Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Analysis: Wilkins, A Zurn Company: Aggregate Production Planning
Case Analysis: Wilkins, A Zurn Company: Aggregate Production Planning
Case Analysis: Wilkins, A Zurn Company: Aggregate Production Planning
Case Questions
Wilkins is in the business of high quality water control products which are Pressure Vacuum
Breakers (PVB) and Fire Valves (FV).
PVB has seasonal market, with the highest demand in the third quarter. Fire Valves is a
product with a high degree of market volatility.
PVBs are made to stock and 54% of the PVB inventory is finished goods. Fire Valves are
made to order and 85% of the fire valve inventory is raw materials
The finished product inventory is distributed through 52 places in the United States. As a
result, it had a decentralized delivery system.
Demand for the company’s product is growing
Due to seasonal demand, current production capacity has constraints during peak season
and surplus capacity during other seasons.
Low labor cost
PVB's seasonal demand triggers production capacity constraints during peak season and
surplus capacity during the rest of the year.
Irregular demand of fire valves
Excess inventory at plant
No inter supplier transfer
Q2. Considering that management has given a target to reduce the inventory by 30%, how can you
achieve it for pressure vacuum breakers (PVB) for the year 2005? (For Safety Stock Calculations,
use the formula Safety Stock = Z.δt..√L , where L is the Lead Time and δ is the standard deviation.
Make the following Assumptions for the year 2005.
a) δq1 = 1877, δq2 = 3361, δq3 = 3851, δq4 = 8154. (where q1 –quarter 1, q2-quarter 2, q3 –
quarter 3, q4 – quarter 4)
b) Customer Service Level of 99% and Lead Time of 2 weeks.
c) 6 Employees of PVB cell manage both Dept 101 which supplies Machine Castings to the
PVB cell and Dept 104 which produce PVB cell.
Z value = 2.326347874
Weeks in a quarter = 13
Initial inventory = inventory value/production cost per unit = 1523789/25.65 = 59407 units
Holding cost = 20% of production cost = 0.2*25.65 = $5.13 per unit per year = 1.2825 per unit
per year
Production rate = 100 units (per day per employee) * 5 days * 13 weeks = 6500 units per quarter
per employee
Level Strategy
Chase Strategy
Column1 Initial Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Forecast (units/week) 4120 7480 9341 5983
Forecast (units/quarter) 53560 97240 121433 77779
Safety stock 1713 3067 3514 7440
Regular production (per
quarter) 0 96408 123188 80340
Ending inventory (in units) 59407 5847 5015 6770 9331
Number of employee 6 0 18 23 15
New employee -6 18 5 -8
Cost of hiring (in $) 10440 2900
Cost of firing (in $) 1800 2400
Cost of regular production (in
$) 1800 2483305 3162672 2063121
7498.77 6431.73 8682.52 11967.0
Holding cost (in $) 8 8 5 1
9298.77
Total cost (in $ per quarter) 8 2489737 3171355 2075088
Annual total cost 7745478
Q3. How the planning would be different if you use the “Chase” and “Level” strategy.
Ans.
Changes in demand are handled by inventory, overtime subcontracting, and other strategies
in the level strategy, while in the chase demand strategy, the workforce level or production
rate is adjusted to satisfy demand.
The decision on which approach to use is based on which expense is higher: the cost of
recruiting and firing or the cost of subcontracting
In level strategy, we can handle with two shifts as the maximum number of employees at the
PVB cell in a single shift is seven. We can continue with no lay-off policy.
As part of the chase strategy, we'll need to prepare for both recruiting and firing, as well as
opting for 3 shifts per day.