Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author's Accepted Manuscript: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.027
Author's Accepted Manuscript: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.027
www.elsevier.com/nanoenergy
PII: S2211-2855(15)00243-8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.027
Reference: NANOEN859
Cite this article as: Zhou Yang, Bing Cai, Bin Zhou, Tingting Yao, Wei Yu, Frank S.
Liu, Wen-Hua Zhang, Can Li, An up-scalable approach to CH3NH3PbI3 compact
Films for High-performance perovskite solar cells, Nano Energy, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.027
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting
galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during
the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content,
and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
An Up-Scalable Approach to CH3NH3PbI3 Compact Films for
Zhou Yanga †, Bing Cai a, b †, Bin Zhou a, Tingting Yao a, Wei Yu a, Frank S. Liu a, c,
Wen-Hua Zhang a * and Can Li a *
a. State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy
of Sciences
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian 116023, China
b. Carbon Research Laboratory, Liaoning Key Lab for Energy Materials and Chemical
Engineering, State Key Lab of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian116024,China
c. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062,
China
1
Abstract
In this work, we describe an up-scalable, two step approach to prepare CH3NH3PbI3
perovskite films with high quality and exceptional uniformity at centimeter-scale (5.0 cm ×
5.0 cm). The resulting solar cells achieve efficiency up to 16% with an average efficiency of
14.3% for small-area devices. Remarkably, devices with size of 1.0 cm ×1.0 cm made on the
5.0 cm × 5.0 cm perovskite films display a very impressive efficiency up to 12.6% with an
average efficiency of 10.9% (for 48 devices), which is significantly superior to previous
reports (< 9.0% efficiency) with centimeter-sized devices. The present approach combines
the advantages of the short reaction time, facile fabrication, exceptional uniformity, good
reproducibility, high device performance and up-scalability, enabling it the potential ability in
large-scale photovoltaic applications.
Graphic abstract
Research highlight
1. A facile, simple and effective way (DCIP) has been developed to fabricate high-quality ,
compact perovskite film.
2. The perovskite film obtained shows exceptional uniformity at size of 5.0 cm ×5.0 cm.
3. The device with active size of 1 cm ×1 cm made from 5.0 cm ×5.0 cm perovskite films can
achieve efficiency as high as 12.6% with an average efficiency of 10.9%.
Keywords
2
Introduction
Organolead halide perovskites (CH3NH3PbX3, X=Br, I) solar cells have recently attracted
dramatic attention due to their high efficiency, cost-effective fabrication, and sufficient
supply of raw materials [1-13]. A prominent feature of perovskite solar cells is that they work
very well in various configurations. For instance, both sensitized devices consisting of TiO2
nanostructures [1, 2, 9, 10, 14, 15] and p-i-n type cells in the forms of Al2O3 supported
meso-superstructure [16, 17], planar heterojunction structures [18, 19] and normal organic
solar cell architecture [20-23] displayed excellent photovoltaic performance. Additionally,
solar cells directly based on the heterojunction of perovskites and n-type semiconductors
have also achieved significant efficiency (> 10%) [24, 25]. Among them, the planar
heterojunction devices (i. e., perovskite film solar cells, the same designation hereafter) are
especially interesting because of their simplified fabrication without using of the oxide
nanostructures and their ability in yielding very high efficiency [18, 19, 26].
To date, a variety of strategies have been exploited to deposit the organolead halide
perovskites for photovoltaic study. One-step spin-coating is a simple way to prepare
perovskite solar cells, while its reproducibility is relatively poor, and the corresponding
device performance is not very high [1, 2, 6, 7, 9-13]. Only coupled with solvent engineering,
can this method produce cells with competitive efficiency [27, 28]. A two-step, solution
sequential deposition was exploited to make perovskite sensitized solar cells with high
efficiency in a reproducible way [29], while it is limited in controlling film thickness and
uniformity that is imperative for perovskite film solar cells. Vacuum co-evaporation of two
precursors (PbCl2 and CH3NH3I) exhibits the ability to generate perovskite films with high
coverage and uniformity, resulting in perovskite film photovoltaic devices with efficiency as
high as 15.4% [18, 19]. However, the vacuum deposition will significantly increase the cost
of large-scale fabrication. It is apparent that a deposition without vacuum technique should be
advantageous for cost-effective perovskite photovoltaics. Combining the advantages of the
two-step solution deposition and vapour evaporation of perovskites, vapour-assisted solution
process (VASP) affords CH3NH3PbI3 films with high uniformity [30, 31], leading to planar
device delivering a power conversion efficiency (PCE or η) up to 12.1%. The VASP was
recently modified to fabricate CH3NH3PbI3 segments within mesoporous TiO2 in a closed
container, resulting in HTM-free solar cells with ~10% efficiency high reproducibility [32].
3
To make perovskite solar cells viable, it is highly necessary to develop the fabrication
process compatible for large-scale production of perovskite films with excellent film
properties. However, this is a big challenge and very few reports have been documented on
the scaling up of perovskite films and solar cells. Ultra-sonic spray-coating has recently been
implemented for preparation of CH3NH3PbI3-xClx films, resulting in planar-structured devices
with the highest efficiency of 11.1% for the 0.025 cm2 cells [33]. Bolink et al. have fabricated
CH3NH3PbI3-based cells by high-vacuum sublimation, giving rise to devices with highest
efficiency of 12% for 0.09 cm2 cells and 8.27% for the 0.98 cm2 cells [20]. Yoon et al. have
made perovskite film photovoltaic devices by solution deposition coupled with solvent
engineering and LiF insertion. Their CH3NH3PbI3 films were extremely smooth and their
cells achieved the remarkably high efficiency up to 14.1% for 0.04 cm2 device, while the
10-cells serially connected module (with substrate area of 10 cm × 10 cm) shows the highest
PCE of 8.7% [34]. It is notable that the above studies of the scalable perovskite solar cells are
all made in normal organic cell architectures. Qi et al [35] have recently modified the vacuum
vapor deposition of CH3NH3PbI3-xClx for fabrication of semi-transparent CH3NH3PbI3-xClx
films with centimeter-scale superior uniformity (5.0 cm × 5.0 cm). Efficiency up to 9.9% was
obtained for the devices with size of 0.05 cm2 in inorganic thin film configuration (namely,
TCO/TiO2/perovskite film/spiro-MeOTAD/Au). It is well-known that solar cells with smaller
size usually show higher efficiency. Therefore, it is highly desirable to explore the possibility
to fabricate perovskite solar cell devices with centimeter sizes on relative large-area
perovskite films (e. g., 5.0 cm × 5.0 cm) with high-efficiency for future large-scale adoption
of perovskite photovoltaics.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the direct contact and intercalation process (DCIP) for growth of
CH3NH3PbI3 compact film.
4
In this work, we exploit a simple, but efficient two-step approach to the growth of
CH3NH3PbI3 compact films with superior uniformity at centimeter-scale for high efficiency
perovskite film solar cells in inorganic film configuration. This process was developed on the
basis of the two-step VASP but incorporated with important modification for fabrication of
5.0 cm × 5.0 cm perovskite films [30, 31]. The preformed PbI2 films on substrate was directly
put onto the CH3NH3I layer with unintentionally controlled thickness, leading to the
CH3NH3PbI3 compact films after intercalation reaction at 150 oC in a closed container. We
hence designate this hybrid approach as direct contact and intercalation process (DCIP). The
CH3NH3PbI3 films formed via DCIP are characteristic of large grain size, small surface
roughness, complete surface coverage and high reproducibility, catering for the requirement
for high-efficiency perovskite film solar cells with centimeter-scale. The photovoltaic devices
made of such films achieved PCEs as high as 16.0% with an average value of 14.3%.
Moreover, the DCIP processed perovskite films show exceptional uniformity at
centimeter-scale (5.0 cm × 5.0 cm). The devices with active size of 1.00 cm2 made from 5.0
cm × 5.0 cm perovskite films show the highest efficiency of 12.6% and an average efficiency
of 10.9% (for 48 devices), which are the record efficiency for perovskite solar cells with
similar active size, demonstrating the up-scalability of present approach to perovskite film
solar cells.
Experiment section
Device fabrication
Fabrication of TiO2 blocking layer: A compact layer of TiO2 block layer (bl-TiO2) was
deposited on FTO glass by DC magnetron sputter, using Ar as working gas and O2 as
reacting gas. The volume ratio of Ar/O2 is 1/0.15. The resulting TiO2 coated FTO was
annealed in air at 500 oC for 1h.
5
Growth of CH3NH3PbI3 films via DCIP: 200 nm thick PbI2 film was first prepared by
spin-coating of 0.462 g/ml PbI2/ DMF solution onto bl-TiO2 coated FTO at 3000 rpm,
followed by annealing for 15 min on a 70 °C hotplate. A flat CH3NH3I powder layer was
spread onto the bottom of a metal container pre-heated at 150 oC, onto which the PbI2 film
was directly flipped. The intercalation reaction was performed for specific durations (2.5, 5.0,
7.5, 10.0, 12.5, 15, 20 and 30 min, respectively) for transition of PbI2 to CH3NH3PbI3 in a
closed container (Scheme 1, Figure S1). After cooled down to room temperature, the
CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite film was washed with isopropyl alcohol and dried by N2, and
CH3NH3PbI3 film with ~360 nm thickness can be obtained if the reaction was lasted over
beyond 30 min.
PbI2 films with ~200 nm thickness were first spinning-coated onto the compact TiO2
block layer/FTO substrate, followed by directly flipping onto the top of the preheated
CH3NH3I films. The intercalation reaction was proceeded at 150 oC within 30min under
nitrogen atmosphere. The transition process from PbI2 to CH3NH3PbI3 was monitored by
XRD (Figure 1a). The pristine PbI2 film shows strong diffraction peak at 12.6 o,
corresponding to the (001) lattice plane. After 7.5 min reaction, a series of new diffraction
peaks of the tetragonal CH3NH3PbI3 appeared, which was accompanied by reduction of the
peak intensity of the 12.6 o reflection of PbI2 within 12.5 min, meaning that the formation of
crystalline CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite is performed by consuming PbI2. In this stage, both PbI2
and CH3NH3PbI3 co-exist in the film, which was further confirmed by UV-Vis absorption (in
Figure 1b). When the reaction was lasted for above 15min, the intercalation reaction was
finished and pure CH3NH3PbI3 films with thickness of ~360 nm can be obtained. Both XRD
patterns and UV-vis absorption spectra were kept unchanged if further prolonging the
reaction to 20 and 30 min, showing that pure CH3NH3PbI3 can be obtained within 15~30 min
DCIP reaction. This is because of the fact that growth of CH3NH3PbI3 is proceeded by
intercalation of CH3NH3I into PbI2, and the reaction would be stopped if the PbI2 was
consumed up within ~ 15min. During the whole process of intercalation reaction, the color of
the film gradually changed from yellow to red-brown and finally to black as shown by
Figure S2.
7
Figure 1. Evolution of the perovskite films subject to DCIP with varied durations at 150 °C. (a) XRD patterns
and (b) UV-Vis absorption spectra.
9
Figure 2. (a) Plane-view SEM images of the CH3NH3PbI3 film, (b) AFM image of the same sample, (c)
Cross-section SEM image of the solar cells. The CH3NH3PbI3 film was made by DCIP for 15 min at 150 oC.
The as-prepared pure CH3NH3PbI3 films with ~360 nm thickness were subsequently
applied for film solar cells in configuration of FTO/TiO2 blocking layer/ CH3NH3PbI3/
spiro-MeOTAD/Au, where TiO2 blocking layer (bl-TiO2) works as hole blocking and
electron transport materials (ETM), CH3NH3PbI3 as light harvester, spiro-MeOTAD as hole
extraction and transporting materials (HTM). The plane-viewed SEM images (Figure 2a) of
the perovskite film employed for PV device present the large crystal sizes in the range of 300
nm to over 1 µm and complete surface coverage across the whole ranges. Atomic force
microscopy (AFM) of this sample reveals that the film formed through DCIP shows small
surface roughness of 27 nm (Figure 2b) in the ranges of 5.0 µm × 5.0 µm, which is
comparable to the films made via VASP. Cross-section SEM images of a complete
photovoltaic device in Figure 2c shows the planar architecture with very large perovskite
grains and uniform features in the vertical direction across the whole film, which is of
paramount importance to alleviate surface recombination when charge carriers transport
within the perovskite layer [30, 31], thus very favorable for improving device performance.
10
Figure 3. The characterization of photovoltaic performance for DCIP processed devices: (a) typical J-V curves
obtained from back scan and forward scan for the CH3NH3PbI3 film-formed solar cells with 15 min DCIP. Inset
in (a) shows the digital photograph of the typical devices. (b) Photocurrent density and PCE as a function of
time for the same cell hold at maximum power point, which was at 0.82V. (c) IPCE spectrum for this device. (d)
Power conversion efficiency statistics based on 80 devices. (e) J-V curve for the champion cells of them.
Current density (J)-voltage (V) measurements were performed under simulated AM 1.5G
(100 mW/cm2) to assess the photovoltaic performance of the present CH3NH3PbI3 film solar
cells. The typical J-V curves in Figure 3a were obtained in backward scan, showing short
circuit current density (Jsc) of 19.6 mA/cm2, open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.0 V, fill factor
(FF) of 74.7% and PCE of 14.7%. Perovskite solar cells often show an unusual hysteresis in
the J-V curves if they are measured in different scan modes, and this is especially prominent
11
for planar heterojunction cells in the architecture of inorganic film devices as studied in this
work [37-39]. The back scan usually leads to overestimation of the device efficiency while
forward scan results in underestimation of the efficiency. The real device performance thus
comprises the data obtained both in the back scan and forward scan [27, 40, 41]. We hence
further characterized it by sweeping the applied voltage in forward scan. The hysteresis was
indeed observed. The corresponding photovoltaic parameters obtained from the forward scan
were 19.6 mA/cm2 (JSC), 0.92V (VOC), 64.5% (FF) and 11.6% (PCE) for this cell. The
performance is apparently lower than that obtained from backward scan, which is in line with
the widely reported results. To check the performance of perovskite solar cell under work
condition, we tested the photocurrent density and the corresponding PCE under its maximum
power point at 0.82V, showing steady JSC of 16.7 mA/cm2 and PCE of 13.7% during 110 s
measurement (Figure 3b), demonstrating the high power output ability of this cell. Origin of
J-V hysteresis could be attributed to ferroelectric property, migration of ions, interfacial
defects, and even to electronic contacts in perovskite solar cells [38, 39, 41]. However, more
efforts should be dedicated to address its exact origin for adoption of perovskite
photovoltaics.
IPCE of this cell (in Figure 3c) shows that the onset of the photocurrent generation
occurred near 800 nm, and rose very quickly around 780 nm, which is consistent with the
1.55eV band gap of the CH3NH3PbI3. The IPCE reaches its peak value of 82.9% at ~480 nm
and keeps high level across the whole visible-light range. The integration of the measured
IPCE spectrum over the solar spectrum estimates a short-circuit current density of 19.1
mA/cm2, very close to that obtained from J-V measurement. To test the reliability of the
DCIP in fabricating perovskite film solar cells, 80 devices were fabricated, showing an
average efficiency of 14.3% with small deviation of ± 0.7% (Figure 3d, Table S1). The
champion cell presents an efficiency of 16.0 % along with JSC of 20.9 mA/cm2, VOC of 1.01 V,
and high FF of 75.7% (Figure 3e). These results demonstrate that DCIP is a highly
reproducible approach to fabricate CH3NH3PbI3 film solar cells with competitive
photovoltaic performance. This is understandable considering the fact that, as discussed
above, the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films made via DCIP exhibit very high quality,
characteristic of the large grain size, small surface roughness, complete surface coverage, and
pinhole-free. All these features are essential to increase photocurrent while reduce the charge
recombination across the grain boundaries and interface traps during charge transportation,
thus leading to high VOC and large FF [30, 31].
12
Figure 4. (a) Digital photograph
graph of the 36 sub-cells
sub with small gold electrode area (>0.12 cm2) made on the
5.0cm×5.0 cm substrate prepared via DCIP. (b) J-V curve for the champion cells based on these sub-cells. (c)
Statistical histograph of power conversion efficiency (SH-PCE)
(SH of them. (d) Digital photograph
graph of devices with
relative large gold electrode area (>1.02 cm2) made on the 5.0 cm×5.0 cm substrate. (e) J-V
V curve for the
champion cell of 1.00 cm2 devices measured in a back scan model.
model (f) SH-PCE based on 48 cells with 1.00 cm2
area. (g) Photocurrent density and PCE as a function of time for the same cell hold at maximum power point
(0.74V).
We then checked the uniformity of the perovskite films and its up-scalability
up scalability for
production of perovskite films made via DCIP. A CH3NH3PbI3 film with substrate size of 5.0
cm × 5.0 cm (Figure 4a) was prepared by DCIP, from which 36 sub-cells (active area 0.1134
cm2 determined by mask for each cell) were fabricated. The performance of 36 devices on the
same substrate is highly uniform, showing the highest PCE of 15.0% (shown in Figure 4b)
and an average PCE of 13.9% with a small deviation of ± 0.7% (Figure 4c and Table S1
S1).
These results in turn demonstrate the exceptional uniformity of the CH3NH3PbI3 film derived
from DCIP, endowing it with the potential in fabricating large-area
large area solar cells. We hence
prepared PV devices with relative large size of 1.00 cm2 from the 5.0 cm × 5.0 cm perovskite
13
films, showing an average PCE of 10.9% with a deviation of ±1.4% for 48 sub-cells (Figure
4d-f, Table S1). The champion cell shows PCE of 12.6% (with Jsc of 19.6 mA/cm2, Voc of
0.96V, and FF of 67.1% ) in back scan (Figure 4e) and stabilized efficient of 11.1% under its
maximum power point of 0.74V (Figure 4g). All these data are significantly higher than the
previous report (< 9% efficiency) on cells with relative large size (~1 cm2) [20]. Overall, VOC
and FF of the 1.00 cm2 devices are somewhat lower than that of the smaller ones due to the
relatively large series resistance and the decreased shunt resistance. This may be attributed to
the increased probability of the charge carrier recombination and charge traps during their
transport within the large-area perovskite films, ETMs and HTMs. Therefore, DCIP has the
potential ability to afford large-area perovskite films with high quality and exceptional
uniformity, catering for the requirement for large-scale fabrication of perovskite film solar
cells.
Conclusion
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support from Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
20873141) and the “Hundred Talents Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
14
Reference
[1] A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai, T. Miyasaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131 (2009)
6050-6051.
[2] H.S. Kim, C.R. Lee, J.H. Im, K.B. Lee, T. Moehl, A. Marchioro, S.J. Moon, R.
Humphry-Baker, J.H. Yum, J.E. Moser, M. Gratzel, N.G. Park, Sci. Rep., 2 (2012) 591.
[3] Z. Yang, W.-H. Zhang, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 35 (2014) 983-988.
[4] H.S. Kim, S.H. Im, N.G. Park, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014) 5615-5625.
[5] P. Gao, M. Gratzel, M.K. Nazeeruddin, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 2448-2463.
[6] G.E. Eperon, S.D. Stranks, C. Menelaou, M.B. Johnston, L.M. Herz, H.J. Snaith, Energ.
Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 982-988.
[7] F. Hao, C.C. Stoumpos, C. Duyen Hanh, R.P.H. Chang, M.G. Kanatzidis, Nat. Photonics,
8 (2014) 489-494.
[8] N.K. Noel, S.D. Stranks, A. Abate, C. Wehrenfennig, S. Guarnera, A.A. Haghighirad, A.
Sadhanala, G.E. Eperon, S.K. Pathak, M.B. Johnston, A. Petrozza, L.M. Herz, H.J.
Snaith, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 3061-3068.
[9] B. Cai, Y. Xing, Z. Yang, W.-H. Zhang, J. Qiu, Energ. Environ. Sci., 6 (2013) 1480-1485.
[10] J.H. Heo, S.H. Im, J.H. Noh, T.N. Mandal, C.-S. Lim, J.A. Chang, Y.H. Lee, H.-J. Kim,
A. Sarkar, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M. Graetzel, S.I. Seok, Nat. Photonics, 7 (2013) 487-492.
[11] P. Qin, S. Tanaka, S. Ito, N. Tetreault, K. Manabe, H. Nishino, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Gratzel, Nat. Commun., 5 (2014) 3384.
[12] J. Liu, Y.Z. Wu, C.J. Qin, X.D. Yang, T. Yasuda, A. Islam, K. Zhang, W.Q. Peng, W.
Chen, L.Y. Han, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 2963-2967.
[13] J.H. Heo, D.H. Song, S.H. Im, Adv. Mater., 26 (2014) 8179-8183.
[14] H.S. Kim, J.W. Lee, N. Yantara, P.P. Boix, S.A. Kulkarni, S. Mhaisalkar, M. Gratzel,
N.G. Park, Nano Lett., 13 (2013) 2412-2417.
[15] D. Zhong, B. Cai, X.L. Wang, Z. Yang, Y.D. Xing, S. Miao, W.H. Zhang, C. Li, Nano
Energy, 11 (2015) 409.
[16] M.M. Lee, J. Teuscher, T. Miyasaka, T.N. Murakami, H.J. Snaith, Science, 338 (2012)
643-647.
[17] J.M. Ball, M.M. Lee, A. Hey, H.J. Snaith, Energ. Environ. Sci., 6 (2013) 1739-1743.
[18] M.Z. Liu, M.B. Johnston, H.J. Snaith, Nature, 501 (2013) 395-398.
[19] C.W. Chen, H.W. Kang, S.Y. Hsiao, P.F. Yang, K.M. Chiang, H.W. Lin, Adv. Mater.,
26 (2014) 6647-6652.
[20] O. Malinkiewicz, A. Yella, Y.H. Lee, G.M. Espallargas, M. Graetzel, M.K.
Nazeeruddin, H.J. Bolink, Nat. Photonics, 8 (2014) 128-132.
[21] P.W. Liang, C.Y. Liao, C.C. Chueh, F. Zuo, S.T. Williams, X.K. Xin, J.J. Lin, A.K.Y.
Jen, Adv. Mater., 26 (2014) 3748-3754.
[22] F. Zuo, S.T. Williams, P.W. Liang, C.C. Chueh, C.Y. Liao, A.K.Y. Jen, Adv. Mater., 26
(2014) 6454-6460.
[23] S.Y. Sun, T. Salim, N. Mathews, M. Duchamp, C. Boothroyd, G.C. Xing, T.C. Sum,
Y.M. Lam, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 399-407.
[24] L. Etgar, P. Gao, Z.S. Xue, Q. Peng, A.K. Chandiran, B. Liu, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Gratzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134 (2012) 17396-17399.
15
[25] A.Y. Mei, X. Li, L.F. Liu, Z.L. Ku, T.F. Liu, Y.G. Rong, M. Xu, M. Hu, J.Z. Chen, Y.
Yang, M. Gratzel, H.W. Han, Science, 345 (2014) 295-298.
[26] H.P. Zhou, Q. Chen, G. Li, S. Luo, T.B. Song, H.S. Duan, Z.R. Hong, J.B. You, Y.S.
Liu, Y. Yang, Science, 345 (2014) 542-546.
[27] N.J. Jeon, J.H. Noh, Y.C. Kim, W.S. Yang, S. Ryu, S. I. Seol, Nat. Mater., 13 (2014)
897-903.
[28] M.D. Xiao, F.Z. Huang, W.C. Huang, Y. Dkhissi, Y. Zhu, J. Etheridge, A. Gray-Weale,
U. Bach, Y.B. Cheng, L. Spiccia, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 53 (2014) 9898-9903.
[29] J. Burschka, N. Pellet, S.J. Moon, R. Humphry-Baker, P. Gao, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Gratzel, Nature, 499 (2013) 316-319.
[30] Q. Chen, H.P. Zhou, Z.R. Hong, S. Luo, H.S. Duan, H.H. Wang, Y.S. Liu, G. Li, Y.
Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136 (2014) 622-625.
[31] Q. Chen, H.P. Zhou, T.B. Song, S. Luo, Z.R. Hong, H.S. Duan, L.T. Dou, Y.S. Liu, Y.
Yang, Nano Lett., 14 (2014) 4158-4163.
[32] F. Hao, C.C. Stoumpos, R.P.H. Chang, M.G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136 (2014)
8094-8099.
[33] A.T. Barrows, A.J. Pearson, C.K. Kwak, A.D.F. Dunbar, A.R. Buckley, D.G. Lidzey,
Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 2944-2950.
[34] J. Seo, S. Park, Y.C. Kim, N.J. Jeon, J.H. Noh, S.C. Yoon, S.I. Sang, Energ. Environ.
Sci., 7 (2014) 2642-2646.
[35] L.K. Ono, S.H. Wang, Y. Kato, S.R. Raga, Y.B. Qi, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014)
3989-3993.
[36] Z.G. Xiao, C. Bi, Y.C. Shao, Q.F. Dong, Q. Wang, Y.B. Yuan, C.G. Wang, Y.L. Gao,
J.S. Huang, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 2619-2623.
[37] H.-W. Chen, N. Sakai, M. Ikegami, T. Miyasaka, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6 (2015)
164-169.
[38] H.J. Snaith, A. Abate, J.M. Ball, G.E. Eperon, T. Leijtens, N.K. Noel, S.D. Stranks,
J.T.W. Wang, K. Wojciechowski, W. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5 (2014) 1511-1515.
[39] E.L. Unger, E.T. Hoke, C.D. Bailie, W.H. Nguyen, A.R. Bowring, T. Heumuller, M.G.
Christoforo, M.D. McGehee, Energ. Environ. Sci., 7 (2014) 3690-3698.
[40] N.J. Jeon, J.H. Noh, W.S. Yang, Y.C. Kim, S. Ryu, J. Seo, S.I. Seok, Nature, 517 (2015)
476-480.
[41] Z. Xiao, Y. Yuan, Y. Shao, Q. Wang, Q. Dong, C. Bi, P. Sharma, A. Gruverman, J.
Huang, Nat. Mater., 14 (2015) 193-198.
16
Authors’ information
Zhou Yang received his Bachelor’s degree in Physics from Hebei Normal
University in 2007, and Ph. D. in Condensed Matter Physics from
University of Science and Technology of China in 2012 supervised by Prof.
Xiaoliang Xu. He is currently a postdoc working with Prof.
Prof. Can Li and Prof.
Wen-Hua
Hua Zhang at Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS. His research
mainly focuses on the third generation solar cell, including quantum dot
sensitized solar cell, perovskite solar cell.
17
Shengzhong (Frank) Liu received his Ph.D. degree from Northwestern
University (Evanston, Illinois, USA) in 1992. Upon his postdoctoral research
at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, Illinois, USA), he joined
high-tech
tech companies in US for research including nanoscale material
materials, thin
film solar cells, laser processing, diamond thin films, etc. His invention at
BP Solar in semi
semi-transparent
transparent photovoltaic module won R&D 100 award in
2002. In 2011, he was selected into China’s top talent recruitment program and now he is a
professor at Shaanxi Normal University and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences.
Research highlight
1. A facile, simple and effective way (DCIP) has been developed to fabricate high-quality
high ,
compact perovskite film.
2. The perovskite film obtained shows exceptional uniformity at size of 5.0 cm ×5.0 cm.
3. The device with active size of 1 cm ×1 cm made from 5.0 cm ×5.0 cm perovskite films can
achieve efficiency as high as 12.6% with an average efficiency of 10.9%.
18