Current Urban Road Requirement = [27,998 X 2.4/1000] – 28,363
= 27,998– 28,363
Current Urban Road Requirement = 38.8322 kms.
If the given standard for urban road is to be followed, Municipality A presently
needs an additional 41.5 kms of road in Poblacion area.
• Rural Road Requirements
Arable lands refer to lands suitable for agricultural purposes, ie. Croplands, orchard, pasture,
etc.
Arable land area = 2,565 hectares
Existing rural road length = 18,908 kms
Standard road-area ratio = 1.5 kms per 100 hectares
Current Rural Road Requirement = [2,565 has X 1.5 km/100 has] – 18,908
Current Rural Road Requirement = 38.475 kms.

Projected Urban Road Requirement = [27,998 X 2.4 kms/1000 pop] – [28,363+38.8322]

= 72.0 – 69.93
Projected Urban Road Requirement = 23.59 kms.