Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TANK FOUNDATION Calculation
TANK FOUNDATION Calculation
VAPORIZER FOUNDATION
REV. 1
Prepared by: Checked by:
Rocky C. Malicse R.C.M.
Senior Structural Engineer Lead Civil/Structural Engineer
Date: 25 Sept. 2019
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
A. DESIGN CRITERIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This specification list the design criteria used while performing calculations for the design
of Liquid Storage Tank Foundation, Vaporizer units Foundation and Fire Wall.
Briefly described herein are the design approach adopted, various codes used,
materials properties, loads and soil properties. This criterion complies with all relevant
Intenational Code and Standard.
1.3 MATERIALS
1.3.1 Concrete:
Concrete cylinder compressive strength at 28 days shall be, f'c = 28 Mpa.
for concrete pavement and f'c = 17 Mpa for blinding concrete.
1.3.2 Cement:
Portland cement shall conform to ASTM C150. Sulphate resistant cement Type V shall
be used for concrete pavement.
1.3.3 Reinforcing Steel Bars:
All reinforcing steel bars shall conform to ASTM A615M grade 60 deformed bars
with fy = 414 Mpa.
Page 1 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
Page 2 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
2
A(Approx.) = W F x 1.10 / SBC = 11.04 M
2
Actual Area, AF = B x L = 16.40 M
0.525
Ø3.00 4.05
0.525
PLAN
Page 3 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
WE
Wind Fx
H = 9.45
W
Ground
T = 0.75
A
4.05
LOAD DIAGRAM
2 2
Therefore, qz= 0.613 x 1.04 x 1.00 x 0.95 x 43 / 1000 = 1.12 KN/M
2
Use = 1.20 KN/M
H/D= = 3.15
D√qz = = 103.92
Cf = = 0.90 Figure 29.5-1
Page 4 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
O.M.
WE
W
2.025 2.025
4.05
L/3= 1.35 M
e L/6= 0.68 M
X
ΣP = W E + W = 460.25 KN
Page 5 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
p(max.)/p(min.) = ΣP / AF ± Mc / I
Where:
2
AF = Area of Footing = L x B = 16.40 M
M = O.M. = 142.49 KN-M
c= L/2 = 2.025 M
3 4
I = B x L / 12 = 22.420 M
2 2
p(max.) = 40.93 KN/M < 60 KN/M OK
2
p(min.) = 15.19 KN/M
WF
W
2.025 2.025
4.05
L/3= 1.35 M
e L/6= 0.68 M
X
ΣP = W F + W = 897.25 KN
Page 6 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
p(max.)/p(min.) = ΣP / AF ± Mc / I
Where:
2
AF = Area of Footing = L x B = 16.40 M
M = O.M. = 142.49 KN-M
c= L/2 = 2.025 M
3 4
I = B x L / 12 = 22.420 M
2 2
p(max.) = 67.57 KN/M > 60 KN/M
2
p(min.) = 23.58 KN/M
p(max.) is greater than the allowable but this is OK, as per code: If the Vertical Load is
combined with Wind Load, the Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity could be increased by
33 %, Therefore 60 x 1.33 = 79.80 KN/M2 > p(max.).
3.00 0.525
4.05
273.66 KN/M
Calculate Moment, Mu
2
Mu = 273.66 x 1.60 x 0.525 / 2 = 60.34 KN-M
Concrete cover = 75 mm
Bar diameter, Ø = 16 mm
Area of bar, AØ = 201.06 mm2
Footing width, B = 4050 mm
Footing thickness, T = 750 mm
d = T - (Conc. Cover + Ø/2) = 667 mm
Page 7 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
ΦVc > Vu OK
Page 8 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
Adopt Footing Size 4.05 x 4.05 x 0.75 with Ø16 @ 155 mm o.c. top & bottom
bars bothways
Page 9 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
DATA: (Client)
PBU Width = 1.52 M
PBU Length = 3.05 M
PBU Height, h = 1.16 M
Weight of PBU, W PBU (3.5 tons) = 35.00 KN
2
A(Approx.) = W PBU x 1.10 / SBC = 0.64 M
2
Actual Area, AF = B x L = 6.60 M
0.24
PBU B = 2.00
0.24
PLAN
W PBU
Fx
h = 1.16
W
T = 0.50
B= 2.00
LOAD DIAGRAM
Page 10 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
2 2
Therefore, qz= 0.613 x 0.85 x 1.00 x 0.95 x 43 / 1000 = 0.92 KN/M
2
Use = 1.00 KN/M
h/D= = 0.76
Cf = = 1.30
Page 11 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
W PBU
W
1.00 1.00
2.00
L/3= 0.67 M
e L/6= 0.33 M
X
ΣP = W PBU + W = 114.20 KN
p(max.)/p(min.) = ΣP / AF ± Mc / I
Where:
2
AF = Area of Footing = L x B = 6.60 M
M = O.M. = 4.22 KN-M
c= L/2 = 1.00 M
3 4
I = L x B / 12 = 2.20 M
2 2
p(max.) = 19.22 KN/M < 60 KN/M OK
2
p(min.) = 15.38 KN/M
Adopt Footing Size 3.30 x 2.00 x 0.50 with Ø16 @ 200 mm o.c. top & bottom
bars bothways
Page 12 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
0.20
1.60 L = B = 2.00
0.20
0.35 1.30 0.35
PLAN
2
A(approx.) = Wv x 1.10 = 0.60 M
SBC
2
Area of Existing Foundation, AE = L x B = 4.00 M
Page 13 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
1.60
Fx Wv 5.00
h = 5.90
W 0.90
T = 0.50
A
2.00
LOAD DIAGRAM
Wind Load: ASCE 7-10
qz = 0.613 Kz Kzt Kd V2
F= qz G Cf Af
Where:
F= Design wind pressure
G= 0.85 - Gust effect factor from Section 26.9
Cf = Force coefficient from Fig. 29.5-1
Af = Projected area normal to wind
2 2
Therefore, qz= 0.613 x 0.94 x 1.00 x 0.95 x 43 / 1000 = 1.01 KN/M
2
Use = 1.05 KN/M
h/D= = 4.54
Cf = = 1.40
Page 14 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
O.M.
Wv
W
1.00 1.00
2.00
L/3= 0.67 M
e L/6= 0.33 M
X
ΣP = R = W + Wv = 108.00 KN
L / 6 < e < L / 3, Therefore R is outside the middle third but the footing is OK
2
p(max.) = 2P = 56.34 KN/M
3B (L / 2 - e)
p(max.) < 110 KN/M2 The Existing Footing is capable of carrying
6 tons Vaporizer Unit
Page 15 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
For the other Vaporizer unit to be transferred to another existing tank Foundation
which is bigger than the above, therefore the Foundation will be safe.
2.892
B = 3.40 1.834
Effective L = 5.00
PLAN
2
A(actual), AF = L x B = 17.00 M
Page 16 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
WE
Fx h1 = 7.00
h = 8.120
W 1.120
Ground Level
A
B T
LOAD DIAGRAM
2 2
Therefore, qz= 0.613 x 0.98 x 1.00 x 0.95 x 43 / 1000 = 1.06 KN/M
2
Use = 1.10 KN/M
h/D= = 3.78
Cf = = 1.35
Fx = 1.10 x 0.85 x 1.35 x L1 x h1 = 28.35 KN
Page 17 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
O.M.
WE
W
1.70 1.70
3.40
B/3= 1.13 M
e B/6= 0.57 M
X
R = W + WE = 256.23 KN
p(max.)/p(min.) = ΣP / AF ± Mc / I
Where:
2
AF = Area of Footing = L x B = 17.00 M
M = Total O.M. = 145.13 KN-M
c= B/2 = 1.70 M
3 4
I = L x B / 12 = 16.38 M
Page 18 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
2 2
p(max.) = 30.14 KN/M < 110 KN/M OK
2
p(min.) = 0.01 KN/M
O.M.
Wo
W
1.70 1.70
3.40
B/3= 1.13 M
e B/6= 0.57 M
X
R = W + Wo = 344.00 KN
p(max.)/p(min.) = ΣP / AF ± Mc / I
Where:
2
AF = Area of Footing = L x B = 17.00 M
M = Total O.M. = 145.13 KN-M
c= B/2 = 1.70 M
3 4
I = L x B / 12 = 16.38 M
2 2
p(max.) = 35.30 KN/M < 110 KN/M OK
2
p(min.) = 5.17 KN/M
Therefore the Existing Footing is Capable of carrying the new 14 tons Vaporizer
Units
Page 19 of 20
AL HAMDAN CONSULTING OFFICE
TEL. : 8983641, 8943981, FAX: 03-8946872
PROJECT: DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION JOB NO.: 1167 SHEET NO.: SEE BELOW
LOCATION: DAMMAM, 2ND INDUSTRIAL CITY DESIGN BY: Rocky DATE: 01/09/2019
CLIENT: CHECKED BY: RCM APPROVED: SB
STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS REFERENCE
Conclusion:
1. The existing water tank foundation is capable of carrying loads due
to Vaporizer unit provided that the reinforcement is in good condition.
Page 20 of 20
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 1 of 9
Input Parameters
Geometrical Description
Vessel Geometry
Pedestal Geometry
Footing Geometry
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 2 of 9
Design Parameters
Soil
Soil Depth (Ts) : 0.000 m
Soil Density : 18.000 kN/m3
Base Value of Soil Bearing Capacity : 60.000 kN/m2
Gross Bearing
Soil Bearing Capacity Type :
Capacity
Concrete
Cover (cc) : 75.000 mm
Concrete Density : 25.000 kN/m3
: 28.000 N/mm2
Reinforcement
fy : 414.000 N/mm2
Bar Type : Metric
Minimum Bar Diameter : 16
Maximum Bar Diameter : 16
Minimum Bar Spacing : 50.000 mm
Maximum Bar Spacing : 300.000 mm
Stability
Minimum Overturning Ratio : 1.500
Minimum Sliding Ratio : 1.500
Coefficient of Friction : 0.500
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Wind Load
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 3 of 9
Wind Directionality Factor (Kd) : 0.950 per ASCE 7-05 Table 6-4
Topographic Factor (Kzt) : 1.000 per ASCE 7-05 Fig. 6-4
Exposure Case : Case2 per ASCE 6.5.6
Exposure Factor : C per ASCE 6.5.6
Importance Factor (I) : 1.150 per ASCE 7-05 Table 6-1
Gust Effect Factor (G) : 0.850 per ASCE 7-05 6.5.8
Net Force Coefficient (Cf) : 0.900 per ASCE 7-05 Fig. 6-20 & Fig. 6-21
Partial Wind Percentage : 50.000 %
0.00256
Design Wind Pressure (P) : psf - per ASCE7-05 6.5.10 & 6.5.15
Kd.Kz.Kzt.v2.I.G.Cf
Pressure W/O G
Elevation Kz Height Width Area Shear Moment
And Cf
2 -3 2
m - kN/m x 10 m m m kN kNm
0.0 - 4.6 0.849 1051.805 4.572 3.000 13.716 11.036 25.229
4.6 - 6.1 0.902 1117.476 1.524 3.000 4.572 3.908 20.847
6.1 - 7.6 0.945 1171.225 1.524 3.000 4.572 4.096 28.093
7.6 - 9.1 0.982 1217.055 1.524 3.000 4.572 4.257 35.679
9.1 - 9.4 0.989 1225.518 0.306 3.000 0.918 0.861 8.001
=24.159 =117.850
Seismic Load
------------------------------------------------------
Load Combination
Allowable Stress Design Factors (Service Loads)
UserLoad1 UserLoad2
LC SWF SBF Empty Operating Wind Seismic Test Erection UserLoad3 UserLoad4
(Live) (Thermal)
101 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
102 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
103 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
104 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
105 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
106 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
107 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
108 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
109 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
110 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
111 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
112 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
113 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
114 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
115 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
116 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
117 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
118 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 4 of 9
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal Design
Check for minimum pedestal dimension is done in accordance with PIP STE 03350 Sect. 4.5.1
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 5 of 9
Design Results
Footing Size
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 6 of 9
Area of
Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure footing
Load at corner at corner at corner at corner in
Case 1 (q1) 2 (q2) 3 (q3) 4 (q4) uplift
(kN/m^2) (kN/m^2) (kN/m^2) (kN/m^2) (Au)
(2 )
106 59.5777 36.3250 36.3250 59.5777 0.0000
102 47.9513 47.9513 47.9513 47.9513 0.0000
102 47.9513 47.9513 47.9513 47.9513 0.0000
106 59.5777 36.3250 36.3250 59.5777 0.0000
If Au is zero, there is no uplift and no pressure adjustment is necessary. Otherwise, to account for uplift, areas of negative
pressure will be set to zero and the pressure will be redistributed to remaining corners.
Factor of safety
Factor of safety
against
against sliding
overturning
Load
Along X- Along Z- About X- About Z-
Case
Direction Direction Direction Direction
No.
101 N/A N/A N/A N/A
102 N/A N/A N/A N/A
103 N/A N/A N/A N/A
104 N/A N/A N/A N/A
105 7.234 N/A N/A 5.498
106 16.278 N/A N/A 12.373
107 N/A N/A N/A N/A
108 N/A N/A N/A N/A
109 9.645 N/A N/A 7.331
110 21.704 N/A N/A 16.497
111 N/A N/A N/A N/A
112 N/A N/A N/A N/A
113 5.868 N/A N/A 4.460
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 7 of 9
Factor of safety
Factor of safety
against
against sliding
overturning
Load
Along X- Along Z- About X- About Z-
Case
Direction Direction Direction Direction
No.
114 11.295 N/A N/A 8.585
115 N/A N/A N/A N/A
116 N/A N/A N/A N/A
117 7.638 N/A N/A 5.806
118 7.638 N/A N/A 5.806
Critical load case and the governing factor of safety for overturning and sliding
Critical load case and the governing factor of safety for overturning and sliding
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 8 of 9
Check that 0.75 * Vc > Vuz where Vux is the shear force for the critical load cases at a distance deff from the face of the column
caused by bending about the Z axis.
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi.
Design for
flexure
about Z
axis is
performed
at the
= = 2.02 m
face of
the
column at
a
distance,
Dx
Ultimate
= = 472.12 kNm
moment,
Nominal
moment
= = 524.57 kNm
capacity,
Mn
Required
= 0.00113
=
Since OK
=
Area of
Steel
= = 5085.18 mm2
Required,
As
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019
Vertical Vessel Foundation Design Page 9 of 9
Find suitable bar arrangement between minimum and maximum rebar sizes
Because the number of bars is rounded up, make sure new reinforcement ratio < max
Nbar * (Area of
Total reinforcement area, As_total = one bar) = 5227.67 mm2
deff = D - Ccover - 0.5 = 0.53 m
* (dia. of one
bar)
file:///C:/Users/STAAD/Documents/PABLO/COLUMN%20UPGRADE/RAFT%20FO... 9/25/2019