Denis Ksenofontov

От: Gustavo Alonso Martinez <Gustavo.Alonso.Martinez@aero.bombardier.com>

Отправлено: 28 мая 2018 г. 19:44
Кому: d.ksenofontov@rusline.aero
Копия: ?????? ???????; Alexander Rapoport
Тема: RE: STBY altimeter issue

Ref: ADR # SPEL‐18‐1433080 
Subject: STBY altimeter split 
MSN: CRJ200 
 
Dear Denis Ksenofontov,  
 
The pneumatic standby altitude and airspeed indicator does not have a Static Source Error Correction (SSEC) as the 
ADC or aircraft equipped with an Integrated Standby Instrument (ISI) have.  
 
Since the Standby Altitude/Airspeed indicator does not have the SSEC to make correction to the pressure altitude 
caused by aerodynamic effects at the static port, the split in altitude indication when compared to the ADC 
indication may be expected.  
 
The functional check per AMM task 34‐12‐01‐720‐803 ‐ Functional Check of the Standby Airspeed/Altimeter 
Indicator (Accuracy Test) that you refer in your email checks for the accuracy of the instrument itself and the S3/P3 
lines for leaks and condition, the functional test does not simulate the aerodynamic effects that are encountered in 
flight, this may explain why the instrument shows the split during flight but not during the functional test.  
 
The AFM section 06‐01‐13 “Altitude Position Error Correction – Standby Indicator, FLAPS 0” provides a table that 
shows the altitude error correction for a flaps 0 configuration. It gives an example that shows that the error 
correction given by the table should be extracted from the indicated altitude in order to get the true pressure 
altitude.  
 

1
  
 
 
The picture attached to your request shows that the standby altitude indicated was 35400 ft with an standby 
airspeed indicated at 265 kts.  
According to the table in figure 06‐01‐7 in the referenced AFM, the error correction should be around ‐350 ft for this 
indicated altitude (35400 – 350 = 35050 ft). 
 
With this information we will proceed to close the referenced ADR, however if you need additional details please let 
us know.  
 
Best regards,  
 
Gustavo Alonso
CRJ - In Service Engineering, Avionics
Customer Services
Bombardier Commercial Aircraft
gustavo.alonso.martinez@aero.bombardier.com

www.iflybombardier.com

Tel. 1-514-855-5001 Ext. 27131

Mobile 1-438-990-6249

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ‐ This communication may contain privileged or confidential information. 
If you are not the intended recipient or received this communication by error, please notify the sender 
and delete the message without copying, forwarding and/or disclosing it. 
 
From: d.ksenofontov@rusline.aero  
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 12:43 AM 
To: RJ Action <thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com> 
Cc: ?????? ??????? <a.belkin@rusline.aero>; Alexander Rapoport <Alexander.Rapoport@aero.bombardier.com> 
Subject: Fwd: STBY altimeter issue 
2
Dear THD,

Would you, please, provide us some information about the following issue?

All stby altimeters on our aircraft indicate cruise altitude higher than on PFD. This difference
usually reaches 300-400 feet, i.e. on PFD we have alt 35000' but on stby altimeter it usually
varies between 35200...35400 and slowly oscillates during the flight. The picture below
shows altitude 35400...

3
 F PERFORMANCE
General
06−01−13
Rev. 66, Apr 22/2016

F. Altitude Position Error Correction – Standby Indicator, FLAPS 0

Figure 06−01−7 provides the altitude position error correction for a FLAPS 0
configuration, for varying conditions of indicated airspeed and indicated pressure altitude, for
the standby altimeter.
Example:
Indicated Airspeed (IAS) = 260 KIAS
Indicated altitude (HI) = 30000 feet
Position correction (DH) = −200 feet
True pressure altitude (HP) = HI + DH
= 30000 + (−200)
= 29800 feet

Airplane Flight Manual

DOT Approved
CSP A−012−099
PAGE PRINTED ON 5-29-2018
F PERFORMANCE
General
06−01−14
Rev. 66, Apr 22/2016

Altitude Position Error Correction – Standby Indicator, FLAPS 0

Figure 06−01−7

Airplane Flight Manual

DOT Approved
CSP A−012−099
PAGE PRINTED ON 5-29-2018