The

Fourth Revolutionary War

A chronicle of the Global Revolutionary Wars of
the Eurasian Alliance.
Main Menu
Skip to content

4PT
News
Analysis
Podcast
Video
Maps
Nuclear war
Trumpocalypse
The radical Subject and the metaphysics
of pain | Alexander Dugin
September 17, 2016 · by Akira Kalashnikov · in 4PT. ·

https://z5h64q92x9.net/proxy_u/ru-en.en/www.platonizm.ru/content/dugin-
radikalnyy-subekt-i-metafizika-boli
(Speech philosopher Alexander Dugin, at the international conference “Against
Post-Modern World”)

The theme of the Radical Subject at our conference for the first time stood in the
centre of systematic scientific discussion. This theme is extremely new.
Although I have written several papers on this subject, in particular, the “Radical
subject and its double”[1], and gave several lectures, system scientific discussion
of representative philosophical environment previously occurred. In a sense, this
is the first experience.

I’ll break my report into two parts.

The first part is an existential introduction to the issues of the Radical Subject.
Second considerations concerning the possibility of consideration of the figure
and the role of Radical Neoplatonic Subject of the topic.

Introduction: empirical-existential aspect

Introduction to the area of thinking about the Radical Subject can pass through
an appeal to concrete historical and empirical experience is the experience of
existence (separate/differencirovannoe, Male) in the End Times, the
eschatological Aeon.

Almost all sacred traditions describe a specific eschatological period, when

spiritual realization, initiation and contact with the fundamental principle (often
in religion we are talking about “salvation”) become problematic or even
impossible. In the gospel of Mark is the statement that if God had not shortened
the time of the reign of Antichrist, Satan in the world, the last time degeneration,
then no one would have survived[2]. So we know that the grace God shortens
the period of existence as an exclusively negative space conditions. It is
important for us now, what are the conditions under which alone “would not
have saved no flesh possible, and the Tradition knows about them.

The Radical idea of the Subject is born from vnimatelno consideration of the
ontology of this period. Regarding the identification of this period it is vital that
during this period of time it is impossible to escape in any way – not relying only
on themselves (in Christianity it is impossible, while in other traditions it is
possible), nor relying on the grace of God. The location of this particular
eschatological Aeon in time and space, as well as his identification with one or
another socio-political system in a particular era is an open question and
discussion. Different traditions see it differently. Negative conditions in
Christianity correspond to the arrival of antihista.For conservatives, the process
of apostasy was actively running, since Nikon right, and to extreme old
believers-bespopovtsy “spiritual antihist” then came into the world. In turn,
among the bespopovtsy is brought to the extreme metaphysics of despair and
abandonment by God of extreme flow, such as runners (the Wanderers) and
natovtsy (Spasovo Soglasie). For many novoobryadtsev from ROC recent times
clearly came in 1917 and in the adjacent Soviet era. For the Jews of anomalous
time – the whole era of Galut. For Shia Muslims – the “gayby”, concealment of
the Imam and his secret world.The Indians say, in this case about Kali Yuga.
Anyway, all the traditions you know about these times, the urge to prepare for
them and think about them.

I personally experience the most acute experience of this time was in the late
70’s-early mid 80-ies. I fully admit that it was very subjective, but that the value
of the experience is not diminished. The experience of existence in the late
Soviet period, until about 1982-1983 represented an awakening into pure hell in
the middle of nothing. In these conditions the idea of the Radical Subject. Later,
the perception of the surrounding world, space and social environment, as such
things have changed somewhat, the sharpness of the experience has worn off,
but the idea has deep roots and remains of fundamental importance so far.
Probably because he has a deep eidetic validity and resonates with sharp edges
global metaphysical structures.

A world without Tradition

Which means entirely closed to the spirit is tightly locked on top of the world? A
world without the possibility of salvation? It is an environment where there is no
more Tradition or even her remains. Not at all, in any capacity. How Rene
Guenon describes the modern world, suggests that still some elements of
Tradition remain. They become extremely rare and exceptional, but they are. But
imagine a world in which Tradition is not at all. Whatever we do, to break
through to it. Moreover, nothing and nowhere, impossible to find out anything
about the Tradition, so we don’t even know that we are something we are
deprived so we don’t have that. Heidegger wrote that sometimes the night
becomes so thick that people generally forget that it is night – weaned so they
are from the light.

Such a being constitutes quite specific conditions, specific ontology, from all
points of view and all sides cut off from the world Traditions. It is a world in
which there are no sacred. Does anywhere, in any level, in any capacity. We can
assume that Nietzsche was deeply impressed by similar experiences when it
proclaimed “death of God”.

In a world where there is no exit, as there was no sign – – and in my personal

destiny, this was the late Soviet period, — all of a sudden, suddenly (here is the
time to think about the term “exaifneV” and its metaphysical significance in
Neoplatonism, beginning with Parmenides” ) breaks the point of radical
disagreement with the very existence of this uncontested opticheskom and
ontological context. Raised a total failure stay in this world as a whole – with all
its direct and indirect structures. It is important to emphasize that this refusal,
painful blow, internal explosive rebellion was not based on something that is
placed outside of the environment for its spatial or temporal limits. Deep, almost
chemical environment of rejection had any Foundation. One could imagine that,
for example, through the family someone belonged to the aristocracy, either to
clergy or to any ethnic, religious or ideological minority, to the environment in
which, even in secret and hidden to the eyes, but convey codes of different social
groups, was broadcast algorithms different identity. Then the protest would have
reason, “suddenly”, “suddenly” would be logical and would be the top layer
deeper, but understandable psychological and social mechanisms.I was an
ordinary citizen of the Soviet Union, born in the USSR by Soviet atheistic
conformist parents are quite middle class, raised in a Soviet environment, trained
and received education in Soviet educational institutions. It is important that I
am Russian, that is, no other ethnic influences, explaining the sudden burst of
distance, could not be. No other factor – external influence, circle of contacts, or
other relations or spontaneous interests, which could explain this radicalrejection
from the environment, it was not. I was a part of the environment at all levels and
in all directions, and knew nothing but her. At the time, Arthur Rimbaud, having
been in early youth a very similar experience (but in very different
circumstances and in different historical scenery), lamented that he has in his
family a single drop of noble blood, which could explain him a piercing sense of
his own otherness in relation to the surrounding. Not a single drop…

I didn’t know any other world except Russian-Soviet. But all that surrounded me
– the sky, earth, world, people, social relations, buildings, mechanisms, speech,
discipline, flow of information, paintings, landscapes, all this is absolutely,
totally rejected. Perceived as poisonous coming from all sides nothing like a
fully lisanne any sense and any logic blind aggression of darkness. It’s probably
safe to compare with pictures from Journey to the end of the night Louis-
Ferdinand Celine[3]. I found myself suddenly in the heart of the night, which
had no edge. Manifesting itself in the heart of the night, I didn’t get Nike news,
no Covenant, no guide on how to get out of there, and who I am, why I am
where I am, how it happened and what’s going on….

Pure experience total nihilism. The world around me was not discarded for some
reason, not for any reason but just because. For no reason, without any internal
or external support. And the lack of support (now the most important thing!), the
absence of most of the rescue and any distant glimpse of the Tradition, it was
conceptually placed in the center of my being and is the basis of systematic
thinking.

This gradually crystallized the concept of the Radical Subject, i.e. the postulation
of the existence of the carrier of the tradition of the Tradition, beyond tradition,
in the dark about the very existence of the Tradition, beyond.

Two ways to get philosophical fire

Later, when I met with the hermetic literature, I came across a description of two
methods of obtaining “Profoscope fire.” The first way is when the substance is
plunged into the fire and ignited it, whatever it was, because the fire is extremely
strong. If we find ourselves in a world of Tradition, spontaneously, whatever raw
our souls, Tradition enlighten them, will dry and rocks. If she’s alive and the fire
burning merrily and violently, transformatie, sacralization undergoes almost any
soul – no matter how cheese logs.If it barely smolders, a fire will do only dry
and adapted to this bars of the tree. Traditional society is hierarchical. It with the
need to present religious institutions and rituals. Dominated by the sacred laws
and spiritually grounded ethics. The tradition integrates us into them from birth
against our will, against the will of others, and we, ultimately, overcome
ourselves and become something valuable.

But there is a second method of ignition of philosophical fire – absolute ice.

Here, on the contrary, something is placed in the zone radical cold, buried in the
ice, drops into the void, but in these extreme conditions, suddenly aware of the
difference from the void and within it spontaneously erupts self-propelled fire.
Heraclitus wrote, perhaps, about this: “the man in the night kindles a light to
yourself”. He does this because the world no longer gives him light. Because he
recognizes himself in the heart of the night. It is not the light of nature, is the
light against nature, le feu contre nature.

The concept of the Radical Subject can be described as the birth of philosophical
fire under the influence of the element of absolute ice. The situation when the
philosophical fire born not because of Tradition, but rather in terms of its
complete absence, in the limit of desacralization, in the heart of the night. Taste
the sacred in this case, awakening is not what the sacred is and it’s burning its
numinous power, and when on the contrary it is not at all.

The Radical “I”

When we translate the lyrics of a Radical Subject in English, the question arises
how exactly to implement it. Radical Subject? Not as immediately sends us to
the subject-object topic Descartes and modern times, and even in the best case –
in the Medieval scholasticism. So one version of the translation can be “Radical
Self”.

The higher self, by contrast with the lower, empirical “I”, can be awakened by
both of the methods. The radical “I” as a synonym for the philosophical fire,
protivoprirodno fire, the Radical Subject is something that awakens only ice —
not because of Tradition, but in spite of her absence.

And here then arises a very difficult question: if something throws in an absolute
way nesakralnaya the world, but in itself is not sacred, then what is it?

If we were passed some elements of the Traditions, its codes, and we would have
been in a situation where Tradition is extremely weak or non-existent, it would
be possible to conceive different scenarios of behavior – until the uprising
against the lack or weakness of Tradition. This was due to the fact that we are
thinking of themselves as its representatives and to rely on it even in hopeless
and desperate situations.

But what happens when we rebel against the lack of Tradition, not as its
representatives? Behalf why are we doing this? Who in the us, or that in that
instance behind it?

Asking this question, as we are philosophical introspection; but inside, there

inside, in soul, in mind, in heart, in thought — not see, do not find anything that
would explain to us clearly this rejection. Nothing, because our content is
completely formed sociologically, otologicaka, psychologically, the world in
which we live and which formed.

Hence, the source of the rejection of the cash is justified not by the fact that
inside of us is something great and special from everything – after all, what is
inside, personality reflects what is outside it, and in our case is completely
desacralized environment, the world, completely devoid of fact. And he
constitutes the same creatures, quite satisfied with his senseless rugbystyle
cycles and partisan in his meaningless (from a spiritual point of view) processes.
We are looking for outside and inside of explanation, but can’t find neither there
nor there anything…

Anatomy of nostalgia

This specific generates an excessive voltage, varagamana in absolute pain.

If we consider the Greek word “nostalgia”, we will notice that it consists of two
parts νόστος – “native land” and άλγος – pain. Nostalgia is, literally, “pain for
the native land”. Experience which is the basis of detecting the presence of a
Radical Subject, it is definitely άλγος , pain, and wild excruciating pain,
monstrous, suffocating anguish. Inside this pain you know only one thing – that
you are absolutely stranger. But here’s the question: where and to whom you’re
not a stranger? The answer is no. There are άλγος, but no νόστος. Such
nostalgia, where νόστος is missing. Embracing the horizon and where and for
whom you are a stranger, you see that you are everywhere and for everyone,
always and everywhere… Pain begins to grow, taking up more and more until it
consumes everything – subject and object, internal and external… It’s not even
heideggers Angst, the horror. It’s something else.

In the center of this pain kristallizuetsya a certain area, a figure that was quite
conventionally called the “Radical Subject”. It is defined as something that does
not belong to Tradition, no Tradition can not exist.

Here the question arises: what to do in this situation? How to solve this problem?
How to escape when the doors of salvation are closed? Here lie the roots are
very dense, thick philosophy.

Meeting

Existential background for understanding the emergence of the concept of the

Radical Subject is very important. Continue her presentation. Being in such
unexplained as unreasonable, but the unbearable painthe situation brings me in
contact with people from the point of view of common sense and sociological
patterns in late-Soviet society just should not be. People who knew Rene
Guenon, Julius Evola, the hermetic tradition, Sufism, studied traditionalism, and
which, in fact, were carriers strictly the same traumatic existential experience. It
experience and it was the basis of all – their knowledge, their positions, their
lives. Not knowledge, not culture, not over generations, not some features
biography, origin or external influence motivated them and made them turn to
the Tradition: it was pain, terrible, unbearable, a giant, cannot fit pain. And that
was the key, and read immediately. It was a circle that has no true name,
sometimes called “the circle of the Moscow metaphysical” sometimes “group
Uinskogo lane”. They themselves never called.

Then, after this meeting, which could not happen, it was easier to find a needle
in a haystack, but could not occur based on the Radical logic of the Subject),
there is a clear and detailed explanation of what is this pain and why I felt. It
showed the image of νόστος – the places, the absence of which, distance and to
produce a feeling of pain insane. From this circle I received a detailed
description of the homeland, νόστος. It was a Tradition, given in the form of a
thorough reconstruction. It was traditionalism. It became clear what was
missing: peace, which was described by Guenon, Evola, and other traditionalists
as normative. The sacredness, hierarchy, caste, sovereign domination of spirit
over matter, eternity and immortality. Direct contact with the Divine. Freedom of
the soul from its bodily ties. According to Plato, “Uranium is a look at the Sky”.
In Excelsis. The Experience Of Uranium. The soul standing and not falling
(anima stante e non cadente). The verticality of masculinity. Tender intimacy the
depths. Initiation. The shining face of death. Eidetic number of characters,
stretching in the living area beyond. Experience with open worlds and myriads
of invisible beings. The invisible was made visible to the visible became
invisible.

But most important of all: nostalgia has preceded in this process to meet you
(albeit theoretical and speculative, it was not so important – um, according to the
Platonists, is the sacred center of the soul, drawing your eyes to the Sky,” he gets
on the right path) with the structure of νόστος.

Two ways – two metaphysics

And here you can go two ways. On the one hand, delighted that we were given a
Tradition in a sample, supplied maps, guidelines, goal, we could go to find it.
This is the correct way. And off we went. In the direction of the center.

But there was something that still remained, not gone, not forgotten, and
continues to remind of itself to attract attention. The second way – the search for
the source of pain, which led to traditionalism, the study of its nature, its
structure, its origins. What was it?

For me metaphysics is conditionally divided in two parts. This metaphysics of

the Tradition, the card descriptions νόστος – native the right place, the absolute
ideal. And the second part: fixing for instance, which was (and is) the cause of
the pain; you can call it “metaphysical pain“.

It was possible to develop this line in the direction of traditionalism. And I’m
doing this. And we are all over it. And was in pain. Based on the understanding
of the authority of the force that caused pain around the Radical concept of the
Subject was built New Metaphysics.

Traditionalism and pain

The radical Subject is the philosophical fire, born of ice, but that’s another
philosophical fire than that born of fire. Philosophical fire, born of fire is a
Tradition, and philosophical fire, born of ice, is traditionalism. Traditionalism
reflects the order that is rooted in a Radical Subject. Traditionalism is manifested
not in the world of Tradition, and in a world without Tradition. Traditionalism
and the demands of Tradition without any reason on her part, based on its
absence. Traditionalism rekonstruiruet Tradition precisely because it does not or
it disappears. But traditionalism is not just looking for Tradition, he wants to find
it in its fullness, and therefore fire recreates the fullness. He knows what he
wants to find before he finds something. How would she know? Why is looking
for? Whom he authorized to do this?

Traditionalism — this is reconstruction νόστος, not νόστος. Traditionalism is not

acquainted with the “native place”, but from something else. It is born from the
experience of pure lack. In traditionalism, nothing is transferred, at least, the
beginning was not with the transmission. Please note, traditio from the verb
tradire, to convey, that is “tradition”, “transmission”. But the pain was not
transmitted by anyone to anyone of us. Pain gave no pass. The pain was. This is
something more than Tradition.

Turns out: traditionalism is a very special “tradition” paradoxical “tradition,”

based not on continuity and transmission, but the gap on that Y. Evola calls the
“gap level” (la rotturra del livello). Not a transmission of something that
underlies pain, but rather the lack of any powertrain generates pain. Hence, in
addition to the classic conventional metaphysics of traditionalism described in
metaphysical, religious and philosophical teachings, the idea of another
metaphysics A New Metaphysics. This New Metaphysics is focused entirely on
the study of the nature and structure of the source of pain. This second area, it
runs parallel to the first (more conventional). I do not oppose.

The Analogy Of The Radical Subject

Again: the Radical Subject is that philosophical fire that was born in spite of the
fire and without any reliance on external and internal. It is not a gift because the
pain may not be in vain. It’s not continuity. Pretty easy to imagine the aristocrat,
or representative of some other ethnic group trapped in an alien environment,
whose hatred of the outside encourage them to differentiate, separate, make
“separate people” and, thus, forced to seek or design alternatives.Blood,
memory, culture, religion – even in a small amount as a thin trace able in certain
circumstances lead to similar existential phenomenology. And in this case it
would be all clear, nostalgia would have been transparent; it would be justified
and the place νόστος, and the shape of transmitting route, and a pedagogy of
hatred and nihilism.

But how to imagine a situation where there is no “before”. No prior instances.

There is only the fact of an insane, endless, unbearable ontological pain for no
reason and basis; of pain, founded in itself… That is the basis for the New
Metaphysics. Further, when mapping this intellectual attitude with the materials
Traditions, come to the conclusion that Radical Subject if it has some analog
among the figures and characters of the Tradition, in a fairly closed and
disturbing the field related to the most complex, confusing and obscure corners
of the most metalicheskoj card.If you look in the sphere of traditions of some
distant counterparts, we can recall some images that representanomaly, a rupture
in the logic of metaphysical and sacred and historical narrative. For example,
those figures that had been opened before his time: like Melchizedek, king of
Salem; who died a strange way (Enoch or Elijah); or such as the Islamic khizr,
performing strange and anaesthsia actions that become comprehensible only to
some other, violating the logic of the functioning of the sacral space level of
existence.

You can try to match the Radical of a Subject with images from a different
context, for example, philosophy. Here’s the closest thing are the concepts of
Nietzsche, especially when he utters the most enigmatically passages of
Sverhcheloveka. In one place he calls Superman “the winner of God and
nothing.” Julius Evola, for his part, wrote about this formula in “Ride the
tiger”[4]. By the way, Evola, traditionalist without Tradition, the figure in this
sense, very revealing and highly attuned to the problems of Radical Subject in all
respects and at all stages of his life (especially the early nihilism and anarchism
of the late right).

“The winner of God and nothing” – this formula gives us the philosophical idea
of a Radical Subject in the particular perspective. The meaning of this phrase is
quite clear. “Conqueror of God” – the one who is in a situation without God,
where God is not. No sacred. The world has lost its meaning, and fragmented, as
without God, gives the world order, he ceases to be a space (it understands the
postmodernists by M. Conche writes that “the world is no longer the world, and
the extravagant ensemble”). What is discovered without God? Just nothing.
“Defeating” God, we loose nothing.And faced with nothing we found that we are
nothing. But thenwho or what are we? This question was asked Kirillov in “the
possessed” by Dostoevsky. Evola and his colleagues have devoted to the
collective monograph of the group “UR” is an interesting analysis of this topic in
the article “Kirillov and initiation”[5].

I researched this concept and some Parallels in a number of papers — first of all,
“Radical Subject and its double”[6], an important section is, “Postfigurative”[7],
certain moments in the development of the “Fourth Political Theory”. Some of
the lyrics on the New Metaphysics is still not published for a number of reasons.
The topic is fascinating and in some ways fascinating, but incredibly dangerous
at the same time.

Smart space Neoplatonism

Now to Platonism. Neoplatonic model, which can in a certain approximation to

correlate with the traditionalist a map of ontology and metaphysics, begins with
en, a Single, radically standing above Jehovah (on), and therefore apophatic.
Damascus to resort to this formula a “Super Single” and prefers to speak the
Unspeakable (αρρετος), so he seeks to clear en from any attributes. Including
from himself.

After “Parmenides” of Plato, the Neoplatonists together argue that en is not, it

over-there. This is its fundamental property. Because it radically above and more
primary than the Genesis. It is transcendental (επικεινα) and apophatic. en not
mixed and not involved in anything. Below him all mixed and involved, but
relatively and on every level of manifestation in different proportions.

Neoplatonism operates with three basic points explaining the device of

metaphysics and ontology: μονη (“preserve the same”), προοδος (“exceeded its
limits” in Latin emanatio), επιστροφη (return to initial state). In such a circular
manner are arranged being. In this en, not participating and not staying in
anything and anywhere, illuminates all being. Intensive contact with the
transcendent and inviolable en constitutes divine “Genady”, that is, the rays of
belonging that nothing could be implicated.”Genady” differ by the degree of
saturation apophatic rays to form multiple hierarchical levels of being,
descending gradually from en to end of space – and so on until it limits. The
limit of deployment of en is matter (most often Platonists understand it in the
spirit Aristotle as υλη, and not as the Platonic χορα).

Single comes (προοδος) from itself and constitutes a Single Lot. It is the same
Things. Here begins the area of the Mind (Νους), noetic space or higher divine
genad. Area of the divine Mind is vast and extensive and starting with the
Neoplatonist Iamblichus through Proclus to Syriana and Damascus, it is given
Central importance in the reasoning of the philosophers of this school.

Highlight the most common: the Mind has three main levels – the highest
intelligible (nοετος), mid – umapathy/to the intelligible (νοετος νοερος) and
lower to the intelligible (νοερος) or demiurgic. Hierarchy emphasizes Plato’s
version of the origin of the cosmos: the demiurge contemplates the ideas and
works in their image of the world soul and the cosmos. Therefore, what is
perceived by mind (intelligible), is higher than what it comprehends (to the
intelligible, intellective).In the structure of the Mind (Νους) is the highest level
of intelligible remains always identical to itself, on average it pushing your
limits, and reaching to the intelligible back to the source.

The mind is the second beginning. It is sheer, single-lot, single-duplex, single-

triple. Of all things this is the most unified and most Supreme.

On the lower level of the demiurgic Mind is the area which repeats the whole
process – saving, beyond, return. Demiurge emits gods (the new gods), which
are divided into three main categories – sverhtermicheskoy, isonline (or free) and
vnutrisosudistye. At all levels of the repeated preservation of the highest started,
the outside medium and the return of the lower, closing the cycle again to the
highest. Such intelligent life living in divine space.

Further, the demiurge creates the world soul, ψυχη, which is uniform and much
is already at odds; and one on the side of the soul, much on the side of
phenomenal space.

Three principles of Unified Mind, Soul constitute the main triad. And again it
three things – persistence, procession, and return.

On the soul level and in some sense under it, on its periphery there is the eidetic
world series, descending to matter. The body is decorated eideticism matter,
from all sides surround and patronized intense divine life. Gods, angels, demons,
heroes, soul, pervade the world with the arrows of dedication the lower to the
higher and pass intelligent life from highest to lowest. Sensual space is not just a
copy, the icon of the smart space, but also its living expression.The stream of
becoming, a series of deaths and births and deaths again, is closed on itself a
reflection of the other, vertical time, which is deployed perpendicular to the time
space and consists of the constancy of eternity, beyond and return.

The man closes his eyes

People in this world picture also has a link in the chain of consistency, the origin
outside and return. As a corporal, he stands at a fairly low level, but it has a
living soul and mind, and, therefore, equipped with everything necessary to
return, επιστροφη, which is the fate and challenge people. We left to go back.
Plunged into the matter and found the body, to part with them, rebounding from
the extreme edge of space and start climbing, flying. Flying – the essence of
man, as being winged. The lack of wings is a humiliation and an anomaly. The
heavenly homeland are inexorably drawn to him. The philosopher hears her loud
and clear, and responds to it with meditation and prayer. He grows the wings of
the soul and going home.

The knowledge in this world is achieved through “closing the eyes” (Dams).
One invisible, as apophatic. Genady invisible. Everything important is invisible,
but we must strive it there, moving inward and upward. Outside there is only
confusion who Knows himself, knows all as he knows the heart and mind, and
they are initiated from the upstream even better delivery. Outside just confusing,
murky reflections and leading away from the essence of vanity.

All the circles of space the principal is the same, it differs only in the density of
matter and, accordingly, the intensity of life and clarity of thought. In a better
world all crystal clear to everyone. In less than the best (platonici do not
pronounce the word “bad”, “bad”, “evil”) not all. Even less all my small number.
Hence, the political task of Platonism – the right mindset is the return around the
axis of the return is to line up the socio-political construction of a better society.
Rule should philosophers who contemplate with his eyes closed. And steel needs
to look at them and be inspired. All inside.All in the name of return.
Transcendental νοστος above all else.

Localization of our position in the Neoplatonic cosmos

If we place ourselves in this picture of Platonic space, we will find ourselves in

the space of extreme economic periphery, below which it is impossible to move.
This is the least best possible dispensations. The least best of the social order.
Around us is the least best of the demons inhabiting the matter. The least best of
the shower. And the least clearest of minds. They crowd into the farthest orbit of
vicodene outside and not in a hurry to return. Slow, confused, push, and thus
make the return problematic for themselves and for others. The least fuss is the
best blocking the sun, darkens the mind, prevents the science, as all urge each
other to get deeper and deeper into matter, which is impossible to understand
because there is nothing to understand.

Now, armed Neoplatonic card, refer again to the world in which I found myself
in the late 1970’s-early 80-ies of the last century. From the Neoplatonic point of
view, it is the last on the “least best” of all the stages of vicodene outside, on the
verge of the substance itself, the way the garbage of the cosmos. Soviet
materialism is in the spirit of neo-Platonism is perfectly consistent with the
nightmare, which euphemistically describes Neoplatonism. Dense in matter a
bunch of the least best shower minds-suicide. However, the liberal materialism is
no better than Marxist.In many ways he is still “less than best”.

Mode switching and return point

Classical Neoplatonism says: επιστροφη starts where προοδος. There is mode

switching. The change of the trajectory. This question has puzzled Plotinus and
his followers. Why would the procession outside not to stay at the level of the
shining Mind? Why to descend a problematic demiurge and descend to less and
less the best series, right up to the late Soviet society or liberal democracy
(below which seems to go nowhere)? Platonists explained it this way: the
common is, above all, good, good (according to Plato), and that means not
greedy are not envious. It stores not only for himself but for another, even
though there is no other and can not be. Therefore, it is beyond your limits and
hypostasized entity that is Mind. And that hypostasise Soul. And the soul –
space. And so on down to us. From the generosity of the apophatic unity gain
Genesis all – including less than the best, because the Mind itself nemnogoe less
better than One.

So, there is the apology of the demiurge, hard to distinguish from neo-Platonic
Gnostics, the Manichaeans and the dualists. The demiurge of the benefits, as it
contemplates the intelligible single entity, the highest Genady. Thus, he returns
to his opostegidae to the source. But he continues to practice generosity by
higher court acts beyond its limits, to bring to life less than the best. Each return
is assumed, the share continue going beyond your limits.

Border

How long has it been? Until we reach the border. On this boundary less than the
best for such less best less best to imagine anymore. It vnutricostna the face of
universal return. The bottom of Plato’s cave. We left, reached the limit, rested in
oblivion apophatically unintelligible matter, to go nowhere else. We are at the
bottom. So, there is only one thing-to return.

But what is returned? Returns that went beyond their own limits. Tradition refers
itself to the border to meet her (this is the “modern world” as understood his
Guenon and Evola) and returns. The tradition of pulses. Open and concealed. It
is a cycle. In Shiite gnosis is called “mabda VA mA ad”, is the procession and
return. The dynamics of the sacred, and Platonists explained and described it
more than convincingly (to may think about it “less than best”).

Radical Subject on the border matter

Now dangerous and looks a bit ridiculous question: can occur at the periphery of
the cosmos, on the verge of matter is something that not an output beam of a
Single beyond their bounds that are not included in προοδος? If matter could
give birth to itself probably could. But it’s nothing, and nothing is sterile.
Nothing begets man. The death of God brings forth a man as what remains after
it. When God dies (is removed/returned) all that was involved in it dies (is
removed/returned) with him. It remains only nothingness. And if the person is
not refundable longer and longer, if everything lasts chajderowski “noch nicht”,
“delay”, he annihilated, vaporized, into a fine demon, drowning in matter, from
time to time pomeshivaya out into the night.

This world, where everything sacred is gone, having returned to itself, and is an
area awakening of the Radical Subject. Suddenly, suddenly (exaifneV) detected
by the authority, which never dies/is removed/returned together with God but not
identical with nothing? This is the fundamental question of a New Metaphysics.
In the periphery, on the border of space, on the verge of matter occurs
somethingthat is neither matter nor part of the pulsating rhythm in the gyre the
vertical time – procession/return?

All would return, and we would have to climb the beam of salvation, once
experience of matter is exhausted and the procession reached the bottom.

Here and there glimmers the suspicion of a Radical Subject, how about a unique
fact, for which, apparently, the lower boundary of matter is not an
insurmountable obstacle. For space and all its noetic dispensation, Yes – the
obstacle of the matter cannot be avoided. As soon as it is reached, it is necessary
to return. So says the Tradition. So wants sacred. We have reached the limit, now
ago. But there is some instance for which this is not the limit, which proposes to
go one step further. The ontological place for such a step – no. Matter is an
impenetrable wall of nothing. Her nintelligent ensures that on her below her to
step impossible. This is all absolutely correct and belongs to the internal logic
smart order, best order.

Think about en

However, if we recall that en, United, apophatically which preceded the
emanation of the whole model, and if we pay attention to the fact that the main
and the highest (best) in three moments of the Neoplatonic dialectic is a saving
in itself (μονη), which makes any outside and, accordingly, any return something
relativem, the question arises: can for a Single to exist any of the obstacles?
Would a Single, faced with the matter? It is not sheer, it only hypostasise things.
So, it is free from the laws that controlled the dispensation of all in existence.
But the matter is as a border and is one of the elements of the dispensation which
is in agreement with his Mind.

There is a strange suspicion that the whole drama of the cosmos, the entire
tension is vertical time, all danger of the dialectic of the sacred and the tension of
sacred history are reduced to this unique moment.

Whether Radical Entity to step through the material, the lower limit of the
manifestation? In a restricted Boolean space over this limit is nothing, but for a
Single apophatic cannot be limits, may not be of duality. Although πειρας, the
limit is the best, and the infinity, απειροn – much less the best and πειρας is not
the same as a Single.

Transgression through the material limit down, a paradoxical return in a different

unexpected route — is it possible? In classical Platonism – no. In the New
Metaphysics of Radical Subject – Yes. Moreover, and this is its meaning.

One breath more

Something like that which was used by Heidegger in the essay “why poets?”
Examining poems by Rilke[8], it parses that the poet had in mind, saying that
“people are the ones who take risks in one breath more.” All existing risk. Flying
bird – it can get under the shot of the hunter. The hare runs – it may be in the
teeth of a wolf. Is retired, he may die from falling icicles. Are all at risk. People
are also at risk, but there are people, some better than others, philosophers and
poets (the others, probably still not quite human), which run the risk of “one
more breath“. In this Platonic space them the risk is small, there is sacred always
switches modes to return at the right time. But the Radical concept of the Subject
risk, indeed, it becomes serious. Elsewhere the same phrase Heidegger quotes
hölderlin: “where There is danger, there salvation is rooted”.

In this sense, the New Metaphysics and offers to turn poison into medicine. It’s
“ride the tiger”, Male. But everything here takes on a new meaning.

Recommendations not to deal with a New Metaphysics

The New Metaphysics and Radical Subject is extremely dangerous and risky
area. I did not invite and do not advise anyone with this to have never any
business. We can consider what we say as “metaphysical elective”. Tradition can
and should do life. Tradition unconditionally. The tradition is undoubtedly true.
Tradition is certainly correct. Today, it is very problematic, but, nevertheless,
work with the approval of the traditional truths – this thing is always important,
useful, necessary. Here it can not be doubted.It is difficult, it can be expensive to
defend Tradition in the area of pins and not nearly the best delivery and Eidos,
makes no warranties. But it is right and worthy.

Occupation of the New Metaphysics and Radical perspective of the Subject is

not something that is optional, but I would say it is unnecessary and undesirable
from a time of extreme danger and unpredictable consequences.

However, what if this sphere is, if this nagging pain Despite the analgesic, the
function of Tradition and reliable cartography of traditionalism, I have to admit
that the pain never ends. Involvement in Tradition and opening its doors is not as
sharp shocked, not so deep experience. Maybe it’s crying of the Titans.

So I decided to indicate the topic of the Radical Subject, as a defined system of

reasoning, propositional combinations of images and series of existential
experiences.

Initiation without a visit



There is another direction in the Tradition, partly as close to what I say[9]. This
Shiite gnosis and the philosophy of Ishraq. First and foremost, the founder of the
school Shihabuddin Yahya Sohravardi. The script initiatic stories, Suhrawardi
begins with nostalgia. Existential description of this nostalgia sometimes quite
close to what I was saying. However, everywhere, in all initiatic stories,
Sohrawardi first experience of sacred nostalgia accompanied with a visit with its
” there’s something with Tradition. Someone reminds you dedicate that time
return and opens the eyes of the soul, reviving in memory the image left the
heavenly homeland. It can be Purple Archangel, or khizr. Kabbalists say about
the visit of the prophet Elijah, which begins with the Kabbalistic practice[10].
Must be someone who throws us in the grain of nostalgia, who is engaged in the
route for the homecoming who gives us pain.

The only difference is the Radical Subject is not selected. To him no one comes.
There is no fact of initiation. No figures angel of Initiator. There is only an eerie
bestowal with nothing. The bestowal of pure pain that allows us to understand
the structure of the initiatory act, but only from the even more profound mystery
and ineffable structures that are not associated at all with any phenomenology,
including even the phenomenology of initiation.

[1] Dugin A. the Radical Subject and its double. Moscow: The Eurasian
Movement, 2009.

[2] “And unless the Lord had shortened those days, it would not have saved no
flesh: but for the elect’s sake, whom He chose, he shortened the days.” (Mark
13:20)


[3] L. F. Celine journey to the end of the night. M.: Izd. group “Progress” —
“Besteller”, 1994.

[4] Y. Evola Ride the tiger. S-Pb.: Vladimir Dahl, 2005.

[5] Evola J. (a cura di). Introduzione alla Magia. Roma: Mediterranee, 1971.

[6] Dugin A. the Radical Subject and its double. Decree. Op.

[7] Dugin A. Polylobate. Moscow: The Eurasian Movement, 2009.

[8] In modern poetry (especially in the so-called “damned poets” of German

romanticism, C. Baudelaire, A. Rimbaud, S. mallarmé, Lautréamont, A. C.
Swinburne, O. Wilde, F. Pessoa, Trakl, E. pound, G. Benn, and some of the
authors still can be found allusions to the figure of the Radical Subject. This is
apparent in their complete rejection of the environment, in fundamental
opposition to “real”, but they are not saying no to this world better (progress) or
back (towards conservatism). They are trying to find some other position that
can not be straightforward to grasp and clear articulation.Often they talk about
her “tongue-tied” systems are complex and little understood by him images. But
of these fragments, if their approach is hermeneutics from the perspective of
New Metaphysics, we can derive a lot fundamentalnyh conclusions.

[9] Neonaticides in other traditions also, you can find certain correspondences.
So, in Hinduism similar motives we can find in some branches of tantric
shaivism, for example, in the circles kapalika and AGHORA, and in theories
Kashmiri abheda-Shiva.Stories about the aghori and their practices (spending the
night in the cemeteries, eating human corpses, communication with the lower
demons, etc.) emphasize the state of the radical ascetics, descending to the
bottom of manifestation to demonstrate complete detachment and non-
involvement to anything divine principle (Shiva or Shakti), which they have
implemented yourself, which is fully identified. It is appropriate to quote the
statement: “the pure all things are pure”. Cm. The Epistle of the Holy Apostle
Paul to Titus (1:15).

[10] the Image of Elijah, the bestower of poetically described in G. Meyrink’s

novel “the Green face” (Gustav Meyrink. Green lik. Meister Leonhard . M:
Enigma, 2004). Y. Evola appreciated books Meyrink, while Rene Guenon
believed that in this novel there is “counter-initiatic” mixing positive figures of
Orthodox esoterism of Elijah with the negative figure of the “eternal Jew”. In
principle, as shown by Genon ambiguity characteristic of the entire series of
risky subjects connected with the figure of the Radical Subject. On this issue see
A. Dugin ‘s Radical Subject and its double. Decree. Op.

Sooner or later the endless spectacle is over. Then we will

take revenge. Mercilessly. -Alexander Dugin

Skype
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Facebook
Google
Email
Print
Reddit
Pinterest
Pocket
Telegram
Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Tags: 4PT, Alexander Dugin, Dugin, Radical Subject, Traditionalism

Recent Comments
How the US Armed-up… on How the US Armed-up Syrian Jih…
mohandeer on How the US Armed-up Syrian Jih…
The War in Syria… on Russian warplanes bomb elite B…
nonothai on Turkish F16 Fighter Jet Downed…
L’homme qui parlait… on Bookchin-Öcalan correspondence…
SHOWDOWN IN ALEPPO |… on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
Showdown in Aleppo |… on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
mohandeer on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
mohandeer on Al-Kindi Hospital liberated |…
Al-Kindi Hospital li… on Al-Kindi Hospital liberated |…
Akira Kalashnikov on Death to Trutherism! | Akira
nwouniversity on Death to Trutherism! | Akira
mohandeer on Prominent Scholars Urge UN to…
Prominent Scholars U… on Prominent Scholars Urge UN to…
Todenhöfer: Intervie… on Todenhöfer: Interview With Al-…
Post navigation
← Russia says wants emergency U.N. Security Council meeting on Syria
Israeli Druze accuse IDF of backing al-Qaeda in Syria →

9/11 Truthers will receive "special treatment"

Enter your comment here...

Post Comment

Search Search … Search

Top Posts & Pages
HSV-2 Swift after attack | Colonel Cassad
Turkish business | Colonel Cassad
Yemenis target US destroyer, fire ballistic missiles into Saudi Arabia
In Trump We Trust | Alexander Dugin
30 Intelligence Officers Including Israelis Killed in Russia Missile Attack
in Aleppo
Briefly on Syria | Colonel Cassad
Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS
The Assault On Aleppo. 08.10.2016 | Colonel Cassad
Briefly on Syria | Colonel Cassad
How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists | Alastair Crooke
Recent Posts
Saudi coalition confirms longest-range Yemeni ballistic missile attack to
date | Jane’s October 12, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – The Eurasian way of Erdogan October 12, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – Madness Day October 12, 2016
T-14: the structure of the secret Russian tank October 12, 2016
U.S. threatens retaliation for missile attack off Yemen | Military Times
October 12, 2016
Briefly on Syria | Colonel Cassad October 12, 2016
Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS
October 12, 2016
Meet The Inmate Who Launched A Massive Prison Strike From His Jail
Cell | Attack the System October 11, 2016
Yemenis target US destroyer, fire ballistic missiles into Saudi Arabia
October 11, 2016
Sunni commander: Turkey won’t take part in Mosul battle October 11, 2016
Turkish business | Colonel Cassad October 11, 2016
When the mountains were red October 11, 2016
Key Neocon Calls on US to Oust Putin | Robert Parry October 11, 2016
We Need to deal with “the sixth column” | Alexander Dugin October 9,
2016
Briefly on Syria | Colonel Cassad October 9, 2016
The Assault On Sirte 4 months later | Colonel Cassad October 9, 2016
Main Syrian “rebel” group pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda October 9, 2016
How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists | Alastair Crooke October 9, 2016
Admiral Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier Is in Final Preparation for Combat Task
in Syria (Photos) — Southfront October 9, 2016
Playlist: The Melody Of Our Alienation (Yemen). October 9, 2016
The Situation in the DPR and the LPR October 9, 2016
Russia builds up forces in Syria, Reuters data analysis shows October 9,
2016
Wahabists, Salafists and ISIS October 8, 2016
The Assault On Aleppo. 08.10.2016 | Colonel Cassad October 8, 2016
Strange mise en scène | Colonel Cassad October 8, 2016
The offensive in Hama | Colonel Cassad October 8, 2016
Russia Nuclear Iskander missile systems in Kaliningrad October 8, 2016
Them Lot: “Actually, Blumenthal is an Agent of Imperialism” October 8,
2016
Russian S-300 systems deployed in Syria after leaks on possible strike at
aerodromes | TASS October 8, 2016
Turkey Rejects Demand to Withdraw Troops as Iraq Warns of Regional
War October 8, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – The birthday of Vladimir Putin October 8, 2016
This Right that Doesn’t Care for its People | Alain de Benoist October 7,
2016
The Tactical Situation Around the Siege of Aleppo October 7, 2016
Chinese navy Type 054 frigate “Ma’anshan” sudden appearance in #Tartus
#Syria October 7, 2016
The Orgy of freedom and democracy in Idlib | Colonel Cassad October 7,
2016
Free | Colonel Cassad October 7, 2016
The Proposal By De Mistura | Colonel Cassad October 7, 2016
Excerpts of Hillary Clinton’s Paid Speeches to Goldman Sachs Finally
Leaked October 7, 2016
Putin Has Given the United States an Ultimatum October 7, 2016
Counter-Hegemony in the Theory of the Multipolar World | Alexander
Dugin October 7, 2016
Russian MoD warns US-led coalition not to strike Syrian army October 7,
2016
President al-Assad: We won’t accept that terrorists will take control of any
part of Syria October 7, 2016
Audio Reveals What John Kerry Told Syrians Behind Closed Doors | NYT
October 7, 2016
Donald Trump and Empire: An Assessment October 7, 2016
US says Turkish army ‘on its own’ in Iraq as Baghdad calls UNSC meeting
October 7, 2016
The “Syrian Express” | Colonel Cassad October 7, 2016
Turkish F16 Fighter Jet Downed by PKK in IRAQ October 7, 2016
DAESH declares war on Kittens (No, really) October 7, 2016
The battle for Aleppo. 06.10.2016 | Colonel Cassad October 7, 2016
The concentration of forces | Colonel Cassad October 7, 2016
HSV-2 Swift after attack | Colonel Cassad October 6, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – Suffragism and Feminism October 6, 2016
Germany is planning to impose new sanctions against Russia over Syria
October 6, 2016
Escalation | Colonel Cassad October 4, 2016
Toward a Fourth Economic & Environmental Policy October 4, 2016
The Ideological Platform of the Eurasian Movement October 4, 2016
The mistrust between Washington and Moscow portends a long war
October 4, 2016
Russia in Syria: Stages of geopolitical victory October 4, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – A Black date in Russian history October 4, 2016
The battle for Aleppo. 04.10.2016 | Colonel Cassad October 4, 2016
WikiLeaks October Surprise October 4, 2016
Obama DOJ drops charges against alleged provider of Libyan weapons
October 4, 2016
Yemen’s Shiite Huthi rebels form rival government October 4, 2016
Russia sends S-300 missile system to Syria port October 4, 2016
Delete Your Yahoo Account NOW October 4, 2016
The West has always sought Russia’s destruction — The Duran October 4,
2016
U.S. fails to fulfill key condition of deal with Russia on Syria October 4,
2016
An election between survival and a Molotov-cocktail | Dedefensa.org
October 4, 2016
US Warned Against Targeting Syria Army October 4, 2016
The successes of the government forces in the North of Aleppo | Chervonec
October 4, 2016
Inside the Shadowy PR Firm That’s Lobbying for Regime Change in Syria |
Max Blumethal October 4, 2016
152-mm gun for the T-14: actuality and perspectives October 4, 2016
Taliban Fighters Penetrate Heart of Afghan City of Kunduz | WSJ October
4, 2016
ISIS Chief Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi ‘Poisoned’ in Iraq October 4, 2016
Solzhenitsyn: “not through me” October 4, 2016
Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick BAHZAD October 2, 2016
Russian Gun Porn October 2, 2016
Al-Kindi Hospital liberated | Colonel Cassad October 2, 2016
The Assault On Aleppo 02.10.2016 | Colonel Cassad October 2, 2016
Welcome to Donbass | VIDEO October 1, 2016
1 Year of the war in Syria | ALEXANDER DUGIN October 1, 2016
“Rooks” for Syria | Colonel Cassad October 1, 2016
The Assault On Aleppo. 30.09.2016 | Colonel Cassad October 1, 2016
1 Year of the war in Syria | Colonel Cassad October 1, 2016
The “basket of deplorables” and the politics of indignation | PODCAST |
VIDEO September 30, 2016
Dugin’s Guideline – Liberalism dies September 30, 2016
Indian Troops Cross Kashmir Line-of-Control, Attack Pakistani Troops |
Antiwar.com September 29, 2016
“The experience of actual combat is simply priceless” September 29, 2016
Three options | Colonel Cassad September 29, 2016
American Threats | Colonel Cassad September 29, 2016
MH17 REPORT September 29, 2016
The battle for Aleppo. 28.09.2016 | UPDATED | Colonel Cassad September
29, 2016
About the Russian operation in Syria | BMPD September 28, 2016
Syrian government launches Aleppo ground attack September 28, 2016
Full text of us-Russian agreements on Syria | Colonel Cassad September 28,
2016
The results of the debate between Trump and Clinton | ALEXANDER
DUGIN September 28, 2016
North Korea has officially completed the development of nuclear weapons |
Colonel Cassad September 28, 2016
‘US knows weapons sent to Syrian rebels end up with terrorists’ – German
journo to RT September 28, 2016
Prominent Scholars Urge UN to Condemn Suspension of Sheikh Qassim’s
Citizenship September 27, 2016
Archives
Archives Select Month
News
Alexander Dugin on Twitter
Dedefensa.org
Alexander Dugin on VK
Mediarepost.ru
Antifashist.com
Cassad.net
CBBSS
Conflict report
colonelcassad.livejournal.com
Conflict news
Censor.net
#EasternUkraine
Eurasia
Eurasian Youth Union
Eurasian News Fairway
El Murid
Espionage history archive
Fort Russ
Here and Now
Imperiya
Interfax
Interfax Ukraine
International Eurasian movement
IOUC
Irrussianality
Jamestown EDM
Johnson’s Russia List
Journalitico
Kiev Ukraine News
The Kremlin Stooge
Milnewsca
naspravdi.info
New Cold War
The New Gathering Storm
New Russia Press
News Front
Novorossia-News
Novorossia-Novosti
Novorossia.su
Novorossia Today
Novorossia Vision
Od-novorossia
Odessa talk
Offguardian.org
Oriental Review
Pravda
Pravoslavnabraca
Red Star over Donbass
RBTH
RIA Novosti
RT
RIAC
The Russian Force
Russia Direct
Russia Insider
Russia other points of view
Russian Universe
rusvesna.su/
The Saker
South Front
Sputnik
slavyangrad.org/
uaposition
US-Russia.org
Ukraine antifascist solidarity
Ukraine at war
Ukraine Gov
Ukraine War info
Ukr-online
ukraina.ru
UTR
Voice of Sevastopol
wartime.org.ua
War in Ukraine in english
Yurasumy
ABYZ News Links
EMM: Russia
EMM: Ukraine
News Now
Militarymaps.info
Lostarmour.info
Mil.ru
arms-expo.ru
topwar.ru
vpk-news.ru
twower.livejournal.com
militarynews.ru
nvo.ng.ru
militaryparitet.com
narod-novosti.com
novorosinform.org
dnr24.su
eng.mil.ru
kremlin.ru
segodnia.ru
vpk.name
warfiles.ru
military-informant.com
eurasian-defence.ru
redstar.ru
anna-news.info
news-mail.by/
bmpd.livejournal.com
brezjnev
mother-russia.org
imp-navigator.livejournal.com
frontinfo.info/
warsonline.info
DNI news
Podcasts
Antiwar Radio/Scott Horton
RSS
Background Briefing
RSS
Bloggingheads
RSS
Carnegie Council
RSS
Covert Contact
RSS
Democracy Now
RSS
The Diplomat
RSS
From Alpha to Omega
RSS
ISN Podcast
RSS
John Batchelor Show
RSS
Lawfare
RSS
The Loopcast
RSS
Middle East Week
RSS
Midrats
RSS
Sean’s Russia Blog
RSS
The Shortwave Report
RSS
Turkey Wonk
RSS
War on the Rocks
RSS
The War Report
RSS
The World Next Week
RSS
Follow Blog via Email
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new
posts by email.

Join 87 other followers

Enter your email address

Follow

Follow The Fourth Revolutionary War on WordPress.com

RSS - Posts
RSS - Comments
Top Posts & Pages
Why Libertarians will never make a
revolution
White Genocide HAPPY MEAL
DEATH TO TRUTHERISM
In Honor of Aleksey Mozgovoy
Alexander Dugin: The Fourth Political
Theory
Alexander Dugin: Putin vs Putin
Alexander Dugin: Eurasian Mission: An
Introduction to Neo-Eurasianism
Alexander Dugin in English
The Gnostic
The Knight Templars of the Proletariat
The Hand is Stretching for the Holster…
Great War of Continents
EURASIA MANIFESTO
ARCTOGAIA MANIFESTO
THESIS ON NBP
Guy Debord Is dead
The blind flutist AZATHOTH
5 Theses
Just Bolshevism
We are going to cure you with poison
Metaphysical Roots of ideology
“Empire”: a global threat
The metaphysics of national-bolshevism
The Man with the falcon beak
On the Threshold of Liberty
Subject without confines
Terror against the Demiurge
Carthage must be destroyed
Because we love you, Revolution!
Satan and the problem of precedence
Death as a language
The Paradigm of The END
Star of an Invisible Empire
The magic disillusion of a Nationalist Intellectual
When Everybody Has Gone
National-bolshevism or NOTHINGNESS
Ideology of the World Government
Lyapunov’s Time
On Ernst Junger
ORION, or the Heroes’ Conspiracy
Katehon
Media Repost
4PT.SU
Antiwar.com
The Scott Horton Show
Tags
4PT 4th Mechanized Division 5.45mm 911 2016 Afghanistan Ahrar al-Sham
AK-74M Akira AKP Al-Nusra Al-Qaeda Alain de Benoist Alawi
Aleppo Alexander Dugin Alexandr Bovdunov ALT RIGHT
America American Politics Anarchism Antichrist Apocalypse Armata
Armenia Asala wa-al-Tanmiya Assad Assange Assassination Athos
Atlanticism Austria Authenticity and Development Front Azerbaijan
Bahrain Balkans Benghazi Black Nationalism Black Sea Blog Rules BND Borg
Breedlove Brexit Britian Bundy Byzantine Canada Castello Road Catalan
Catalan Republic Cathars Chapo Trap House Chechens China Christianity
CIA Clinton Col Cassad Comments Communism Conspiracy coup
Crimea Daesh Deir Ez Zour Deir Ez Zour revolutionary association
Democracy DNC DNC hack DNR Donbass Donetsk Drone Druze Dugin
Dugin’s Guideline EEU Egypt Erdogan EU euphrates
shield Eurasianism Europe Fallujah Fascism FBI France Freemasonry
FSA FSB GCC Genocide geopolitics Germany Gladio Glenn Beck
Gnosticism Gothic Russian Socialism GRU Gulen Hackers Hama Hamedan
Airbase HDP Hersh Hezbollah Hillary Hillary Monster Hillatoad
Homs Houthi Houthis HPG Ibn Taymiyyah Idlib Incirlik India Insane Intelligence

Iran Iraq ISIS Iskander Islam Islamophobia Ismailis Israel Jabhat al-
Nusra Jabhat Asala Wal-Tanmiya Jabhat Fateh al-sham Jarablus John
Kerry Jordan JSOC Julius Evola Jund al-aqsa KA-52 Kafala Kalashnikovs
Kalibr Karabakh Kazakhstan KDP KDPI Khanasser KRG Kurdistan

Kurds Kuwait Kuwaries Latakia Left Liberalism Libya Manbij Maps

Marxism McGnostics Metaphysics MH17 Mi-8 Mi-24 Mi-28 MI-35M Micah X
Militia MIT MKP MLKP MLRS Moderates Moskva Mosul Mozgovoy
multiculturalism Nagorno Nationalism NATO Nazi Nazism Neo-Nazism
Neocons New Right news New Syrian Army North Korea Nour al-Din
al-Zenki Novorossiya Nuclear war Nurreddin Zengi Brigade Obama
Occitania Oil OPEC Oregon Orthodoxy Pakistan Palmyra Paris PBS Persia

Peshmerga PKK PMC Podesta Group Police State Politics Poroshenko

Postmodernism Prussia Putin Putin Trump Conspiracy SITREP PYD
Qatar Racism Radical Subject Ramadi Raqqa Rene Guenon Republicans
Retarded Revolution Right sector Rojava Russia Russian Navy S-
300 S-400 S-500 SAA Sanctions Sarajevo Sarin Satanism Saudi Arabia SBS
SDF Shia Siberia Sinjar Sirte Spain Special Forces Spetsnaz Srebrenica
Strategy Su-24 Su-25SM SU-34 SVR Syria T-14 T-72 T-90 Tabqa
Taliban Tanks Ted Cruz Terror Thermobaric THKP-C/MLSPB Tiger Force
TIKB TKEP-LENINIST TKP/ML TOS-1 Totalitarianism TOW tra Traditionalism
Transhumanism Trump Trumpocalypse Truthers TSK TU-22 TU-22m3

Turkey Twelvers UAE Ukraine UN Unicorns

TU-95 Tu-160

United States UNSC USA USSR Wahhabis Wikileaks World

War III Yarosh Yazidis Yemen Ypg YPJ YPS Yugoslavia
Recent Comments
How the US Armed-up… on How the US Armed-up Syrian Jih…
mohandeer on How the US Armed-up Syrian Jih…
The War in Syria… on Russian warplanes bomb elite B…
nonothai on Turkish F16 Fighter Jet Downed…
L’homme qui parlait… on Bookchin-Öcalan correspondence…
SHOWDOWN IN ALEPPO |… on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
Showdown in Aleppo |… on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
mohandeer on Showdown in Aleppo | Patrick B…
mohandeer on Al-Kindi Hospital liberated |…
Al-Kindi Hospital li… on Al-Kindi Hospital liberated |…
Akira Kalashnikov on Death to Trutherism! | Akira
nwouniversity on Death to Trutherism! | Akira
mohandeer on Prominent Scholars Urge UN to…
Prominent Scholars U… on Prominent Scholars Urge UN to…
Todenhöfer: Intervie… on Todenhöfer: Interview With Al-…
Blog at WordPress.com.
%d bloggers like this: